Massage Parlor Reports

**HighAmperage** · 09-15-13 21:29

What happened in Bedford, if it really happened as described, was patently illegal. The police don't have the power to terminate a contract between two parties. Only a court of law can do that, and then, only with difficulty. No, this is a classic example of good old fashioned civil extortion. LEO shows up and tells the AMP to cease and desist and then trots on over to the landlord and says, if you don't forget all about that lease we'll charge you as an accessory to running a house if ill reputation. Even if the landlord doesn't roll over, his tenant has flown the coop, and the damage is done. Uncle Leo knows there is no Civil Liberties Union for AMPs, so no one with any knowledge or power is going to come to their rescue, no matter wronged they were. It's a technique that's nearly as old as the world's oldest profession itself.

I posted some time ago warning about the regs taking effect on Nov 1 and that it's going to virtually end the AMP as we know it here. This is all being driven from the top. I think old Mahthah hasn't had an orgasm in at least twenty years, if ever, and so, can't understand why anyone else would want to. People like that feel that sexuality is something that needs to be suppressed because of fear of that which they don't understand. The same thing happened with professor what's her name down in Rhode Island that got the law changed. I'm sure she never had an orgasm so just wanted to keep hubby home at night. By the way, have you ever noticed that you never see a smokin' hot advocate for these "reforms"? Hmmm, I wonder why that is.

Are the bad things that happen in the trade? Sure there are, and that needs to be addressed. But there are many more hard working providers that have simply chosen to make a living this way. And now they can't. Everybody loses.

**MongerExpert** · 09-14-13 23:39

Originally Posted by Acid Black [View Original Post]

Believe I mentioned something about this several months ago. Hate to lose the Bedford spas, now I'll have to drive further.

Acid.

MC got craigs adult encounters stopped, now look what blossomed backpage et cetera, it's all political. MC is covering her position currently on all this crap. Who gives a sh- about Arlington? Lots of $$$$ needs to be made, I guess LE forgot to inspect the coercion from the top down. Coercion doesn't just happen at the surface level. This is ultimately why the sentencing is so weak.

**MongerExpert** · 09-14-13 23:21

Originally Posted by MrRogers [View Original Post]

Article is a few months old, but something to be aware of:

http://www.patriotledger.com/news/co...suburbs?zc_p=0

It was shut down before I was going to partake, typically happens. This location was horrific. It's at an intersection down the street from Hanover mall, and up the street from Starland and some reputable Americanized Chinese takeout places. There's not too much going on in the burbs, but the location was way too obvious. It got good reviews that a lot was on the table. Not a big deal, just go north. The problem with all this BS, is they allow it for a lengthy (months to years) amount of time, like the big trafficking bust on the north shore. Mr. Keplin and company made hundreds of thousands of dollars and probably couldn't stop even if they wanted to get out. There was a report on here that a monger actually saw Keplin at a parlor. If I saw that I wouldn't say anything, but still that would be a clear signal of a ring in progress, unless you are in utter oblivion. I mean there was a prostitution ring in Quincy et cetera that got busted off of newbury ave et cetera, on other streets, if you didn't realize what was up there, mattress on floor, again utter oblivion. Most places think they are invincible, but as soon as surveillance reveils a ring in progress, even if the bad guys know who we are, they do, there are other ways to build a case. The Phoenix classifieds were in business because of underground stuff like this.

**Acid Black** · 09-14-13 21:51

Believe I mentioned something about this several months ago. Hate to lose the Bedford spas, now I'll have to drive further.

Acid.

Originally Posted by Top Floor [View Original Post]

Here's Arlington's requirements, effective November 1.

http://www.arlingtonma.gov/Public_Do...odyworkegs.pdf

Regarding Bedford, I'm amazed and wonder what legal right they have in doing what they did. I couldn't find anything posted on the town's website if they are going to start regulating bodywork like Arlington & Newton do. To just walk into a place and say you have to close and you can stop paying rent? What about the rent they already paid? Do you really think a landlord is going to give them back the remainder of Septembers rent that they already paid when they can't operate the business anymore? And most, if not all of the owners, will simply throw up their hands and say ok and walk away and not question the legality of what the town is doing. What if a place is legit? Just because they're Asian they're being targeted? We might as well go back to the days when businesses had "NINA" signs posted.

]My source is direct from horses mouth. I know Lindsey well of Bedford Spa. None of the three places in Bedford are licensed as Mass massage businesses. I know what some read and believe about 54 Middlesex being a registered ' massage' business. It is NOT despite what the sign or ads might say. To further clarify an owner might have a Mass massage license but may choose for various reasons to not operate business under license and instead operate under Bodywork. It question the legal grounds of what they did yesterday but I am not an attorney. That's the facts as I know them now.

[/QUOTE]

**Smoke Screen** · 09-14-13 20:20

Originally Posted by CamperVan10 [View Original Post]

What about the Thai places that charge $80 at the door? Is $40 of or does that get bumped up to $50? I stay firm on $40 for HR and $60 for BJ unless it was over and above (gave Coco in CT 50 for going 1 hour plus and taking gret care of me throughout).

Most of the Thai parlors will negotiate with you for 60 / HJ, but no harm in trying to give less. I don't understand why they think they are so special, I gave up on them, for what they want I prefer Brazilians or other than Thai Asians.

**Verpa** · 09-14-13 19:36

Originally Posted by BigDog001 [View Original Post]

Just my guess, but the picture on the ad, the writing style of the ad, leads me to believe that Lavender / Ninja is back. Just my guess, but can anyone confirm?

Dog

Yes, it's Jennifer from Ninja.

**Ledger6969** · 09-14-13 18:16

I guess the response to ss is that MANY individuals at AMP providers make there own choices on what they will provide and to whom.

Guys talk about this all the time on this forum. Unique is no different they operate under the same set of rules in reference to the girls that work there.

I also saw Susan some years ago. She was truly exceptional but, back to the matter at hand. (no pun intended) Yes, hudson st. Is a business and has been a business that gentleman leave happy for many, many years now and it continues today. Just another comment no matter what AMP place you visit some individuals will not do extra services. But, the number has grown thin.

**Smoke Screen** · 09-14-13 18:01

Originally Posted by Ledger6969 [View Original Post]

Anybody try this place lower level hair salon with massage rooms in the back. The former 2 pop Susan was there for years and years the owner has been very successful flying under the radar for quite sometime.

You asked this question in post #14186, I gave you an answer. Then in post #14188, you answer your own question, and again in post #14206, you give another answer. Then in post #s 14214 & 14215 you again answer with a double post, along with ridiculing me for my answer.

**CamperVan10** · 09-14-13 18:00

Originally Posted by MongerExpert [View Original Post]

Don't mislead other non-mongers. 10. 40 is acceptable. Anything else is ridiculous. 50+, no way why? 50 is ridiculous. If everyone was like me it would be 40 w / UTC no problem, otherwise 10-20, with hh or hour, see'mon with utc 40, otherwise 10-20. UTC depends as well. The therapists don't give a sh.

What about the Thai places that charge $80 at the door? Is $40 of or does that get bumped up to $50? I stay firm on $40 for HR and $60 for BJ unless it was over and above (gave Coco in CT 50 for going 1 hour plus and taking gret care of me throughout).

**Dh1610** · 09-14-13 17:39

I am in agreement with you. I have had little time too talk it through with Lindsy and help her. Yes I believe she is throwing up her hands and she was not doubt intimidated yesterday. The irony of it all is she is one of a few that really gives a good honest massage and does not want to do extras.

Originally Posted by Top Floor [View Original Post]

Here's Arlington's requirements, effective November 1.

http://www.arlingtonma.gov/Public_Do...odyworkegs.pdf

Regarding Bedford, I'm amazed and wonder what legal right they have in doing what they did. I couldn't find anything posted on the town's website if they are going to start regulating bodywork like Arlington & Newton do. To just walk into a place and say you have to close and you can stop paying rent? What about the rent they already paid? Do you really think a landlord is going to give them back the remainder of Septembers rent that they already paid when they can't operate the business anymore? And most, if not all of the owners, will simply throw up their hands and say ok and walk away and not question the legality of what the town is doing. What if a place is legit? Just because they're Asian they're being targeted? We might as well go back to the days when businesses had "NINA" signs posted.

]My source is direct from horses mouth. I know Lindsey well of Bedford Spa. None of the three places in Bedford are licensed as Mass massage businesses. I know what some read and believe about 54 Middlesex being a registered ' massage' business. It is NOT despite what the sign or ads might say. To further clarify an owner might have a Mass massage license but may choose for various reasons to not operate business under license and instead operate under Bodywork. It question the legal grounds of what they did yesterday but I am not an attorney. That's the facts as I know them now.

[/QUOTE]

**Top Floor** · 09-14-13 17:29

Here's Arlington's requirements, effective November 1.

http://www.arlingtonma.gov/Public_Do...odyworkegs.pdf

Regarding Bedford, I'm amazed and wonder what legal right they have in doing what they did. I couldn't find anything posted on the town's website if they are going to start regulating bodywork like Arlington & Newton do. To just walk into a place and say you have to close and you can stop paying rent? What about the rent they already paid? Do you really think a landlord is going to give them back the remainder of Septembers rent that they already paid when they can't operate the business anymore? And most, if not all of the owners, will simply throw up their hands and say ok and walk away and not question the legality of what the town is doing. What if a place is legit? Just because they're Asian they're being targeted? We might as well go back to the days when businesses had "NINA" signs posted.

]My source is direct from horses mouth. I know Lindsey well of Bedford Spa. None of the three places in Bedford are licensed as Mass massage businesses. I know what some read and believe about 54 Middlesex being a registered ' massage' business. It is NOT despite what the sign or ads might say. To further clarify an owner might have a Mass massage license but may choose for various reasons to not operate business under license and instead operate under Bodywork. It question the legal grounds of what they did yesterday but I am not an attorney. That's the facts as I know them now.[/QUOTE]

**Dh1610** · 09-14-13 16:28

My source is direct from horses mouth. I know Lindsey well of Bedford Spa. None of the three places in Bedford are licensed as Mass massage businesses. I know what some read and believe about 54 Middlesex being a registered ' massage' business. It is NOT despite what the sign or ads might say. To further clarify an owner might have a Mass massage license but may choose for various reasons to not operate business under license and instead operate under Bodywork. It question the legal grounds of what they did yesterday but I am not an attorney. That's the facts as I know them now.

Originally Posted by Skatar018 [View Original Post]

Hey DH.

Can you provide a link to the source of this information?

I could not find it on the net using google, nor anything about it in the Bedford Minuteman newspaper.

Thanks.

**Amp Slave** · 09-14-13 16:13

Now she wasn't the best looking but she could have you on all fours. What ever happened to her? Did she go back to China?

**MongerExpert** · 09-14-13 15:38

Originally Posted by BigDog001 [View Original Post]

Just my guess, but the picture on the ad, the writing style of the ad, leads me to believe that Lavender / Ninja is back. Just my guess, but can anyone confirm?

Dog

I called them, and they said " we'll take care of you ", same exact response when I called Ninja in quincy. There are good reports at Ginza, but the board needs more to not mislead anyone. The craziness at the old ninja / lavender is due to them not leaving the office all day / not allowed at most spots. Same thing occurs at all R. I spots.

**Smoke Screen** · 09-14-13 14:57

Originally Posted by Ledger6969 [View Original Post]

According to SS he says the place is LEGIT, THEN WHY did Susan have home base there for years and years the hair salon on Hudson is definitely very selective in who they will provide services the owners make sure of that. Definitely, things are done more covertly at this location. But rest assured when everything is said and done the salon provides similar services.

What you say is half true. While similar services are available, not all the providers will go along with it, and 2 pop is long gone.