BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[Mosin Nagant]

I saw her once. Nice gal, career outside of the hobby.

However she had some facial skin problem (maybe acne scarring? That didn't bother me, but the overdone makeup cake did. Left makeup all over my hotel sheets, clothes. Not good.

Most mongers overlook flaws provided they don't compromise the mission!

http://daytona.backpage.com/FemaleEs...liv-26/4825587

Yes, Liv was one of the best.

[Mrmrmr]

Anyone have any info on girl next door Stephanie (not PMC. That one is a def keeper). I've seen her advertise for a few months but my search turns up nothing.

http://spacecoast.backpage.com/Femal...-3-29/10618311

[Matt Man II]

LIV what a sex lady I was new to the hobby back then. If I know then what I know now. I only got to see her once but she was wonderful. Put on the dress I wanted and just made me feel great real GFE. Wish she was still around. I do have my aft and will share info but always looking for the next LIV from the kissing to rolling in the hay oooooops dated myself there. If you had seen her you know what I am talking about if anyone maybe has an utr like to share.

http://daytona.backpage.com/FemaleEs...liv-26/4825587

Yes, Liv was one of the best.

[Matt Man II]

Don't think it's the same gal, different belly button. If you have seen Cindy you know what the difference is. Though they look much alike.

[DocSter]

I have often looked at Cindy's BP ads and been interested. Actually, her being older is a plus for me. Your post got me interested again. Did a simple google search on her phone number. It appears she does advertise with current pictures (I think), just another number. The gal on the left below is how she advertises here in Brevard with the 813 number. The one on the right has a 321 number, but I found an ad for her in Tampa with the 813 number and the same picture. Is that her Docster? Looks close allowing for aging, still nice body but tata's not as pronounced. Only thing is, I thought there were some bad reports on the one on the right.

Any info appreciated. Otherwise I may call the 813 and report back.

Attachment 333783Attachment 333782.

The one on the left is the Cindy I saw, not sure how the one on the right hijacked her number, I noticed that also when I googled her number. Cindy's pix are at least 10 yrs and 1 kid old, some of the recent reviews talk how beautiful she and her hair are, have to admit little disappointed when she opened the door maybe 7, breasts are bolt on but the sex was 10+.

[Mosin Nagant]

Don't know if you guys remember her, went by Stacy then I think Tara or something like that. Some people loved her, others were turned off. I found her to be a reliable every so often gal.

She has been off at a program funded by the state of Florida, "graduating" this week. Anyone know if she is coming back to town? Pretty sure she would like to return to the hobby.

[Mosin Nagant]

Any explanation about the phone number being used in the link?

Two brunettes, both do Tampa and Brevard, and now one has the others' number on an ad in Tampa?

Thank you. I am sure you know what you are talking about, just curious what is up.

The girl in the picture looking all good is cindy the 1 in the mirror is NOT cindy.

I have been with cindy and spoken to her a few times. Also spoke to the other girl to and trust me they are not the same person at all.

[Member #4565]

My experience (once) was somewhat disappointing; not because of performance, but because of expectations. Service was fine; the pics could be deceiving--if you go expecting a hot 30-something, hot early 40's provider. Body may be her, and she provides a solid, drama free experience. But be prepared for a mature late 40's+ provider who looks her age or older.

Has any of you Seniors noticed that the recent flurry of activity re: Kassey has all been from either new or relatively new members of the Guide? Smells like a lot of self promotion going on here by the provider. She may be a great provider,. But I tend to rely on reviews from seasoned vets (I. E. Seniors).

[BoaterBw]

I have to say that the recent reports are accurate. I have seen Kassey as well and had very positive experiences as well.

I'm not sure I enjoy being called seasoned but I've been around. I saw Kassey several times right up until this year. All of the good things that I am reading are spot on. I reviewed her as outstanding back then and stand by it. Over time I have graduated to mature (not old) ladies with no hang ups no drugs no men etc, who know what the score is, like Kassey. I've been to her house and had her to my house. Totally trust her and that is a very very very short list.

[Pic Mike]

Nice work. I'm curious to see if this is the same girl. And you're right about the girl on the right having some bad reports.

See post 4199 of this section.

[MrdTheOne]

Has any of you Seniors noticed that the recent flurry of activity re: Kassey has all been from either new or relatively new members of the Guide? Smells like a lot of self promotion going on here by the provider. She may be a great provider,. But I tend to rely on reviews from seasoned vets (I. E. Seniors).

I'm not sure I enjoy being called seasoned but I've been around. I saw Kassey several times right up until this year. All of the good things that I am reading are spot on. I reviewed her as outstanding back then and stand by it. Over time I have graduated to mature (not old) ladies with no hang ups no drugs no men etc, who know what the score is, like Kassey. I've been to her house and had her to my house. Totally trust her and that is a very very very short list.

[StymieChula]

Nice work. I'm curious to see if this is the same girl. And you're right about the girl on the right having some bad reports.

The girl in the picture looking all good is cindy the 1 in the mirror is NOT cindy.

I have been with cindy and spoken to her a few times. Also spoke to the other girl to and trust me they are not the same person at all.

[Druh1923]

Has any of you Seniors noticed that the recent flurry of activity re: Kassey has all been from either new or relatively new members of the Guide? Smells like a lot of self promotion going on here by the provider. She may be a great provider,. But I tend to rely on reviews from seasoned vets (I. E. Seniors).

[Richbal]

I have been with Kassey several times and she is very special. Bueatiful long hair, very sweet and just so special. Nice long legs too. She makes you feel welcome.
Kassey is always fresh from the shower.

Saw her several times a few years ago. While she is no longer a teenager (who is?) she was always very gracious and made sure I enjoyed myself.

Nothing to say but good about Kassey.

[Dee32]

Also: http://spacecoast.backpage.com/Femal...ll-23/10817238.

There are multiple reasons someone could experience this situation from a provider and the least likely is theyre playing pranks. They want to feel safe and secure too and if their own spidey-sense gives them an inkling that the person who answered their ad is a cop, crazed serial killer, or any one of a number of other undesirables, the only prudent thing for them to do is cut the line and keep fishing. I've had so many providers cancel or no-show on me I couldn't even count but I imagine they have their own justification.

That being said, I've seen Angel several times and posted a couple of relevant reviews on her, all completely positive, with one addendum being her menu options. I won't get into details but apparently she has a more varied offering, perhaps due to frequent flier miles, however I'm sure its a case of YMMV. (Review #4111 has additional pictures.) Her in-call location is as safe as it gets, being gated, and not near any high-crime areas. Donations are reasonable and well within the acceptable range of local providers. Considering my own experience and what I've been provided with they are very good rates.

I agree with your comments. I actually decided to call Angel & Brandii based on your review. I should point out it was Brandii who talked me all the way to the hotel and then "cut the line" after the long drive. Anyway. I'm just sharing my experience.