Thread: Escort Classified Ads - Member Discussions
+
Add Report
Results 9,871 to 9,885 of 13329
-
03-24-13 23:03 #3459Senior Member

Posts: 136Thanks D Nut
Thanks for pointing these out. Lots of good posts from you lately and greatly appreciated.
-
03-24-13 22:51 #3458Senior Member

Posts: 2645SingleDad513 posted FAKE PICS AGAIN!
I can only shake my head. After being called out for posting fake pics of Nadia last night, his / her solution is to post ANOTHER FAKE PIC? Seriously?
Scroll down a little on this page: http://blue-eyedvixen.com/2010/06/me...hands-and-tft/
And here: http://images.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/avatars/coolnerd69/coolnerd69-1286319481.jpg
And here: http://discretedivasusie.com/photos.phtml
I can only shake my head, and go, WTF!
-
03-24-13 22:48 #3457Senior Member

Posts: 121Hahahaha. She doesn't like the fake pic talk. She has no problems with the fake pictures. She just doesn't like people calling her out on it. I love it. Thanks for a good laugh.
Originally Posted by Jalex
[View Original Post]
-
03-24-13 20:40 #3456Senior Member

Posts: 1141This seems to have gone way past my original post.
CK believed herself to be the queen bee as soon as she hit national #1 on the large canine board list and it was a classic case of believing her own press.
Originally Posted by D Nut
[View Original Post]
This resulted in her clashing with any lady that appeared to be ready to take #1 as well as offering deals for reviews in order to keep her name on top. The lady understood the value of marketing (which if I remember right was what her BA was in) and knew the value of having "Rated #1 on." in the header on her site.
Which in business we refer to as creating her brand.
I met her several times socially, but never opted to meet even though I had a "coupon" for 1 appointment of multiple hours at $200 / hr + 1 hr free with no expiration date that I received when she was helping Sara raise money to support the old escortamerica board (you got the coupon if you donated $100 to the board). For me there was nothing about CK that really made her stand out compared to her peers at the time unlike say Taylor Fox, Nikki Spence or Sara Jade so this was purely a matter of personal preference.
Strangely enough until I came across the screen saver that I built for CK back in 2003 about a month ago I hadn't even thought about her in years.
-
03-24-13 20:12 #3455Senior Member

Posts: 307Fully agree and there's an equally important flip side."what a guy chooses to pay is his own business". To extend DN's metaphor a little, why do I care if some guy is willing to pay for a Lamborghini. I'm not because it's just not a good value to me. Even if I could drop a couple hundred grand on a car, that's not where I'd spend it. For 200k, I could do a lot of other things first. But that doesn't make the guy who can (and does) get one a jerk.
Originally Posted by D Nut
[View Original Post]
I wouldn't know Cindy Kemp from Clark Kent but if she has a service model that can command $450 / hour I only have 3 words on the topic "fanf*ckingtastic for her". And if any of you guys have to cash to lay out for that and you think it's a value,"fanf*ckingtastic for you too". This is capitalism 101. Ain't America great.
Here's the thing. It is ALL about VALUE. I don't care if we're talking about dropping 0. 20 for a drive by BBBJ versus. 30 or paying $$/hr versus $.5 / hr. All this crap about how "it's raising prices for the rest of us" is just that. It's horsehockey. It only raises prices if you don't know what value you're willing to pay for. It's only raising prices if you spend your time negotiating with the little head instead of the big head. If it's not a value, don't buy it. Move on to the next place where you might find a value.
My friend. I know he overpays some provider partners but to him they're a good value even at the slightly higher price. For whatever reason. Location, ambiance, they remind him of an old high school girlfriend, or that tickle his nutsack with a feather while calling him "stallion". For whatever reason, those providers are a value to him.
You might not think they're worth the price. Who cares?
They may not charge you the same price he pays, they may charge you less. Who cares?
There are some providers who my friend has decided to not see because the value isn't obvious. Their prices seem high to him. They're not bad providers and they're not bad people, they're just not good providers FOR HIM. He's talked to several of them and they're smart women who run a good business and have an appropriately positive opinion of their worth in this area. My friend thinks they might be a little high. So what. If you can't pay the toll, don't drive the road.
No hard feelings. They're still good people and for many mongers, they may be perfect provider partners.
But com'on guys, don't slam a potential provider partner because she has built a business you can't afford. That's just un-American. LOL.
Have a great day.
Dz
-
03-24-13 19:34 #3454Senior Member

Posts: 2645One last comment on CK then I'm done
So let me get this straight. The complaints against Candy Kemp is because you COULDN'T see her? All those hard feelings and negativity is because you were denied by your wallets? Isn't that unfair? That's like being pissed off at Lamborghini because you can only afford to drive a Mercedes or a Toyota.
What happened to old,"What a lady chooses to charge is her own business."? She didn't deny you. YOU denied you, by virtue of your career choices and your financial situation.
Publicly comparing her rates against the rates of other ladies does a disservice not only to Candy, but to the other ladies as well, and to the hobby in general. It's saying that the experience each lady provides are exactly the same and should be priced equally. One minute with Candy is the same minute with Rhonda, or with Chantal, or Gemini, or (among the new crop) Dawn, Molly, Brandy or Nicole the Nympho.
-
03-24-13 18:51 #3453Banned Member

Posts: 5352Winwithjen
Does anyone have any input on winwithjen.
-
03-24-13 18:25 #3452Senior Member

Posts: 898Back in the GOOD OLD DAYS BOYS LOL
NS 200+100 each hour after Chantel 3 or 2 for six Help me Rhonda 200 and 100 after first hour, I am talking about help me Rhonda not Rhonda Day from Louisville, Margarita 250 and 450 for two. Gem 350 or two for six. Silk 200 and 1 to 150 second hour. All as good as CK and none hitting you for 900 for a two hour minimum first time I have nothing against CK except her prices for first timers were ridiculous. Even if you had seen her once her two hour was seven to 900 and that was way back in the day. China was 3 and hour and floated 2 or three for the second hour. Calia was 250 to 3 and same for the second hour. I appreciate the break down and forgot about RDay who seems has just come back out again. In Louisville there is a woman named Jordan who is hot as hell and two and hour and 1 to 150 a second hour. Thanks GC for the break down on some lovely ladies from the past. PT
Originally Posted by Golfcart
[View Original Post]
-
03-24-13 18:08 #3451Senior Member

Posts: 174Babyniki
Has anyone had an experience with babyniki?
-
03-24-13 17:58 #3450Senior Member

Posts: 1420The facts:
I'm going to make P-Man's case. Candy Kemp was more expensive than the others.
Originally Posted by Puntang Man
[View Original Post]
Back in the day when all these girls were around:
Rhonda Day $300.
Chantel $350.
Gemini Starr $400.
Candy Kemp $450 (would do one hour in-call if in town and already set up, available and she had seen you before; otherwise two hour minimum at $900)
Agent Margarita. Have no idea.
Nikki Spence. Have no idea
-
03-24-13 17:18 #3449Senior Member

Posts: 55NicoleNympho
I asked about her hygiene and appearance, she told me that she had no teeth. I decided to move on after that.
-
03-24-13 17:04 #3448Senior Member

Posts: 1248Nadia
Thanks for all the Intel fella's. I was about to possible waste my hard earned hobby funds on this one two!
Originally Posted by Jalex
[View Original Post]
-
03-24-13 16:04 #3447Senior Member

Posts: 898Fun BCD
Totally agree GC and DN but why pay outlandish rates when Gem, Chantel, Margarita, Nikki S, are / where no where near CK's needs and are giving top level service. Look at SBl, Jordan, Jasmine, Silk, Rhonda, on USASG Every bit as good as CK and no where near her Elite needs. YMMV is the guide for us all and so is the word no if you can find as good for half or more unless people just have an overwhelming desire to go overboard. Just my opinion and as for jealousy among ladies true then true now. So what's in your wallet?
Originally Posted by Golfcart
[View Original Post]
-
03-24-13 15:50 #3446Senior Member

Posts: 2645Hmmm. I think I know where your perception coming from then.
Originally Posted by Puntang Man
[View Original Post]
However, maybe it was my sparkling wit or kick ass personality, or maybe it's because I developed a friendly backchannel friendship with her long before our first meeting (chatting about nerd stuff) , but I only gave her 3 portraits of Ben Franklin for each session. And like I previously stated, each session, lasted well past the hour mark.
And as for Sasha Black, if you notice, I rated my EXPERIENCE with her, not just her looks. She is a hottie. Are there hotter ladies? Yes. But the GFE she brings to the table, stressing the F & E (FRIEND EXPERIENCE), is her best attribute. She has that fun, playful, and funny personality that can't be faked. And the reason I would see her again is for that GFE, again, stressing the F and E.
-
03-24-13 15:43 #3445Senior Member

Posts: 1420Cand Kemp
I don't either other than most observers here mention her rates. Candy Kemp had a high dollar hottie presence elsewhere and at the same time maintained rates at home in line with the top women in Nashville, Louisville and other locations where she had "her guys" (her term). She was also good about grandfathering her rates.
Originally Posted by D Nut
[View Original Post]
The Candy Kemp that Warlock describes is not the Candy Kemp I knew. We forget escorts are like all women, jealous by nature of other women; escorts are businesswomen and businesspeople can be contentious when it comes to competition.
The Candy Kemp I knew was in a class occupied by few others and at that level it comes down to personal preference on this and that.









Reply With Quote






