"Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?

[JZLizard]

9/9 mixed 20 yr old wants $1500/ week. You can't make this stuff up. Went dark after I countered. My guess is that these girls have valued their pussies based on the BS they are reading in these girlie blogs. I've read some of the crap and they say "real" SDs will pay $3000 to 5000 minimum / month.

One of the things I establish early on (usually right in my profile) is that I prefer to be contacted by SBs who are mature enough to understand the difference between a REAL SB / SD arrangement and the hyped fantasy version that you see on TV.

I don't know to what extent it has acted as a bullshit filter and saved me from time wasters, because of course if it really put anyone off I would never hear from them or know that it worked. But I do hear a lot of them trying to convince me right off the bat how mature they are for their age (especially in the 18-22 range). They always have this vision of themselves as very level-headed, but at that age rarely are.

I have had some of them try to test the market by saying "well I've done this before and gotten $1500 for a weekend". And, these were stunners at the upper end so it's possible someone did pay them that for a weekend. But I quickly tell them I'm not interested in committing to that much time with someone I just met, nor paying that much.

[FredMoore]

GPS rules the day.

Pot #1 (ex).

9/9 mixed 20 yr old wants $1500/ week. You can't make this stuff up. Went dark after I countered. My guess is that these girls have valued their pussies based on the BS they are reading in these girlie blogs. I've read some of the crap and they say "real" SDs will pay $3000 to 5000 minimum / month. Maybe they are but the girls who want "no sex" and big bucks are still on the site every day, so I guess they haven't found that elusive rich daddy yet. They will not prostitute themselves for less than that number.

Pot #2.

8/8 20 yr old so far willing to meet in the FC for $$ . Need to do the M&G 1st.

Pot #3.

Most likely prospect is 40 something and 9/9 /? M&G on the books and I am actually looking forward to her. She sounds like she has her shit together but I am fearful that she will demand high dollar. I decided not to discuss $ before hand. Hollywood, this one looks like your fantasy to nab a MILF.

These young girls seem to be harder to nail down in my market. I suspect the competition is tighter and money offers are higher.

[JZLizard]

Having worked directly and as a 3rd party contractor for every major and most minor dating sites on the net for the last 10 years, including all the major SD sites, I can tell you that what you have postulated is rare but not unheard of. Its mostly relegated to the "get laid tonite" or "fuck a MILF tonite" type of operators. Those sites typically have a 100 to 1 ratio of men to women. They are BS and there is never a reason to join them.

I know Brandon Wade owns SA, WhatsYourPrice, and MissTravel. I'm sure the two lesser used sites are probably more legitimate attempts to diversify his line than they are to be red herrings that help diffuse competitive attempts, but the line is a little blurry there in my opinion. I have no insider knowledge or reason to believe he has connections to any of the other sites. I do believe however that if he was deploying the tactic I mentioned, I'm sure he would create spin off companies in ways that made it hard to link back to him. For example PassTheSugar.com, which mysteriously was mentioned pretty much out of the clear blue on a recent daytime talk show with a broad audience has sketchy / missing contact info and does not mention much about the holding corp. Makes one wonder. I don't know where they came from but they must have some serious marketing muscle to get it mentioned on the air like that. This was on The Doctors. It even sounded like one of the doctors (the black girl with the blonde hair) was almost endorsing the practice of sugar-babying, defending it by indicating there was nothing new or abnormal about young girls looking for lifestyle upgrades from older wealthy men. I bet she's been an SB once or twice herself, maybe it even put her through med school.

[HollywoodGuy]

More than once I've thought, if I were the owner of a successful dating site, since there's no way to patent or protect the concept from competition, what sort of strategy could I employ to stay in business? The most effective one I could come up with would be to completely saturate cyberspace with lots of useless knock-off sites that do little more than send people running back to the main site. I'm not saying the owner of SA owns that particular site or any of other alternative sites, I'm just saying it could be a very useful tactic for preventing competitor efforts from succeeding.

Having worked directly and as a 3rd party contractor for every major and most minor dating sites on the net for the last 10 years, including all the major SD sites, I can tell you that what you have postulated is rare but not unheard of. Its mostly relegated to the "get laid tonite" or "fuck a MILF tonite" type of operators. Those sites typically have a 100 to 1 ratio of men to women. They are BS and there is never a reason to join them.

[JoeBlowDC]

Just TOFTT.

Not impressed. Can't really search the members even after you pay. YOu can get local results, close to you, but at least in my area, most of them say they haven't logged in in months.

By comparison, on SA, there's about 10, maybe 15 that currently log in every day, every couple days. SO they are at least active. THe ones on NSA, seem to be old or something.

ANd there's no way to filter the search results to only those that have been on the site in the last X days or something. On SA you can filter the results to the "most recently active" or something like that.

Save your $$, unless you just want to blow 30 bucks and if you do, make sure you go into your billing history / account section and turn off "auto renew" if you don't like the site, or you'll get dinged again next month.

Thank you Sir!! Well done!!

[JZLizard]

Just TOFTT.

Not impressed. Can't really search the members even after you pay. YOu can get local results, close to you, but at least in my area, most of them say they haven't logged in in months. By comparison, on SA, there's about 10, maybe 15 that currently log in every day, every couple days. SO they are at least active. THe ones on NSA, seem to be old or something.

More than once I've thought, if I were the owner of a successful dating site, since there's no way to patent or protect the concept from competition, what sort of strategy could I employ to stay in business? The most effective one I could come up with would be to completely saturate cyberspace with lots of useless knock-off sites that do little more than send people running back to the main site. I'm not saying the owner of SA owns that particular site or any of other alternative sites, I'm just saying it could be a very useful tactic for preventing competitor efforts from succeeding.

[BamBam]

And thanks for TOFTT. I had the same impression. Most profiles were of women over 30 and inactive. You cannot see anything before you pay and it sounds like not a lot more after you pay.

RB.

Just TOFTT.

Not impressed. Can't really search the members even after you pay. YOu can get local results, close to you, but at least in my area, most of them say they haven't logged in in months.

ANd there's no way to filter the search results to only those that have been on the site in the last X days or something. On SA you can filter the results to the "most recently active" or something like that.

Save your $$, unless you just want to blow 30 bucks

[HollywoodGuy]

Just TOFTT.

Not impressed. Can't really search the members even after you pay. YOu can get local results, close to you, but at least in my area, most of them say they haven't logged in in months.

By comparison, on SA, there's about 10, maybe 15 that currently log in every day, every couple days. SO they are at least active. THe ones on NSA, seem to be old or something.

ANd there's no way to filter the search results to only those that have been on the site in the last X days or something. On SA you can filter the results to the "most recently active" or something like that.

Save your $$, unless you just want to blow 30 bucks and if you do, make sure you go into your billing history / account section and turn off "auto renew" if you don't like the site, or you'll get dinged again next month.

Thanks for taking the hit.

[Almighty]

http://nostringsattached.com/

Claims to have 3 MM members.

Just TOFTT.

Not impressed. Can't really search the members even after you pay. YOu can get local results, close to you, but at least in my area, most of them say they haven't logged in in months.

By comparison, on SA, there's about 10, maybe 15 that currently log in every day, every couple days. SO they are at least active. THe ones on NSA, seem to be old or something.

ANd there's no way to filter the search results to only those that have been on the site in the last X days or something. On SA you can filter the results to the "most recently active" or something like that.

Save your $$, unless you just want to blow 30 bucks and if you do, make sure you go into your billing history / account section and turn off "auto renew" if you don't like the site, or you'll get dinged again next month.

[JZLizard]

Completely understand. I'm typing this on my phone as I walk to a meeting (work not pleasure).

Besides you're probably busy juggling multiple sb s as well.

Wish that were my excuse, but sadly, I'm in my dormant stage at the moment. No contact with any SBs. I ramp all that activity up when I'm in a position to act on it. I used to keep a few lingering SB contacts, some of whom would send me e-mails once every few weeks asking if I was ready to meet or not, but I found that they eventually either move away, get a boyfriend, or whatever, so when I get a chance to play around I just look at what's currently out there and start working from there.

[HollywoodGuy]

Saw my "little girl" S yesterday. She got herself into a small jam since we went exclusive about 4 months ago. She is a normal college student and so her family was getting a little suspicious as to why she never dates or has any visible boyfriend.

So she manged to find a closeted gay guy at her school that was in the same predicament. They have now pretended at a few family functions no problem. While she is not close to my type physically, she is pretty and her total devotion to me is hard to ignore. I also put her in the top 3 of all time in the BJ department. She may even be #1. Not really sure. But she should be giving lessons. It's amazing how important BJ skills can be to a relationship. Very few girls are willing to spend an hour at a time on oral. And do it well.

I am her first boyfriend ever, but she is totally cool and would never do anything to rock that boat. So far in 4 months I have bought her one gift for 40 dollars. Thats it. We have hit the FC 10 times and always for a few hours at a time. So she hit the all important 10 date mark and she is still here.

I was actually feeling sorry for her at one point because she seems so lonely and that's not a good reason to stay together. But for now I am going to stick with her because she really is sweet and giving and is genuinely in love with me (something I know most guys on here would dread). I have a tendency to forget the importance of giving if the girl is a real looker. But all my regulars right now are real givers in the FC.

[BamBam]

http://nostringsattached.com/

Claims to have 3 MM members.

You have to pay before you can view profiles. Bad business model: guys won't pony up until they see something worth pursuing. Also, in my area, the pickings look very slim.

RB.

[HollywoodGuy]

http://nostringsattached.com/

Claims to have 3 MM members.

[IluvSmellyFish]

Looking back, I scanned your post too fast and misunderstood it. Sorry about that, I've been in overdrive today trying to get lots done and sometimes read too quickly when I'm in that mode.

Completely understand. I'm typing this on my phone as I walk to a meeting (work not pleasure).

Besides you're probably busy juggling multiple sb s as well.

[HollywoodGuy]

Walduscl, your post really hit home with me. I've always had an active sex life with the SO but it has always been me that initiated, and always with a lot of uncertainty about how or if she would respond. I can probably count the number of times on one hand, in our 40 plus years of marriage, that she actually initiated sex. I had my first SW experience in my late twenties, moved on to escorts shortly thereafter, and know rely on UTR and SBs to fill my needs. My hobby probably had no impact on sex frequency with thE SO until I started the pursuit of SBs about 3 years ago.

I know the SO can tell that something has changed but I can't really tell if she is concerned or relieved that I am now much less trouble to keep satisfied. My session yesterday with my SB lasted a full 90 minutes. We s_ked, f__ked, massaged and fondled until our free time ran out, and both complained that we needed to schedule longer for next time.

My SO is clueless on how important it is for her to sometimes take the lead and initiate some excitement in our bedroom. Without the extra excitement that the SB world provides, I would have a pretty pitiful sex life for sure.

Alias.

Assuming you eliminate all traces of an SB session. Like hair, makeup, perfume, etc. , if there is no emotional investment, an SO may never pick up on your extra curricular activity.

But if you have an emotional investment in another girl, even if you only fuck her once a month, your SO will pick up on the vibe.

This is what they are tuned in for. It's in their nature.