Thread: General Reports
+
Add Report
Results 13,741 to 13,755 of 18707
-
05-03-13 10:52 #4967Advertiser-Escort

Posts: 734I was told
That the meaning behind this charge is when they were using their phones to warn other people of the bust?
Originally Posted by OldPumper
[View Original Post]
-
05-03-13 10:41 #4966Senior Member

Posts: 421REALLY? 2013 an still that clueless?
This is unreal,
Originally Posted by Loving302
[View Original Post]
Not sure if the gal your speaking of is a provider or not, but one things for sure your not Loving life these days Mr Loving303 that's for damn sure.
Sitting hear scratching my head wondering how a Senior Member could have that many damn post and still be that clueless when it comes to this hobby because you should already know that's a major NO NO.
I'm fresh out of matches and don't have a lighter so I won't try to FLAME to badly on the question. Infractions are pass out on these types of subjects faster then running a red light at an intersection getting caught by the red light camera, therefore I'll say you should make better choices in this life because stupid choices could end it.
OliverOil took the words right out of my head, enough said!
OP
-
05-03-13 10:09 #4965Senior Member

Posts: 700Bare is a no no!
This is a very bad move!
As some one else stated! Let us know; who you see so, we stay away.
Originally Posted by Loving302
[View Original Post]
Bare anal is a no no in my book and always go with a rain coat.
JMHO
Ee
-
05-03-13 10:01 #4964Senior Member

Posts: 421Can't they find better shit to do?
Those LE idiots,
Originally Posted by OrlandoPilot
[View Original Post]
You would think LE would try to help gals who get busted turn over a new leaf and get themselves back on the right track after getting caught for prostitution.
But no instead they would rather bust those gals and tag on extra charges to increase there bonds in an effort to maybe keep them behind bars longer.
They are not solving the problem in fact their just adding to it. More then likely the gals that get the extra charge of Illegal use of a two-way communications device, are the one's who refused to cooperate with LE or may have given LE the potty mouth during their arrest because she may have been pissed off for getting busted in the first place.
That charge when applied to prostitution is almost always in reference to an because a gals laptop / computer or her cell phone was confiscated / seized as evidence at the time of her arrest.
Ever wonder why after a gal gets busted by LE for prostitution then bonds out of jail an comes back to the hobby with a new cell phone number?
Well, in almost every case LEO will take a gals cell phone and computer for sure an keep it as evidence on her prostitution charge, and her laptop or computer is what their really after to prove their case in court because her laptop or computer has all her ad posting info stored in it more then likely if she's busted with it at the time of the arrest.
I'm not 100% sure but I think if LE was tying to be really nasty with a monger they could charge a monger with Illegal use of a two-way communications device if the monger was caught with a (LE decoy) prostitutes phone number in his phone at the time of his arrest if their decoy was communicating back and forth will him via cell phone during a sting operation. Again don't hold me to this because I'm not 100% sure about it, but that could be considered using a two communication device in the commission of a crime I would think. As well as using a computer / laptop to aid in placing illegal prostitution ads over the Internet is why a prostitute will get this charge if caught with her laptop at the time of her arrest for prostitution.
If anyone has any thoughts on this feel free to chime in because at the end of the day it's just another stupid ass law on the books IMHO.
OP
-
05-03-13 09:56 #4963Advertiser-Escort

Posts: 598[QUOTE=OliverOil; 1752373]"
Ntm. For some it takes up to 3 months (6 months in rare cases) to develop the anti-bodies that will cause a positive test result. I won't go any further in this thread because there is aalready a place for this conversation here : http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/fo...p?268-Safe-Sex
Originally Posted by Loving302
[View Original Post]
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/basic/
-
05-03-13 08:49 #4962Senior Member

Posts: 963Really bad idea
"[QUOTE=Loving302; 1751917]I have gotten involved with a really cute lady who would love to have Anal without a condom! I have read the good the bad and the ugly about this and wondered if anyone has an opinion."
I don't think you're fully understanding the risks for you, her and your other partners. Please let us know who you see in future so we can avoid them. Thanks
-
05-03-13 03:48 #4961Senior Member

Posts: 236I'm assuming he means have her take the test before you do the deed. Regardless my suggestion to you is think it through and then don't do it
Originally Posted by KingOfTheEarth
[View Original Post]
-
05-02-13 22:52 #4960Senior Member

Posts: 45Risky is a understatement.
Originally Posted by Mojoworks
[View Original Post]
Just my 2 cents
-
05-02-13 22:27 #4959Senior Member

Posts: 154Confused
How does one mitigate their risks after testing positive for HIV?
Originally Posted by Mojoworks
[View Original Post]
-
05-02-13 21:31 #4958Senior Member

Posts: 61That's some risky behavior and normally I would say no way, but now that they have the quick home HIV tests maybe you could mitigate some of your risk.
Originally Posted by Loving302
[View Original Post]
-
05-02-13 20:22 #4957Senior Member

Posts: 154Q for L302
Dude, WTF? You have like 400 posts and this is the first time you are thinking about this? Why are you asking us?
Originally Posted by Loving302
[View Original Post]
-
05-02-13 19:24 #4956Senior Member

Posts: 407Anal With or Without A Condom?
I have gotten involved with a really cute lady who would love to have Anal without a condom! I have read the good the bad and the ugly about this and wondered if anyone has an opinion. This little lady has NO problem taking a digit and admittedly it sounds REALLy tempting. However maintaining my life sounds a whole lot more promising. Your comments are welcome even PM me if you prefer.
Thank you
-
05-02-13 18:20 #4955Senior Member

Posts: 60200 posts?
200 posts? Then you wouldn't give youself any info.
Originally Posted by TRowePrice
[View Original Post]
-
05-02-13 13:50 #4954Regular Member

Posts: 20Scanners, phones, etc.
The point I was making is LE attempting to tack on excessive charges that do not apply. The cases that I looked at were misdemeanors. So the other charge of two-way communication does not apply, as that only applies in the case of a felony.
Originally Posted by SC1975
[View Original Post]
A streetwalker with a police scanner? Not very likely. They have enough problems keeping a cell phone operating.
I believe it is just LE attempting to hang a felony rap on a misdemeanor offense.
-
05-02-13 10:58 #4953Senior Member

Posts: 377Furthermore.
I found more info. Police scanners. Its a felony if you're using it to commit a crime.
Originally Posted by SC1975
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote


