BackPage Advertiser Reviews

**Werm2011** · 04-15-14 17:09

Originally Posted by HoHunter328 [View Original Post]

PCP.

http://www.urban75.com/Drugs/drugterm.html

She's looking for cocaine (powder), extasy/molly, or PCP, and maybe crack (probably not her first choice, but willing to if that's all that's available). Pretty common choices for college girls in my experience.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

Had no idea that shit was even still around, never mind in demand. Are quaaludes still around, too? LOL.

**Ho Hunter 328** · 04-15-14 16:41

Originally Posted by Werm2011 [View Original Post]

Also, what is 'surf'? Couldn't find it on Urban Dictionary, either. Never heard of that one. She said she doesn't smoke, and the only references I could find were to do with weed.

PCP.

http://www.urban75.com/Drugs/drugterm.html

She's looking for cocaine (powder), extasy/molly, or PCP, and maybe crack (probably not her first choice, but willing to if that's all that's available). Pretty common choices for college girls in my experience.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

**Werm2011** · 04-15-14 16:23

Originally Posted by HoHunter328 [View Original Post]

I'd bet that one is legit. She's only looking for guys in "decent shape", Aunt LEO wouldn't discriminate based on physical appearance. I'd surmise she's a young girl willing to hookup to get drugs as long as she finds the guy at least somewhat attractive. Which pretty much describes a huge number of college girls... The drugs she's referencing would support this hypothesis as well. I bet she's the type of girl that would have no problem blowing a guy for a couple of pills worth $10-$20, but would be offended by someone offering her $40-$50 in cash for the same.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

I thought of that, but I think most guys that had what she wants wouldn't say "I have what she wants, but I'm too fat for her", or "Damn, she wants a clean guy, I'm filthy". I also think LEO knows this in order to ad some realism to the ad? She says nothing about being 'good looking' or anything like that, either.

You may be right, but there are too many other things that were in common with the confirmed LEO ads where I wouldn't risk it even if I was into those things she wants.

BTW, I just remembered that there were many misspellings in the confirmed LEO ads.

Also, what is 'surf'? Couldn't find it on Urban Dictionary, either. Never heard of that one. She said she doesn't smoke, and the only references I could find were to do with weed.

**Ho Hunter 328** · 04-15-14 15:55

Originally Posted by Werm2011 [View Original Post]

Now, this one here was one I strongly suspected as being LEO, but it seems the ad is still up months later. Even so, I wouldn't contact this one for anything. It has a few of the things I consider highly suspicious. Maybe someone can prove me wrong? Who dares? LOL.

http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...rs-22/25627743

I'd bet that one is legit. She's only looking for guys in "decent shape", Aunt LEO wouldn't discriminate based on physical appearance. I'd surmise she's a young girl willing to hookup to get drugs as long as she finds the guy at least somewhat attractive. Which pretty much describes a huge number of college girls... The drugs she's referencing would support this hypothesis as well. I bet she's the type of girl that would have no problem blowing a guy for a couple of pills worth $10-$20, but would be offended by someone offering her $40-$50 in cash for the same thing.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

**SpermSac** · 04-15-14 15:34

Originally Posted by Werm2011 [View Original Post]

Yes I wouldn't think a LEO ad would stay up for more than 48 hours.

Now, this one here was one I strongly suspected as being LEO, but it seems the ad is still up months later. Even so, I wouldn't contact this one for anything. It has a few of the things I consider highly suspicious. Maybe someone can prove me wrong? Who dares? LOL.

http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...rs-22/25627743

I would agree with you 100% on that one. To many red flags pop up to take the chance.

There was a recent newspaper article about the efforts of LEO and what they do to promote Martha's political ambitions.

It is hard to understand that there are some on here who will argue that LEO doesn't have the time or $$ to know what is going on. All I can say is DREAM ON.

From that article:

"The same online sites used to order a smorgasbord of sexual activity anywhere and everywhere are also being monitored by law enforcement agencies throughout the suburbs, as local police step up efforts to combat prostitution and human trafficking. While enforcement once focused on the prostitutes walking the streets, it has now expanded to include the johns.

"About every other week, two or three times a month, we'll conduct sting operations," he said. "We'll either use an undercover female officer in a hotel and advertise in that direction, or we'll actually just go to an Internet-driven service that provides us with the advertisements.".

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/reg...V2O/story.html

**Werm2011** · 04-15-14 15:20

Originally Posted by SpermSac [View Original Post]

The postings that I have suspected as belonging to Uncle or Aunt LEO usually drop off after the end of the day not popping back up on searches. A connection to drugs has also been indicated in the sting ads.

She does say " .80 SHORT STAY TODAY ONLY" probably a lollipop special.

Yes I wouldn't think a LEO ad would stay up for more than 48 hours.

Now, this one here was one I strongly suspected as being LEO, but it seems the ad is still up months later. Even so, I wouldn't contact this one for anything. It has a few of the things I consider highly suspicious. Maybe someone can prove me wrong? Who dares? LOL.

http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...rs-22/25627743

**SpermSac** · 04-15-14 11:16

Originally Posted by Werm2011 [View Original Post]

I said there is nothing in that particular ad that points to LEO that I see. Chicks and pimps stealing pics from other websites is common. Is it not? GIS confirms the pics were stolen. What else in that ad give you an idea the LEO posted it?

Since I've been here, there have been only two or three ads that were confirmed as being LEO by others that were, or almost, arrested. That is, that I'm aware of and on BP. I've never known LEO to steal pics form a teen sex web site (like those pics are from) or any other web site. The ones confirmed as LEO postings had no pics or their own pics since they did not appear on GIS. There were plenty of others I thought were LEO postings, but there was no proof of it.

Also, there was no hint of trading sex for drugs or 'party girl' stuff that I read in that ad. I know they use that as 'bait' as well, as most here know. LEO admits to doing so on BP and CL in their gloating newspaper articles.

In that particular ad, there are those silly 'stipulations' in the last pic. I would find it hard to believe LEO would post an ad asking solicitors not to talk about acts of sex over the phone. I'm pretty certain they want you to speak about sex for money.

There is one other thing I've noticed in a couple of the confirmed LEO ads, and I'll PM you with that one.

The postings that I have suspected as belonging to Uncle or Aunt LEO usually drop off after the end of the day not popping back up on searches. A connection to drugs has also been indicated in the sting ads.

She does say " .80 SHORT STAY TODAY ONLY" probably a lollipop special.

**Eugene West** · 04-15-14 07:41

Obviously hard to tell for sure but if I had to guess I would say this is not a LEO ad. I have had some interesting experiences with the FL & NY numbers with Latin girls. While they are rarely the girl in the pic, they have been some of the most intense mystery sex encounters experienced. There's just something about the mystery and Latin girls that does it for me. They're tough to repeat with. They seem to come and go quickly and numbers don't seem to last. One thing is for sure. Nothing beats a horny latin girl with a succulent pussy.

Originally Posted by Handiman69 [View Original Post]

What do you think?

http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...ld-21/20650757

.

**Ho Hunter 328** · 04-15-14 00:07

Originally Posted by Werm2011 [View Original Post]

Also, there was no hint of trading sex for drugs or 'party girl' stuff that I read in that ad. I know they use that as 'bait' as well, as most here know. LEO admits to doing so on BP and CL in their gloating newspaper articles.

In that particular ad, there are those silly 'stipulations' in the last pic. I would find it hard to believe LEO would post an ad asking solicitors not to talk about acts of sex over the phone. I'm pretty certain they want you to speak about sex for money.

There is one other thing I've noticed in a couple of the confirmed LEO ads, and I'll PM you with that one.

They do that so they can get a two for one special on the arrest, better chance of getting one of the charges to stick too.

Uncle LEO doesn't screen either, they don't want to risk scaring off potential arrests. So if the girl doesn't screen, that's a red flag for me. Even if they aren't Aunt LEO, it at least shows they're careless (or stupid), which means there's a higher chance they're being watched.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

**Werm2011** · 04-14-14 22:35

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

Really? Interesting. Care to share things that you usually look for in LE-sponsored ad? The ones that would raise red flags for you as in 'that must be Martha's best'? PM, if prefer.

I said there is nothing in that particular ad that points to LEO that I see. Chicks and pimps stealing pics from other websites is common. Is it not? GIS confirms the pics were stolen. What else in that ad give you an idea the LEO posted it?

Since I've been here, there have been only two or three ads that were confirmed as being LEO by others that were, or almost, arrested. That is, that I'm aware of and on BP. I've never known LEO to steal pics form a teen sex web site (like those pics are from) or any other web site. The ones confirmed as LEO postings had no pics or their own pics since they did not appear on GIS. There were plenty of others I thought were LEO postings, but there was no proof of it.

Also, there was no hint of trading sex for drugs or 'party girl' stuff that I read in that ad. I know they use that as 'bait' as well, as most here know. LEO admits to doing so on BP and CL in their gloating newspaper articles.

In that particular ad, there are those silly 'stipulations' in the last pic. I would find it hard to believe LEO would post an ad asking solicitors not to talk about acts of sex over the phone. I'm pretty certain they want you to speak about sex for money.

There is one other thing I've noticed in a couple of the confirmed LEO ads, and I'll PM you with that one.

**Nrlmus** · 04-14-14 22:09

Originally Posted by Werm2011 [View Original Post]

Looks like your typical stolen pics ad to me? You're def not going to get that girl at the door, but see no evidence it's LEO related.

Really? Interesting. Care to share things that you usually look for in LE-sponsored ad? The ones that would raise red flags for you as in 'that must be Martha's best'? PM, if prefer.

**Werm2011** · 04-14-14 21:40

Originally Posted by Handiman69 [View Original Post]

What do you think?

http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...ld-21/20650757

Looks like your typical stolen pics ad to me? You're def not going to get that girl at the door, but see no evidence it's LEO related.

**Yellowfever023** · 04-14-14 21:28

Originally Posted by Yellowfever023 [View Original Post]

Hi Guy's.

Looks like one of my UTR girls has been caught on radar. She gets 4 out of 5 stars being my UTR but as always YMMV.

http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...ay-20/26005061

Hi Guy's.

I am getting a ton of PM's about this girl, too many to reply to so I will put the info here for all. Sasha has a fantastic body! As far as her rates go I have no idea and you will have to speak to her. When I saw her it was on a UTR basis not a BP basis. She was GFE with me but again YMMV.