Massage Parlor Reports

[Benargen]

I was excited to see my favorite Sunny back at Bally. Definitely will be a regular again to go see her.

Massage = 8.

Attractiveness = 9.

Attitude = 10

Might like to give her a try can I ask what the total damage was? Thanks

[Zipper34]

Late Monday night I got a text from this girl named Lena. I asked her if I knew her or something and she said "Yes, I used to give you bodyrubs." I asked her if she knew my name, and she did know it. At this point, I started wondering if it was Lena off of Holcome Bridge Road who works with Nataly. I asked her if she was off Holcombe Bridge Road and she said no. So after that, I asked her to send me a picture of just her face to see if I would recognize her. She then sends me pics, but none of her face whatsoever. I agreed to meet her and drove to a hotel on Peachtree Dunwoody Road. When I get there, I go to her room and she lets me in, doesn't look familiar to me at all either. Then this guy comes out of the bathroom and tells me to give them the money now and I can be on my way. Me and the guy start taking swings at each other with Lena watching in the room. After I got him out of the way, I bolted out of there. I do have pics of this girl's body if you want to see them to see if you know her or if she has texted you before. Beware of her, her number started with 413 when she texted me.

[Aaron Hamlet]

I'm no lawyer, but it could be argued, depending on the nature of the ad the cost of the massage that additional services are implied. If an ad has a hot girl (not the real one) in a bikini offering a massage for $160 you could argue something is going on there. At the same time I suspect LE isn't going to lure someone in unless they have a pretty good case by getting someone to request or commit to something they could charge them with. Didn't this happen to an Atlanta Braves player down in Florida in the last few years?

They don't need nothing to bust you, impound your car, take you to jail. Prosecuting for the same offense is a different subject

[Fanofhg22]

Here's her link. She's a very kind girl as well so treat her nice! I wanted to pull out them big titties so bad but she didn't let me. Hopefully you have better luck. Prices are exactly what she indicates on the link as there was no upselling at all.

http://atlanta.backpage.com/Therapeu...tcall/14419332

Price and link for Zee? Seems USASG is messing up again as it's not copying the quote when I reply to it.

[Sam1969]

I was excited to see my favorite Sunny back at Bally. Definitely will be a regular again to go see her.

Massage = 8.

Attractiveness = 9.

Attitude = 10

[Niteluvr]

Price and link for Zee? Seems USASG is messing up again as it's not copying the quote when I reply to it.

[Fanofhg22]

This is interesting info. I saw Zee expecting a good massage, which it was, but ended up getting full body massage! I didn't ask or even hint, but was pleasantly surprised. She's a bigger girl with huge tits. She's fond of the twins wears cleavage shirts. If you are into looks or size, I'd go elsewhere but if you want a wonderful, deep tissue massage with the possibility of an HJ then I wouldn't hesitate to see her again.

Thanks for finding that statute. It didn't come up when I looked on-line for Georgia's prostitution laws.

The Georgia statute, Section 16-6-16,"masturbation for hire" by its language makes the act a misdemeanor for the masseuse but not for the customer.

Also, it is a misdemeanor only if the masseuse gives a customer a hand job for hire. So if a customer pays for a massage, and the masseuse gives him a massage and while they are together does a hand job without being paid for specifically for the hand job (doesn't ask for more money to do a hand job) , it can be argued the massage was for hire but the hand job was not. So in a way, what the Georgia law does is outlaw what on this web site is sometimes called "upselling", which may be to the customer's advantage.

If a law enforcement officer were to pose as a customer and ask For* masturbation for hire, there would be a strong argument that constitutes entrapment, which in many if not all states of the USA a defense to a criminal charge. Probably in most if not all states it is illegal for a law enforcement officer to ask you to do something that is illegal and then arrest or charge you for doing what the law enforcement officer asked you to do. So a masseuse is probably safe if she gives a customer a hand job only after he asks for one.

In states where it is a crime for the customer ask for a sexual act for which he pays explicitly, customers need to be careful how they phrase their requests.

But in Georgia, what I've seen so far still makes it seem to me customers seeking "manual release" from a masseuse can ask for it without breaking any laws.

Param

[Dudeatl]

Thanks for finding that statute. It didn't come up when I looked on-line for Georgia's prostitution laws.

The Georgia statute, Section 16-6-16,"masturbation for hire" by its language makes the act a misdemeanor for the masseuse but not for the customer.

Also, it is a misdemeanor only if the masseuse gives a customer a hand job for hire. So if a customer pays for a massage, and the masseuse gives him a massage and while they are together does a hand job without being paid for specifically for the hand job (doesn't ask for more money to do a hand job) , it can be argued the massage was for hire but the hand job was not. So in a way, what the Georgia law does is outlaw what on this web site is sometimes called "upselling", which may be to the customer's advantage.

If a law enforcement officer were to pose as a customer and ask For* masturbation for hire, there would be a strong argument that constitutes entrapment, which in many if not all states of the USA a defense to a criminal charge. Probably in most if not all states it is illegal for a law enforcement officer to ask you to do something that is illegal and then arrest or charge you for doing what the law enforcement officer asked you to do. So a masseuse is probably safe if she gives a customer a hand job only after he asks for one.

In states where it is a crime for the customer ask for a sexual act for which he pays explicitly, customers need to be careful how they phrase their requests.

But in Georgia, what I've seen so far still makes it seem to me customers seeking "manual release" from a masseuse can ask for it without breaking any laws.

Param

I'm no lawyer, but it could be argued, depending on the nature of the ad the cost of the massage that additional services are implied. If an ad has a hot girl (not the real one) in a bikini offering a massage for $160 you could argue something is going on there. At the same time I suspect LE isn't going to lure someone in unless they have a pretty good case by getting someone to request or commit to something they could charge them with. Didn't this happen to an Atlanta Braves player down in Florida in the last few years?

[Southbound]

Thanks for finding that statute. It didn't come up when I looked on-line for Georgia's prostitution laws.

The Georgia statute, Section 16-6-16,"masturbation for hire" by its language makes the act a misdemeanor for the masseuse but not for the customer.

Also, it is a misdemeanor only if the masseuse gives a customer a hand job for hire. So if a customer pays for a massage, and the masseuse gives him a massage and while they are together does a hand job without being paid for specifically for the hand job (doesn't ask for more money to do a hand job) , it can be argued the massage was for hire but the hand job was not. So in a way, what the Georgia law does is outlaw what on this web site is sometimes called "upselling", which may be to the customer's advantage.

If a law enforcement officer were to pose as a customer and ask For* masturbation for hire, there would be a strong argument that constitutes entrapment, which in many if not all states of the USA a defense to a criminal charge. Probably in most if not all states it is illegal for a law enforcement officer to ask you to do something that is illegal and then arrest or charge you for doing what the law enforcement officer asked you to do. So a masseuse is probably safe if she gives a customer a hand job only after he asks for one.

In states where it is a crime for the customer ask for a sexual act for which he pays explicitly, customers need to be careful how they phrase their requests.

But in Georgia, what I've seen so far still makes it seem to me customers seeking "manual release" from a masseuse can ask for it without breaking any laws.

Param

I favor your interpretation, however it never seem to go that way.

[Param Ahmad]

Sorry. 16-6-16 makes "masturbation for hire" a misdemeanor, and defines it.

"A person, including a masseur or masseuse, commits the offense of masturbation for hire when he erotically stimulates the genital organs of another, whether resulting in orgasm or not, by manual or other bodily contact exclusive of sexual intercourse or by instrumental manipulation for money or the substantial equivalent thereof."

Whether or not they're actively pursuing massage parlor patrons I cannot say.

Thanks for finding that statute. It didn't come up when I looked on-line for Georgia's prostitution laws.

The Georgia statute, Section 16-6-16,"masturbation for hire" by its language makes the act a misdemeanor for the masseuse but not for the customer.

Also, it is a misdemeanor only if the masseuse gives a customer a hand job for hire. So if a customer pays for a massage, and the masseuse gives him a massage and while they are together does a hand job without being paid for specifically for the hand job (doesn't ask for more money to do a hand job) , it can be argued the massage was for hire but the hand job was not. So in a way, what the Georgia law does is outlaw what on this web site is sometimes called "upselling", which may be to the customer's advantage.

If a law enforcement officer were to pose as a customer and ask for* masturbation for hire, there would be a strong argument that constitutes entrapment, which in many if not all states of the USA a defense to a criminal charge. Probably in most if not all states it is illegal for a law enforcement officer to ask you to do something that is illegal and then arrest or charge you for doing what the law enforcement officer asked you to do. So a masseuse is probably safe if she gives a customer a hand job only after he asks for one.

In states where it is a crime for the customer ask for a sexual act for which he pays explicitly, customers need to be careful how they phrase their requests.

But in Georgia, what I've seen so far still makes it seem to me customers seeking "manual release" from a masseuse can ask for it without breaking any laws.

Param

[CajunFlame]

A Georgia lawyer told me there had to be some sort of penetration, which is consistent with what you state here.

We probably have all seen the 'masturbation for hire' charges. It sounds like there may be a separate law for that.

Sorry. 16-6-16 makes "masturbation for hire" a misdemeanor, and defines it.

"A person, including a masseur or masseuse, commits the offense of masturbation for hire when he erotically stimulates the genital organs of another, whether resulting in orgasm or not, by manual or other bodily contact exclusive of sexual intercourse or by instrumental manipulation for money or the substantial equivalent thereof."

Whether or not they're actively pursuing massage parlor patrons I cannot say.

[Xeo1111]

The other ones directly across the street and down the road (4 more) in both directions. Have you done any research on AMPs in that area to find out?

Agree Nite. Pretty much all of the ones down that part of Piedmont are open past 11 pm, and mostly 24hrs last time I checked. I've been at 6am on a few occasions.

[Niteluvr]

Not a lawyer, don't like the words,"including but not limited to". Any thoughts / comments. May be up to interpretation.

But we're in the Atlanta, Georgia thread or section, so let's look at Georgia's law:

16-6-9. Prostitution.

A person commits the offense of prostitution when he or she performs or offers or consents to perform a sexual act, including but not limited to sexual intercourse or sodomy, for money or other items of value.

http://statutes.laws.com/georgia/tit...apter-6/16-6-9

Param

[/QUOTE]That law is so vaguely written, it could be interpreted many ways. I assume they did that so they could interpret it any way they desire.

[Sadsack2]

Not a lawyer, don't like the words, "including but not limited to". Any thoughts / comments. May be up to interpretation.

But we're in the Atlanta, Georgia thread or section, so let's look at Georgia's law:

16-6-9. Prostitution.

A person commits the offense of prostitution when he or she performs or offers or consents to perform a sexual act, including but not limited to sexual intercourse or sodomy, for money or other items of value.

http://statutes.laws.com/georgia/tit...apter-6/16-6-9

Param[/QUOTE]

[Dudeatl]

A Georgia lawyer told me there had to be some sort of penetration, which is consistent with what you state here.

We probably have all seen the 'masturbation for hire' charges. It sounds like there may be a separate law for that.

Sure, I'm happy to do that.

In North Carolina, prostitution is defined in Sec. 14-203: "Definition of terms. The term 'prostitution' shall be construed to include the offering of receiving of the body for sexual intercourse for hire, and shall also be construed to include the offering of receiving of the body for indiscriminate sexual intercourse without hire."

Additionally, according to an article by a North Carolina lawyer who previously was a superior court judge and was a member of the North Carolina legislature,"North Carolina's current prostitution law specifically applies only to vaginal intercourse." You'll find the article here:

http://www.raywarrenlaw.com/Amendment-QA.pdf

According to this definition, not just orgasms by hand but oral-genital contact you pay for legal in North Carolina.

===============================================================

Massachusetts as another example:

http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/Ge...272/Section53A

Accessed October 29, 2012:

(Please forgive the (be) and (see) for the letters that sound like those words. This web site's automatic editing changes the second and third letters in the alphabet into the words be and see. I've already asked Jackson or the current site administrator to stop using that automatic editing program in a comment in the appropriate thread or forum.)

[Text of section effective until February 19, 2012. For text effective February 19, 2012, see below. ]

Section 53A. (a) Whoever engages, agrees to engage, or offers to engage in sexual conduct with another person in return for a fee, or whoever pays, agrees to pay, or offers to pay another person to engage in sexual conduct, or to agree to engage in sexual conduct with another natural person, shall be punished by imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than 1 year or by a fine of not more than $500 or by both such imprisonment and fine, whether such sexual conduct occurs or not.

(be) Whoever pays, agrees to pay, or offers to pay any person with the intent to engage in sexual conduct with a child under the age of 14, or whoever is paid, agrees to pay, or agrees that a third person be paid in return for aiding a person who intends to engage in sexual conduct with a child under the age of 14, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 10 years or in the house of correction for not more than 21/2 years, whether such sexual conduct occurs or not.

Chapter 272: Section 53A. Engaging in sexual conduct for a fee; engaging in sexual conduct with child under age 18 for a fee; penalties.

[ Text of section as amended by 2011, 178, Sec. 25 effective February 19, 2012. For text effective until February 19, 2012, see above. ]

Section 53A. (a) Whoever engages, agrees to engage or offers to engage in sexual conduct with another person in return for a fee, shall be punished by imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than 1 year or by a fine of not more than $500, or by both such imprisonment and fine, whether such sexual conduct occurs or not.

(be) Whoever pays, agrees to pay or offers to pay another person to engage in sexual conduct, or to agree to engage in sexual conduct with another person, shall be punished by imprisonment in the house of correction for not more than 2 and one-half years or by a fine of not less than $1, 000 and not more than $5, 000, or by both such imprisonment and fine, whether such sexual conduct occurs or not.

(see) Whoever pays, agrees to pay or offers to pay any person with the intent to engage in sexual conduct with a child under the age of 18, or whoever is paid, agrees to pay or agrees that a third person be paid in return for aiding a person who intends to engage in sexual conduct with a child under the age of 18, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than 10 years, or in the house of correction for not more than 2 and one-half years and by a fine of not less than $3, 000 and not more than $10, 000, or by both such imprisonment and fine, whether such sexual conduct occurs or not; provided, however, that a prosecution commenced under this section shall not be continued without a finding or placed on file.

===============================================================

I couldn't find a definition of "sexual conduct" in the Massachusetts statutes, but I did find this on a Massachusetts lawyer's web site:

http://www.bostoncriminallawyer.com/...y-1614225.html

Accessed October 29, 2012:

"The legal definition of 'sexual conduct' in Massachusetts includes intercourse, oral sex and any intrusion of a part of someone's body or some other object into the genital or anal area of another person's body."

Since giving a man an orgasm with a hand or hands only doesn't involve an intrusion of a part of her body "into" any part of his body, I don't see how the Massachusetts law against "sexual conduct * * * in return for a fee" is violated when a masseuse gives a man an orgasm with only her hand or hands.

===============================================================

But we're in the Atlanta, Georgia thread or section, so let's look at Georgia's law:

16-6-9. Prostitution.

A person commits the offense of prostitution when he or she performs or offers or consents to perform a sexual act, including but not limited to sexual intercourse or sodomy, for money or other items of value.

http://statutes.laws.com/georgia/tit...apter-6/16-6-9

Accessed October 29, 2012.

So the next question is whether hand to genital contact, or oral-genital contact, is defined as a "sexual act" in Georgia.

Georgia statute 16-6-2. Sodomy; aggravated sodomy.

(a) A person commits the offense of sodomy when he performs or submits to any sexual act involving the sex organs of one person and the mouth or anus of another.

Georgia statute 16-6-5. 1. Sexual assault against persons in custody; sexual assault against person detained or patient in hospital or other institution; sexual assault by practitioner of psychotherapy against patient. (a) As used in this Code section, the term:

* * *

4."Sexual contact" means any contact for the purpose of sexual gratification of the actor with the intimate parts of a person not married to the actor. * * *

However, that definition seems to apply to only sexual assault against persons in custody or in psychotherapy and for the sexual gratification of the "actor", who in a massage parlor would be the masseuse. I'd have look at the court decisions to say for sure, but what I've found so-far gives me the impression one could reasonably argue hand jobs for compensation for gratification of the recipient rather than the actor are legal in Georgia.

Param