Massage Parlor Reports

**Edajunct** · 01-23-14 19:05

Originally Posted by Roaminrnd [View Original Post]

I have to agree. At one point, her massage was very good. Now it's almost non existent. I saw her recently and don't believe I will be going back.

I'm very sorry to hear that; in my experience once I made it clear that I really wanted a massage. She could deliver a massage that I thought was nearly as good as Leeza's.

**Lincoln54** · 01-23-14 17:28

Originally Posted by Roaminrnd [View Original Post]

I have to agree. At one point, her massage was very good. Now it's almost non existent. I saw her recently and don't believe I will be going back.

I agree.

I have stopped seeing her a few months ago and I can go all the way back to her days in Stoneham.

She never was pretty nor could I ever understand half of what she said but it in the past it was ok in a pinch.

**Roaminrnd** · 01-23-14 16:56

Originally Posted by HowardSprague [View Original Post]

I've been to Hong a number of times. Her massage has deteriorated considerably, but her on a bad day is better than others I've had at high profile places. Nevertheless, I won't be returning. As for cleanliness, though, I've always observed her to use paper towels for sanitary reasons and have never felt less than clean afterward. I've never found her or her place to have any hint of a hygiene problem.

It is my understanding she is looking to get out. I have heard her business is for sale.

I have to agree. At one point, her massage was very good. Now it's almost non existent. I saw her recently and don't believe I will be going back.

**Spaz2580** · 01-23-14 11:35

Decent massage & left happy. Forget the name of the provider I had. Saw another one on the way out. 60/40 and convenient if you work downtown.

Originally Posted by MongerExpert [View Original Post]

I haven't been but it's above Beantown pub, down the street from Suffolk. The ad clearly indicates an AMP. I don't frequent that area at all anymore, + you would more than likely have to take the t. The ad says traditional Chinese bodywork so you know what that means. As long as they say " have you been here before " you know you are good to go. If they don't say that, I would take off rather quickly.

**Member #4437** · 01-22-14 17:49

If anyone need info on any South Shore AMPs PM me for the info.

North shore in Everett I made an app for one that was the best prostate massage...we'll it was the WORST place ever and on top of that she didn't even give what they promoted so stear clear.

**MongerExpert** · 01-22-14 17:08

Originally Posted by MrBao [View Original Post]

Did any of why'all tried this spot?

http://boston.backpage.com/BodyRubs/...25-20/25231499

I haven't been but it's above Beantown pub, down the street from Suffolk. The ad clearly indicates an AMP. I don't frequent that area at all anymore, + you would more than likely have to take the t. The ad says traditional Chinese bodywork so you know what that means. As long as they say " have you been here before " you know you are good to go. If they don't say that, I would take off rather quickly.

**HowardSprague** · 01-22-14 13:52

Originally Posted by Kenny9370 [View Original Post]

I saw Hong a couple of weeks ago and agree with Harley. She is willing to please but there are too many you have to do it like this, like that, you got to do it this way, that way, etc. I also found that her massage is not very good. It has got to be one of the worst that I have had. She just put a towel on your back and runs her hand up and down your body. The other thing that I did not like is that everytime I get out of there I smell like a dirty rag. Not sure if its the lotion that she is using or the towels that she cleans you with but you smell like a dirty rag when you get out of there. I think Hong keeps your phone number and takes note about your session because she remembers EVERYTHING from the last time that I saw her. She is a great value but not sure I would repeat.

I've been to Hong a number of times. Her massage has deteriorated considerably, but her on a bad day is better than others I've had at high profile places. Nevertheless, I won't be returning. As for cleanliness, though, I've always observed her to use paper towels for sanitary reasons and have never felt less than clean afterward. I've never found her or her place to have any hint of a hygiene problem.

It is my understanding she is looking to get out. I have heard her business is for sale.

**M Scores Easy** · 01-22-14 09:23

This is my first post. I have been reading a lot of mediocre to bad reviews lately, so I just wanted to share my positive experiences at 3 places. One piece of advice I can give everyone to increase their chances of a better experience is to always shave and shower right before going. Dress decently. No hooded sweaters with sweatpants.

With that being said, I've had good luck in Crystal Spa Lexington, Melissa in Danvers, Siam in Malden.

Crystal- Alice and Angela are great. Angela has strong hands and Alice is very cute soft and gentle. Left happy with both.

Melissa- two attractive girls working there. There's is an older one with a huge fake rack too. Happy with all 3.

Siam- every girl I've see there is fairly attractive. They have 6 or 7 girls in rotation. A bit more expensive. 80 for hr+ 70 tip. Left happy here. Def best looking talent. Massage was not great but ending was nice.

**Fuhgetaboudit** · 01-22-14 08:23

WS,

I stand corrected, thanks for straightening out my erroneous connections.

Either way, all 3 (now 2) of those places are on my do not revisit list. My biggest challenge is that that list keeps growing, and I have to keep having to reach out and expand my service provider areas in search of new most favored locations and providers.

Originally Posted by WaveSeek [View Original Post]

From what I managed to deduce, 10 Cochituate (a new-ish location) is a sister-location of Myrtle Street. Have reached Lily at 10 Coch / Natick, after having seen her a couple of times at Myrtle / Fram: she was answering for both locations. Not sure if Lily is still in Natick; have been meaning to call--would enjoy seeing her again. As far as I know, there was not a connection to 400/ Fram (where I have never visited).

**Bigben99** · 01-22-14 07:07

But I believe in the concept of PM. I think it has been provided as an option here for a reason. Especially when the public board discourse trends towards discussions of exact addresses, what locations might be owned by the same people and in more than one case the name of the manager. Really? And what is the purpose of showing your advanced knowledge? A numeric address is normally pretty explicit. Especially when the township is stated. And I will always return my PMs with additional information. A little bit of discretion is a good thing. Call me crazy but the levels of detail being provided in a town that has clearly attracted LEO serves little purpose and is really annoying me. Take exact addresses, names and other details offline.

**Mr Bao** · 01-22-14 02:51

Did any of why'all tried this spot?

http://boston.backpage.com/BodyRubs/...25-20/25231499

**Kenny9370** · 01-22-14 00:10

Needed a massage a couple of days ago so I decided to called 400 in metrowest but everytime I called it went straight to voicemail on the first ring (now I know why after reading the posts from a couple of days ago). That didn't registered in my mind at the time so I decided to called Winchester looking for Linda but was told that the person working there is Michelle now. I was hesitant but was convinced by the lady on the phone that Michelle "was good" so I booked the appointment. Got there and was surprise that Michelle was very good looking (not a spinner but good overall), petite, nice rack, nice ass, and very good english. Michelle is very talkative and gave a very good massage. She worked the entire body and I felt great afterwards. She did a really nice job on my shoulders which was really bothering me at the time. Everything was standard on the flip, tried for UTC but was denied every single time. Fees and tips was standard. After the finished we had a couple of minutes left and Michelle continued to work on my shoulders until time was up. I was not shorted on time at all. Overall this was a great session and I would repeat. The only thing that I hate is the daycare center you see when you drive by to park your car in the back of the building.

**Jstyre** · 01-22-14 00:00

Took my first trip to this spot a few days ago. Called to set appointment, and got a raspy voiced troll with bad English.

Offputting, but, with only mild trepidation I sallied forth anyway.

The door was answered by a young lady (20's) with medium length hair. Looked more Japanese or Korean then Chinese. But I'm not an expert.

Very, VERY thin, and very VERY cute.

And a complete Beast with those bony little arms. I am not a small guy. She smeared my muscles into a paste.

Started off by climbing on me and knee walking down my glutes and legs. It seemed to not get the effect she.

Wanted, so she hopped off the table and did some neck work. Thumbs into the shoulders, etc.

Then she used her forearms to make me flatter then a pancake. It was painful at parts, but I am much more relaxed.

Her English is nearly nonexistant. We engaged in an intricate interpretive dance and mime routine so I could explain where I had injured myself a.

While back and didn't want worked on.

Flip was...very nice. Midway through she stopped asked for the tip. I got it, we resumed. Light roaming.but it was apparent that more could be had for greater tip. (I gave 60/40).

I asked her name after. In a quiet shy voice she said what I thought was "Cao Cao". I was pretty shocked. It's not every day you get a massage from a 2000 year old Chinese Warlord.

Then I realized she was actually the 475th CoCo I've met in the Biz.

Will do again.

**Kenny9370** · 01-21-14 23:37

Originally Posted by Bigben99 [View Original Post]

400 seems to have closed. I am thinking lack of business or community pressure. Anyone confirm??

Are we talking about 400 Union in Framingham? Was thinking about going there a couple of weeks ago to see one of my favorite but decided to go see Hong in Wilmington (which was a mistake).

**Kenny9370** · 01-21-14 23:33

Originally Posted by Harley90 [View Original Post]

I visited with her, very nice, a little older, what's to please. Open to options, skills beyond what I would call the basics for an AMP are subpar, available but lackluster.

Looks: 5.

Body: 4-5, typical.

Massage: 5-6, be specific in what you want.

Pleasant: 8.

No Rush: 8.

Total: 1.2.

I have repeated when I wanted easy, safe, non rush and relaxing.

I saw Hong a couple of weeks ago and agree with Harley. She is willing to please but there are too many you have to do it like this, like that, you got to do it this way, that way, etc. I also found that her massage is not very good. It has got to be one of the worst that I have had. She just put a towel on your back and runs her hand up and down your body. The other thing that I did not like is that everytime I get out of there I smell like a dirty rag. Not sure if its the lotion that she is using or the towels that she cleans you with but you smell like a dirty rag when you get out of there. I think Hong keeps your phone number and takes note about your session because she remembers EVERYTHING from the last time that I saw her. She is a great value but not sure I would repeat.