Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 20,581 to 20,595 of 24245
-
11-21-12 15:13 #3665Senior Member

Posts: 853Make a withdrawal from the rainy day fund and have at both of them. We will expect 2 reports though.
Originally Posted by Gansett
[View Original Post]
-
11-21-12 11:00 #3664Senior Member

Posts: 1384Tough decision to make. Same donation.
25 year old hard body.
40+ year old whose body shape reminds me of my mothers friends.
Decisions, decisions.
My preference is 25-35 not to say I haven't had great times with both younger and older.
-
11-21-12 02:23 #3663Senior Member

Posts: 265Gina
Hey M's.
I am not one of the great providers of who's and where's's, but seeing this woman post on BP everyday, says things in volumes, first off she competing with a young and more fly by night provider who want a quick buck and I would guess she can't compete with that. I haven't seen her nor would I, to me she looks weather and worn, and I'm saying I'm anything spectacular but I'm only mind 40's. The second is her price, who wants to pay 250 for "time and companionship" that's what Psychologist and psychatrist is paid for and most insurances will cover it.
If this woman needs to have verification to see a client all the power to her, and woo be damned to the person that gives it to her. Who has time to go through all the hoops to get verified for a little something on the side. I would bet most of us are married or have a significant other.
I think this person likes to blow smoke up peoples ass to get the attention, even bad attention is more than no attention.
This my personal opion, but her second pic from the left makes her look like a drag queen. And old one at that.
-
11-20-12 23:53 #3662Senior Member

Posts: 381C'mon, Muff. You know why she is posting. Her business has dried up and she is looking for new fish to fry. She is savvy to the biz but only requires "verification" in the form of greenbacks.
I met Gina once a while back and once was enough. She has been plying her trade in the RI area for quite some time now and either got chased out or moved on but now has returned. She caused a lot of trouble on Mr. O's board and got that good thing closed down. She is, simply put, BAD NEWS!
I am sure she will flame me on here but that is my opinion. Take it or leave it.
Originally Posted by MuffyTheDiver
[View Original Post]
-
11-20-12 23:41 #3661Senior Member

Posts: 36Thanks
The little head has been looking at this one for a while now,
Thanks for saving him disappointment.
Originally Posted by TapThePie
[View Original Post]
-
11-20-12 19:35 #3660Senior Member

Posts: 253Time for companionship
Yep, most well done. The most beutifullest words ever!
Originally Posted by Umbrellaman1
[View Original Post]
I feel compelled to add my 2 cents, since, a coupla years ago, I visited a provider whose fee was for "time and companionship" only; as stated in her ad. Figuring that it was a necessary diclaimer to the ad, I made an appointment, anticipating FS.
Being naive and very new to it all, I indeed was shocked to find out that after nearly the whole hour was used up with small talk and some grabbing and stroking, that more was available from her (FS) , but for a hefty additional fee. In addition, lots of questions were asked of me, and I. D. Had to be shown. (it sucks being a newbie in some things!)
I surely wished I had known about this site then; it would have given me the proper insight as to what to expect; and I really appreciate all of the tips and advice the Seniors give.
As of today, I would utilize a provider from an ad, but never again for those advertising that their service is only for "time and companionship", and never with a provider that won't say what she offers. After all, I am the customer, and I feel I have the right to know what my money will purchase. There's simply too many providers that will give the information. It has to be a compromise between provider and client.
-
11-20-12 16:05 #3659Senior Member

Posts: 842I'm sure your busy enough where it doesn't matter if you don't get the guys who can't or won't verify to your satisfaction. Just curious though as I been seeing many ads from you on a few sites, if your busy enough using your current guidelines for verification then why have the continual ads? My read is that there are more and more men not willing to hand you over the "Keys" to there life and take the risks involved since the Zumba girl up north. I for one have never given anything more then a first name to meet with any escort and my phone. If they ask more then that then I tell them to look here or another site to see my history if thats not sufficient then I don't need to see them. And I'm not married. Can't imagine giving out that info being a married guy."Death Wish".
Originally Posted by GinaInTheMorni
[View Original Post]
There are other ways you can "Verify" were not LE or Freaks or Murderers. Without intruding on your customers personal information. Ask if they are members of any of the forum sites, another site or any other site that they have a history or reviews or posts, then all you need to do is do a bit of reading to get a feel for the person requesting your time! I don't think LE would take the time to make 700 posts on this site or any other, I don't think LE would take the time to put reviews on another site. By reading a bit you can also get a good feel of how that person will be. So that in itself should be plenty verification for you to accept there request for a meeting. Unless of course you read there post history or reviews and they are freaks.
If they are not active on these sites then I guess you can do whatever you feel is appropriate to feel safe. Bottom line is that I would never consider seeing you or any other girl based on these VERY intrusive requirements and I am sure there are plenty others who feel the same. So in essence you have limited your client base. Best wishes and be safe! Happy T-Day
-
11-20-12 15:29 #3658Senior Member

Posts: 473That's beautifully put right there.
Originally Posted by Gansett
[View Original Post]
Oh that's even beautifuller.Now I'm willing to bet your real name isn't Gina, same as my momma didn't name me Gansett. Now when providers provide me with the same information they're asking me for maybe then I'll have a different opinion on screening and references. Not before.
I have provided personal info. (in which the lady did not reciropcate) exactly ONE time and still to this day feel like a heel for doing so.
-
11-20-12 12:26 #3657Senior Member

Posts: 265Monday romp
Hey M's.
It's been awhile since I have played the game, so this Monday I was up in New Bedford, and I have been seeing this BP ad for awhile and thought I hadn't had some Hispanic / latin in awhile.
http://southcoast.backpage.com/Femal...ls-24/20911494
I was a easy set up. 2 call. Got to the locataion and parked and waited a few minutes, The place was in fairhaven a seedy motel. I called and told the girl I'll be there in 2 minutes and just sat there and waited to see if any Mangers would be coming out the door, and sure did 2 of them within 2 minutes of each other. Watched them cross the street until they were not in view.
Well the girl calls back and asked where I was, I told her. I had parked far away from the entrance incase they wanted a look at the plate number.
The girl meet me at the door, the pics are of the girl but they are a old set, she was much heavier.
Went to the room and had me do a le check, looked around and it was a mess, I saw more male shoes around than hers. She is a smoker, asked if it bothered me, told her no, so not a big deal. Had to use the restroom and that was a mess, shower seemed like it was still running? This girl is noway GFE or even close to it, it was down to business she wasn't a time watcher and definatley a saftey girl. There wasn't anything specatular about her that I would want to repeat. It's 100 hh and 180 hr. She floats between Dartmouth and New Bedford.
-
11-20-12 03:09 #3656Senior Member

Posts: 119Please no more about the merits of verification
Yes, I do. And I would NOT feel safe with a provider who has my personal information! We've been over this in various forums. Any guy who goes with a provider who requires his personal information is taking a risk on the level of bareback service with streetwalkers. Please don't start another argument about the merits of verification. Ask some clients of Ms. Wright from Maine what they think of their personal information having been in her hands.
Originally Posted by GinaInTheMorni
[View Original Post]
Many providers' ads do not give nearly enough information to answer all of my questions. If the provider has reviews that answer them, great. If not, and the provider uses this "don't ask explicit questions" disclaimer, I don't bother with her. Why should I go pay a provider only to find out she does not provide the things I am looking to get? It's not like I can say,"Hey let's do lunch and I'll ask you then." When you arrive to meet with a provider you are generally expected to have the donation ready before a word is said.
Originally Posted by GinaInTheMorni
[View Original Post]
References aren't needed when there's no verification. It's time to start _culling out_ the providers who require personal info.
Originally Posted by GinaInTheMorni
[View Original Post]
-
11-19-12 13:44 #3655Senior Member

Posts: 1384References on a guy you haven't seen in "years"? Just how far back does your reference list go?
Originally Posted by GinaInTheMorni
[View Original Post]
If "years" old how accurate can it be? First name is fine, cell number is ok too as most of us use the pay-as-you-go 'monger' phone. But even a 'monger' email goes thru your ISP and if need be LE can obtain a warrant and compel them to give them the info.
There was a recent post that a agreement was reached yet when the provider arrived it was learned she was there just for a hours "companionship" and anything else that happened between consenting adults was additional. That's why us "clowns" ask. Because for every good provider there's two that are not so good and a fourth that is just a plain rip off. BTW If I only want time and companionship I'll take my dog to the park.
Now I'm willing to bet your real name isn't Gina, same as my momma didn't name me Gansett. Now when providers provide me with the same information they're asking me for maybe then I'll have a different opinion on screening and references. Not before.
-
11-19-12 11:48 #3654Forum Advertiser

Posts: 46Then where is his reference
I think we can all agree that if any escort that has an online ad and sends out a text of her kitty or any explicit pic, she can be arrested if its LE. I have always been amazed at the men that think its ok to text, email or call and ask me for an illegal act, and this is before they even give a reference or provide their screening info. I have found if they ask for pics, they have not bothered to check me out (reviews, Google searches) , or they are simply pic collectors, that have no intent of booking.
If a provider going to rip you off, or upsell, don't you think she would lie to you and agree to anything just to get you to book? If a provider is not worried about her safety, and getting herself arrested, I doubt she give a shit about the clients safety either.
If more of the clients would take the time to actual read our ads, and do some basic research there would be NO NEED for any kind of explicit conversation. I can't tell you how many times a day, I have to remind some clown on the phone that my rate is for my time and companionship and if they are not comfortable with that, then they shouldn't book with me. As far as screening, just give us a reference, after all most of you are regular hobbyist, and try picking the providers that have no problem giving references. I give references on guys I haven't seen in months or years, and the only info I keep is the first name, email address and cell number. The only info I will even give to another provider, is that I met with the man with no problems and I would be willing to see him again. It seems much of this kiss and tell shit is the downfall of many.
Do you guys really feel safe with providers that will give out their location without confirming who you are, perhaps this is why some of the hotels have cop cars sitting in parking lot, as it so easy to figure out where most of these girls are staying, just call them and they say "come right over I am at the Holiday Inn". Now at this point LE may not know the providers room number, but if the girl has 10 guys coming and going a day, its pretty easy to figure out what room they are in. Or they simply call the girl and say they are at the Holiday Inn and the provider gives them the room number. Needless to say I learned this lesson from a bad experience years ago, and while I understand many of you men are scared to give out screening info, escorts are just as scared of getting arrested, raped, robbed or murdered.
So perhaps before picking out your next provider you could ask, will you give me a reference in the future if I book with you, and perhps its time to start calling out the providers that refuse to provide references.
Originally Posted by Deb4512
[View Original Post]
-
11-19-12 11:19 #3653Senior Member

Posts: 333Charmed Ones
I'm up in MA and this BP ad has been showing up lately with a RI number, one of the spas moving north perhaps?
http://worcester.backpage.com/Female...23-23/21150978
-
11-16-12 23:15 #3652Senior Member

Posts: 28I concur. Although I did not partake her FS, her oral skills are about as good as you can get. Would repeat anytime I happen to be in her area.
Originally Posted by P Sil
[View Original Post]
-
11-16-12 17:25 #3651Senior Member

Posts: 90Candy the Amber
Always on the watch for new talent so I gave candy (22 year old #ending in 4782) a call a couple weeks ago. Sorry for the delay in posting but been having computer issues. Anyway, sounded nice on the phone and agreed on $ for a half hour. Went to her motel in Seekonk and gave her a call. No answer, waited 5 min and called again. No answer, don't understand why they do this. While I was waiting I was checking out other options and decided to call Amber in Pawt. Glad I did. Very easy to get to appt. And was also very nice. Nice BBBJ then cfs till completion. Same money as I was going to pay anyway so all worked out in the end. Definitely will repeat with Amber.








Reply With Quote



