Escort Reports

**Ho Hunter 328** · 10-16-12 18:57

Originally Posted by Stressed Out [View Original Post]

Well HH it's in your hands. Get some hot pics of those goddesses out here! And still waiting for the halloween pics of the hottest goddess of all! Hehe SO

I know she's going with a pirate, but she's still finalizing the details. She'll be using my old flintlock pistol as a prop for all you guys who love girls with guns. I also ordered some new lights, and I'm waiting for them to be delivered. They should be here next week. But here's a few pics that she's using for inspiration. I'm trying to arrange to do the shoot on an actual sailing ship as well, but I'm not sure how much luck I'll have with that endeavor.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

**Hags Joe** · 10-16-12 18:01

Originally Posted by Deb4512 [View Original Post]

http://www.city-girls.com/provider-martina.html

Obviously never seen her, because I'm female. But damn hot. And good reviews on another site, except for the last one which I'd dismiss, because it's only one bad review. Any comments? Apparently she's here for a few days and is $375 an hour $350 an hour for VIP's whatever that means.

W. T. F?

Deb, what is the point in this?

Please check the purpose of this board in the FAQ and / or elsewhere. Thanks.

**Stressed Out** · 10-16-12 16:19

Originally Posted by Gansett [View Original Post]

Sux to be them. Channel 12 in Providence reported that because the "authorities" didn't post their age or address there's several guys screaming they'll be falsely accused due to having the same name. A couple had motions denied by the court.

She's facing over 100 charges, her business partner 59 and if you think they, or any other provider, won't cut a deal you're only fooling yourself.

http://bostinno.com/2012/10/15/alexi...titution-case/

With only the names posted (not full names either) and no other info inc age, hometown ect you know there will be at least one who will be named by mistake and will sue.

**Stressed Out** · 10-16-12 16:16

Originally Posted by Ho Hunter 328 [View Original Post]

I'm inclined to agree. I think both sides have made their point of view clear, and I doubt any further discussion will sway those who have made up their mind as to which side they're on. For it or against it, it is what it is.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

Well HH it's in your hands. Get some hot pics of those goddesses out here! And still waiting for the halloween pics of the hottest goddess of all! Hehe SO

**Deb4512** · 10-16-12 10:49

http://www.city-girls.com/provider-martina.html Obviously never seen her, because I'm female. But damn hot. And good reviews on another site, except for the last one which I'd dismiss, because it's only one bad review. Any comments? Apparently she's here for a few days and is $375 an hour $350 an hour for VIP's whatever that means.

**Gansett** · 10-16-12 08:23

Sux to be them. Channel 12 in Providence reported that because the "authorities" didn't post their age or address there's several guys screaming they'll be falsely accused due to having the same name. A couple had motions denied by the court.

She's facing over 100 charges, her business partner 59 and if you think they, or any other provider, won't cut a deal you're only fooling yourself.

http://bostinno.com/2012/10/15/alexi...titution-case/

**Mfp79** · 10-15-12 22:30

I saw Tara Kennedy for the first time last week: http://tarakennedy.escortwebsite.com/

All I can say is Holy shit. She's on the pricey side, but very very worth it. Some of, if not the best sex of my life. I was on cloud 9 for several days afterwards. Looks like she's in town until Saturday. If you have the means and the time, I highly recommend.

Longer review up on the oThER site which I can send to anyone interested.

**Member #5013** · 10-15-12 20:21

Originally Posted by Pw Herman [View Original Post]

This board has been in decline but it is now completely fucking useless!

Guys: If a girl wants too much info, move on. You will not convince her otherwise.

Girls: If a guy doesn't want to give you info, save your horse shit story of " Its safe with me" "I am discreet" " Blah blah blah" and move on. You will not convince him otherwise.

What are the chances of us getting an actual Escort review on the Escort Reviews thread?

I am not holding my breath.

Most intelligent post I've read in weeks. Although I was going to suggest to Jackson to rename the thread "Point / CounterPoint".

BB

**Ho Hunter 328** · 10-15-12 20:18

Originally Posted by Pw Herman [View Original Post]

This board has been in decline but it is now completely fucking useless!

Guys: If a girl wants too much info, move on. You will not convince her otherwise.

Girls: If a guy doesn't want to give you info, save your horse shit story of " Its safe with me" "I am discreet" " Blah blah blah" and move on. You will not convince him otherwise.

What are the chances of us getting an actual Escort review on the Escort Reviews thread?

I am not holding my breath.

I'm inclined to agree. I think both sides have made their point of view clear, and I doubt any further discussion will sway those who have made up their mind as to which side they're on. For it or against it, it is what it is.

Stay safe, and happy hunting.

**Amp Slave** · 10-15-12 19:55

A small list is out with 21 names and they will be charged in court on Dec. 04, 2012. There are many more that will be released soon.

http://bostinno.com/2012/10/15/alexi...titution-case/#ss__244098_1_0__ss

**Member #4675** · 10-15-12 19:04

Originally Posted by Pw Herman [View Original Post]

This board has been in decline but it is now completely fucking useless!

Guys: If a girl wants too much info, move on. You will not convince her otherwise.

Girls: If a guy doesn't want to give you info, save your horse shit story of " Its safe with me" "I am discreet" " Blah blah blah" and move on. You will not convince him otherwise.

What are the chances of us getting an actual Escort review on the Escort Reviews thread?

I am not holding my breath.

I want to ad to this by saying, I have never had a problem with NH or maine, I have had problems here in mass, But most girls on backpage will not give you a hard time, Been doing this for 15 years plus, Is it against the law to meet another human being from a site called backpage? WTF dude. Its legal if I meet a chic at the mall or a bar, But god danm if I meet her thru backpage the powers that be will arrest me and throw me in one of the fema camps? Give me a fucken break.

How the hell am I going to meet a girl and get married? Again meeting another human being on planet earth is legal, you guys need to chill the fuck out and stop the paranoia.

**Member #4868** · 10-15-12 18:57

This board has been in decline but it is now completely fucking useless!

Guys: If a girl wants too much info, move on. You will not convince her otherwise.

Girls: If a guy doesn't want to give you info, save your horse shit story of " Its safe with me" "I am discreet" " Blah blah blah" and move on. You will not convince him otherwise.

What are the chances of us getting an actual Escort review on the Escort Reviews thread?

I am not holding my breath.

**Stressed Out** · 10-15-12 17:49

Originally Posted by Nyx GG [View Original Post]

What provider in her right mind would discuss anything explicit over the phone with someone they've never met? That's just begging to get busted. If anyone tried that with me, I'd just hang up on them.

As for you being safe if she does, that's equally ridiculous. LE can say whatever they want once you've broached the subject. They'll agree to anything you request, at whatever price you offer, because all they want is to get you in front of them so they can bust you.

Xoxo.

Nyx

So if you are seeing an independent or someone who doesn't screen then you make no mention of money or services during the initial call. Obviously if the ad is in the escort section then it is probably for escort services and if it is in the 'body rubs' section then it is at a minimum a 'body rub'. You meet in the room or wherever you are having the session look around at the set-up and say hello and give a hug. Most of us at that point would try the 'LE' check. (ie grab ass, or boobs) or if we didn't then the girl might ask us to do it. So no mention of money or services yet. We know that LE will not touch the girl in a sting (or are not supposed to do it). At that point then the conversation can continue. Of course LE can touch you and then say he didn't. But if they are going to lie then you weren't getting out of it anyway so your screwed LE check or not.

**Nrlmus** · 10-15-12 15:39

Originally Posted by RoadStar01 [View Original Post]

Nrlmus, I couldn't disagree with you more on the point of explicit phone talk. The only time I would mention ANYTHING explicit, be it euphemisms, abbreviations, or what have you, is trying to flush out a sting.

Wasn't that one of the points that I was making?

Originally Posted by RoadStar01 [View Original Post]

In my opinion, any provider that discusses such things over the phone with an unknown client is either:

A) LEO setting you up for a welcoming party, or.

B) Careless, and putting you at risk of being in the area when LEO decides to crash her party.

And how do you propose I'd know what at least approximately I'm getting myself into when I call a number off the backpage that has not yet been reviewed? I mean whether you're explicit or not it wouldn't matter if it's a sting, wouldn't it? In fact chances are sting would try to avoid being too explicit until they get you on-site, right?

Originally Posted by RoadStar01 [View Original Post]

Now you can extoll the virtues of this kind of behavior all you like, but you won't convince me otherwise. That's why we have boards like this, and oThERs to guide us and share info with each other.

Granted, some one has to take one for the team once in a while, but to use your approach just seems like asking for trouble. Any legit provider is going to hang up on you like Nyx said, and then where are you? You've just alienated a potentially good provider.

That's fine. Actually, chances are I just "alienated" provider that wouldn't do those things anyway. Again, it's a terminology issue here. For me, legit (and professional) provider is the one that answers all the questions of the potential client while not asking any herself. Then backs up her answers with the dids. For others it's maybe the reverse. We have a difference in approach. Oh well.

Originally Posted by RoadStar01 [View Original Post]

Recognizing the warning signs for an up-sell scam or thief, and protecting yourself accordingly is a lot less risky IMHO.

Case in point: How explicit phone talk can backfire and leave you in a pinch. (or more accurately, getting pinched)

Check the posts from the past couple days. I would have linked directly to the post, but that feature doesn't appear to have worked for some time now.

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...ws#post1570022

Well, somebody has to take a plunge in the beginning on a new ad that looks "so nice", right? That's when you take your chances. As I said in my previous post, the more variety you want from the "independents" off the backpage, the more chances you'd be taking. No matter how explicit you are on the phone. If you want to go with a service, indeed it is probably a bit safer but the issue here is verification. If you get yourself verified it would definitely be safer for the service and the girls. As for yourself, I believe that it is even more dangerous then dialing an unknown number of an independent on the backpage. That's how I feel. You may feel differently. More power to you. Let's just agree that both pose a certain risk to a monger.

**RoadStar01** · 10-15-12 10:25

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

Yeah-ah but there are ways to discuss things using certain abbreviations that we all love, like GFE, BBBJ, DFK, etc. To which you know if they don't say yes Or say: we can discuss it in person, or you can discuss it with the girl when you see her, or just plainly hang up on you. In all of those case you can safely assume that it just simply ain't happening. If you've been on the prowl one tenth, no, one hundredth, of the time that I've been on it, you know it as "the holy truth". LOL.

Nrlmus, I couldn't disagree with you more on the point of explicit phone talk. The only time I would mention ANYTHING explicit, be it euphemisms, abbreviations, or what have you, is trying to flush out a sting.

In my opinion, any provider that discusses such things over the phone with an unknown client is either:

A) LEO setting you up for a welcoming party, or.

B) Careless, and putting you at risk of being in the area when LEO decides to crash her party.

Now you can extoll the virtues of this kind of behavior all you like, but you won't convince me otherwise. That's why we have boards like this, and oThERs to guide us and share info with each other.

Granted, some one has to take one for the team once in a while, but to use your approach just seems like asking for trouble. Any legit provider is going to hang up on you like Nyx said, and then where are you? You've just alienated a potentially good provider.

Recognizing the warning signs for an up-sell scam or thief, and protecting yourself accordingly is a lot less risky IMHO.

Case in point: How explicit phone talk can backfire and leave you in a pinch. (or more accurately, getting pinched)

Check the posts from the past couple days. I would have linked directly to the post, but that feature doesn't appear to have worked for some time now.

http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...ws#post1570022