Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 29,566 to 29,580 of 42936
-
06-13-13 17:31 #13371Senior Member

Posts: 42Had my first visit with Wendy last week. Easily my best first-time visit ever. Great tease and ending. Chatting as we were finishing up she hinted that there was more on the menu. Anyone have any advice reviews on additional options? PM is fine.
Originally Posted by Jeevs
[View Original Post]
-
06-13-13 13:37 #13370Banned Member

Posts: 792Monkey see monkey do.
Originally Posted by Top Floor
[View Original Post]
I guess this will have a rippling effect all over to disrupt service for awhile and make the providers tighten up.
What will happen next? Special I'd pass keys to pass the LE inspection? OH AARP cum to the rescue!
I wonder what the implications would be if LE is asked if they are LE and they lie?
-
06-13-13 10:37 #13369Senior Member

Posts: 460Here's the story. And as usual, there's a part of it that's inaccurate that I won't disclose here.
http://www.salemnews.com/local/x1912...y-across-state
Originally Posted by BaconBits
[View Original Post]
-
06-13-13 07:40 #13368Senior Member

Posts: 473Interesting
Pretty in depth article. Interesting read.
Originally Posted by BaconBits
[View Original Post]
-
06-13-13 06:28 #13367Senior Member

Posts: 723Salemeveningnews
Guys, I can't attach story. But if anyone can feel free. Check out today's Salem evening news. Great article on AMP's.
BB
-
06-13-13 00:30 #13366Senior Member

Posts: 106Body and Soul
Body and soul.
So called my recent favorite spot (Shawsheen) for an appointment, booked, everything ok to arrive in 30 mins. 10 min later I get a call from strange number saying they had a walk-in, can I come in an hour. Of course not, only limited time to practice my serves at the club. She says I can go to their new spot and gives me the address. I'm worried (see previous post about my LE heads up) and curious. New chicks, table shower? I reschedule for 3 hrs later at the new spot after I cook dinner. So GPS takes me to a new part of town. I drive up and people are in front of the building shooting a commercial (WTF)! Get scared, call and verify address and ask if they know people with a camera are out front. Yes, come in. Long story short, entrance is on the side of the large building not the front.
Inside the spot, OK setup but no One Spa hotties! Typical 30/40ish Asian nothing to get hard about. Pay 60 fee, undress and get on table. Good massage, I've had better (Jenny) but pretty good. Lite chatter, name Katie.
Massage is winding down and she does the light finger over the body. I'm thinking standard finish. Adds some oil and starts one of the best HE I've had here. Spends 10 mins rubbing hand or massaging down my crack with slight poking, feels great, grabbing the boys and pulling the rod (milking style). I'm lifting my but and then I'm on my knees because this feels great, I want her to milk me in that position. So 10 to 15 minutes of this and she has me flip and finishes me off with a standard rub. But I wanted to be back on my knees. Finish and tip. 6 for total of 1. 2.
They don't appear to advertise on BP but on CL.
Later.
-
06-12-13 07:57 #13365Senior Member

Posts: 195Research From MGL chapter 272.
Originally Posted by Leggeddog
[View Original Post]
Section 105. (a) As used in this section, the following words shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
'Electronically surveils' or 'electronically surveilled', to view, obtain or record a person's visual image by the use or aid of a camera, cellular or other wireless communication device, computer, television or other electronic device.
'Partially nude', the exposure of the human genitals, buttocks, pubic area or female breast below a point immediately above the top of the areola.
(be) Whoever willfully photographs, videotapes or electronically surveils another person who is nude or partially nude, with the intent to secretly conduct or hide such activity, when the other person in such place and circumstance would have a reasonable expectation of privacy in not being so photographed, videotaped or electronically surveilled, and without that person's knowledge and consent, shall be punished by imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than 21/2 years or by a fine of not more than $5, 000, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
(see) Whoever willfully disseminates the visual image of another person who is nude or partially nude, with knowledge that such visual image was unlawfully obtained in violation of subsection (be) and without consent of the person so depicted, shall be punished by imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than 21/2 years or in the state prison for not more than 5 years or by a fine of not more than $10, 000, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
(the) This section shall not apply to a merchant that electronically surveils a customer changing room, provided that signage warning customers of the merchant's surveillance activity is conspicuously posted at all entrances and in the interior of any changing room electronically surveilled.
(e) This section shall not apply to a law enforcement officer acting within the scope of the officer's authority under applicable law, or by an order or warrant issued by a court.
(f) A sheriff, deputy sheriff or police officer may arrest without a warrant, a person whom he has probable cause to believe has violated this section.
(g) A photograph, videotape or other recorded visual image, depicting a person who is nude or partially nude that is part of any court record arising from a prosecution under this section, shall not be open to public inspection and shall only be made available by court personnel to a law enforcement officer, prosecuting attorney, defendant's attorney, defendant, or victim connected to such prosecution for inspection, unless otherwise ordered by the court.
(h) In a prosecution under this section, a justice of the superior court or district court may issue appropriate orders to restrain or prevent the unlawful dissemination of a person's visual image in violation of this section.
-
06-11-13 22:02 #13364Senior Member

Posts: 31Was there a couple of weeks ago and they did seem a little spooked. I had Julie / Julia and she left my session at one point to help verify if someone was LE or not. When I left, they told me if someone stops me and asks me questions to not mention anything and to leave by the side entrance. I don't know if they were actually feeling any heat from LE or were just extremely spooked by the big bust back in May. I'm just sad that my two favorite places are now gone.
Originally Posted by MrNewton
[View Original Post]
-
06-11-13 20:41 #13363Senior Member

Posts: 297Video
As mention before this is a serious concern. Video taping with surveillance cameras. Be
Originally Posted by Adobe
[View Original Post]
Careful look around
-
06-11-13 20:12 #13362Senior Member

Posts: 87Lilly Spa
I think they are closed at 6pm except for Tuesday and Thursday.
Originally Posted by Top Floor
[View Original Post]
-
06-11-13 17:34 #13361Senior Member

Posts: 1856Good move!
Good move. While I don't know about the other 'ladies' there I do know of one. She is older. Always bitches about the younger ones taking all her clients and giving themselves 'away'. And oh yea this ladies massages are very painful and hurt like hell. And no extras!
Originally Posted by Rito1
[View Original Post]
-
06-11-13 17:29 #13360Senior Member

Posts: 157Waltham WW (Chinese Bodywork)
I have been there several times over the past few months, and have seen 2 providers: Lulu and Lili. I definitely enjoyed Lili (Lee Lee?) way more than Lulu. I read another review of Lulu that is spot on: she has a scar on her belly, and she does this thing where she digs her thumbs into the meat of your buttocks that flat out hurts. I'm not sure why she thinks that feels good. Lili, on the other hand, provides an A+ massage, with lots of teasing, UTC roaming, and a great finish. She has huge, soft nips, and is all-natural below. She is definitely my favorite there. I'm not sure about the hygiene there, though. Both providers bring in a warm tub of water and give you a washdown with towels that you can only hope are clean and sterile. Given the laundry I saw in the bathroom, I'm not convinced. I was also a bit grossed out by a plastic cup with tobacco water and cigarette butts in the bathroom.
-
06-11-13 17:24 #13359Senior Member

Posts: 390Not the first time
Remember the Spa bust in Salem NH. Those of you will recognize the name and recall the bust there.
Originally Posted by Hotboyzz
[View Original Post]
Not a first time poster. The name is two in one.
It was videotape bust much further north that caused my departure. Still lurking.
Take care and stay safe
-
06-11-13 17:13 #13358Senior Member

Posts: 1856That would really suck!
Nuff said. I like that place. Any other info out there?
Originally Posted by MongerExpert
[View Original Post]
-
06-11-13 17:09 #13357Senior Member

Posts: 1856Maybe a little more
Paul. A couple of thoughts here for whatever it is worth. Yes 40 is the standard starting off point. But again I take the intangibles and go from there. If it was a lackluster massage and HJ then yes 40 is fine. But you mentioned she did a great job (A+) , was super friendly and had a lot of enthusiasm and let the girls out to play with gusto. To me I would have given the extra 10 right off the bat and maybe if we really clicked and it was one of my fave haunts I might have gone the extra 20 (for 60 total) to encourage a relationship and good results on a return trip. (there have been reports of an expanded menu in the past from certain girls there) You also mentioned you gave Tina 50 when you saw her. Was Tina's session that much better than Angela's? Again I wasn't there but from what you wrote I would have cultivated a relationship with a little extra. If it worked out then it would be a great deal and if not only 10 or 20 lost.
Originally Posted by Paul Sweeter
[View Original Post]
On the other hand I may just have to go see her based on your report! SO









Reply With Quote



