Massage Parlor Reports

[Blackfire]

For Example: Rather than say "A pussy smells bad"I'd rather say "She should, ve taken a shower" And I'm sure there are other comparisons. Why'all get my drift / discretion, taste and a little class.

I think the few guys who are barking about the "to much detail" would rather see posts like "Went to Serenity Spa today and had a really nice time with Camille. PM me for more information". Then if you PM and are a senior member (or whatever other criteria the poster might be using to decide if they are going to answer your PM or give you any more information) they would like that to be the way to answer the dirty detail portion. As Asianplvr can attest too, that could wind up creating alot of work depending on how many individual PM's the reviewer gets. It's also very selective as to who may or may not get the information, which leads to a "class" (or clique) system similar to private rooms on other boards I've been on. In my opinion, the way this board operates with the open information is far superior to limiting access and I would hate to see a few guys get the masses to thinking that's the way to go.

I agree with Bloozer quote above, you can use a little class when posting detail rather than being crass about it.....but when you have a group this size you're always going to have either the guy who is crass for shock effect or the guy who just doesn't know any other way and if that bothers you too much maybe your skin is too thin.

[Asianplvr]

For Example: Rather than say "A pussy smells bad"I'd rather say "She should, ve taken a shower" And I'm sure there are other comparisons. Why'all get my drift / discretion, taste and a little class.

LOL, I guess I have no taste at times. If her pussy smells bad I'm going to let ya know directly. There will be no question of what part smells bad. I see nothing wrong with putting explicit details in the report, good or bad. This forum is for guys to find sex, period. I'm just not going to pussy foot around and word things with fuzzy letters. I for one want to know details, out here in the open forum. Pm's reserved for names, numbers, locations and other pertinent info that should go thru pm.

Us mongers want to fuck girls, that's what were are here for. I want to see pics like ILieToGirls posts and all the dirty details. I don't mean to come off hard to anyone here but this topic has been coming up more and more. If we keep things all sweet and kind and keep most details thru pm's it goes against what this forum is all about.

Be kind, Play Safe, Fuck them, Report.

[Bloozer]

I appreciate your view and respect that side of the debate. I am pretty open about details as I feel it gives a better picture for what lies ahead. If a pussy smell bad, I want to know and I don't feel the need to pm for that sort of info. Locations, contact info, of course needs to go thru pm's as well as private info the providers do not want in the open forum. We have to use our judgement in pm's what we share and who we share it with. I do feel that info about girls whom work at massage parlors are the exception and agree that specific info should go thru pm's as their work establishments monitor forums and it puts their jobs in jeopardy.

For Example: Rather than say "A pussy smells bad"I'd rather say "She should, ve taken a shower" And I'm sure there are other comparisons. Why'all get my drift / discretion, taste and a little class.

[Asianplvr]

While I don't often get specific information either way, I do get enough, if I read between the lines, to spend the small amount of play money I have in a way that leaves me happy. Frankly, I generally doubt anything on the open board and look for more than one source saying similar things before moving ahead with regardless. PM's feel more reliable but I don't generally ask for any information as I don't post a lot and don't want to impose or whatever on those that do.

Further, I worry about folks who insist on getting everything out in the bare open. Places like this are not private and why arm those who might be looking to cause problems? Even MIC is not really private; they let people in whom they've never met and know nothing about. That's not a bad thing but it means it's more like a semi-public club or hangout where things spoken aloud can be overheard.

A bit of discretion hurts no one and, even if it proves totally unnecessary, is worthwhile if it does nothing more than cover some of the drama. People can do what they want of course and, hopefully, no one person does something that puts everyone at risk. Still, it's not terrible advice to self-censor public statements and leave taste, color, consistency, position, moisture, and so on to more discrete communications.

I appreciate your view and respect that side of the debate. I am pretty open about details as I feel it gives a better picture for what lies ahead. If a pussy smell bad, I want to know and I don't feel the need to pm for that sort of info. Locations, contact info, of course needs to go thru pm's as well as private info the providers do not want in the open forum. We have to use our judgement in pm's what we share and who we share it with. I do feel that info about girls whom work at massage parlors are the exception and agree that specific info should go thru pm's as their work establishments monitor forums and it puts their jobs in jeopardy.

[Bloozer]

While I don't often get specific information either way, I do get enough, if I read between the lines, to spend the small amount of play money I have in a way that leaves me happy. Frankly, I generally doubt anything on the open board and look for more than one source saying similar things before moving ahead with regardless. PM's feel more reliable but I don't generally ask for any information as I don't post a lot and don't want to impose or whatever on those that do.

Further, I worry about folks who insist on getting everything out in the bare open. Places like this are not private and why arm those who might be looking to cause problems? Even MIC is not really private; they let people in whom they've never met and know nothing about. That's not a bad thing but it means it's more like a semi-public club or hangout where things spoken aloud can be overheard.

A bit of discretion hurts no one and, even if it proves totally unnecessary, is worthwhile if it does nothing more than cover some of the drama. People can do what they want of course and, hopefully, no one person does something that puts everyone at risk. Still, it's not terrible advice to self-censor public statements and leave taste, color, consistency, position, moisture, and so on to more discrete communications.

Well said. However without a little "open-forum" there would be nothing to check. Discretion, taste, and respect!

[Bismark]

No I can't point to an arrest do to information gathered from this board. But I can point to 4 arrests and two local boards shut down due to information gathered from meet and greets. Informants and posts on those boards. If you don't think it can't or won't happen you're kidding yourself...while I believe info is a good thing it's just as good to be discrete. I'm not saying we shouldn't post reviews...just sayin the juicy stuff can be handled back channel and you still get good results..

While I don't often get specific information either way, I do get enough, if I read between the lines, to spend the small amount of play money I have in a way that leaves me happy. Frankly, I generally doubt anything on the open board and look for more than one source saying similar things before moving ahead with regardless. PM's feel more reliable but I don't generally ask for any information as I don't post a lot and don't want to impose or whatever on those that do.

Further, I worry about folks who insist on getting everything out in the bare open. Places like this are not private and why arm those who might be looking to cause problems? Even MIC is not really private; they let people in whom they've never met and know nothing about. That's not a bad thing but it means it's more like a semi-public club or hangout where things spoken aloud can be overheard.

A bit of discretion hurts no one and, even if it proves totally unnecessary, is worthwhile if it does nothing more than cover some of the drama. People can do what they want of course and, hopefully, no one person does something that puts everyone at risk. Still, it's not terrible advice to self-censor public statements and leave taste, color, consistency, position, moisture, and so on to more discrete communications.

[EndlessNites]

I've been around awhile used to frequent Natalie and Natasha at Panacea until I walked in and everyone was sleeping in the back. Then I started seeing Anita or Sydney at pacific until I saw a fight break out between them decided to much drama for me. Rhonda at wonder was just to far away and Jennifer always answers her phone during the massage. E / w is by far my favorite. Yes there is a lot of girls to shy away from but there is also a lot of girls to see I highly recommend Anna. Maggie is alright if you like them little, Lynn and Tina do excellent massages as for extras very reserved. I believe sandy is at wonder now or I would recommend her as well. So overall I stick to what I already know and am comfortable with don't like the guessing game much these days prefer to know what I'm getting for what. Although a "little" cluttered e / w is clean and the girls always make me feel welcome and I love the fact that there is a shower available.

Hey there. Been thinking about going to see Anna, does she offer FS? If so were the rates reasonable?

Thanks

[KtheChickFkr]

I was at E / W last week and saw Mal. I walked in and got her and I didn't feel like switching (I'm too polite, LOL). Anyway the massage was ok but not the best I've had. She has a sweet personality though so I guess that counts for something. It was my second visit to E / W and my first experience was a whole lot better. Can't remember the name of the person I saw. I'll return again and try another person.

[WolvGuy]

I don't think he was saying "all new readers are fellow mongers". I think he was saying that new fellow mongers (I.e. Non-senior members who are fellow mongers) don't often get good information when asking for the "private details" back channel. I agree with the idea that this is a forum for information, we all know LE can read it if they wish but in reality they already know what is going on. Can you point me to any arrest in the Grand Rapids area that was due to a posting that came from this forum?

No I can't point to an arrest do to information gathered from this board. But I can point to 4 arrests and two local boards shut down due to information gathered from meet and greets. Informants and posts on those boards. If you don't think it can't or won't happen you're kidding yourself...while I believe info is a good thing it's just as good to be discrete. I'm not saying we shouldn't post reviews...just sayin the juicy stuff can be handled back channel and you still get good results..

[Improven]

Admin, just want to extend a thanks to you for making me a Senior Member, I just noticed this today, and would like to extend a warm thanks. I didn't expect that at all, but thanks none the less, I'll try to live up to the status.

Have a great day!

[Blackfire]

What makes you think all new readers are fellow mongers? I didn't suggest censorship...I suggested discretion by handling the juicy details by way of pm's.

I don't think he was saying "all new readers are fellow mongers". I think he was saying that new fellow mongers (I.e. Non-senior members who are fellow mongers) don't often get good information when asking for the "private details" back channel. I agree with the idea that this is a forum for information, we all know LE can read it if they wish but in reality they already know what is going on. Can you point me to any arrest in the Grand Rapids area that was due to a posting that came from this forum?

[RepArgent]

What makes you think all new readers are fellow mongers? I didn't suggest censorship...I suggested discretion by handling the juicy details by way of pm's.

IMHO details regarding extras by specific ladies in massage parlors should only be discussed in PMs. I've meet several of them in the past who are reluctant to provide anything more than a HJ (and sometimes not even that) for fear of being exposed to their bosses and friends who know where they work. Escorts and body rub ladies who advertise their services in the open are a different story.

[WolvGuy]

What words are censored in reports? I don't know anybody that wants a private message about Camille. Infact All new readers fellow mongers can't read a fresh juicy details via pm. That's what we called FORUM.

What makes you think all new readers are fellow mongers? I didn't suggest censorship...I suggested discretion by handling the juicy details by way of pm's.

[Nocox]

I've been around awhile used to frequent Natalie and Natasha at Panacea until I walked in and everyone was sleeping in the back. Then I started seeing Anita or Sydney at pacific until I saw a fight break out between them decided to much drama for me. Rhonda at wonder was just to far away and Jennifer always answers her phone during the massage. E / w is by far my favorite. Yes there is a lot of girls to shy away from but there is also a lot of girls to see I highly recommend Anna. Maggie is alright if you like them little, Lynn and Tina do excellent massages as for extras very reserved. I believe sandy is at wonder now or I would recommend her as well. So overall I stick to what I already know and am comfortable with don't like the guessing game much these days prefer to know what I'm getting for what. Although a "little" cluttered e / w is clean and the girls always make me feel welcome and I love the fact that there is a shower available.

[Mike3430]

The same results can be accomplished by handling the juicy details via pm. Sometimes discretion can be a good thing.

What words are censored in reports? I don't know anybody that wants a private message about Camille. Infact All new readers fellow mongers can't read a fresh juicy details via pm. That's what we called FORUM.