Thread: BackPage Advertiser Reviews
Closed Thread
Results 721 to 735 of 3327
-
01-22-15 12:57 #2607Regular Member

Posts: 3Zoinks. Very glad I walked out if there without getting hurt. Sounds like a loon. Guess I should be even happier she didn't give me anything else. Everything was covered but you never know.
What is this about having babies for clients?
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
[View Original Post]
-
01-22-15 11:39 #2606Regular Member

Posts: 12Proof Videos II
When it comes to proof videos, in 90% of the videos I've seen the provide doesn't state the specific location, so I'm actually OK with that. I would prefer if they spoke, that makes it a lot easier to take the dive. But they must must MUST show their face and a significant portion of their body. No if ands or buts. I see some girls just posting ass shaking videos, I'm like wow these girls are dumb AF, defeats the whole purpose.
-
01-22-15 09:56 #2605Senior Member

Posts: 436Taylor Bates
So I see the nutty professor is back. This chick has assaulted clients with frying pans and got locked up for it. She has had babies for clients (More than one) She is on some serious mental meds. (The ***** is loopty) She cursed me out because I didn't recognize her when I went to see her friend. Her achievements are many and distinguished.
Originally Posted by Hamasaki
[View Original Post]
-
01-22-15 05:28 #2604Senior Member

Posts: 229Proof Video
A lot of "proof videos" offer no proof. A true proof video demonstrates that a provider is who she claims, establishes that the video was recently made, is specific to location and Is specific to provider. A video of a chic with no face shown and no verbal statement that the provider is in the location of the posted ad, is not a proof video. " this is zzzzz, I'm visiting dc for a couple days, this is my # and then shows her face and body is a true proof video. A chic on a pole, or a chic showing her body from the neck down, or some chic just dancing without and words / statements indicating where she is located or how to contact her, does nothing to verify a provider.
Originally Posted by StealthMode
[View Original Post]
Improperly made proof videos tell a lot about a provider, if she is attempting to use the video as proof and not just as an advertising tool. I agree that nothing is 100% and proof videos, even those properly made, can be fabricated by LE. However, I just wanted to clear the air on the term, since I have noticed a lot of providers and hobbyists labeling advertising videos as proof videos, and they are two completely different things.
A proof video is only useful as a tool to lower the likelihood of a bait and switch. It does not lower the likelihood of LE involvement.
-
01-21-15 16:31 #2603Regular Member

Posts: 3I saw Seneca in foggy a month ago. Average massage but upgraded to the FS option for only 40. Wish I could say it was fun but she just laid there. Great tiggos up top though. Prob should have just taken the he and left. She was definitely weird but also nice. No issue with me taking a shower and getting me a clean towel.
Glad she didn't beat me up though. LOL.
Originally Posted by Hamasaki
[View Original Post]
-
01-19-15 21:19 #2602Senior Member

Posts: 56Seneca aka Taylor Yates
Originally Posted by BunkerBuster
[View Original Post]
She's back, this time going as Senaca (7066660797). This post she has a video showing off that magnificent body. If she didn't have schitzo tendencies, I'd hit her up again.
Originally Posted by Hamasaki
[View Original Post]
http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Bod...in-dc/15980413
http://liverubreviews.com/ad/washing...6-0797/1/44458
-
01-19-15 18:39 #2601Senior Member

Posts: 56Busty Redhead Lady
So I've been eyeing this one (2403859014) for quite some time. Notice she sometimes posts with a friend. Tried setting up a few sessions before but they fell through. This time I was fortunate and she came over right away.
She looks just like her pics, nice young breasts and a lot of tattoos if you're into that sort of thing. I have a thing for redheads and think her tattoos are quite appealing as well so she scored points there. But that's just about all she scored points on. The service was definitely par to sub-par at best. CBJ, no BBBJ whatsoever (I asked), no playing with her breasts (she said they're too sensitive), no fiv / fia, moderate touching on the outside though, no GFE.
It was very much more of a business like transaction. It was $. 5 for the half and $$. 2 for the hour. I only did the half, would have upgraded for an hr if the service was better. Won't repeat, although the best part of the session was getting head while watching the NFC playoff game.
Looks: 8.
Service: 5.
http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/sout...5-9014/1/30959
http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Fem...-need/15586637
-
01-19-15 17:54 #2600Senior Member

Posts: 1039She has to come to me.
I'm not sure if he did an incall to her hotel, but if he did that was his first mistake. I personally believe that you never, ever go to their hotel. Never. I know a lot of mongers say that an incall is better, but it is not. There are so many variables that you cannot control. From the time that you enter the hotel, you will most likely be under surveillance. There are cops and cameras everywhere. The hotel floor and room is locked down. You are essentially arrested when you touch her door.
On the other hand, in your own room, you have so much more control. Now I'm not going to go into detail on what you should do after an escort knocks on your room door,(do not want the cops to develop counter tactics), but there are certain ways to prevent the girl,(if she is misrepresenting herself, or her manager from entering the room), if you do not want them to enter. Remember, it is you who controls the situation, the environment and the money.
Propilot-Always check your six.
-
01-19-15 11:25 #2599Senior Member

Posts: 543Correct Correction!
1. All it takes is 1% to throw 99 to hell.
Originally Posted by Stealth Mode
[View Original Post]
2. Why would you call the man a low life anchor?
3. Who cares what hotel CBS put him in?
Like I said below:
Any Gentlemen in Monger Land wanna set up an appointment with (CLICK IT)
Originally Posted by Tha X Facta
[View Original Post]
'Jamie @ 3109278824' . . . . Stealth Mode?
X . . . My theory is that she's gone!
-
01-19-15 11:07 #2598Regular Member

Posts: 12Latin Candy
Where is this Latin candy interview you all were speaking of? Anyone have a link?
-
01-19-15 09:47 #2597Senior Member

Posts: 378I stand to be corrected
https://sites.google.com/site/beefea...wns-in-the-dmv
Originally Posted by StealthMode
[View Original Post]
-
01-19-15 03:51 #2596Senior Member

Posts: 378Oh really?
DC sting. I actually had a person say on the Baltimore side, if a person has a video, 99% they are legitimate. This totally blew me away. My theory, and you can tell Pimp Trick this, CBS isn't putting no low life anchor in a luxury hotel in DC. I think ol' boy was staying in Greenbelt near the Maryland campus where they run stings all of the time.
Don't forget about the escort that was killed there not too long ago.
-
01-18-15 21:05 #2595Senior Member

Posts: 543Hmmm . . . . .
Was advised by an ex Guide member 'Pimp Trick', that this may have been the BP post that took G.A. down.
CLICK IT
3109278824
Originally Posted by Md Curious2
[View Original Post]
X ----> If it looks like a duck . . .
-
01-18-15 21:01
Senior Member
-
01-18-15 20:53
Senior Member
-
01-18-15 18:11 #2594Senior Member

Posts: 1046Sarah
Sarah.
http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscor...-va-md/8995175
Don't do it, 20 years older than the ad, old, pale, lot of body odor, plus ash tray smell. Huge gut, complete waste of time and money. She could not pay me to screw her, damn I hate this place. Knows what she's doing. Soon as the door cracked open she was in and had the cash stuck in her purse and in the bathroom while I was still standing there wondering who the hell this eewokk was, if this isn't bad enough she actually took a dump while in there.
-
01-18-15 17:24 #2593Senior Member

Posts: 543Md Curious2 . . . . .
I see you're still alive and kickin!
I Don't miss it one bit!
Originally Posted by MdCurious2
[View Original Post]
Originally Posted by ThaXFacta
[View Original Post]
X . . . Alternative measures 99% less riskier!












