CookyJar's Streetwalker Photos

[FlyGuyEddie007]

Guys stop overpaying the normal rates just like we talk about in the Newark and Paterson New Jersey. You know the standard prices please stop overpaying ty.

[CookyJar]

Oopsy! My Bad! I took these pictures around the end of May. I got a little caught-up in what was going on in Camden and forgot about Britney.

CookyJar.

[CookyJar]

I picked-up Britney on the Huntingdon Park side of the stroll. She looked fresh, with a nice smile and the promise of some nice cleavage. As is my normal routine, we agree on X number of pictures for X amount of dollars and an option for more if we both agreed.

During the photo shoot, I asked Britney about a small, obviously old, scar on her shoulder that looked like a bullet wound. I thought nothing more about it. The wound was small and in no way impacted her appearance or the photos. After we reached the agreed upon number of pictures, Britney claimed that she felt uncomfortable with my questioning and did not want to continue. I inquired and she stated that my asking about the wound had made her uneasy. Not being one to push an issue with a girl who seemed in a rush, I gave her XX dollars for the picture and no tip. That ended the session with Britney.

It does not happen a lot, but it does happen. Usually it is me that ends the session, either because I am not comfortable with the appearance or attitude of the girl. Sometimes it is the girl who ends things quickly, being satisfied that the picture money is enough for her needs of the moment. In either case I am not mad when things end after a good photo shoot, since the original agreement was competed, I got what I am paying for and I am only out of a few dollars. It could have been worst and I would have been angry had the service been bad or rushed.

There is someone out there who knows Britney better than I. Maybe they will comment and give a better / more detailed review on the service I missed.

CookyJar.

[HollywoodGuy]

So I have to ask, why do pictures where the girl are not touching or barely touching get the most views?

CookyJar.

When the girls are not touching you can get a much better view of their bodies. Especially their pussy, tits and ass.

[TonyJohnson]

Finally, I learned the whole story. Finally, I got the full experience and it was well worth the wait.

Everything is on the table, its all negotiable. (Be forewarned, there is no backdoor entry at standard Avenue prices.)

CookyJar.

Wl be in town and wld like try local talent. Wl be able to give good info if ever guyscome to indy.

[CookyJar]

Rule #1: Do no harm.

In order to keep Rule #1, I often have to walk a very fine line between my obligations to the ladies I photograph and my obligations to my fellow mongers. The girls want to be featured at their best and the guys want to know what's out there.

Love it. Cookie you can do no wrong. One picture or one thousand I'm happy. Girls solo, double or group-able I'm happy. Daily posts from you I'm happy. Only when you are absent or others, with the ability to choose not to look, criticize you am I unhappy. It would only make me happier to meet you some day to encourage and support you. Every town on USASG needs a Cookie.

I am not trying to mislead or deceive anyone. I am not trying to promote or get dates for anyone. I am just trying to have some fun doing what I enjoy. If I can help others while I am doing what I enjoy doing – so be it. If others benefit, that is alright with me.

If posting Girl on Girl Action pictures means that some poor working girl might be rejected by a monger because he saw her pictured with another female; then I do not have to do Girl on Girl. I mean, it is not that important. I could always just show two girls posing together. They don't have to be licking and sucking on each other. I am not trying to hurt anybody or hurt their business.

I was a little concerned when I saw what I perceived to be a lack of interest in the female action shots.

CookyJar.

[CookyJar]

I received this PM and it verifies a hypothesis I was considering.

Please pardon the pm

As for me, I enjoy the girl on girl pics, but am more likely to click on the side-by-side pics because more of each girl is visible, and I can more easily take in their faces as well as all the tasty bits.

It's an assumption I came too after I thought about it a little more. It's what I do when viewing a Girl and Guy photo action set. I avoid the pictures with the guy's dick in the girl's mouth and look for the pictures where I can view the girl's face, body and other female features.

CookyJar.

[Msaunders6969]

I would like to give my reason for requesting your participation. And! I would like to address an issue that may have been lost in the jumping back and forth between this and the Southern Jersey, General Thread.

My participation was not only welcomed, but insisted upon. Selfies of my involvement do exist. However, they shall remain on file, in my possession, to be view at shuck time as my retirement as a monger.

The observant viewer ought not to have any problem determining the menu. Neither girl offered everything, but between the two the menu was complete. There was very little that both girls were not willing to do. And, whatever one was not willing to do the other did. When one of the girls bought up the subject of analingus, although it is not my thing, the party took on a whole new glow. DATY, DFK, BBBJ and all of the basic freaky sucking and fucking positions can be conferred simply by viewing the pictures. Which brings me back to the question: Are Girl on Girl Pictures a Turn On or Turn Off?

On the 1 oth, in the Southern Jersey, General thread, I posted a photo set of 10 pictures. On the 11th, I posted another set of 10 Girl on Girl photos. In both sets the pictures viewed most often are the ones with the two girls sitting or kneeling side by side. The more intimate the two girls are with each other the lesser the views.

There are a lot of variable to be considered, the size of the thumbnails, the fact that most of the viewers are lurkers and visitors who visit the forum for the free porn and etc. Whatever the reason, the most viewed tend to be the less intimate, followed by those showing the most ass or pussy. (I always expect the pussy and ass shots to be popular.).

So I have to ask, why do pictures where the girl are not touching or barely touching get the most views?

CookyJar.

Any Girl on Girl is a big turn on either live or in pics. CG you put a nice series together showing great progression.

[HuntingOne]

I would like to give my reason for requesting your participation. And! I would like to address an issue that may have been lost in the jumping back and forth between this and the Southern Jersey, General Thread.

My participation was not only welcomed, but insisted upon. Selfies of my involvement do exist. However, they shall remain on file, in my possession, to be view at shuck time as my retirement as a monger.

The observant viewer ought not to have any problem determining the menu. Neither girl offered everything, but between the two the menu was complete. There was very little that both girls were not willing to do. And, whatever one was not willing to do the other did. When one of the girls bought up the subject of analingus, although it is not my thing, the party took on a whole new glow. DATY, DFK, BBBJ and all of the basic freaky sucking and fucking positions can be conferred simply by viewing the pictures. Which brings me back to the question: Are Girl on Girl Pictures a Turn On or Turn Off?

On the 1 oth, in the Southern Jersey, General thread, I posted a photo set of 10 pictures. On the 11th, I posted another set of 10 Girl on Girl photos. In both sets the pictures viewed most often are the ones with the two girls sitting or kneeling side by side. The more intimate the two girls are with each other the lesser the views.

There are a lot of variable to be considered, the size of the thumbnails, the fact that most of the viewers are lurkers and visitors who visit the forum for the free porn and etc. Whatever the reason, the most viewed tend to be the less intimate, followed by those showing the most ass or pussy. (I always expect the pussy and ass shots to be popular.).

So I have to ask, why do pictures where the girl are not touching or barely touching get the most views?

CookyJar.

I will cast a vote for more of the girl on girl pics, I think they are hot!

[Spazen]

... I know not everyone likes the Girl on Girl photo.,,,CookyJar.

But, "Everyone" doesn; t read the forums, There are always the Church goers. They might not like Girl on Girl <G ".

[CookyJar]

...

So I have to ask, why do pictures where the girl are not touching or barely touching get the most views?

CookyJar.

I am also a little concerned that there was / is not at least one dissenting vote. I know not everyone likes the Girl on Girl photo. I for one am not fond of the hardcore butch types with strap-ons.

CookyJar.

[CookyJar]

I would like to give my reason for requesting your participation. And! I would like to address an issue that may have been lost in the jumping back and forth between this and the Southern Jersey, General Thread.

My participation was not only welcomed, but insisted upon. Selfies of my involvement do exist. However, they shall remain on file, in my possession, to be view at shuck time as my retirement as a monger.

The observant viewer ought not to have any problem determining the menu. Neither girl offered everything, but between the two the menu was complete. There was very little that both girls were not willing to do. And, whatever one was not willing to do the other did. When one of the girls bought up the subject of analingus, although it is not my thing, the party took on a whole new glow. DATY, DFK, BBBJ and all of the basic freaky sucking and fucking positions can be conferred simply by viewing the pictures. Which brings me back to the question: Are Girl on Girl Pictures a Turn On or Turn Off?

On the 1 oth, in the Southern Jersey, General thread, I posted a photo set of 10 pictures. On the 11th, I posted another set of 10 Girl on Girl photos. In both sets the pictures viewed most often are the ones with the two girls sitting or kneeling side by side. The more intimate the two girls are with each other the lesser the views.

There are a lot of variable to be considered, the size of the thumbnails, the fact that most of the viewers are lurkers and visitors who visit the forum for the free porn and etc. Whatever the reason, the most viewed tend to be the less intimate, followed by those showing the most ass or pussy. (I always expect the pussy and ass shots to be popular.).

So I have to ask, why do pictures where the girl are not touching or barely touching get the most views?

CookyJar.

[Vbgent4u2c]

I know this is a long shot, but that girl is gorgeous.

Anyone have her contact info?

Thanks!

[Dh1610]

Girl on girl is fine by me. It certainly doesn't offend or bother me in the least bit. On the other hand I wouldn't be interested in paying anything to just watch.

What is the forums opinion on Girl or Girl action photos? Are they a, "Turn on," or a "Turn off?" Do they make a difference? What's YOUR opinion? Does a girl kissing, fondling, and getting it on with another girl turn you on or off?

As long as I'm getting mine, it doesn't bother me.

I have always thought that girl on girl action shots showed how willing a lady was to approach the freaky side of her nature. Freakiness may not be a desirable feature for some guys. Wholesome girls, wifey types and girls who wouldn't do that kind of stuff, maybe what some guys want.

What's YOUR opinion?

CookyJar.

P.S.: Once again, just to keep it straight, Deena & Stacey are two girls from the Camden side of the Delaware.

[LikkerFront]

What is the forums opinion on Girl or Girl action photos? Are they a, "Turn on," or a "Turn off?" Do they make a difference? What's YOUR opinion? Does a girl kissing, fondling, and getting it on with another girl turn you on or off?

As long as I'm getting mine, it doesn't bother me.

I have always thought that girl on girl action shots showed how willing a lady was to approach the freaky side of her nature. Freakiness may not be a desirable feature for some guys. Wholesome girls, wifey types and girls who wouldn't do that kind of stuff, maybe what some guys want.

What's YOUR opinion?

CookyJar.

P.S.: Once again, just to keep it straight, Deena & Stacey are two girls from the Camden side of the Delaware.

Always love your pics CJ! Who wouldn't love to be the cock provider smack dab in the middle of that pussy licking tryst? Keep up the good work! (Damn I need to make the mongering road trip to the north!