Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 20,206 to 20,220 of 24774
-
12-28-12 12:36 #4569Senior Member

Posts: 331Another AMP bit by LE.
Back on LE subject.
KTVI posted this this am.
DES PERES, MO (KTVI). A massage business in an upscale shopping area of Des Peres, Missouri, has been shut down, and two workers arrested for prostitution. The Rong Hua D-Stress Sauna and Massage was drawing complaints from neighbors. That's when an undercover cop went in.
An officer from the St. Louis County Police Special Investigation Unit delivered the evidence. Fox 2's partners at Patch report the officer was able to solicit prostitution from one of the two women charged, was 62. Officers entered and saw a second woman, Age 40, engaged in a sex act with another customer.
The two women both list an address on in Chesterfield, a quiet street that is home to several houses valued at more than a quarter million dollars.
In Des Peres, neighboring businesses in the strip mall on Manchester Road are not surprised. Business on the floor below Rong Hua D-Stress, says they were not surprised people were led out in handcuffs. The clientele, exclusively male, didn't add up.
"You work out or something, it feels great to get a massage. But this deal, there was no women going to the massage place, and I just found it sort of odd that you would open a massage parlor and there would be no women at all as customers. The massage places I go to, I'm normally the minority. Guys go there but it's mostly women,".
He says he told his landlord something was amiss, but the man responded that he had no evidence and couldn't discriminate against the business.
"I just think it's a shame. We've got mostly women as a clientele. There's women that are going to the quilting place upstairs and the nail studio, and this has to happen right where they're all going to do their business. I didn't think it was real good."
-
12-28-12 03:10 #4568Regular Member

Posts: 7Here's to wishing this site had a "like" button.
Originally Posted by STLguy1980
[View Original Post]
-
12-27-12 20:07 #4567Senior Member

Posts: 252Any reports on this gal?
-
12-26-12 17:56 #4566Banned Member

Posts: 682Probably more like some dumbass client who wanted more even though he knew she didn't offer it and after multiple visits not getting what he wanted he finally got pissed and turned her in. Or he 'really likes her' and thought she felt the same because he is 'special to her' and was trying to save her. People like that should be no where near this business. They are looking for something these girls are not offering.
Originally Posted by Just Aguy
[View Original Post]
-
12-26-12 12:11 #4565Senior Member

Posts: 539Maybe an LE turned her in because she wouldn't play "ball."
Originally Posted by Richard Dicken
[View Original Post]
-
12-26-12 11:29 #4564Senior Member

Posts: 56J
J indicated that one of her regulars gave her up. What a friend!
Originally Posted by STLguy1980
[View Original Post]
-
12-26-12 10:58 #4563Senior Member

Posts: 263Are you kidding!
20K for prostitution!
Originally Posted by Just Aguy
[View Original Post]
I have spoken to some ladies here in this city that state they have 1 or 2 LEs as regular clients and one lovely services a Judge.
Can we say this is a little ass-backwards and corrupt?
-
12-25-12 23:32 #4562Senior Member

Posts: 539I've never seen her but I know her real full name. I looked it up on Casenet and it looks like she was arrested on 12/17 for prostitution. Bond was set at $20k and was posted on 12/20.
Originally Posted by Bonerfide
[View Original Post]
Trial is January 16.
-
12-25-12 23:16 #4561Banned Member

Posts: 682I thought the comment from Gerry was that one of her regulars gave her up.
Originally Posted by Bonerfide
[View Original Post]
-
12-25-12 23:08 #4560Senior Member

Posts: 181J
I would speculate that someone in the apartment complex complained to LE.
Originally Posted by HardHead69
[View Original Post]
-
12-25-12 02:10 #4559Senior Member

Posts: 918They have been around for a while and I agree, she is rather uninspiring. I always called her Yank-yank. Some new talent would be nice, it's getting boring out there. Too bad that Chinese hub thing fizzled. Can you imagine the hidden cargo one of those jumbos could carry?
Originally Posted by Gerry2753
[View Original Post]
-
12-24-12 11:27 #4558Regular Member

Posts: 7J
J was always a very pleasant girl in a very tough business. If this is true, I hate to see a nice gal like this get popped. My question is why would they nail her if she was not full service. I haven't seen her in a while, but there are bigger fish out there to catch. I have dreamed about other ladies in this job calling and quite frankly none looked as good as her are were as nice as her. If you get anymore information on her, please pass it on thank's. Wish you the best J.
Originally Posted by Train88
[View Original Post]
-
12-23-12 22:26 #4557Senior Member

Posts: 186J
Even if she is seeing regulars, doesn't really sound worth the risk. I think I'm done with the hobby.
Originally Posted by STLguy1980
[View Original Post]
-
12-23-12 15:34 #4556Senior Member

Posts: 690B2b
Anyone have a real Body-to-Body provider to recommend? I haven't found one in STL yet.
-
12-23-12 13:04 #4555Senior Member

Posts: 56Tgtbt
And finally, I decided to try the massage salon To Good To Be True in O'Fallon.
http://stlouis.backpage.com/Therapeu...s-soon/7531339
I know they are advertised as legit and no sex, but that just made it more intriguing to find out and I sort of like the girl with the tat on her inner arm that says FEARLESS. Well, it appears to be totally legit. She indicated that I could get naked if I want but make sure I was under the sheet when she entered. I did hoping that something would maybe start later which it didn't. The massage was very good and I realized my shoulder was really hurting but so was other parts of my body which never got a touch or even uncovered. Oh, well. The sad thing is that I probably will go back because I still like the girl with the tattoo, the massage, and the hope that the advertisement is wrong.











Reply With Quote





