Thread: Backpage Advertiser Reviews
+
Add Report
Results 13,846 to 13,860 of 19537
-
04-10-13 10:56 #5692Senior Member

Posts: 1898Toftt?
It's a Covington number but the ad location says Cincinnati / Fairfield. I found a duplicate ad on Eroticmugshots but nothing in other locations. She doesn't give a work name making it impossible to check references or reviews. It would make me nervous on two counts: 1) could be a trap; or 2) could be someone trying this out and you get a completely inexperienced experience. That said, maybe you should buy her a cup of coffee and report back.
Originally Posted by HotnCoolPk
[View Original Post]
-
04-10-13 10:37 #5691Senior Member

Posts: 180She's Legit
She's legit. Keeps a little muff around the ginger the majority of the time. Attitude-9 Skills-7ish a little on the thin side 32Aish breasts. YMMV, I've had several deams with her and each time was nice.
Originally Posted by HotnCoolPk
[View Original Post]
-
04-10-13 08:07 #5690Senior Member

Posts: 31Any info on this one
I've seen her posts before, probably a year or so ago. Did research on google. Even Tineye, came up nothing. Good thing I suppose. Any info would be appreciated. Here or PM me.
Happy Hunting
-
04-10-13 01:20 #5689Senior Member

Posts: 42New BP girl
Does anybody have info on this gal?
http://cincinnati.backpage.com/Femal...-p-23/13377039
Tinyeye and phone number search didn't yield anything. PMs are welcome. Thank you!
-
04-10-13 00:21 #5688Senior Member

Posts: 325Reposted from another thread into this one. On to what I can tell you:
Originally Posted by NKY747
[View Original Post]
Top one is definitely legit, though not FS, at least according to my friend. Body rub, BBBJnoCIM, HJ finish according to him. Not everyone's cup of tea in terms of looks probably, but a genuinely nice girl. PM me if you want some additional details, and please, treat her well if you decide to go.
Second one looks familiar to me for some reason, but I have no hard intel to offer. Google Image Search only spit out the Backpage ads, so that's a good sign. Googling the number yielded nothing. The only thing that seems like a minor red flag is the fact that she never hashes up the phone number in the exact same way twice. Spammers of all stripes will sometimes do that to defeat systems on websites that look for duplicate / overposts (or sites that have a ban against posting phone numbers / contact info). Probably OK IMHO, but that's a decision you have to make for yourself.
Number 3 is flat-out fraudulent. The first red flag is no phone number. The number of legit providers that will post on Backpage and not post a phone number or some other method of contact can probably be counted on one hand. The photo came clean through Tineye, but Google Image told a different story. The bad (rectangular) crop job made suspicious too.
http://www.flickriver.com/groups/big...l/interesting/
Number 4 looks ok as well. Google Images spit back ads on BP and elsewhere dating back to October. I didn't dig into all of them, but the ones with #'s in snippet seem to match. Same with Googling the phone number.
Now with the meat of the reports out of the way, I have a couple of quick things to add regarding the discussion on the other thread. I get that PhatDaty came down on you pretty hard, and I hope that through this post, I've demonstrated that he doesn't speak for all of the seniors on this board. Don't get me wrong; I'm not in the "I hate PhatDATY" club that also seems to exist on this board. I don't know the man, and his posts may be bombastic and sometimes (as you've seen) unnecessarily rude, but he posts good, accurate intel (yes at a level of detail that makes some folks uncomfortable, but that's another thread) , and that's what we're all about as a community (such as it is) here. Also, he wasn't wrong in terms of points he made, either. It was posted in the wrong thread, and it is always good to include any research you've done (tineye etc). I don't necessarily mind helping like this when I have the time, but that's rare, so hopefully you're willing and able to pay this forward the next time to the next poor guy that lands in PD's crosshairs over a post like that LOL.
And yes, fellow seniors, I get that the volume of "know anything about this one" posts gets aggravating, but I'm imploring you to take a deep breath and either ignore or gently advise the new members that do this. I've been here long enough to know that it will _never_ go away. Full stop. We can probably improve it by teaching the noobs how to do what we do, and I think that's the best solution, but I also understand that not everyone feels inclined to teach, and that's OK too. What can hurt us, though, is running off new members who are trying to cut their teeth by being pricks about simple things like the original post. And that's not pointed solely at PD either; others are guilty, and if you go far enough back in my post history, you might even catch me doing it once or twice. I'm no saint, and I'm certainly no holier than anyone else here. I just think we can help ourselves by not being jerks. Just my 2c. I'm sure I'll get flamed for filling the above request, but I hope I've outlined why I chose to do it.
That said. 747, I also want to be clear that you've earned my respect as well through info you've relayed that kept me out of a potentially hazardous situation. That's why I was so willing to do the legwork for this. In short, you're good in my book, and hopefully I've now given you the tools to do some research on your own. Always Use Google (AUG). Numbers, pictures, email addresses, anything that identifies an ad or makes it unique.
One last thing, I know that a lot of you guys like Tineye, but seriously, stop. It sucks. Google Image search will spit back similar images, which is incredibly useful in picking out spammer images like out lovely (?) number three above. It's simple to use, too. Simply click on the picture in the ad until you get to the full size image, then right click. Copy image URL, then open Google. Tab Images. Click on the camera in the search box. Right click. Paste. You WILL get some false-positives from sites that use thumbnails of all images in their own ads on ad pages, but those are usually easy to pick out by their small size (usually square-ish, in the 70x70 to the 90x90 range). You can always click through if you're not sure.
Hopefully this helps a bunch of you guys. Stay safe out there gents.
-
04-09-13 23:05 #5687Senior Member

Posts: 243Anyone?
Anyone met with this girl. This is one of those,"pictures almost too good to be true" ads for me that makes a new guy nervous. LOL.
http://cincinnati.backpage.com/Femal...un-25/12165074
-
04-09-13 22:37 #5686Senior Member

Posts: 243Too good to be true?
Some of these ads have pictures that simply are too good to be true. LOL So many choices for a new guy! Argh!
-
04-09-13 22:23 #5685Senior Member

Posts: 243Oh, oops! I search quite a few pages back. Maybe I missed it or didn't go far enough.
Originally Posted by Bucks9297
[View Original Post]
Thanks for the head's up though!
-
04-09-13 21:58 #5684Senior Member

Posts: 474Coco let down
Rub and Tug only complete let down. She is the woman in pics.
Originally Posted by JustMe79
[View Original Post]
-
04-09-13 21:30 #5683Senior Member

Posts: 265Thanks for the sarcastic post Ahole!
Originally Posted by TheGoodSh
[View Original Post]
Admittedly, I tried the Tineye test and she passed that one but I'm not a spring chicken to think that the photos might not be fake. There have been instances where the photo wasn't real but gal/service was still decent was my point in asking. We're all on the same team here dhead so we may want to act like it.
-
04-09-13 21:22 #5682Senior Member

Posts: 265Coco
Keep searching thru the reviews because I've seen some and placed one myself. YMMV but the girl inthe pic is accurate. Location 3 service 4 and Not a repeat for me.
Originally Posted by JustMe79
[View Original Post]
Bucks
-
04-09-13 17:11 #5681Senior Member

Posts: 84Search for Corri. You'll find some info. Beautiiful girl, not much menu, and pricey at that. Or at least she was 2 months ago or so. No idea if she's changed.
Originally Posted by JustMe79
[View Original Post]
-
04-09-13 15:56 #5680Senior Member

Posts: 722Pretty Damn Funny
Wow, that was harsh but really funny. Wish I would have said it.
Originally Posted by Countryboy72
[View Original Post]
Originally Posted by TheGoodSh
[View Original Post]
-
04-09-13 15:54 #5679Senior Member

Posts: 99Ok
I browsed one that was a tranny named Queenie on BP and I wouldn't want to run into that situation.
Originally Posted by Mlive123
[View Original Post]
Sorry to penisless Queenie
-
04-09-13 15:05 #5678Senior Member

Posts: 243Has anyone met with CoCo?
I'm a sucker for those eyes. LOL Any info? (Yes, I am new and yes I have tried to scour the forums for her before I asked. The search bar is a *****.)
http://cincinnati.backpage.com/BodyR...bs-22/12944430










Reply With Quote






