Massage Parlor Reports

**Wildbill2** · 12-11-12 15:38

Against my better judgement I decided to partake. I'm not going to again till this craziness dies down again. The girls are spooked. I'm not sure if its true but mbs got busted last week. They are still posting ads. Has anyone been? Its possible its a sting operation. I'm laying low. My 2cents. You can see a roxy and natasha are on there own now.

**Ricky James1** · 12-11-12 12:58

At the end of the day it all boils down to what the comedian Lewis Black once said about why so many people got mad about Bill Clinton getting a blow job from Monica: "because they didn't get one."

I'd bet these cops are getting hummers from MPs like the rest of us. Hell, if it was my job to look at backpage ads all day I'd be masturbating all the time and horny as hell!

**VerySlowly** · 12-11-12 12:23

Originally Posted by TheeeGentleman [View Original Post]

The politicians, criminals, and LEO are like a trinity, like the three stooges, like the three musketeers. One for all and all for one. Would it surprise anyone if some big shot AMP owner pulled the strings and told a politician in pocket which competition they wanted taken out, who then told MBI who they wanted busted. Why are there no mouli massage parlors with hot little bubble butts running around playing yanky my wanky. As whatever happens goes down, let's review the property owners just to see who gets busted and who doesn't get busted.

You better have ItalianNY explain what a "Mouli" is. I'm not touching that with a ten foot pole, even though I love eggplant, c'mon Goomba go for it! LOL

**VerySlowly** · 12-11-12 12:18

Just so much BS. It sounds good in the newspapers and the TV and scares some customers but it is BS in the first degree. Proving a landlord who rented to a person or corporation that is licensed by the state to perform ethical massage by saying he knew or should have known illegal activities were being carried on in the building that is a state licensed premises is ridiculous.

They cannot even close the premises when a massage tech is arrested for violating the law they can only arrest the violator, not the owner of the business. Landlord no way.

A premises can be closed when it is declared a "Public Nuisance" but this is generally used to close "Dive" bars and clubs that have constant police activity regarding fights, drugs etc. In other words if the police are called to a bar 122 times to a bar in six months it will be declared a public nuisance (after a court hearing, this can take Years) and the state will pull it's license.

Have no fear Massage fans, unless the state statutes are changed dramatically you will be old and grey before you cannot get a massage in Orlando, remember this, most commercial property landlords are tough, some are lawyers, all have lawyers and many are very wealthy and they are not going to lay down and die because some MBI bureaucrat runs his mouth to the media. MBI is FOS and they damn well know it-VS

**MathGeek** · 12-11-12 00:23

Wound up in Kissimmee again, so I thought I'd try another place. This time I wound up at Spa Asia (or something like that) at 535 and Irlo Bronson. 80 for the hour, pretty girl, but a little older. Late 30's maybe early 40's.

Started with a TS, which was much nicer than in my last report. She took her time, and made sure all the important parts were clean. Afterward, it was off to the room for the massage.

The massage itself was also much better than in my last report. It was a very thorough massage, with lots of attention to the back and shoulders where I needed it. It could have been a tad harder, but she was a small girl. I'm not sure she had it in her. There was some light touch and nice teasing before the flip. On the flip, there was no negotiation, and a standard finish with lots of skin and roaming.

The only real downside was after the flip, things were getting going, and the door suddenly slid open and the other girl stuck her head in to have a conversation with my masseuse. I almost jumped out of my skin. Fortunatly, that conversation was cut extremely short, but it was still more than a little nerve-wracking.

Overall, it was a good time, and I would consider repeating if in the area.

**MrFuat** · 12-10-12 23:20

I dreamt I'd gone out of this world and met with Rubee. I'm about convinced she lives there, as she is there every visit. I went for the. 7 special, skipped the TS and asked for it hard. Her little Korean hands sure have a grip, she kneaded firmly before climbing on the table and using her heel and toes to get deeper. She was very specific and hit certain places, not the walk around I've had before. Overall it was good, more therapeutic than enjoyable or relaxing though. After the flip she plays a bit then starts her usual faux-job! Very skilled handshake accompanied by bobbing and sucking noises. I tried to encourage the real thing but it's not on the menu for me. Terrific finish and hot hot towel cleanup. Just to note, I did inspect the towels and sheets prior to laying down and they had fold marks and smelled clean. She noticed my inspection and assured me they were clean. Of course, the definition of clean varies from person to person but they seemed OK to me.

**Barolo** · 12-10-12 22:26

Originally Posted by Lrpilot [View Original Post]

Has anyone seen these two? Can't seem to find any reviews on them?

http://orlando.backpage.com/BodyRubs...uke-25/7140658

I have seen her twice now. Once at her place and the second at mine. The first time at hers place which is a dump! A weekly hotel in Altamonte. The place is dirty and smell of cigarettes. Angel has a great tight body! Her face is so-so. The massage is decent but a rush to get done in 40 minutes, I kept reminding her I paid for an hour. My hands were very active.

**TheeeGentleman** · 12-10-12 20:43

The politicians, criminals, and LEO are like a trinity, like the three stooges, like the three musketeers. One for all and all for one. Would it surprise anyone if some big shot AMP owner pulled the strings and told a politician in pocket which competition they wanted taken out, who then told MBI who they wanted busted. Why are there no mouli massage parlors with hot little bubble butts running around playing yanky my wanky. As whatever happens goes down, let's review the property owners just to see who gets busted and who doesn't get busted.

Originally Posted by TheJester [View Original Post]

I know we've all gotten a bit chicken little with the recent news. I, myself, have been concerned that the rapidly growing number of AMPs in town the last couple of years might cause problems. But I'm going to hit you with a different perspective. The government perspective. I used to work for a county government, NO NOT LEO. At first I thought my job was to do what was actually in my job description, but then I learned from my supervisor that my job was really to continue to justify our existence and to spend our entire budget. I have friends and family members that also work for governments and for them it's also the same. The true purpose of any government entity is to justify their existence and to spend their entire budget. This provides them with job security and proves the need to have at least the same budget the next year or more.

Your tax dollars at work.

So what does this mean? My take on MBI is this. Their job isn't to bust all of the AMPs and providers out there. I mean lets face it. They have enough manpower that they could easily do a clean sweep in about a week and bust all of the providers out there. I mean how hard is it really to go to an AMP and get these girls to offer you at least a handshake? If they really did make a clean sweep they'd put themselves right out of existence!

That's why whenever we see the articles about an AMP or some such place getting busted it's "the result of an 18 month investigation." I mean really. Their job, like I said before, is to justify their existence and spend all of their budget. They make the occasional bust that's the result of tons of manhours and countless dollars spent. It looks good for the press and continues to justify their existence.

In the meantime, we have all noticed that the number of AMPs has grown, not shrunk.

I've honestly been waiting for a big crackdown to reduce the numbers back down. But the best time for that would have been before the elections. And there was some busts, but not a huge crackdown. I'm still concerned about that.

The other thing to think about is to think from MBI's and other LEO's perspective, not a monger's perspective. We all get to worrying that our posting is leading LEO where to make busts. But it's been said before by others, LEO doesn't need us to know where to go. Cops aren't that dumb. It's not hard to look at an AMP and determine if extras are available. Their perspective is about politics and complaints (aside from all of the above mentioned existence justification). That article said that Miss May was the worst for providing happy endings. Really? We haven't reviewed it here in months and the last reviews weren't very good ones. Not since they rotated their staff. Not to mention that there hasn't been a single bust of Miss May staff. So why did Miss May get singled out?

My take on it has to do with location. Miss May is right at the entrance to a residential street. If I lived there I sure as hell would be complaining to the cops! Nobody wants that kind of business in a residential area. My guess is that Miss May has been getting a lot of complaints.

Let's look at the politics of it too. Is Miss May the "worst offender?" Of course, not. We all know better. There are others that are far worse, but politics do play a role in who gets busted and who doesn't (bribes might too, but I'm not going there). Others here have been mentioning property ownership and you can bet that makes a difference as to who gets hit and who doesn't.

They mentioned in the article that the landlord's property can get seized. As far as I know the only way this can happen is if the arrests fall under RICO, which I'm pretty sure prostitution doesn't. RICO is pretty much racketeering and drugs isn't it? So to me that sounds mostly just an empty threat to scare the ignorant. Does anyone know otherwise on this? I'm just curious.

Anyway, that's my take on things

**Indian River** · 12-10-12 19:31

I have read many of the posts regarding Spa closings. I would like to add my opinion that loose lips sink ships. I have said this many times.
If you look at most of the closings by LEO, we will see that most of these AMPs have been spoken frequently about on this board. Also, we all know that
there are great AMPs out there that we never speak about for fear of causing problems. Most of these AMPS are still in business. We need to be more reserved in the
manner in which we describe our experiences. I rest my case.

**TheJester** · 12-10-12 18:24

Originally Posted by Redbeard0504 [View Original Post]

So, let's keep in mind the MBI is on a mission to wipe out the numbers of places that are open by putting the pressure where it can be best applied, the landlords and landowners. I believe this tactic will be more successful than any they have used before as it would cost money and draw public attention to defend against these MBI actions. The funny part to me is that if they just let the market work they might have seen a decrease in the number of establishments anyway since I think the trade can only support so many in the first place. (Well, not really "funny" since the MBI has to justify their existence.)

I know we've all gotten a bit chicken little with the recent news. I, myself, have been concerned that the rapidly growing number of AMPs in town the last couple of years might cause problems. But I'm going to hit you with a different perspective. The government perspective. I used to work for a county government, NO NOT LEO. At first I thought my job was to do what was actually in my job description, but then I learned from my supervisor that my job was really to continue to justify our existence and to spend our entire budget. I have friends and family members that also work for governments and for them it's also the same. The true purpose of any government entity is to justify their existence and to spend their entire budget. This provides them with job security and proves the need to have at least the same budget the next year or more.

Your tax dollars at work.

So what does this mean? My take on MBI is this. Their job isn't to bust all of the AMPs and providers out there. I mean lets face it. They have enough manpower that they could easily do a clean sweep in about a week and bust all of the providers out there. I mean how hard is it really to go to an AMP and get these girls to offer you at least a handshake? If they really did make a clean sweep they'd put themselves right out of existence!

That's why whenever we see the articles about an AMP or some such place getting busted it's "the result of an 18 month investigation." I mean really. Their job, like I said before, is to justify their existence and spend all of their budget. They make the occasional bust that's the result of tons of manhours and countless dollars spent. It looks good for the press and continues to justify their existence.

In the meantime, we have all noticed that the number of AMPs has grown, not shrunk.

I've honestly been waiting for a big crackdown to reduce the numbers back down. But the best time for that would have been before the elections. And there was some busts, but not a huge crackdown. I'm still concerned about that.

The other thing to think about is to think from MBI's and other LEO's perspective, not a monger's perspective. We all get to worrying that our posting is leading LEO where to make busts. But it's been said before by others, LEO doesn't need us to know where to go. Cops aren't that dumb. It's not hard to look at an AMP and determine if extras are available. Their perspective is about politics and complaints (aside from all of the above mentioned existence justification). That article said that Miss May was the worst for providing happy endings. Really? We haven't reviewed it here in months and the last reviews weren't very good ones. Not since they rotated their staff. Not to mention that there hasn't been a single bust of Miss May staff. So why did Miss May get singled out?

My take on it has to do with location. Miss May is right at the entrance to a residential street. If I lived there I sure as hell would be complaining to the cops! Nobody wants that kind of business in a residential area. My guess is that Miss May has been getting a lot of complaints.

Let's look at the politics of it too. Is Miss May the "worst offender?" Of course, not. We all know better. There are others that are far worse, but politics do play a role in who gets busted and who doesn't (bribes might too, but I'm not going there). Others here have been mentioning property ownership and you can bet that makes a difference as to who gets hit and who doesn't.

They mentioned in the article that the landlord's property can get seized. As far as I know the only way this can happen is if the arrests fall under RICO, which I'm pretty sure prostitution doesn't. RICO is pretty much racketeering and drugs isn't it? So to me that sounds mostly just an empty threat to scare the ignorant. Does anyone know otherwise on this? I'm just curious.

Anyway, that's my take on things

**Mr Bob 111** · 12-10-12 17:07

The fact is that there are several other rub review sites out there that give a lot more detailed info than here.

I don't know why there is a big push now unless someone out there is looking for a promotion or out to prove something.

Stay safe and keep your heads on straight and we should come out of this OK.

Just my 0. 02.

MrB.

BTW, too bad about miss may's. Never got out there.

Originally Posted by Gruglok [View Original Post]

No fucking way.

I found a gem of a AMP in Seminole that hasn't been talked about on USA that I know of. And it won't be mentioned by me either. These sites need a new way to reduce the leaking of info.

**ItalianNY** · 12-10-12 15:54

Originally Posted by Hotrodvfr [View Original Post]

I know variations of this discussion have popped up several times but call me a masochist.

I get your point, if no one says anything publicly chances of places getting busted goes down. But do you get mine? Nothing said on here can cause an arrest, its just hearsay. Sure might point them where they might want to investigate but if the girls don't screw up cops can't do anything. I got so frustrated a while ago hearing guys complain "my favorite place got busted because of reviews here". I was thinking and of course the fact that the girls were running around with super short tennis shorts and no panties had nothing at all to do with it.

Sure we can just pass notes to our friends but you can do that just as well on Facebook and not need this forum at all. Sure a review here can raise cops suspicion. But guess what as soon as a provider advertises in the bodyrub section of backpage cops are suspicious. Cops use the same hints we do to find the places.

Hotrod: You are 100% correct, as are other posters here. These "rub","massage" girls should NEVER, EVER, offer sex for money. It's real simple. Just don't do it. Then, the "undercover" cop can't bust them. Does, anyone knwo how a cop actually busts, these girls? Does he get naked? Does he stay in his boxer short and lie onthe table waiting for the right "signal. I mean seruiously, WTF. And what kind of a pussy ass fucking "pig" (bacon anyone) would actually "get off" (I know, terrible pun) on arresting a poor girl who is simply trying to pay her bills, school tuition, etc. These goddamn pigs, are the real assholes. These girls are not hurting anyone. They are providing a service to guys like me who are divorced and are not interested in relationships right now, or, like myself, are simply happy with seeing a girl on an "as needed" (or is it "kneaded", LOL) basis. It's just a real fucking shame that Vegas is the only place where we are "free". I've been to Vegas a few times over the past ten years (Yes,"VS" and "Vino", my real name is "Mo Greene" and you don't buy me out, I buy you out!" "Godfather I" quote) and the girls there are soooo goddamn hot. It is unbelievable. The cops leave you alone, of course, because "rubs" and "massages" are legal in Vegas. Yet, I did spend big time cash while I was there. 10k minimum for a ten day stay, with all the "trimmings". YMMV, of course.

**Member #4882** · 12-10-12 15:25

http://orlando.backpage.com/BodyRubs...ion-24/7449779

Call the numberfrom this add and got way to mcuh info on the phone. Convo went-Start at 60-80 and I work my way up. And I also offer everything on the menu. I was scared so did not book. When I google the number from the ad; it was BlueMoon. Any info and this lady?

**Hotrodvfr** · 12-10-12 14:13

I know variations of this discussion have popped up several times but call me a masochist.

I get your point, if no one says anything publicly chances of places getting busted goes down. But do you get mine? Nothing said on here can cause an arrest, its just hearsay. Sure might point them where they might want to investigate but if the girls don't screw up cops can't do anything. I got so frustrated a while ago hearing guys complain "my favorite place got busted because of reviews here". I was thinking and of course the fact that the girls were running around with super short tennis shorts and no panties had nothing at all to do with it.

Sure we can just pass notes to our friends but you can do that just as well on Facebook and not need this forum at all. Sure a review here can raise cops suspicion. But guess what as soon as a provider advertises in the bodyrub section of backpage cops are suspicious. Cops use the same hints we do to find the places.

Originally Posted by Gruglok [View Original Post]

Massage / Body Rub girls don't have the benefit of being able to pick up in a half our and move camp to a different local. They're sitting ducks and for as little as I truly care I still recognize that it takes a significant amount of investment of time and resources to even establish yourself in a brick and mortar setting. When I find a spot I like, I'd like them to stick around for a while rather than be shut down due to boisterous reviewers giving a little too much info up publicly. I don't need a pat on the back from fellow mongers, what I need is a good massage and a nice tug after.

I'm more than happy to exchange info via PM's.

To the monger getting his massage tonight that had his session cut into midway, sorry for be bother my friend, I just wanted to make sure she got a tip I owed her.

**Redbeard0504** · 12-10-12 12:06

Originally Posted by VerySlowly [View Original Post]

Youse takin' credit for makin' the F. B. I. More powerful? And youse are proud a that? Shame on youse? Ya should a left the Moulies and the Columbians handle the dope. Ya should a stuck with the shylockin', garbage collectin, stealin frum the docks, the hookas, the numbers and the shakedowns in the garment industry, and the swag, den youse woulda been straight. But no youse got greedy and wanted the dope business, shame on youse ya ruint it fer all us legit walyos! And I ain't got no gravy on my chin my mama made me wear a napkin around my neck, how about, YO MAMA. LOL.

Just remember, prostitution for the first three arrests is a Misdemeanor after that the prosecutor can up the charge to a felony (Not done often but possible). The operation of a place for prostitution (If it can be proven) moves it up to a possible felony) So if a girl handles the phone correctly, does in-calls only, does not have nosey neighbors, does not EVER indicate a sexual act for money, keeps her back page ad's vague with no overtly sexual pictures, and never indicates a drug addiction. The odds are LE will not spend a lot of time and money to mount an operation to arrest her on a misdemeanor charge that nets a short probation or a fine and / or court costs with STD testing and a red cross lecture on safe sex-VS

So, let's keep in mind the MBI is on a mission to wipe out the numbers of places that are open by putting the pressure where it can be best applied, the landlords and landowners. I believe this tactic will be more successful than any they have used before as it would cost money and draw public attention to defend against these MBI actions. The funny part to me is that if they just let the market work they might have seen a decrease in the number of establishments anyway since I think the trade can only support so many in the first place. (Well, not really "funny" since the MBI has to justify their existence.)