BackPage Advertiser Reviews

**DryAle** · 04-11-13 18:18

Originally Posted by Metloaf [View Original Post]

The original post of DryAle is not accurate. Yes she legit not LE but ads are fake. Thought we were on here to watch each others back but some post are just that setup BS. The girl posting the ad changes names and uses several different reviewed providers pics. The link below is her and she first came to the area two years ago between comfort inn on hill to potomac mills. Mexican girl that was rolling with a nice provider back then. That's how I meet her. The friend I was seeing rates were. 6 to $.5 just don't recall name. This is girl posting now.

http://sf.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts...ls-23/11732136

Funny thing she had ad up yesterday gone already. Stop making fakes out to be good finds.

I did my part, TOFTT, had a good time, and reported back. If you wanted details, all you had to do was PM. You're a trusted senior and would have gotten a detailed response. Don't be accusing me of posting to setup fellow mongers.

BTW her ad is still up, as of today. Just click the link on my original post.

**ZicomoPapi** · 04-11-13 15:42

One pics was used by a different provider in NY.

http://bronx.backpage.com/FemaleEsco...ou-32/24651136

Others point to another provider who goes by April. Her ad says 23, April's ad says 37.

http://www.escortgirlguide.com/escort/profile/aprils-ad

http://jcl630.wix.com/april-nonum#

Her ad:

"HAVE" me. We'll have fun with my 36DD's.

I'm a sexy. 23 yo. 34DD-25-34, 5'5" 120#

Enjoy my face for kissing & other sexy pleasure.

(No hat required for my face)

I will "fully" please you with my erotic attention.

I will relax you & be your own NATURAL PLAYMATE.

I'm naughtier then anyone else.

$200 Special Rate for an Unrushed, Unforgetable Experience.

You WON'T be disappointed. Pictures are real.

Enjoy my warmth & experience your excitement as I entertain you.

CALL NOW. I'm READY.

Kayla Krush.

571-533-75xx.

Poster's age: 23.

• Location: Northern Virginia, Incall Sterling VA, Private Apt & Out 2U.

Be safe gents!

**Metloaf** · 04-11-13 13:06

Originally Posted by Marlo [View Original Post]

Glad she worked out for you. I called, made arrangements, called back once at her location but when I called back to let her know the hotel doors were locked, she put me on hold and never answered my calls the rest of the night. So I guess its safe to say YMMV with her.

The original post of DryAle is not accurate. Yes she legit not LE but ads are fake. Thought we were on here to watch each others back but some post are just that setup BS. The girl posting the ad changes names and uses several different reviewed providers pics. The link below is her and she first came to the area two years ago between comfort inn on hill to potomac mills. Mexican girl that was rolling with a nice provider back then. That's how I meet her. The friend I was seeing rates were. 6 to $.5 just don't recall name. This is girl posting now.

http://sf.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts...ls-23/11732136

Funny thing she had ad up yesterday gone already. Stop making fakes out to be good finds.

**Marlo** · 04-11-13 11:16

Originally Posted by DryAle [View Original Post]

This one caught my eye for some reason. The other board has a review out of Herndon, I saw her in Springfield. Definitely worth the effort. Legit and very fun. PM if you want details.

http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscor...nny-23/9917434

Glad she worked out for you. I called, made arrangements, called back once at her location but when I called back to let her know the hotel doors were locked, she put me on hold and never answered my calls the rest of the night. So I guess its safe to say YMMV with her.

**Metloaf** · 04-11-13 09:01

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster [View Original Post]

When Google gives the answer in 20 seconds?

http://imagetwist.com/4btzfhylrm7v/*_ma1ddsI7vx1qh5vnbo1_. Jpg. Html.

If link stops working, the banned portion is t you m be l are

Seems I wasn't the only curious camper. This just in from another site and when posting I thought the purpose was to help and inform. But until a trusted senior member reports your in the dark to weather is it the provider or management posting this good review or hell LE. Two so so reviews but this quote seemed more true to me " Not a whole lot to say. Typical 2 call system. Got to the room and it was not the same as pics. Nice outfit but would not repeat" the lastest on the shared number for landmark latinas. To much camouflage and smoke cover never a good sign.

**Bunker Buster** · 04-10-13 18:28

Originally Posted by Metloaf [View Original Post]

Fellows thought about visiting Lorena couple weeks ago after doing some homework on her and reading a few reviews but she didn't post the weekend I had time. Than I noticed this number with another latina provider shock was the same in Lorena ad 571*2694223. Any info on the crew? Are pics somewhat accurate? Or just waste of time? Several didn't names and pics same number but Lorena reviews look legit.

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Fem...na-24/10613655

When Google gives the answer in 20 seconds?

http://imagetwist.com/4btzfhylrm7v/******_ma1ddsI7vx1qh5vnbo1_.jpg.html

If link stops working, the banned portion is t u m b l r

**Powkid** · 04-10-13 17:37

Went to see Chloe for a nice body rub after falling in love with her pics. She's working out of an upscale location in Tyson's corner and the pictures are really her! I spent 1hr with her which included a body rub and shower. Good time, but very limited menu. Nice girl but for the price I want a little more action.

http://wonderfulchloe.wix.com/chloe1

Stay safe!

**Metloaf** · 04-10-13 17:07

Fellows thought about visiting Lorena couple weeks ago after doing some homework on her and reading a few reviews but she didn't post the weekend I had time. Than I noticed this number with another latina provider shock was the same in Lorena ad 571*2694223. Any info on the crew? Are pics somewhat accurate? Or just waste of time? Several didn't names and pics same number but Lorena reviews look legit.

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Fem...na-24/10613655

**Grafenberg** · 04-09-13 20:19

I visited Chelsea Marie. Was not pepper sprayed or robbed, had an enjoyable time with her.

**Bunker Buster** · 04-09-13 16:12

Pix are of an internet hottie named Brooke Marks.

http://img.adultsearch.com/classifie...wU1Kl13Dyc.jpg

704-604-7215

**JoeFreeman** · 04-09-13 15:38

Ok, I saw Maddie last week while she was in Sterling. If you're into girls with extra meat then she'll fit the bill. She is the girl in the photo. However she is not 25. I'm not the best at age guessing but if I did guess I'the add about 7-10 yrs. Photos do not show the round belly either, it wasn't a deal killer but just wasn't expecting it. Nice hotel, set it up by a series of text, voice le check when I arrived then she gave me the room number. I opted for the short session which is prolly why I kinda got the rush treatment on the CBJ, I did do a little dining myself. Where I discovered the clit piersing. Started in k9 till she asked if we could switch to mish, we did where I finished. Apart from the slight rushing on the CBJ I don't have anything bad to say about the session. Best part was the k9 just for the view. She'll do in a pinch for something quick, nothing stood out that would make me want a longer visit. I doubt that I would repeat. .6 was the damage.

http://washingtondc.backpage.com/Fem...is-25/10588432

Hello! I'm back to the area. My name is Maddie. I'm young, vibrant, sweet & sexy. Ready to please and give the best service you can find. No rushed sessions! I'm very friendly! Ill make you feel comfortable & at ease.

40 DD <<

Warm thick thighs <<

BoOT¥ £I€iouS <<

Be@utiFu£ F@c€ <<

Please! Serious Inquiries Only!

I accept phone calls, texts & emails!

Maddie 202-436-2338 Ask about pics! Ill send you a couple! .

**ZicomoPapi** · 04-09-13 15:18

Imagine that, I provider using another provider's pictures.

Alexis is using Kali's pics. I notified Kali about this and she said this provider has been doing this for a while even through she has contacted her and asked her to stop. I have never seen Alexis so can't report on that, but any provider that uses another's pictures is plenty of reason to scratch them off the list to see.

See safe out there gents.

http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscor...wn-24/10403833

Hi I'm Alexis, I'm a HOTT Blonde SUPER-Sweet, ExTrA-Sexy, & VeRy PLaYFuLL LET *ME* Make Your DREAMS Come True I'm Down-2-Earth, SWeeT aS PiE, & eVeRy MAN'S Fantasy.

Let me TReAt you LiKe A *KiNG*

As Far as my Pictures. TheY don't DO ME JusTIce.

I'm KNoWn 2 B *HiGHLy* aDDiCTiVe.

CaLL ME NoW, don't ReGReT iT LaTeR.

AlExiS. 615 289 43xx Please no black men under the age of 36.

Poster's age: 24.

• Location: Northern Virginia, herndon in / out specials.

• Post ID: 10403833 nova

**JmSuttr** · 04-08-13 19:06

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster [View Original Post]

That you could have easily made your report top shelf with very little effort. This isn't about going the extra mile; it's about going the extra foot.

I never said anything about keeping reports to yourself or having to meet my standards; just wondering why some people set their own where they do.

If I was asking for information, I would absolutely agree with you regarding the research steps that ought to be taken before asking others for help. But when I'm offering help, in the form of a heads-up, no matter how brief (as long as it's accurate) , then it seems to me that the help ought simply to be accepted in the spirit in which it was offered. If I was on the other side of that trade, that's what I would do.

Think of it as a practical application of the 80/20 rule. What I put out there was the 20% of the info that was important for that moment. If somebody was interested enough in seeing her to want to do the other 80% of the research, then that's absolutely fine, but that's on them to work out.

Anyway, I'm done with my soapbox. At the end of the day, it's all about sharing timely, quality info and keeping safe out there.

Cheers

**Bunker Buster** · 04-08-13 18:48

Originally Posted by JmSuttr [View Original Post]

Dear BB, I didn't look for further info on this chick since, once I determined her pics were suspect with a quick Google / Escortphonesearch check, I had absolutely zero interest. Had I wanted to get further info, I would have RTFF and searched her number and found your post.

My sole purpose for posting was to give others a bit of a heads-up. And it seemed to me that the info I provided was sufficient to do that. Anyone reading my post would then see the red flag and could then do whatever amount of research they felt was appropriate for their purposes. And what you call "wishy washy" was my desire not to trash someone unnecessarily. Since the number is associated with Ginger, who has good reports on this forum and elsewhere, I chose to give her (and Sasha) the benefit of the doubt. As happens from time to time, a provider may not use accurate pics but might still be worth seeing.

Your research skills are well-known but, if what your saying is that any warning must meet your standards or else be subject to criticism, then just let me know and I'll keep them to myself. FWIW, I wasn't asking anyone for anything, I was making an honest effort to contribute.

That you could have easily made your report top shelf with very little effort. This isn't about going the extra mile; it's about going the extra foot.

I never said anything about keeping reports to yourself or having to meet my standards; just wondering why some people set their own where they do.

**JmSuttr** · 04-07-13 21:32

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster [View Original Post]

And made it definitive rather than wishy-washy, with a ten-second Google image search.

The pix belong to Camerella Cams and GND Kayla, and have been stolen and reused all over the internet.

In fact, if you'd searched the phone number in Google, or even just this thread, you'd have found my post from October.

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...35#post1571031

Dear BB, I didn't look for further info on this chick since, once I determined her pics were suspect with a quick Google / Escortphonesearch check, I had absolutely zero interest. Had I wanted to get further info, I would have RTFF and searched her number and found your post.

My sole purpose for posting was to give others a bit of a heads-up. And it seemed to me that the info I provided was sufficient to do that. Anyone reading my post would then see the red flag and could then do whatever amount of research they felt was appropriate for their purposes. And what you call "wishy washy" was my desire not to trash someone unnecessarily. Since the number is associated with Ginger, who has good reports on this forum and elsewhere, I chose to give her (and Sasha) the benefit of the doubt. As happens from time to time, a provider may not use accurate pics but might still be worth seeing.

Your research skills are well-known but, if what your saying is that any warning must meet your standards or else be subject to criticism, then just let me know and I'll keep them to myself. FWIW, I wasn't asking anyone for anything, I was making an honest effort to contribute.