Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 28,036 to 28,050 of 32894
-
10-16-12 10:49 #4859Forum Advertiser

Posts: 844Ok I will start with an actual escort review
http://www.city-girls.com/provider-martina.html Obviously never seen her, because I'm female. But damn hot. And good reviews on another site, except for the last one which I'd dismiss, because it's only one bad review. Any comments? Apparently she's here for a few days and is $375 an hour $350 an hour for VIP's whatever that means.
-
10-16-12 08:23 #4858Senior Member

Posts: 1384Sux to be them. Channel 12 in Providence reported that because the "authorities" didn't post their age or address there's several guys screaming they'll be falsely accused due to having the same name. A couple had motions denied by the court.
She's facing over 100 charges, her business partner 59 and if you think they, or any other provider, won't cut a deal you're only fooling yourself.
http://bostinno.com/2012/10/15/alexi...titution-case/
-
10-15-12 22:30 #4857Senior Member

Posts: 116Meanwhile. Back in actually posting reports land.
I saw Tara Kennedy for the first time last week: http://tarakennedy.escortwebsite.com/
All I can say is Holy shit. She's on the pricey side, but very very worth it. Some of, if not the best sex of my life. I was on cloud 9 for several days afterwards. Looks like she's in town until Saturday. If you have the means and the time, I highly recommend.
Longer review up on the oThER site which I can send to anyone interested.
-
10-15-12 20:21 #4856Senior Member

Posts: 723Most intelligent post I've read in weeks. Although I was going to suggest to Jackson to rename the thread "Point / CounterPoint".
Originally Posted by Pw Herman
[View Original Post]
BB
-
10-15-12 20:18 #4855Senior Member

Posts: 2643I'm inclined to agree. I think both sides have made their point of view clear, and I doubt any further discussion will sway those who have made up their mind as to which side they're on. For it or against it, it is what it is.
Originally Posted by Pw Herman
[View Original Post]
Stay safe, and happy hunting.
-
10-15-12 19:55 #4854Senior Member

Posts: 327Alexis Wright
A small list is out with 21 names and they will be charged in court on Dec. 04, 2012. There are many more that will be released soon.
http://bostinno.com/2012/10/15/alexi...titution-case/#ss__244098_1_0__ss
-
10-15-12 19:04 #4853Senior Member

Posts: 504I want to ad to this by saying, I have never had a problem with NH or maine, I have had problems here in mass, But most girls on backpage will not give you a hard time, Been doing this for 15 years plus, Is it against the law to meet another human being from a site called backpage? WTF dude. Its legal if I meet a chic at the mall or a bar, But god danm if I meet her thru backpage the powers that be will arrest me and throw me in one of the fema camps? Give me a fucken break.
Originally Posted by Pw Herman
[View Original Post]
How the hell am I going to meet a girl and get married? Again meeting another human being on planet earth is legal, you guys need to chill the fuck out and stop the paranoia.
-
10-15-12 18:57 #4852Senior Member

Posts: 922Pathetic
This board has been in decline but it is now completely fucking useless!
Guys: If a girl wants too much info, move on. You will not convince her otherwise.
Girls: If a guy doesn't want to give you info, save your horse shit story of " Its safe with me" "I am discreet" " Blah blah blah" and move on. You will not convince him otherwise.
What are the chances of us getting an actual Escort review on the Escort Reviews thread?
I am not holding my breath.
-
10-15-12 17:49 #4851Senior Member

Posts: 1856So the answer would be.
So if you are seeing an independent or someone who doesn't screen then you make no mention of money or services during the initial call. Obviously if the ad is in the escort section then it is probably for escort services and if it is in the 'body rubs' section then it is at a minimum a 'body rub'. You meet in the room or wherever you are having the session look around at the set-up and say hello and give a hug. Most of us at that point would try the 'LE' check. (ie grab ass, or boobs) or if we didn't then the girl might ask us to do it. So no mention of money or services yet. We know that LE will not touch the girl in a sting (or are not supposed to do it). At that point then the conversation can continue. Of course LE can touch you and then say he didn't. But if they are going to lie then you weren't getting out of it anyway so your screwed LE check or not.
Originally Posted by Nyx GG
[View Original Post]
-
10-15-12 15:39 #4850Senior Member

Posts: 2138Wasn't that one of the points that I was making?
Originally Posted by RoadStar01
[View Original Post]
And how do you propose I'd know what at least approximately I'm getting myself into when I call a number off the backpage that has not yet been reviewed? I mean whether you're explicit or not it wouldn't matter if it's a sting, wouldn't it? In fact chances are sting would try to avoid being too explicit until they get you on-site, right?
Originally Posted by RoadStar01
[View Original Post]
That's fine. Actually, chances are I just "alienated" provider that wouldn't do those things anyway. Again, it's a terminology issue here. For me, legit (and professional) provider is the one that answers all the questions of the potential client while not asking any herself. Then backs up her answers with the dids. For others it's maybe the reverse. We have a difference in approach. Oh well.
Originally Posted by RoadStar01
[View Original Post]
Well, somebody has to take a plunge in the beginning on a new ad that looks "so nice", right? That's when you take your chances. As I said in my previous post, the more variety you want from the "independents" off the backpage, the more chances you'd be taking. No matter how explicit you are on the phone. If you want to go with a service, indeed it is probably a bit safer but the issue here is verification. If you get yourself verified it would definitely be safer for the service and the girls. As for yourself, I believe that it is even more dangerous then dialing an unknown number of an independent on the backpage. That's how I feel. You may feel differently. More power to you. Let's just agree that both pose a certain risk to a monger.
Originally Posted by RoadStar01
[View Original Post]
-
10-15-12 10:25 #4849Senior Member

Posts: 475Explicit Talk = Uncle LEO
Nrlmus, I couldn't disagree with you more on the point of explicit phone talk. The only time I would mention ANYTHING explicit, be it euphemisms, abbreviations, or what have you, is trying to flush out a sting.
Originally Posted by Nrlmus
[View Original Post]
In my opinion, any provider that discusses such things over the phone with an unknown client is either:
A) LEO setting you up for a welcoming party, or.
B) Careless, and putting you at risk of being in the area when LEO decides to crash her party.
Now you can extoll the virtues of this kind of behavior all you like, but you won't convince me otherwise. That's why we have boards like this, and oThERs to guide us and share info with each other.
Granted, some one has to take one for the team once in a while, but to use your approach just seems like asking for trouble. Any legit provider is going to hang up on you like Nyx said, and then where are you? You've just alienated a potentially good provider.
Recognizing the warning signs for an up-sell scam or thief, and protecting yourself accordingly is a lot less risky IMHO.
Case in point: How explicit phone talk can backfire and leave you in a pinch. (or more accurately, getting pinched)
Check the posts from the past couple days. I would have linked directly to the post, but that feature doesn't appear to have worked for some time now.
http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...ws#post1570022
-
10-15-12 00:45 #4848Senior Member

Posts: 2138Yeah-ah but there are ways to discuss things using certain abbreviations that we all love, like GFE, BBBJ, DFK, etc. To which you know if they don't say yes Or say: we can discuss it in person, or you can discuss it with the girl when you see her, or just plainly hang up on you. In all of those case you can safely assume that it just simply ain't happening. If you've been on the prowl one tenth, no, one hundredth, of the time that I've been on it, you know it as "the holy truth". LOL.
Originally Posted by Nyx GG
[View Original Post]
And look, come on, no matter how you go about things, we can agree that there is no such thing as being completely safe when we're doing what we're doing. If you spend too much time registering yourself on their radar screen they'll get you no matter how careful you are.
In my opinion, the safest provider can be in such an environment is by quickly acquiring clients that work in the right places. You'd be surprised how many of them would arrest you in the morning but would be your clients at night or the other way around. So many of them are former military that spent much time on liberty hitting every dubious establishment possible and during their get-togethers with their former military bodies they still nostalgically reminisce about their One Nights in Bangcocks. LOL. How would she best attract such clients? I've no idea I'm not a provider but I can assure you that none of them would allow you to verify themselves. If they do then I refuse to pay taxes. LOL
-
10-14-12 21:04 #4847Forum Advertiser

Posts: 66What provider in her right mind would discuss anything explicit over the phone with someone they've never met? That's just begging to get busted. If anyone tried that with me, I'd just hang up on them.
Originally Posted by Nrlmus
[View Original Post]
As for you being safe if she does, that's equally ridiculous. LE can say whatever they want once you've broached the subject. They'll agree to anything you request, at whatever price you offer, because all they want is to get you in front of them so they can bust you.
Xoxo.
Nyx
-
10-14-12 16:04 #4846Senior Member

Posts: 2138And the Kennebunkport lesson meant nothing to you? Or DC Madame's? Or Eliot Spitzer's? No info means no trace. The more I know about you, the more I can use against you if the situation presents itself when I should. Isn't it just common sense? I mean, there is a reason why lawyers don't want their clients talking, like at all! They don't want them to provide the other party with more information then the other party already has or they are required to provide the other party with!
Originally Posted by JimmyMcC
[View Original Post]
Look, it's like this, if providers don't ask you questions you have to make sure that they are safe bet yourself. Be more explicit on the phone about what you want them to do. If she seems like she doesn't want to answer directly, chances are she is either not going to provide you with what you're asking for, or there maybe something else wrong. I'd move on to another provider. If she answers ok, chances are you're fine at least on the cops front. It's not a foolproof recipe but nothing is. The rule of thumb is simple: the more variety of providers you want, the more chances you'd be taking.
However if you provide your personal info to the service, it really is out of your hands now. In many ways they are the once who are in control of you now. If they want to blackmail you and you have something to be blackmailed about, they can. Doesn't mean that they will. But can they? Of course. If you would like me to spell it out for you how would I go about blackmailing you if I'd known your real name, let alone your address and phone# if I'd wish to blackmail you (which believe me I don't) ask me, I'd spell it out. And it would not Involve anything advanced like trying to find you out via your computer's IP address or anything like that.
On the other hand, if the service gets busted, chances of them not Taking you along for the ride would be very slim. Don't forget, you said it yourself,"they are serious about protecting themselves and their girls" Trust me you come distant third, if not thirteenth. If I'd be you and I found out that some service that you provided your personal info to got busted I'd take an extended vacation to Brazil, or hasten mightily my long thought of retirement to Costa Rica.
Because if you persist to stay here chances are pretty soon you'd find yourself quite famous among your friends and coworkers and not for the things you'd want to be famous about. You may even find that some changes have just been filed against yourself too.
-
10-14-12 14:08 #4845Senior Member

Posts: 297Secrets no longer
Secrets are no longer secrets when two individuals know about it. With technology today anyone and I mean anyone can gain access to your info whether it is through the internet, town, city halls, public records just to name a few. We all know that agencies and girls have notes on us and they leave a paper trail that I do not want to be a part of. Usng drop phones and I stay away from agencies, and only deal with individuals. A learning process for us all will be when the names from the Kennebunk ME bust comes out. Becareful out there.







Reply With Quote




