Thread: "Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?
+
Add Report
Results 21,226 to 21,240 of 23675
-
12-24-12 18:31 #2450Senior Member

Posts: 272Not cynical
Z My Man! You are dead on!
Originally Posted by Zomby
[View Original Post]
We are dealing with another human being here. I believe most SD's choose the sugar world in order to have a little more human interaction with lovely young women we are dumping our loads into. I don't want to be treated like a walking ATM. And I trust that our Sugar Babies do not want to be treated simply as cum depositories.
SubCmdr Out!
-
12-24-12 17:05 #2449Senior Member

Posts: 754Holiday Greetings
My brothers, and of course, Mandy!
I am back from my extended tour of the south, and have tales to tell, but so far not enough time to compose my narrative. I will get to it this week, but in the meantime wanted to just wish you all a very happy and festive holiday season, whatever you celebrate, and to wish us all a 2013 filled with wonderful, agile, naughty, willing and sexy babies.
Peace,
Scott
-
12-24-12 12:15 #2448Senior Member

Posts: 1773Gifts, Christmas or otherwise
On the subject, from a slightly different perspective, of Christmas gifts, those given with even a modicum of thought towards appropriateness tend to elicit a reaction all out of proportion to the actual value of the gift.
For example, this is the third Christmas my SB and I have been together. The first one I gave her a modest amount of cash as a gift, and it was a gift. I expected nothing special for it, and I told her that. She thanked me, and we went on about our business. The next year, I gave her cash and a small gift. It was nothing extravagent, not worth a tenth of the cash that I gave her, just a little locket necklace with a picture of her kids, taken from her Facebook page, inside of it. You would have thought I'd given her a diamond necklace. She was all hugs and kisses, and even got a little misty-eyed.
I did something similar this year, but a little more expensive. She still went way more ga-ga over the gift, than she did the cash.
This may sound cynical, but don't discount the perceived value of a thoughtful gift.
/z
-
12-24-12 12:08 #2447Senior Member

Posts: 1773Not automatic
I'd tend to agree, at least from the baby side.
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
Don't know. Haven't gotten to the "discontinuing" part yet. (:
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
/z
-
12-24-12 12:03 #2446Senior Member

Posts: 1773Overreaction?
Trick? Yes. Far, I hope, from ignorant however. I will freely admit to sometimes posting before reading what I wrote. (:
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
Understood. My distaste for the word for which that is a euphemism stems from my experiences with people who tend to use it, and their disrespect and contempt for women who are, after all, just trying to make a living. I've since learned that such contempt is generally a mask for a degree of self-contempt to which many of them don't wish to admit.
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
For all its technical accuracy, the word "wh0re" carries a significant derogatory connotation in our society, one that is in many cases undeserved. Combine that with the fact that I don't think there's anything more immoral about prostitution, in and of itself, than any other activity that involves interaction between humans, and it just rubs me the wrong way most times.
I really should get over it, but it's hard to overcome attitudes ingrained as a child.
Honestly, for me, it has nothing to do with political correctness. It's about disrespect. I thought I detected that in your note. I was mistaken, as I often am when I don't have visual cues to guide me. (:
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
Merry Christmas, all.
/z
-
12-23-12 22:35 #2445Senior Member

Posts: 5603And thank god for that. LOL. I haven't been in a so called regular relationship for about 6 years now. And those cost me far more than my sugar babes. I realize there are married guys on here. So that does change the dynamic a bit. But if you are single and have a few regulars, they are constantly competing to get your attention. This has a tendency to drive the price down. And if they get high and mighty. Just stand your ground as they will be calling back eventually. And if they don't, so what?
Originally Posted by Hernando
[View Original Post]
-
12-23-12 22:29 #2444Senior Member

Posts: 5603Is that rhetorical? I always end it. So I get your point.
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
-
12-23-12 20:38 #2443Senior Member

Posts: 272A break with tradition
A few Brother's have petitioned me on the back channels about Sugar Baby leads. I've had success so far sharing information. I will continue to do so until someone fucks things up for me.
Got a MILF, 32 White Girl who favors Black and Latin Men. Based in the Southwest but will travel. On SD4M. I will point you in her direction. I will not provide sugar amount, menu options or any other information that compromises my OPSEC rules. PM for details.
I'm looking for Asian and Hispanic SB's in the Southwest.
SubCmdr OutLast edited by SubCmdr; 12-23-12 at 20:41. Reason: failue to proofread my first draft
-
12-23-12 20:10 #2442Senior Member

Posts: 272Sugar Baby v Escort
HG,
Originally Posted by HollywoodGuy
[View Original Post]
Please note, I did not say a Sugar Baby was the same as a Escort. I said being a Sugar Baby is simply another type of sex work.
Also, I challenge the assertion that a Sugar Baby HAS to have chemistry for the relationship to continue. Brothers & Sister, which party usually discontinues a Sugar relationship and why?
SubCmdr Out!
-
12-23-12 15:57 #2441Senior Member

Posts: 5603Great story. I get requests from my regulars to add in another girl I might be seeing. I think curiosity is a big factor. So far I have not gone for it. Did a lot of that back in the college years.
Originally Posted by Exacta Picker
[View Original Post]
-
12-23-12 15:52 #2440Senior Member

Posts: 5603As per my discussions with a number of sugar babies about the use of the term escort vs sugar baby. A sugar baby does exchange cash for sex, but there must be chemistry for the relationship to continue past a date or two. Where as an escort is unconcerned with chemistry and will date you for a lifetime as long as the agreed upon compensation is forthcoming.
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
-
12-23-12 15:47 #2439Senior Member

Posts: 5603I find the direct approach always works best. When the air is cleared then the real fun can begin.
Originally Posted by Bondo500
[View Original Post]
-
12-23-12 12:45 #2438Senior Member

Posts: 272In real life I'm much more distinguished
[QUOTE=Zomby; 1630965]I'm not going to disagree that escort and sugar baby are simply different names for the same thing, but I do tend to take issue with the apparent attitude displayed by the use of the phrase "garden tool". Yes, it's accurate, but use of even such a euphemism implies a level of disregard and outright disrespect that, admittedly some, but certainly not all, such women deserve.
If I've misinterpreted your intent, the fault is mine.
[noparse]/[noparse]z[/QUOTE]Zomby you ignorant trick!
'Garden Tool' is a euphemism that I have used since I was introduced to it in my college days. Long before I knew of or ever though I would need the sugar world. I use it as a cleaver way to get around the site censors and to make a point.
It is term that I happen to like. The way I like most other sexually derogatory and nasty terms that won't get past the site censors. I once had a woman tell me to 'Fuck me with that "N" dick'. She walked away sore. LOL My point is the mere use of a term does not make it derogatory.
But if my fellow Brothers and Sisters out there find the term 'Garden Tool' to be offensive to their tender sensitivities then please let me know. I will discontinue describing the fine upstanding women that are sucking dick, swallowing cum, taking it in the ass, coxing splooge onto their faces, and overall being three hole cum depositories for the highest bidder as 'Garden Tools'.
But seriously, if I wanted to be politically correct I would write a well researched academic article and get that mother fucker published in the Journal of Human Sexuality. LOL.
SubCmdr Out!
-
12-23-12 10:47 #2437Senior Member

Posts: 1773True, but not quite in agreement
I'm not going to disagree that escort and sugar baby are simply different names for the same thing, but I do tend to take issue with the apparent attitude displayed by the use of the phrase "garden tool". Yes, it's accurate, but use of even such a euphemism implies a level of disregard and outright disrespect that, admittedly some, but certainly not all, such women deserve.
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
If I've misinterpreted your intent, the fault is mine.
[noparse]/[noparse]z
-
12-23-12 09:04 #2436Senior Member

Posts: 526I like this approach. Something that involves a room, plenty of time, drinks and gifts works!
Originally Posted by Bigsqueeze
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote






