Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 6,676 to 6,690 of 18202
-
12-17-14 10:40 #11527Senior Member

Posts: 183No way. They might do a number of different things. Just look at the "new" tanning salon that opened in Cranston. I haven't been there since Emerald so couldn't tell you if they're the same services but I bet it's similar.
Originally Posted by Hockey
[View Original Post]
-
12-17-14 06:35 #11526Banned Member

Posts: 1701It sure looks like it, at least life as we know it is over.
Originally Posted by Hockey
[View Original Post]
-
12-17-14 00:07 #11525Senior Member

Posts: 133Omg!
Game over?
-
12-16-14 20:52 #11524Senior Member

Posts: 56Ord-2014-55
As I read it. I suspect one of the main attempts of the ordinance is to ensure that those working at said spas are documented. Allegedly, some of the workers in these types of spas are working there against their will.
Originally Posted by FlyDangler
[View Original Post]
The decency and sanitation section sound more like a recommendation than enforceable code. The documentation required with regard to employees and ownership will be harder for a spa to abide by than the decency recommendations. And no more late nights.
-
12-16-14 18:42 #11523Senior Member

Posts: 351Read the ordinance again. UNder exceptions, barbers and beauticians are listed and are exempt from this ordinance.
Originally Posted by FlyDangler
[View Original Post]
-
12-16-14 17:14 #11522Administrator

Posts: 5119Recent actions
One of the curses of a free forum is, well, it's free. Anybody can join. One of the hardest things for me to figure out is when there is an invasion of shills like what happened here this week. I changed the titles and banned the ones I was sure of SpaHunterUSA, RedSox1980, and Steel1973, Shills no doubt. Joblo not so much, he has a low post count but joined a long time ago.
As with most of you guys I'm always suspicious of new members till they get some history but it would keep the threads cleaner if you just reported the post so I could look into it.
A2
-
12-16-14 16:19 #11521Senior Member

Posts: 628RE: New Prov Bodyworks Ordinance 2014-55
http://providenceri.iqm2.com/Citizen...D=2497&ID=4371
Originally Posted by Knight62
[View Original Post]
It doesn't provide any definition of what constitutes body work and is so poorly worded that it could apply to beauty shops, barbers and all kinds of other businesses. IAC I expect we'll see the same thing occur in Providence as happened in St Petersburg, FL when they tried this and all the AMPs became aroma therapy salons.
-
12-16-14 16:02 #11520Senior Member

Posts: 381New Prov Bodyworks Ordinance 2014-55
If you guys want to read the new ordinance concerning our AMP's just Google Prov Ordinance 2014-55.
Can't find when it will take effect. It doesn't say anything about massages, just bodywork's.
-
12-16-14 14:27 #11519Senior Member

Posts: 84My bad. I didn't say you did. I agreed with your point though. I think spahunter is someone working for another spa bad mouthing. And the others with 1 post that defended maybe workers from the west warwick spa. Spa cat fight? I do know they review and defend themselves on another site.
Originally Posted by Ccup2
[View Original Post]
-
12-16-14 14:16 #11518Senior Member

Posts: 179Ironic
Ironic that a competing site would trash a site they have yet to review themselves.
Originally Posted by SpaHunterUsa
[View Original Post]
-
12-16-14 13:29 #11517Senior Member

Posts: 1417Spahunterusa
No you do not have the reviews I have but that does mean you have a life either. You are a front for a competing establishment. Try making your service better and clients will come and not look for other places. I suggest you take a business course.
Originally Posted by SpaHunterUsa
[View Original Post]
-
12-16-14 13:27 #11516Senior Member

Posts: 1417Young prince
I did not trash the place, I was questioning spahunter with his one review that happens to be negative. I know gina and her reputation, she is a good person and her places have all been good in my book.
Originally Posted by YoungPrince1
[View Original Post]
-
12-16-14 13:25 #11515Senior Member

Posts: 1417Hey steel please read my post
My post was about spahunter and his report on enso; he has one report and he trashes the place. Think about it. I asked for more experienced members to report on the place and they did.
Originally Posted by Steel1973
[View Original Post]
-
12-16-14 03:01 #11514Senior Member

Posts: 84It's funny that someone signs up to just blast a place like that and then quickly there are two responses defending the place from people that just signed up here. I know gina who owns simple serenity has defended her place somewhere else on a review site and the management of opulence has put up a fake bogus review as well. There is a connection and history with opulence and this new place in west warwick as well as simple serenity that is all I am saying.
Originally Posted by Ccup2
[View Original Post]
-
12-15-14 18:23 #11513Senior Member

Posts: 41Seven
With the original reports of "7" I decided to try her out about a week and 1/2 ago. Kinda tight on money so usually are and T but the slide intrigued me. I agree with the others her bod aint what I'm into but had a little 420 and just wanted to relax and get the slide. So like all the other reports started off with the BBBJ tease then off to TS.
The slide was ok but I was expecting it to be more slow and sensual and get me all aroused. She was sliding like she was on a frigging luge for god's sake! She had this 2 day old stubble that was also scraping all the dead skin off of me LOL. Anyway the rest was as others said. It was fun for a change but I won't repeat.









Reply With Quote


