General Reports

[CookyJar]

Thanks for you honest reply.

To answer your question
In my humble opinion, it depends on the girl. You have gotten the girls to fully participate in the photo shoots and have been upfront that pics will be taken. They seem to agree, so no reason why their full repertoire shouldn't be described in the reports. Other girls are not as willing and they may not be appreciative. That's why I always obscure faces. Even if they did agree, I fear they'd change their mind after the fact and regret it later. As far as our expressing our own likes, dislikes, etc, well to each his own. Some guys don't like the girl tonguing their butthole precisely for the reason you cited. Others, like me, don't care, because I'm not kissing them. No easy answers here. Keep up the good work and the penetrating philosophical discussion starters.

Full disclosure is my policy.

Maybe I didn't make myself clear. I always tell the girls that their photographs will get posted on USASexGuide. I also explain that I will be giving them a review along with the pictures. I further explain that in my reviews I always include references to BJ's and FS, but not anal unless the individual girl gives me her permission to mention that she is willing to have anal sex. I also include within this discussion the fact that I never discuss prices or money.

Please note that in my post I never actually disclosed who actually performed what sex act on whom. Both encounters took place earlier this summer and with girls other than the two pictured in this latest review.

In part, one of the reasons I asked the question was to find out if some guys might be turned-off and not date a girl after finding out that she may not be as innocent as they thought. Some guys might not want to know the truth. I am not a pimp, but I am not out too hurt anyone's business or prevent a girl from getting dates either.

If the girls says it is okay and the majority of mongers say they would like the information, why not disclose it.

Since it's gotten little response I am fine with leaving things just the way they are.

CookyJar.

P.S.: If a girl asks for it, I have no problem writing it down and giving her the USASexGuide web address. I have absolutely nothing to hide and no shame too my game.

[WhenWhen]

To answer your question below:

"Which brings me back to Great Expecta's quote. My question is, should we be more specific in our reports. Is it enough to say a girl performs a good BBBJ, FS, Anal and is a freak. Should we announce the girl's entire list of known performance activities. And, just as important to the conversation, how many guys would be willing, like Great Expecta, to express their likes, dislikes and preferences in the open forum. ".

In my humble opinion, it depends on the girl. You have gotten the girls to fully participate in the photo shoots and have been upfront that pics will be taken. They seem to agree, so no reason why their full repertoire shouldn't be described in the reports. Other girls are not as willing and they may not be appreciative. That's why I always obscure faces. Even if they did agree, I fear they'd change their mind after the fact and regret it later. As far as our expressing our own likes, dislikes, etc, well to each his own. Some guys don't like the girl tonguing their butthole precisely for the reason you cited. Others, like me, don't care, because I'm not kissing them. No easy answers here. Keep up the good work and the penetrating philosophical discussion starters.

I pulled this Quote from a Virginia thread. It got me to thinking about a subject that has been coming up more and more, with more girls than I though was usual.

It all started while on a double date, earlier this summer, when one girl nonchalantly asked her friend if she preformed asshole licking. She was not asking her to lick her ass or my ass or anyone's ass at the time. They were simply comparing each other's repertoire. The one girl said, "No," she didn't. The other girl then commented that she did lick asshole and stated, "A lot of men like it. " This was the first occasion .

On another date, with two altogether different girls, the subject came up again. While in the middle of a very hot and steamy session, the dirty talk was flowing. I was fucking one girl doggie style while she was sucking the nipples of the other girl, when that previous conversation popped in my head. I asked the girl who was laying on her back having her nipples sucked, if she, Toss Salad. She answered, "What. " I inquired again, "Do you toss salad. " I was purposely being vague, not asking, "Do you lick asshole. " I was laying a trap. She looked up at me, questioning, "What?" Sucking air and grunting, I continued and asked, "You don't know what tossing salad is, do you?" Then I said to the girl I was doggie fucking, "She doesn't know about tossing salad. Want to show her?" The girl I was fucking looked back at me and smiled a devilish smile. I told our young apprentice to flip over.

Here the scene: I'm standing on the side of the bed doggie fucking one girl, while she's licking the ass of another girl, who has her face buried in a pillar, twitching and shaking. "Ah shit, you like that, don't you, you little twitching *****," was just one of the many comments spoken in the heat of that moment. This was the second occasion.

Which brings me back to Great Expecta's quote. My question is, should we be more specific in our reports. Is it enough to say a girl performs a good BBBJ, FS, Anal and is a freak. Should we announce the girl's entire list of known performance activities. And, just as important to the conversation, how many guys would be willing, like Great Expecta, to express their likes, dislikes and preferences in the open forum.

Most girls are willing to suck dick and fuck and most are aware of the high rewards for offering up their assholes. For a lot of girls it doesn't end there. They are willing to do a lot more. The question is, how much do we want to know about these girls. Would it bother you to know that the sweet innocent little thing that you've just finished DFK'ing, recently had her face buried deep between an ass crack.

CookyJar.

[Member #4703]

The white chick seems to have some great tits. Those two look like a fucking great time. Tip of the cap to you sir.

[CookyJar]

Take a look at this photo. What do you see? What comes to mind?

Me: That's great Kate, now wrap your legs around hers and hold that little squirming ***** down while I lube-up her asshole.

Kate: Yeah, you little *****, don't move. Take his dick up you ass. You're gonna love his hot nut shooting up your butt.

Angela: WTF, Nooooooo! Not that big dick! Not in my ass!

And then I woke up. It was just my imagination.


CookyJar.

[CookyJar]

Kate was in rare form during this one...no holes barred.

CookyJar.

[CookyJar]

I finally blew my load and cleaned up and she then started using the toys on me to hit my prostate. Don't knock it guys. The prostate is the male g-spot. I finally came again and it was getting late so we decided to get dressed...

I pulled this Quote from a Virginia thread. It got me to thinking about a subject that has been coming up more and more, with more girls than I though was usual.

It all started while on a double date, earlier this summer, when one girl nonchalantly asked her friend if she preformed asshole licking. She was not asking her to lick her ass or my ass or anyone's ass at the time. They were simply comparing each other's repertoire. The one girl said, "No," she didn't. The other girl then commented that she did lick asshole and stated, "A lot of men like it. " This was the first occasion .

On another date, with two altogether different girls, the subject came up again. While in the middle of a very hot and steamy session, the dirty talk was flowing. I was fucking one girl doggie style while she was sucking the nipples of the other girl, when that previous conversation popped in my head. I asked the girl who was laying on her back having her nipples sucked, if she, Toss Salad. She answered, "What. " I inquired again, "Do you toss salad. " I was purposely being vague, not asking, "Do you lick asshole. " I was laying a trap. She looked up at me, questioning, "What?" Sucking air and grunting, I continued and asked, "You don't know what tossing salad is, do you?" Then I said to the girl I was doggie fucking, "She doesn't know about tossing salad. Want to show her?" The girl I was fucking looked back at me and smiled a devilish smile. I told our young apprentice to flip over.

Here the scene: I'm standing on the side of the bed doggie fucking one girl, while she's licking the ass of another girl, who has her face buried in a pillar, twitching and shaking. "Ah shit, you like that, don't you, you little twitching *****," was just one of the many comments spoken in the heat of that moment. This was the second occasion.

Which brings me back to Great Expecta's quote. My question is, should we be more specific in our reports. Is it enough to say a girl performs a good BBBJ, FS, Anal and is a freak. Should we announce the girl's entire list of known performance activities. And, just as important to the conversation, how many guys would be willing, like Great Expecta, to express their likes, dislikes and preferences in the open forum.

Most girls are willing to suck dick and fuck and most are aware of the high rewards for offering up their assholes. For a lot of girls it doesn't end there. They are willing to do a lot more. The question is, how much do we want to know about these girls. Would it bother you to know that the sweet innocent little thing that you've just finished DFK'ing, recently had her face buried deep between an ass crack.

CookyJar.

[Johnny 49]

Does anyone know who the girl in the picture with Deena is? A couple of us have asked Johnny boy who it is and he has not replied.

Just a friend and a non-pro.

[CookyJar]

That's her! Thanks for doing the photo research and sharing on the site. Is there nothing in the world of mongering that you can't do?

Now that the subject has come up; I wonder whatever happened to her.

For awhile, after she left Broadway, she was working for a agency in NJ. Anyone have any further knowledge about her. I sure hope she made it out.

CookyJar.

[ILikePussy]

Does anyone know who the girl in the picture with Deena is? A couple of us have asked Johnny boy who it is and he has not replied.

[Member #4581]

I don't remember a red-head by the name of Candy. Could we be talking about Cherry (aka Julie). I don't like re-posting photographs of girls so long gone from the scene. With any luck at all she's long out of the business. Although! With her looks, she could be in Vegas, Hollywood or somewhere.

I guess there is no harm in posting a little eye-candy.

CookyJar.

PS: Absolutely no touch-up work on these.

That's her! Thanks for doing the photo research and sharing on the site. Is there nothing in the world of mongering that you can't do?

[MotoMoto]

I don't remember a red-head by the name of Candy. Could we be talking about Cherry (aka Julie). I don't like re-posting photographs of girls so long gone from the scene. With any luck at all she's long out of the business. Although! With her looks, she could be in Vegas, Hollywood or somewhere.

I guess there is no harm in posting a little eye-candy.

CookyJar.

PS: Absolutely no touch-up work on these.

Love your pictures, CookyJar, keep them coming.

[CookyJar]

CJ you had a picture of a red head, Candy, back from 2003 or so. I looked for it and couldn't find it. Any chance when you're up late with nothing better to do, you could locate it and re-share for the board?

I don't remember a red-head by the name of Candy. Could we be talking about Cherry (aka Julie). I don't like re-posting photographs of girls so long gone from the scene. With any luck at all she's long out of the business. Although! With her looks, she could be in Vegas, Hollywood or somewhere.

I guess there is no harm in posting a little eye-candy.

CookyJar.

PS: Absolutely no touch-up work on these.

[ILikePussy]

Taken this past Friday. Had a great date. I am not Brad Pitt and I appreciate that she is willing to hang out with me.

Well I am Brad Pitt. I have seen her with her legs spread before me. I have been very intimately close. Maybe it was a bad day idk but she had many of these little scabbed bumps I'm talking about. Not mad at CJ or here to debate anyone about her. Just giving my review. I saw her about a week later walking Broadway and she looked very unkempt. I wish she was as clean as these pics when I had her.

[Johnny 49]

Taken this past Friday. Had a great date. I am not Brad Pitt and I appreciate that she is willing to hang out with me.

[Member #4581]

What I like about CJ's photo shoots are: there is always, for the most part, a head shot of the girl of the day. I like this because I can look at the face and most importantly the eyes and make a judgment on the girl if she is attractive to me. As far as Photoshop-ing the images, I can't really tell. If CJ adjusts the brightness / contrast to enhance an image that's fine. I do the same on many of my submissions. Finally, CJ you had a picture of a red head, Candy, back from 2003 or so. I looked for it and couldn't find it. Any chance when you're up late with nothing better to do, you could locate it and re-share for the board?

I hear, I understand and I agree. I feel as if I somehow let you down.

My point was to you and all USASexGuide Members: There is a built in time delay between the time of my posting and the date the pictures were taken. I do this to avoid having a easily discernible schedule or pattern presented in this open forum. Therefore, even if you picked-up a girl on the exact same day her pictures were posted by me, enough time would have pass for some changes to have taken place.

I've known girls who were flat out beauties upon their release from LA custody and within a week become unrecognizable. It isn't always a matter of photographic skills.

For example, Johnny 49's pictures, which I am assuming were taken after mine, do not show red spots or signs of recent picking and no signs of photographic manipulations.

I am sorry if somehow you were misled and disappointed. Perhaps I should revert back to a lesser skill level or post at least one untouched camera raw photo with each set. In any case, it is always up to the individual to determine if the girl in the flesh is too his liking.

CookyJar.