Like Beef Lolo?

**Shipshape** · 03-05-15 01:48

Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]

Threads like this are created so that guys can act EXACTLY like they are acting. So long as the trolls keep their bullshit here A2 is one happy guy. Like me laying in fields of pakalolo (Urban Dictionary says that mean weed, I'm trying brothers)

No vote gonna happen bro.

A2

There yah go A2. Pakalolo is correct. Note the "lolo" part and you get the derivative which is shared in the named thread.

Ss.

**Admin2** · 03-05-15 01:08

Originally Posted by Kaina2076 [View Original Post]

Aloha Admin,

Would you consider setting up a vote much like you did for the creation of a Fight Thread? This would be a vote as to whether or not to ban DT25 and / or Real Deal. Although 100% of the posts are against these guys, not everyone would want to ban them as some brothers enjoy the "banter" that their presence engenders. It might be an exercise in futility as they could just re-register under a different name. Also I realize that Admin has a stake in maximizing activity in the forum. Having said all that, I agree with GO and would no longer like to see their disruptive posts. (and as a concession to Dr. Realdeal, the absence of their posts might cure my Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.).

Kaina.

Threads like this are created so that guys can act EXACTLY like they are acting. So long as the trolls keep their bullshit here A2 is one happy guy. Like me laying in fields of pakalolo (Urban Dictionary says that mean weed, I'm trying brothers)

No vote gonna happen bro.

A2

**Shipshape** · 03-05-15 00:21

Originally Posted by Realdeal808 [View Original Post]

Home run? Squirming? More like I'm Randy Johnson and I just struck both of you out for the 5th time in the game. .

In order to have two batters strike out 5 times in a regulation game (9 innings) it would mean that the rest of the team has around 30 plus hits (of course lineup position gives this a plus or minus tally) so while the 2 weren't so productive, the rest of the team was making that PITCHER their BIATCH. Again, its only a game but it was a fun math problem (well for me anyways).

Ss.

**Getting Old** · 03-04-15 22:57

Originally Posted by CosmicKid [View Original Post]

In this particular situation a vote would end up being a travesty of justice. That's because it isn't just comments made by those two fellows which are outrageous, but some comments made by guys in opposition to them as well. As a result, we cannot with integrity censor certain board contributors but not others. The clear line you may imagine between sides no this thread, that convenient polarization is a fiction; it doesn't exist. If we do vote to kick those two off, that vote will be a farce, a kangaroo court. No, the only ethical way to deal with this scenario is as has been suggested early on by A2 and others; IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT THOSE GUYS ARE SAYING, DON'T RESPOND!

How many times have I called on the membership to stop feeding the troll, how many times has it worked? Yes outrageous comments have been made on both sides but who started the name calling first. I wish you take your bleeding heart and keep it quiet. Integrity, these men have none in my opinion. I have stated I don't see DT25 post as Admin has blocked his posts all together, Real Deal is on my ignore list (Redneck) but when attacked I will respond in kind. Post come my way and I have had to empty my PM 2 x this week already. So I am informed. .

I could list what we know about this person now but why add insult to injury, by his own admission he has stated he vented his anger after a hard days work on the membership. How does your bleeding heart feel about that. I don't like it very much and those on the receiving end of his tirade and meaningless posts and anger probably feel the same.

I doubt Administration will hold a poll and this troll will be here long after I stop posting so you can satisfy your bleeding heart but "what goes around comes around" I find this true in life and in the end I am confident this troll and his buddy will stop posting on this web site, one day. You are over thinking this problem and it is a problem. We just want this guy (s) gone from this web site. The troll should get the professional help he needs and maybe he can turn his life around if he hasn't damaged it beyond repair yet. I wish him luck but I have no sympathy for him or his buddy, not anymore. I got two infractions trying to help this "DUMBASS" no more, no more. I will make no bones about it I want him gone.

**RdPuerco** · 03-04-15 21:21

Originally Posted by CosmicKid [View Original Post]

In this particular situation a vote would end up being a travesty of justice. That's because it isn't just comments made by those two fellows which are outrageous, but some comments made by guys in opposition to them as well. As a result, we cannot with integrity censor certain board contributors but not others. The clear line you may imagine between sides no this thread, that convenient polarization is a fiction; it doesn't exist. If we do vote to kick those two off, that vote will be a farce, a kangaroo court. No, the only ethical way to deal with this scenario is as has been suggested early on by A2 and others; IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT THOSE GUYS ARE SAYING, DON'T RESPOND!

Agree with Cosmic; that way lies madness.

**Redneck 1** · 03-04-15 20:59

Rather than endless debating, taking votes and banning members, there's a quick and easy solution:

If any member dislikes reading any other member's posts in this thread, simply don't read them!

Indeed, by going to "Edit Ignore List," any member can place any other member on his personal "Ignore List".

An internet message board is similar to a newspaper, a magazine or a library. You can freely read or not read whatever you choose. For example, the Hawaii State Library's book collection includes books by despicable characters such as Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse-tung, Karl Marx, and Hillary Clinton. Should those books be banned? Of course not, because whether or not to read them is a voluntary personal choice.

Bottom line: If any member thinks that any other member's posts in this fight thread are too offensive, just don't waste your time reading them.

**Cosmic Kid** · 03-04-15 19:50

In this particular situation a vote would end up being a travesty of justice. That's because it isn't just comments made by those two fellows which are outrageous, but some comments made by guys in opposition to them as well. As a result, we cannot with integrity censor certain board contributors but not others. The clear line you may imagine between sides no this thread, that convenient polarization is a fiction; it doesn't exist. If we do vote to kick those two off, that vote will be a farce, a kangaroo court. No, the only ethical way to deal with this scenario is as has been suggested early on by A2 and others; IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT THOSE GUYS ARE SAYING, DON'T RESPOND!

**DickTracy25** · 03-04-15 19:26

"Threatening" who the fuck got flagged for threatening? I did not, you were the only one from here. Now stop talking like you are an innocent angel, you fucker got flagged twice in less than a month. Keep.

Trolling on Mr Dick Face. And don't forget to add your own name on the silly ass ban poll. Carry on fool!

Originally Posted by GettingOld [View Original Post]

Amen to that last post, probably going get tattle tales on but that's ok at this point would like to resole this problem. I would like to see a vote so maybe they can see the amount of displeasure that has been generated by their being trolls. I doubt they will learn any lesson but if the numbers show the displeasure of the membership maybe they will get the message and buzz off. That or Admin will be able to take this poll to Jackson and show him the numbers I see a lot of brothers not posting anymore because this has gotten out of hand. I am disappointed in the reaction and non-action taken in this situation. DT25 has threatened all the brothers taking all comers and no action on administrations part. It may have been in a phrase but a threat is a threat. WHAT no action Jackson? I am disappointed but if your bottom line is more important than following the rules then so be it. ;.

I second brother Kaina proposal since Admin and Jackson will not ban these trolls. I agree with Brother RL good for sitting on the toilet and reading the posts.

**Realdeal808** · 03-04-15 17:38

Originally Posted by HelloKitty [View Original Post]

Hello kitty is a real girl in London, Hello Kitty it's not a cat.

Since everyone has plagiarized my use of "dumbass" (geez can't you guys think on your own?) in their posts, I shall call you Sir DUMBSHIT.

Ok "dumbshit", so now you telling me that your screen name is not a girl cat but it's a real little girl in London? Do you have a thing for 3rd grade girls, are you a 3rd grade girl (u write like one), or do you wish you WERE a 3rd grade girl? Doesn't matter which one it is, you are a sick fuck! Get some professional help before you end up on the 6 o'clock news! Or are you already a registered offender? OMG!

**Realdeal808** · 03-04-15 17:08

Originally Posted by UkiEater [View Original Post]

It can hit a nerve to some people. To some readers, it can be funny and entertaining. But, to others, they can get irritated/offended, even if the post wasn't directed towards them.

Agreed. We should all go thru a mandatory 'sensitivity training' workshop before we can post further. We all meet at the Ala Moana Hotel conference room and spend the day there. AMP Providers can provide testimony as to how negative language or poor reviews by members affect their psyche and well-being. KBG's can take the mike and explain how they're just doing their job and to plead with A2 to censor any language that implies that they're ROB's. Finally, we members can listen as DT25 goes up and conducts a lecture on appropriate and inappropriate verbiage and topics for Internet use. Then we all will take a test which we will need a 90% or higher score in to post further. The test questions will be compiled by Adrian Peterson, Ray Rice, Kobe Bryant, and Jameis Winston. Start studying guys! Who wants to arrange this mutha? Oops sorry. My bad. I meant "event".

**Realdeal808** · 03-04-15 16:20

Originally Posted by Kaina2076 [View Original Post]

Aloha Admin,

Would you consider setting up a vote much like you did for the creation of a Fight Thread? This would be a vote as to whether or not to ban DT25 and / or Real Deal. Although 100% of the posts are against these guys, not everyone would want to ban them as some brothers enjoy the "banter" that their presence engenders. It might be an exercise in futility as they could just re-register under a different name. Also I realize that Admin has a stake in maximizing activity in the forum. Having said all that, I agree with GO and would no longer like to see their disruptive posts. (and as a concession to Dr. Realdeal, the absence of their posts might cure my Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.).

Kaina.

Haha! Love you right back bro! You know you'd miss me! We have a symbiotic thing going.

**RdPuerco** · 03-04-15 16:00

Originally Posted by Rdpuerco [View Original Post]

Oh for God's sake, why do whoreboards bring out the drama? Not calling out HS in particular, but why would anyone give a shit about what the guy says? If he says he has a mansion in the sky, whose life does it affect?

Brother RD, this is in blue so it's my official position;

You need to post more!

I agree 100%

A2

Well, I can see this is the Official Whoreboard Drama thread, so it's to be expected. But still and all, it's the Internet. Of course people are going to bring the bullshit. Getting worked up over that is like reading the Cathy comic strip and getting upset because it's stupid.

**Getting Old** · 03-04-15 15:20

Originally Posted by RatchetLover [View Original Post]

This is the fight thread. Why ask to ban someone for being an excellent troll? It's the whole purpose of the thread. Starve them out by not responding if you want it to stop. Personally it's amusing reading while I take a shit is all it is for me. Remember arguing with people on the Internet is like the Special Olympics. Even if you win you're still retarded! Haha have fun and hopefully people in this thread are still fucking the ladies and not just fighting.

Amen to that last post, probably going get tattle tales on but that's ok at this point would like to resole this problem. I would like to see a vote so maybe they can see the amount of displeasure that has been generated by their being trolls. I doubt they will learn any lesson but if the numbers show the displeasure of the membership maybe they will get the message and buzz off. That or Admin will be able to take this poll to Jackson and show him the numbers I see a lot of brothers not posting anymore because this has gotten out of hand. I am disappointed in the reaction and non-action taken in this situation. DT25 has threatened all the brothers taking all comers and no action on administrations part. It may have been in a phrase but a threat is a threat. WHAT no action Jackson? I am disappointed but if your bottom line is more important than following the rules then so be it. ;.

I second brother Kaina proposal since Admin and Jackson will not ban these trolls. I agree with Brother RL good for sitting on the toilet and reading the posts.

**Uki Eater** · 03-04-15 15:20

Originally Posted by RatchetLover [View Original Post]

This is the fight thread. Why ask to ban someone for being an excellent troll? It's the whole purpose of the thread. Starve them out by not responding if you want it to stop. Personally it's amusing reading while I take a shit is all it is for me. Remember arguing with people on the Internet is like the Special Olympics. Even if you win you're still retarded! Haha have fun and hopefully people in this thread are still fucking the ladies and not just fighting.

It can hit a nerve to some people. To some readers, it can be funny and entertaining. But, to others, they can get irritated/offended, even if the post wasn't directed towards them.

**Larry Hoover** · 03-04-15 14:58

Originally Posted by JohnRoss [View Original Post]

This is rather ironic as your writing skill and grammar depicts exactly what you liken Sam's skills to. You do not present a cogent argument when you call him a haole, then not an American, and finally from a 3rd world country. Haole as I define it, is usually a caucasian person. People from 3rd world countries are usually of African descent, not caucasian.

How was it playing for Skippa? His handshake could crush most men.

I was with you until the "most people from 3rd world countries are of African descent" comment. Admin2 is literally in a 3rd world country right now, and he's nowhere near Africa. I'm just saying.