The Massholes

[Member #5013]

But what he neglects to say, is that his (Baconbits), Massholes posts are 16.76% of all his posts combined, mine are 8.96%. Maybe your ace can beat 4 of a kind.

You're a funny old guy. Although I didn't get all that fuzzy math and lame spermlike joke at the end. I was just joking a little. All that aggressive hostility isn't called for.


BB.

[Yardape08]

There is no integrity in ANY of your data. You state, "anything you post here becomes your property to edit, post and basically do whatever you want with it!" Your counts are a lot of unfactual data that mean nothing". Actually, I have a email from Admin. Saying the same.

Dude, that list can be found by clicking on the number where it says reports for any specific thread. You could always check it against the actual thread. You're a numbers guy that should be easy for you to do.

[Yardape08]

Yardape, your percentage of Massholes posts is 17.71% of your total posts, YF, yours is 11.68%. I find that even more interesting than your initial post regarding Massholes posts.

Smokescreen what you're failing to understand here is that since massholes was created only last spring everyone who was already a member here is on pretty much equal footing so therefore you seem to be light-years ahead in massholes posting. Why I'm over 50 posts behind you lmao. That's a substantial gap and hard for me to fathom since I don't shrink from offering my opinion here. Although you're still far behind our illustrious sausage loving member.

[Deb4512]

I've had a dinosaur fetish since I was a child and wanted to know what it was like to have sex with a dinosaur since watching Barney. Essentially I want you to dress up in a crotchless Barney costume (I will provide) and have you do rails off the coffee table while I plow. Afterwards, I want to throw Jerky Treats on the floor and have you fight for them against my two miniature Schnauzer's. Any takers?

[Smoke Screen]

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/mi...posted&t=11219

Found these statistics to be interesting-Massholes all time post count standings.

Yardape, your percentage of Massholes posts is 17.71% of your total posts, YF, yours is 11.68%. I find that even more interesting than your initial post regarding Massholes posts.

[Smoke Screen]

That's three of a kind that would beat a full house any day!

BB.

But what he neglects to say, is that his (Baconbits), Massholes posts are 16.76% of all his posts combined, mine are 8.96%. Maybe your ace can beat 4 of a kind.

[Member #5013]

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/mi...posted&t=11219

Found these statistics to be interesting-Massholes all time post count standings.

That's three of a kind that would beat a full house any day!

BB.

[Yellowfever023]

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/mi...posted&t=11219

Found these statistics to be interesting-Massholes all time post count standings.

I know I am number 5 on the list, but excluding A2 where do the rest of you find the time LOL?

[Bozscaggs]

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/mi...posted&t=11219

Found these statistics to be interesting-Massholes all time post count standings.

There is no integrity in ANY of your data. You state, "anything you post here becomes your property to edit, post and basically do whatever you want with it!" Your counts are a lot of unfactual data that mean nothing". Actually, I have a email from Admin. Saying the same.

[Yardape08]

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/mi...posted&t=11219

Found these statistics to be interesting-Massholes all time post count standings.

[Skatar018]

It's been kicked around before, maybe not quite the way you put it, but bottom line is it would still require some sort of upgrade & update which costs money so I doubt it will happen, but I could be wrong & hope I am.

BTW if we're making a wish list I'd like to throw in that if a member is blocked I'd rather not see their screen name when they post, & not see the content of their post when another member copies the OP.

I know you can ask A2 to do this, but that's a function & feature I'd like control of & to be able to turn block on or off as I see fit.

I like it, but go a little further, only count an actual review of a provider you've actually seen, & you can't count the same one more than once within a 3-6 month time frame.

I'm not sure if it could be done, as I think post counts are one of those things that are either on or off, but I could be wrong.

I think if his CMS allows such a content tinkering, Admin2 should not include The Massholes posts in our posts counts. After all, besides Deb's posts, there ain't no nothing pussy-related here alright. So count only ladies posts towards their counts but not ours. If it's too hard to do, don't count anybody's.

In my book asking him to do anything more would make it way too work intensive.

Many posts in the main threads aren't about actual pussy either. There is a lot of logistical discussion, high fiving, posting of LE videos and many other misc commentary. Some of these posts are certainly relevant and useful in the pursuit of finding pussy while many are just B.S.

For Admin to discern whether each and every post meets a specific criteria would be a logistical nightmare. To solely exclude Massholes posts doesn't achieve the desired end of quantifying substantive posts. Keep it simple-I agree with bringing back the "join" date. It is one of the first things I used to check for a member's credibility in relation to his post count.

Just as when we post now there is a tally done in the background that the Admin never sees & doesn't get involved with on any level.

The same could be done for a review of a provider, certain minimum criteria would have to be met before the flags are set to record & tally that it's a review & not just a general post, e.g. did you pay her, did you receive a unhappy or happy ending HJ, BJ, or FS sex, was the massage good bad or ugly, & other relevant information.

Perhaps both could be recorded & tallied so that it would show the number of reviews & the number of general posts separately.

Though I agree it would not eliminate the BS posts from the forum or insure that a review is legit, it would give us a little more to go on than a total post count & a join date, which I also would like to see the join date reinstated & I know I had seen A2 mention that they were looking into this.

While this could be done it would require an upgrade which costs money & as it's been pointed out this is a free site so chances of this happening is zero nada zilch ain't going to happen.
Then again ya nevah know what those crazy mad Russians are working on!

I'm sure many of you noticed that there is a new member Theo TheMonger, who's been lighting up Boston's Streetwalker forum with substantive posts from time to time with scores of posts, devoting a post for each episode he experienced in between of his post sprees. I've noticed however that his post counter counted all of his posts for the day as one. I thought that was not fare and PMed Admin2 about it and then I got this idea. Many of you here have been complaining about SpermSac and that he's not posting any substance but just fucking around.

This is what I'm thinking. In order to keep this forum focus on pussy Admin2 should encourage the minimum number of non-pussy-hunting related posts, agree? I think it would be great idea if Admins would not count any posts posted either here or in Off-Topic towards a member's general count. That would definitely help in figuring out which senior member is for real and which is not. It would probably also keep the Ledger's count (or whatever her next name would be) count to close to zero if not zero no matter how much she posts.

All of those who've been actively involved here are senior members with high scores as is, Massholes or not. If your Massholes posts wouldn't be counted, it wouldn't affect your number count much anyhow (law of diminishing returns). But I think it would make sure that those who join with the primary goal of getting and not giving, get as little from this forum as possible too.

[Rito1]

Support this 100%.

I am with it also.

[Hags Joe]

I'm sure many of you noticed that there is a new member Theo TheMonger, who's been lighting up Boston's Streetwalker forum with substantive posts from time to time with scores of posts, devoting a post for each episode he experienced in between of his post sprees. I've noticed however that his post counter counted all of his posts for the day as one. I thought that was not fare and PMed Admin2 about it and then I got this idea. Many of you here have been complaining about SpermSac and that he's not posting any substance but just fucking around.

This is what I'm thinking. In order to keep this forum focus on pussy Admin2 should encourage the minimum number of non-pussy-hunting related posts, agree? I think it would be great idea if Admins would not count any posts posted either here or in Off-Topic towards a member's general count. That would definitely help in figuring out which senior member is for real and which is not. It would probably also keep the Ledger's count (or whatever her next name would be) count to close to zero if not zero no matter how much she posts.

All of those who've been actively involved here are senior members with high scores as is, Massholes or not. If your Massholes posts wouldn't be counted, it wouldn't affect your number count much anyhow (law of diminishing returns). But I think it would make sure that those who join with the primary goal of getting and not giving, get as little from this forum as possible too.

Support this 100%.

[Smoke Screen]

I'm sure many of you noticed that there is a new member Theo TheMonger, who's been lighting up Boston's Streetwalker forum with substantive posts from time to time with scores of posts, devoting a post for each episode he experienced in between of his post sprees. I've noticed however that his post counter counted all of his posts for the day as one. I thought that was not fare and PMed Admin2 about it and then I got this idea. Many of you here have been complaining about SpermSac and that he's not posting any substance but just fucking around.

This is what I'm thinking. In order to keep this forum focus on pussy Admin2 should encourage the minimum number of non-pussy-hunting related posts, agree? I think it would be great idea if Admins would not count any posts posted either here or in Off-Topic towards a member's general count. That would definitely help in figuring out which senior member is for real and which is not. It would probably also keep the Ledger's count (or whatever her next name would be) count to close to zero if not zero no matter how much she posts.

All of those who've been actively involved here are senior members with high scores as is, Massholes or not. If your Massholes posts wouldn't be counted, it wouldn't affect your number count much anyhow (law of diminishing returns). But I think it would make sure that those who join with the primary goal of getting and not giving, get as little from this forum as possible too.

While that's a very noble thought, it doesn't hardly seem fair to those of us who have paid their dues through the years. It's like changing the rules half way through the game. That's my 2 cents.

[Member #4868]

But I am not sure how easily it could be implemented. If it wasn't too much work on admin's and then I am all for it with one exception. It should be retroactive. What I mean is that anything that any of us has ever posted in massholes or off topics should be lopped off from our post count. Poor Spermie would probably lose 500 posts. LOL.

I'm sure many of you noticed that there is a new member Theo TheMonger, who's been lighting up Boston's Streetwalker forum with substantive posts from time to time with scores of posts, devoting a post for each episode he experienced in between of his post sprees. I've noticed however that his post counter counted all of his posts for the day as one. I thought that was not fare and PMed Admin2 about it and then I got this idea. Many of you here have been complaining about SpermSac and that he's not posting any substance but just fucking around.

This is what I'm thinking. In order to keep this forum focus on pussy Admin2 should encourage the minimum number of non-pussy-hunting related posts, agree? I think it would be great idea if Admins would not count any posts posted either here or in Off-Topic towards a member's general count. That would definitely help in figuring out which senior member is for real and which is not. It would probably also keep the Ledger's count (or whatever her next name would be) count to close to zero if not zero no matter how much she posts.

All of those who've been actively involved here are senior members with high scores as is, Massholes or not. If your Massholes posts wouldn't be counted, it wouldn't affect your number count much anyhow (law of diminishing returns). But I think it would make sure that those who join with the primary goal of getting and not giving, get as little from this forum as possible too.

.