Rubrankings.com
rubmaps
High Class Companions
Live Escorts
Top Escorts
The hottest girls are here
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Meet Sugar Babies
High Class Companions
Live Escorts
Top Escorts
The hottest girls are here
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Meet Sugar Babies
High Class Companions
Live Escorts
Top Escorts
The hottest girls are here
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Meet Sugar Babies
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #3474

    Winwithjen

    I saw her last week, pics are accurate, decent incall. But a far drive out to New Richmond. Very nice girl but she is kind of shy, no clock watching, no rushing, I stayed the full hour. BBBJCIM skills are excellent. Hope this helps.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hillbilly Bob  [View Original Post]
    Does anyone have any input on winwithjen.

  2. #3473

    Nice Retort

    Now that is an entertaining read and a very good way to make a point.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dweezil  [View Original Post]
    Fully agree and there's an equally important flip side."what a guy chooses to pay is his own business". To extend DN's metaphor a little, why do I care if some guy is willing to pay for a Lamborghini. I'm not because it's just not a good value to me. Even if I could drop a couple hundred grand on a car, that's not where I'd spend it. For 200k, I could do a lot of other things first. But that doesn't make the guy who can (and does) get one a jerk.

    I wouldn't know Cindy Kemp from Clark Kent but if she has a service model that can command $450 / hour I only have 3 words on the topic "fanf*ckingtastic for her". And if any of you guys have to cash to lay out for that and you think it's a value,"fanf*ckingtastic for you too". This is capitalism 101. Ain't America great.

    Here's the thing. It is ALL about VALUE. I don't care if we're talking about dropping 0. 20 for a drive by BBBJ versus. 30 or paying $$/hr versus $.5 / hr. All this crap about how "it's raising prices for the rest of us" is just that. It's horsehockey. It only raises prices if you don't know what value you're willing to pay for. It's only raising prices if you spend your time negotiating with the little head instead of the big head. If it's not a value, don't buy it. Move on to the next place where you might find a value.

    My friend. I know he overpays some provider partners but to him they're a good value even at the slightly higher price. For whatever reason. Location, ambiance, they remind him of an old high school girlfriend, or that tickle his nutsack with a feather while calling him "stallion". For whatever reason, those providers are a value to him.

    You might not think they're worth the price. Who cares?

    They may not charge you the same price he pays, they may charge you less. Who cares?

    There are some providers who my friend has decided to not see because the value isn't obvious. Their prices seem high to him. They're not bad providers and they're not bad people, they're just not good providers FOR HIM. He's talked to several of them and they're smart women who run a good business and have an appropriately positive opinion of their worth in this area. My friend thinks they might be a little high. So what. If you can't pay the toll, don't drive the road.

    No hard feelings. They're still good people and for many mongers, they may be perfect provider partners.

    But com'on guys, don't slam a potential provider partner because she has built a business you can't afford. That's just un-American. LOL.

    Have a great day.

    Dz

  3. #3472

    Re: Sara

    After she posts on BP, she starts to take calls. She will not return them from voice mail so if you call during a session, you are out of luck.

    I can tell you she is clean, willing and damn good. Very worth the $$$ and I have been a repeat.

    Quote Originally Posted by DickHerDown  [View Original Post]
    I've read several good things about the BP Sara in Norwood. The problem for me is that she NEVER answers her phone! Any pointers on how to actually get in touch with her would be greatly appreciated.

  4. #3471
    You do what you feel dude. I'm not here to lie to anybody. I just wonder why you have such a hard on for this particular girl (see what I did there?) when every other ad on the internet is sporting fake pics. The first pic in the new ad IS REAL. That IS in fact the girl called Nadia. If you don't want to get with her don't.

    Quote Originally Posted by D Nut  [View Original Post]
    It is not much of a misrepresentation","She looks just like that anyway.","It's close enough.","She likes her privacy.". These are all the standard response when someone gets called out on using fake pics. However, what I really have a problem with, is after being called out for fake pics the first time, the response is MORE fake pics? Did she not think someone would check. AGAIN? Whoever SingleDad513 is, he really screwed up the girls he's representing with that little stunt. Anyone who has read the boards know someone ALWAYS checks. I know I do until one gets verified and vetted by someone 100% trustworthy.

    The girls say they need 2 references from a guy to make an appointment. With the red flags using fake pics sends up, it sounds more like they need to provide 2 references themselves from WELL ESTABLISHED MEMBERS.

    I don't want to seem like I'm attacking you WyldeChild, but you're pretty new. To me, you don't sling the same weight as Big Mack, or Warlock, or Golfcart.

    Who is willing to stand up for these women? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

  5. #3470

    Correction

    Quote Originally Posted by TheStigyEh  [View Original Post]
    So I'm browsing along the site tonight having a perfectly pleasant evening, enjoying a cocktail, relishing the after-glow positive feelings of my first visit to Blake which occurred earlier this evening (review forthcoming in the near future) and what do I happen upon?

    Seriously? Say it isn't so Hannah2 / RemmeyLynn?

    http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...=1#post1715445

    Note the publisher.

    All I can think is "Sasha Gray take me away"?

    Sigh,

    The Stig
    Opps. I meant Sasha Black. That's the problem with posting after a couple cocktails.

  6. #3469

    Singledad513

    So is this "singledad513" guy Nadia's handle. Is that her?

  7. #3468

    Sara?

    I've read several good things about the BP Sara in Norwood. The problem for me is that she NEVER answers her phone! Any pointers on how to actually get in touch with her would be greatly appreciated.

  8. #3467

    SingleDad513

    So I'm browsing along the site tonight having a perfectly pleasant evening, enjoying a cocktail, relishing the after-glow positive feelings of my first visit to Blake which occurred earlier this evening (review forthcoming in the near future) and what do I happen upon?

    Seriously? Say it isn't so Hannah2 / RemmeyLynn?

    http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...=1#post1715445

    Note the publisher.

    All I can think is "Sasha Gray take me away"?

    Sigh,

    The Stig

  9. #3466

    Nadia

    So is she real and worth it then? I have talked to her, but haven't met yet.

  10. #3465
    Senior Member


    Posts: 2645
    Quote Originally Posted by WyldeChild99  [View Original Post]
    Yes, the original pics are fake. As is the close up that D is talking about, although it is not much of a misrepresentation. She's short, and thin with some serious boobs. The first pic in the new ad is most definitely her."How do I know", you might ask. Well, it's because I had one of those "dream" meetings with her yesterday.

    She's got a few tats, which is a plus for this guy, and she f*ed the living hell out of me. BBBJ, CG, RCG, DOGGY, MISH, DATY, COB, and I'd imagine anything else. We hit it off well, and I had a really good time with her, all for $$.
    ". It is not much of a misrepresentation","She looks just like that anyway.","It's close enough.","She likes her privacy.". These are all the standard response when someone gets called out on using fake pics. However, what I really have a problem with, is after being called out for fake pics the first time, the response is MORE fake pics? Did she not think someone would check. AGAIN? Whoever SingleDad513 is, he really screwed up the girls he's representing with that little stunt. Anyone who has read the boards know someone ALWAYS checks. I know I do until one gets verified and vetted by someone 100% trustworthy.

    The girls say they need 2 references from a guy to make an appointment. With the red flags using fake pics sends up, it sounds more like they need to provide 2 references themselves from WELL ESTABLISHED MEMBERS.

    I don't want to seem like I'm attacking you WyldeChild, but you're pretty new. To me, you don't sling the same weight as Big Mack, or Warlock, or Golfcart.

    Who is willing to stand up for these women? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

  11. #3464
    Quote Originally Posted by WyldeChild99  [View Original Post]
    Yes, the original pics are fake. As is the close up that D is talking about, although it is not much of a misrepresentation. She's short, and thin with some serious boobs. The first pic in the new ad is most definitely her."How do I know", you might ask. Well, it's because I had one of those "dream" meetings with her yesterday.

    She's got a few tats, which is a plus for this guy, and she f*ed the living hell out of me. BBBJ, CG, RCG, DOGGY, MISH, DATY, COB, and I'd imagine anything else. We hit it off well, and I had a really good time with her, all for $$.
    I talked to Nadia (I think) on the phone and she said she just moved to Covington. We never did meet because I heard her pics are fake. Anyone know her story?

  12. #3463
    Quote Originally Posted by WyldeChild99  [View Original Post]
    Yes, the original pics are fake. As is the close up that D is talking about, although it is not much of a misrepresentation. She's short, and thin with some serious boobs. The first pic in the new ad is most definitely her."How do I know", you might ask. Well, it's because I had one of those "dream" meetings with her yesterday.

    She's got a few tats, which is a plus for this guy, and she f*ed the living hell out of me. BBBJ, CG, RCG, DOGGY, MISH, DATY, COB, and I'd imagine anything else. We hit it off well, and I had a really good time with her, all for $$.
    Thank you, I'm pleased you enjoyed yourself and for the great review! Hope to dream with you again real soon.

  13. #3462

    RE; Nadia and the pics

    Yes, the original pics are fake. As is the close up that D is talking about, although it is not much of a misrepresentation. She's short, and thin with some serious boobs. The first pic in the new ad is most definitely her."How do I know", you might ask. Well, it's because I had one of those "dream" meetings with her yesterday.

    She's got a few tats, which is a plus for this guy, and she f*ed the living hell out of me. BBBJ, CG, RCG, DOGGY, MISH, DATY, COB, and I'd imagine anything else. We hit it off well, and I had a really good time with her, all for $$.

  14. #3461
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1395

    That was my point Warlock when I was hobbying back in the day

    Quote Originally Posted by WarlockKy  [View Original Post]
    CK believed herself to be the queen bee as soon as she hit national #1 on the large canine board list and it was a classic case of believing her own press.

    This resulted in her clashing with any lady that appeared to be ready to take #1 as well as offering deals for reviews in order to keep her name on top. The lady understood the value of marketing (which if I remember right was what her BA was in) and knew the value of having "Rated #1 on." in the header on her site.

    Which in business we refer to as creating her brand.

    I met her several times socially, but never opted to meet even though I had a "coupon" for 1 appointment of multiple hours at $200 / hr + 1 hr free with no expiration date that I received when she was helping Sara raise money to support the old escortamerica board (you got the coupon if you donated $100 to the board). For me there was nothing about CK that really made her stand out compared to her peers at the time unlike say Taylor Fox, Nikki Spence or Sara Jade so this was purely a matter of personal preference.

    Strangely enough until I came across the screen saver that I built for CK back in 2003 about a month ago I hadn't even thought about her in years.
    Everyone has a choice as to how to spend their dollars and women what to charge for them. If we don't like it we say no. No argument there. My personal guidance has always been if I am going to spend top dollar on a lady what is she giving me that the others aren't? The other ladies mentioned in posts will all be a friend experience and are quite good at it. I never saw Rhonda Day time issues or Gemini due to distance, and wouldn't see CK due to her over inflated needs. Most of us work hard for our money and when we meet a lady for pleasure we want to get a lot of quality at needs that will allow us to see her often. If a guy has the $$s and wants to spend them his choice. I value my resources much more than just to say I "I saw Candy Kemp" I would much rather see the others. It has nothing to do with Lamborghini's and Toyotas, it has to do with service and enjoyment vs resources for me. For others it might be for other reasons. When I can see Silk at 2 and she is HOT, or Sasha Black, Jasmine, Help me Rhonda and numerous UTR's JJ, Mandy etc at their needs, don't have to look for the high rollers. Again it all comes down to personal preference. No one is right or wrong but as my Bro said, what is in your wallet? Let me add how deep are your pockets. Believe Warlock said it best. What happens when you become a victim of your status and own advertising. Have a great day and hope you all disn't get hit by the storm as we did.

  15. #3460
    Quote Originally Posted by TheStigyEh  [View Original Post]
    There goes my over-inflated sense of self. Oh well, it was nice while it latest. I had the same experience as well. She enjoys her "job".

    "He also said that she had more pops than he did."
    My friend said she had 2 Mt. Dews, he only had 1. Maybe she was equally satisfied by you both, or really does love her job and has a few mt. Dews everytime she's thirsty.

    Either way, you're over-inflated sense of self is still in tact.

    PS. My friend was married once & can easily tell the difference between a fake Diet Mt. Dew and a real, fully caffeinated Mt. Dew.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Tier Escorts
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Tier Escorts
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Tier Escorts

Protected by Copyscape