The Massholes

[Smoke Screen]

Gents:

I guess I have been dragged, kicking and screaming, into this forum by our pal Bozy. Apparently in response to my short posting about one of the Waltham places, Bozy sent me the following PM:

"the king.

Sure sounds like the king of mongers who picks up Chinese Gi or chickens. Smkescrn. ".

Bozy, I sent you a courteous reply simply stating that I did not know what you meant. Reflecting on it now, I think you are saying that you think Smoke and Blambo are one and the same. I may well have may well have many problems, but split identity is not among them. Sorry to disappoint. By the way, from what deep well do you come up with this stuff? "Chinese Gi?" "Chickens?

Wow, BoozeBoy says I'm the king of mongers, what a dipshit. Now he says you & I are one in the same. He must have crawled out of the bottle long enough to post something, not to worry, I'm sure he's back in the bottle again. I have no idea what he's talking about by "Chinese Gi" or "Chickens" he's the only chicken I know of.

[SpermSac]

When I looked in the FAQ's of this site the first question is "What is the purpose of this site?" The answer listed is:

"The purpose of this Forum is to facilitate the exchange of information between men who are looking for sex with women. ".

By not posting details you defeat the purpose of this site. Providers advertise on multiple websites they open themselves up for discussion and this goes with the territory. Guys talk, " hey buddy where can I bang a hot chick? Out of all the providers I have seen (300+) only one or two asked me not to post anything about them. If these women are true professionals they will welcome a review and if they don't welcome it guaranteed they more than likely deserve a bad review. If this was a site that was about restaurant reviews would you let the rest of us eat slop because you want to be a gentleman? What ever your reason you and other members who don't post details defeat the PURPOSE that the creators of this site intended. Post details, don't post details, I could care less but it does defeat the purpose.

I would appreciate it if you would at least post and at a minimum let the rest of us know what real female providers you have seen. I am not trying to be a a dick but after reading some of your reviews on the other sites about your encounters with trannys and men dressed as women I would want to avoid the real women you have seen, again not trying to dredge up the shit but I feel you owe it to the rest of us here to make sure we don't contract anything.

Contrary to your statement about not being a dick. You certainly are and proving that you are gullible has been shown.

Members can exchange information and it doesn't say whether that exchange has to be thru a public posting or private message. The posters option. For some the word discretion would be appropriate and on numerous occasions I have posted and presented PM for details and a response has been given. The purpose of this site has not be changed. It is the way YOU view it.

You have 773 post and you claim to have seen 300+ women. You saying that you have posted a review on every one of them? I also would want to know everyone of them you "banged" so that I can make sure I don't contract anything. Not dredging up shit! Who you kidding?

I could care less how many post you have or how many women you have seen. You mean to tell us that the vast majority of them like having intimate details publicly posted about them? Only one or two asked "NO" reviews? How many actually know this style forum exists? If they are not concerned about having intimate details on public display IMHO I question their quality.

By the way don't ask as I certainly won't share with you.

[Yellowfever023]

I don't think you'll find anyone on here advocating that no one post, other than Ledger aka Bozscags who has an agenda to stamp out sex entirely.

You ever wonder what a provider means when they include in their ad "gentlemen prefered"? Does it mean that we have to come down with a case of oral diarrhea to post for the public every intimate detail of a meeting with any woman? For some, they have no clue other than their desire to pump up their own dimented egos. But realize that what gets posted is available for anyone to read, copy and twist to create their own illusion and from that point on things are determined on how people react.

The article written that takes comments taken out of context, is a clear indicator (to me anyways) that there are people and groups out there hell bent on seeing the trade of the ladies get eliminated and unfortunately they are members on here too. I don't see it happening, but I foresee a dry period where many of our providers go UTR if for nothing more than to escape being noticed and put on some LE's screen. The fate of those quality providers is effected by our actions and posted words.

For me, if you want details send a PM.

When I looked in the FAQ's of this site the first question is "What is the purpose of this site?" The answer listed is:

"The purpose of this Forum is to facilitate the exchange of information between men who are looking for sex with women. ".

By not posting details you defeat the purpose of this site. Providers advertise on multiple websites they open themselves up for discussion and this goes with the territory. Guys talk, " hey buddy where can I bang a hot chick? Out of all the providers I have seen (300+) only one or two asked me not to post anything about them. If these women are true professionals they will welcome a review and if they don't welcome it guaranteed they more than likely deserve a bad review. If this was a site that was about restaurant reviews would you let the rest of us eat slop because you want to be a gentleman? What ever your reason you and other members who don't post details defeat the PURPOSE that the creators of this site intended. Post details, don't post details, I could care less but it does defeat the purpose.

I would appreciate it if you would at least post and at a minimum let the rest of us know what real female providers you have seen. I am not trying to be a a dick but after reading some of your reviews on the other sites about your encounters with trannys and men dressed as women I would want to avoid the real women you have seen, again not trying to dredge up the shit but I feel you owe it to the rest of us here to make sure we don't contract anything.

[Yardape08]

I was hoping you & I would agree on something sooner or later. Yes, that whole article was taken out of context. The author didn't even have the stones to sign his name to it, only his initials, J. G.

Ok we agreed on something just don't let it happen again LOL.

This site wouldn't be very interesting if there wasn't healthy debate and disagreement. I think the Founding Fathers would be proud of us.

[Blambo McGee]

I don't think you'll find anyone on here advocating that no one post, other than Ledger aka Bozscags who has an agenda to stamp out sex entirely.

Gents:

I guess I have been dragged, kicking and screaming, into this forum by our pal Bozy. Apparently in response to my short posting about one of the Waltham places, Bozy sent me the following PM:

"the king.

Sure sounds like the king of mongers who picks up Chinese Gi or chickens. Smkescrn. ".

Bozy, I sent you a courteous reply simply stating that I did not know what you meant. Reflecting on it now, I think you are saying that you think Smoke and Blambo are one and the same. I may well have may well have many problems, but split identity is not among them. Sorry to disappoint. By the way, from what deep well do you come up with this stuff? "Chinese Gi?" "Chickens?

[SpermSac]

Y And no it wouldn't change my opinion on whether or not we should post here.

I don't think you'll find anyone on here advocating that no one post, other than Ledger aka Bozscags who has an agenda to stamp out sex entirely.

You ever wonder what a provider means when they include in their ad "gentlemen prefered"? Does it mean that we have to come down with a case of oral diarrhea to post for the public every intimate detail of a meeting with any woman? For some, they have no clue other than their desire to pump up their own dimented egos. But realize that what gets posted is available for anyone to read, copy and twist to create their own illusion and from that point on things are determined on how people react.

The article written that takes comments taken out of context, is a clear indicator (to me anyways) that there are people and groups out there hell bent on seeing the trade of the ladies get eliminated and unfortunately they are members on here too. I don't see it happening, but I foresee a dry period where many of our providers go UTR if for nothing more than to escape being noticed and put on some LE's screen. The fate of those quality providers is effected by our actions and posted words.

For me, if you want details send a PM.

[Smoke Screen]

Yes I saw that article and the alleged journalist even lifted a quote by out distinguished member Spermsac. Of course everything written was taken out of context. And no it wouldn't change my opinion on whether or not we should post here.

I was hoping you & I would agree on something sooner or later. Yes, that whole article was taken out of context. The author didn't even have the stones to sign his name to it, only his initials, J. G.

[Yardape08]

I do agree with him about posting details, that's just my personal preference. If you go back in the Providence massage forum to LatinHunt's post # 11620, you might understand why (then again, being you, you probably won't) but give it a shot. The article he referred to in The Indy publication mentions many posters in this forum and he quotes them in his article, word for word, all the details in many of the posts, then it gets published.

Yes I saw that article and the alleged journalist even lifted a quote by out distinguished member Spermsac. Of course everything written was taken out of context. And no it wouldn't change my opinion on whether or not we should post here.

[Smoke Screen]

I suppose you have an allegiance with him of sorts going back to the initial arguments about whether to post details or not.

I do agree with him about posting details, that's just my personal preference. If you go back in the Providence massage forum to LatinHunt's post # 11620, you might understand why (then again, being you, you probably won't) but give it a shot. The article he referred to in The Indy publication mentions many posters in this forum and he quotes them in his article, word for word, all the details in many of the posts, then it gets published.

[Yardape08]

You think calling someone a fudgepacker over and over is creative?

Come on Smoke there's a lot more on those posts getting to the core of the issue here pointing out falsehoods, deceit, and other patterns of behavior. So yes I do feel the posts were far more creative than the posts calling Ledger a drunk over and over again since last summer.

[Yardape08]

I said days, sorry to wake you up but November is a month. So you're comparing my posts in 70 + days to the 6 days of your combined posts (by your, I'm talking about the group, not you individually). Thought I should clarify that seeing how you take everything personal.

Stating that I lifted your posts going back two months obviously implies the same thing. The large amount of posts in a short period of time by the gang of five can be directly attributed to Spermsac's repeated denials and attempts to sidestep his involvement with those nefarious wig wearing cocksmokers he has hitched his wagon too.

[Smoke Screen]

all the recent posting here has been very creative.

You think calling someone a fudgepacker over and over is creative?

[Smoke Screen]

I did say how many days they were for. Read it again it says they go back to early November..

I said days, sorry to wake you up but November is a month. So you're comparing my posts in 70 + days to the 6 days of your combined posts (by your, I'm talking about the group, not you individually). Thought I should clarify that seeing how you take everything personal.

[Member #5037]

You can find the meaning online:

Scrotum The scrotum is the loose pouch-like sac of skin that hangs behind the penis. It contains the testicles (also called testes), as well as many nerves and blood vessels. The scrotum has a protective function and acts as a climate control system for the testes. For normal sperm development, the testes must be at a temperature slightly cooler than the body temperature. Special muscles in the wall of the scrotum allow it to contract and relax, moving the testicles closer to the body for warmth and protection or farther away from the body to cool the temperature.

The spermsac you spotted on the other site is probably a whole different person. There's nothing wrong with our Spermsac. He was nice to me, generous and actually goodlooking and masculine as well. The argument as I see it is this. Spermsac doesn't post reviews and some of you guys don't like that. Why not? He is available to give you guys information on utr's or any good escorts he's seen via pm, so he is a contributor to this board. He just contributes more discretely. I'm sure if you are nice to him and / or apologize he'd give you some good information.

Spermsac, you are similar to me in that the members here will post something negative about you and then you reply back and all it ends up is being a lot of useless drama. That never works as tempting as it is, as it's only going to be a never ending argument between you and the disgruntled members here. And insulting them is as useless as them insulting you.

To all of you. None of this arguing over his post counts makes much of a difference does it? Just let him be discrete and contribute the way he has been. Let him make comments on the other discussion sections if he wants to. Like I said, he will pm you reviews if you ask him to. Is he hurting any of you by posting his comments? If you don't like his posts just put him on ignore. Maybe other members find them helpful. If you don't, like I said, put him on ignore.

All this negative banter reminds me of when I was bullied as a kid. Probably because I was shy and had a mother was way overprotective of me. Bullying does no good, causes emotional harm and I believe bullies have low self esteem, don't like themselves much and want to seem superior to others, and that's why they enjoy doing so. Aren't weall adults here or am I missing something? Or are we still grade school children? How would all of you like it if you were the one being bullied? How would that make you feel? Do you think all of this negativity is doing any good? Just leave the guy alone for gosh sakes and continue to post about pussy as A2 would say. A2 you rock!

It Has nothing to do with post counts its what he doesn't put in his post. Bullying? His past 150 posts starting back in August consisted of leading a crusade to perpetually rip Ledger. Bullying? He found a common cause and became the leader of the pack with the as spermie calls it "Keyboard warrior" a term he lifted from A2 and his cut and paste. Personally I don't give a rats ass about ledger he never botherd me but your pal sperm sac, he's a whole differant story from day one.By the way the discussion of pussy is on the other forums not here.

[Member #5037]

Don't know what else to say, but he doesn't' post reviews or detailed reviews, because he feels it's disrespectful to the escorts. He wants to tell you all via pm. If he does a review it's very short. I don't know what else to say about him, since I only saw him once.

So much for discretion Deb.

I love a good BJ Deb and you know that. How long did you go with me? I was enjoying it to much.

Out of 700* this is about the only escort reveiw he's posted.Yea you got the short part right.