Rants Opinions and Totally Pointless Bullshit

**Jeepster1** · 12-20-15 22:11

Originally Posted by MrChooShoes [View Original Post]

Man in Maid Costume Arrested During Prostitution Sting.

The story of David Marsh has all the makings of a good WTF Florida story. He answered an ad placed online by what he thought was a prostitute. He hoped she would dominate him. He agreed to meet at a hotel and rode his bicycle there (he travels by bike because of a previous DUI). When he showed up, he took off his outer layer of clothing to reveal a French maid outfit and a dog collar. Underneath his apron was some sort of male chastity belt. Turns out, however, the prostitute was an undercover deputy, and Marsh was arrested.

Naturally, it made headlines, and the incident has gone viral for obvious reasons.

The arrest was part of a wider prostitution sting in which the Polk County Sheriff's Office arrested 95 people and publicly shamed every single one. Dubbed "Operation Naughty or Nice," the five-day sting netted 33 johns, 50 prostitutes, and 12 people who were arrested on other charges.

Sheriff Grady Judd seems to take a bit too much glee in publicly shaming those arrested, though. The amount of public assistance that arrestees received, their job titles, and marital status were collected and disseminated to the public. Many, it seems, had turned to prostitution just to get by. The Polk County Sheriff's Office might also need some sensitivity training. The department refers to multiple arrestees as "transgender," while others are classified as "transvestite. " The news release is kind of a sad document to read.

These prostitution stings seem to be a regular hobby of many smaller county sheriff's departments in Florida. This sting is at least Polk County's third of the year. Yet the county still seems to have plenty of people engaging in prostitution. Larger Florida law enforcement offices tend to forgo such tactics and concentrate on going after sex-trafficking rings and violent pimps.

When you get down to it, LEO relies primarily on the threat of public shaming in its enforcement methodology. Sure, they have the draconian "promoting" laws that are increasingly misapplied to the individuals on the supply side, but on the demand side the threat is almost entirely that of public exposure. Nobody wants to be on the mugshot list.

It's unfortunate that the Puritans settled here instead of finding a nice safe haven somewhere in Europe.

-Jeepster1.

**MrChooShoes** · 12-19-15 09:01

Man in Maid Costume Arrested During Prostitution Sting.

The story of David Marsh has all the makings of a good WTF Florida story. He answered an ad placed online by what he thought was a prostitute. He hoped she would dominate him. He agreed to meet at a hotel and rode his bicycle there (he travels by bike because of a previous DUI). When he showed up, he took off his outer layer of clothing to reveal a French maid outfit and a dog collar. Underneath his apron was some sort of male chastity belt. Turns out, however, the prostitute was an undercover deputy, and Marsh was arrested.

Naturally, it made headlines, and the incident has gone viral for obvious reasons.

The arrest was part of a wider prostitution sting in which the Polk County Sheriff's Office arrested 95 people and publicly shamed every single one. Dubbed "Operation Naughty or Nice," the five-day sting netted 33 johns, 50 prostitutes, and 12 people who were arrested on other charges.

Sheriff Grady Judd seems to take a bit too much glee in publicly shaming those arrested, though. The amount of public assistance that arrestees received, their job titles, and marital status were collected and disseminated to the public. Many, it seems, had turned to prostitution just to get by. The Polk County Sheriff's Office might also need some sensitivity training. The department refers to multiple arrestees as "transgender," while others are classified as "transvestite. " The news release is kind of a sad document to read.

These prostitution stings seem to be a regular hobby of many smaller county sheriff's departments in Florida. This sting is at least Polk County's third of the year. Yet the county still seems to have plenty of people engaging in prostitution. Larger Florida law enforcement offices tend to forgo such tactics and concentrate on going after sex-trafficking rings and violent pimps.

**Jeepster1** · 08-16-15 13:49

Originally Posted by Hankishere [View Original Post]

I think Nashville will just continue on with the trajectory that was started by Dean during the Bredesen administration no matter who is elected. A new mayor isn't a clean slate across the board. You still have all of the other officials or higher-ups who've been there forever who will keep doing what they know best.

We do have a newish D-A. With a new mayor possibly a shift in priorities might occur.

But if the enforcement choices are left up to MNPD brass then the status quo is probably assured.

Ever notice you never hear much about conventioneers getting busted? Maybe they're just extra-smart.

-Jeepster1.

**Member #5658** · 08-16-15 11:57

Originally Posted by Jeepster1 [View Original Post]

Should Megan Barry become Nashville's mayor, which scenario is more likely?

1. Stereotypical social reformer crusades to save providers from themselves, or.

2. Stereotypical enlightened libertarian lets adults make adult decisions about their bodies?

Not trying to troll. Just haven't followed the arc of her career in a while.

-Jeepster1.

I think Nashville will just continue on with the trajectory that was started by Dean during the Bredesen administration no matter who is elected. A new mayor isn't a clean slate across the board. You still have all of the other officials or higher-ups who've been there forever who will keep doing what they know best.

**Jeepster1** · 08-15-15 17:54

Should Megan Barry become Nashville's mayor, which scenario is more likely?

1. Stereotypical social reformer crusades to save providers from themselves, or.

2. Stereotypical enlightened libertarian lets adults make adult decisions about their bodies?

Not trying to troll. Just haven't followed the arc of her career in a while.

-Jeepster1.

**Jeepster1** · 06-03-15 13:51

Originally Posted by RoadWarrior615 [View Original Post]

Wow so you took the time to look through all my post. Just wow.

Not really much of a feat. It took about 15 seconds to search the Nashville forums for the word "alcoholic. ".

-Jeepster1.

**RoadWarrior615** · 06-02-15 04:35

Originally Posted by Jeepster1 [View Original Post]

Thanks for clarifying. This is the post I was referencing:

http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/sh...ic#post1884699

-Jeepster1.

Yes it was sarcasm even though I do drink alot.

**RoadWarrior615** · 06-02-15 04:34

Originally Posted by Jeepster1 [View Original Post]

Thanks for clarifying. This is the post I was referencing:

http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/sh...ic#post1884699

-Jeepster1.

Wow so you took the time to look through all my post. Just wow.

**Member #4886** · 06-01-15 21:41

Originally Posted by Jeepster1 [View Original Post]

Thanks for clarifying. This is the post I was referencing:

http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/sh...ic#post1884699

-Jeepster1.

Snap! I think there are varying definitions of an alcoholic. But I'd say anybody who goes to the beer store almost every day, and not to mention openly calls himself an alcoholic, probably meets one or more definitions. Judging by his attitude on this site, RoadWarrior615 definitely has the ego of an alcoholic. And I say that as a recovered alcoholic and drug addict. But I'm still a untreated pussy addict! LOL.

**Jeepster1** · 05-31-15 13:09

Originally Posted by RoadWarrior615 [View Original Post]

I don't remember saying that unless it was sarcasm. I'm no where near an alcoholic.

Thanks for clarifying. This is the post I was referencing:

http://www.USASexGuide.info/forum/sh...ic#post1884699

-Jeepster1.

**RoadWarrior615** · 05-30-15 13:07

Originally Posted by Jeepster1 [View Original Post]

RW, you've said before that you're an alcoholic (I can link the post if necessary).

So, other than drug of choice, how would that differ from A2's past?

-Jeepster1.

Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]

Please illuminate me. Seriously this is me not being a dick. I'm always willing to learn something new.

Truth be told, Jax is the grammar Nazi not me. Vocabulary, not grammar, is my strong suit.

I reckon I probably shouldn't get into shit like I did here, not because it's unprofessional, we run a pussy board, how professional can we be expected to be? I shouldn't because it's a waste of my time.

People who spout ignorance as if it's fact just piss me off.

A2

Your grammar is off! Wasn't you chewing me out for it but now your doing it as well. I will give you a hint. You have a run on sentence. Please don't spill grammar talk and chew the people out when in fact, your doing the same thing and suck at grammar just as much.

You needed to say you're doing the same thing not your.

I had a run on because I didn't proof what I wrote, you use your for you're because you don't know they aren't the same thing.

Sad

A2

**RoadWarrior615** · 05-30-15 13:03

Originally Posted by Jeepster1 [View Original Post]

RW, you've said before that you're an alcoholic (I can link the post if necessary).

So, other than drug of choice, how would that differ from A2's past?

-Jeepster1.

I don't remember saying that unless it was sarcasm. I'm no where near an alcoholic.

**Admin2** · 05-30-15 00:42

Originally Posted by HornDawgs [View Original Post]

Along the lines of the Mark Twain quote: "Never pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel" would be: "Why get into a pissing match with the admin who can ban your argumentative ass?

When I post in blue ink like this I'm acting as the admin, that guy will in fact ban your ass.

If you notice all my posts in this exchange were in black ink. When I do that I'm just posting as another asshole. I have never banned or thrown a flag at anybody for shooting back at me when I was posting in black ink.

Well, unless they said they were going to fucking kill me or something.

A2.

**Admin2** · 05-30-15 00:34

Originally Posted by Jerry1235 [View Original Post]

It's funny how this started out as someone saying something to the effect that someone else had no clue what they were talking about. Adm. 2 then corrected RW, quite colorfully, I might add, in how he, RW, did not not know what he was talking about. And it was on then! I won't pretend to know the facts as each presented them in regards to criminalization of prostitution and its consequences. What I do know, in my limited intelligence, is that BOTH made grammatical errors. RW's are very obvious, Adm2's are not. I'm just glad it's over and nobody got hurt.

I'll probably get mine chewed out. Please, please pkease, don't do it Adm2. We all make grammatical mistakes. Heck, this rant has probably got a few in it as well.

Please illuminate me. Seriously this is me not being a dick. I'm always willing to learn something new.

Truth be told, Jax is the grammar Nazi not me. Vocabulary, not grammar, is my strong suit.

I reckon I probably shouldn't get into shit like I did here, not because it's unprofessional, we run a pussy board, how professional can we be expected to be? I shouldn't because it's a waste of my time.

People who spout ignorance as if it's fact just piss me off.

A2

**HornDawgs** · 05-29-15 19:29

Originally Posted by Lookee [View Original Post]

I am glad that I subscribe to the "never say never" theory. I never would have guessed that I'd find myself in agreement with A2 in a battle on here LOL. But I do. I suppose we are all liars, etc. , so always best to move on, hoping those who have lied, etc. Have matured enough to move on and hopefully not repeat those prior patterns.

Along the lines of the Mark Twain quote: "Never pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel" would be: "Why get into a pissing match with the admin who can ban your argumentative ass?