Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 32,746 to 32,760 of 42962
-
04-10-12 07:09 #10217Senior Member

Posts: 86She is by appointment only. So you won't be roaming the halls. She will meet you at the door.
Originally Posted by DontFailMeNow
[View Original Post]
A. M.
-
04-09-12 18:05 #10216Senior Member

Posts: 261Yumi
I haven't seen Yumi in 6-12 months at her newton / wellesley locale. Definitely portly, round face, avg. To below avg. Looks. I opted for the light touch only and a fair amount of tease both back and front. It was worth my while, yet no rush to hurry back. She gives the full hour and is clean. Good release, pleasant enough.
Originally Posted by Jimmy Pratt
[View Original Post]
At this point, where else is recommended? Is Lexington the number one option, is Arlington in the mix at all, is any place in Waltham worth while. Is W. W still open?
-
04-09-12 17:33 #10215Senior Member

Posts: 211Thanks man. That number's still good. At least for now! Now does anyone know which suite is hers? Not sure if I could get away with just roaming the building hoping to find her!
Originally Posted by Stressed Out
[View Original Post]
-
04-09-12 16:55 #10214Senior Member

Posts: 1856It's not suite 203
Your right there are at least 2 places in there. I know it isn't suite 203. That is / was Sophia. Barb usually runs her ads with an e-mail address rather than a phone number. Her cell used to be 617-750-2114 but I think she has changed it at least once.
Originally Posted by DontFailMeNow
[View Original Post]
-
04-09-12 16:22 #10213Senior Member

Posts: 375A friend in the biz tells me competition is on the rise so I have to agree with ARG.
Originally Posted by ARegularGuy
[View Original Post]
ND
-
04-09-12 12:02 #10212Senior Member

Posts: 68Body work V. Massage
A reg. Guy My spellcheck changes my posting.
Posting was inquiring about Body Work and fines. Just figured I'd put my 2 cents in.
Also suspect within the next 3 years they will have new laws for AMPs and fines.
I think for 2011 and 2012 they set a new record for AMP busts.
BTW
Client List had male models as all the mongers. Not the Frank Cannon models I see going in and out of these places.
All the best
-
04-09-12 10:37 #10211Senior Member

Posts: 211Barbaraat67 Coddington, Quincy?
I'm trying to get some info on this provider. As many here already know, the Coddington St. Locations where some other establishments are, are located within an office building. So there's lots of business going on here. I know there's at least 1 if not more establishments at 67, but as the title indicated, I'm specifically looking for Barbara, who I've read is at this location. If anyone has any info / feedback they could share with me, it would be greatly appreciated. General info in a reply here would be great, though any other details please PM me. Thanks!
-
04-09-12 09:28 #10210Senior Member

Posts: 1249French, can you decode this for me?
I'm no rookie but I have no idea what you are talking about[.
ARG.
QUOTE=French; 1420854]They are given a 200 ticket for non lic. Even though they are adv. Only be. W. They constitute the application of oil and removal of clothing to be msg and not be. W. Enclosed is a list of be. W forms that do not need to be lic.
http://www.mass.gov/ocabr/licensee/d...dividuals.html
I guess someone can appeal and argue these tickets, then with the sex for a fee hanging over head and the "code" violations from city inspectors all come together in being alot to chew with anyone with out a 10 K legal fund.
Once the Code violations are given out, electric is shut off and it takes atleast 2 months before they give the violators what they are.
This is just a rough run down.
I guess I will have to see the new series the client list to see how everything goes down. Might be a little melba.[/QUOTE]
-
04-09-12 09:23 #10209Senior Member

Posts: 1249I beg to differ
Despite a closing here and there from time to time, the number of AMPs, store front or otherwise, is on the rise. There have never been more of these establishments at any time in the past. License crack downs? Lets face it, enforcement is essentially non-existent!
Again I beg to differ, the entire industry has never flourished like it does today. Factors include high unemployment, cheap Internet marketing and increased demand from a culture awash in sexual stimulation and repression.
ARG.
Originally Posted by Jon Gris
[View Original Post]
-
04-09-12 04:20 #10208Senior Member

Posts: 1739I hit Framingham Bodyworks on Franklin Street in early March; it was about 6:00 PM. The door was answered by Coco who seemed to be the only masseuse there. Late 30's early 40's. Asian, neither pretty nor ugly; just average. Almost zero English. Massage was very good. She climbed up on the table a lot. Did face and feet massage. Typical service, usual $60 + $40.
Originally Posted by Pw Herman
[View Original Post]
Other posters have reported a better time. The really good ladies must have been out that day.
-
04-08-12 22:08 #10207Senior Member

Posts: 68Fines and Body workers
They are given a 200 ticket for non lic. Even though they are adv. Only be. W. They constitute the application of oil and removal of clothing to be msg and not be. W. Enclosed is a list of be. W forms that do not need to be lic.
http://www.mass.gov/ocabr/licensee/d...dividuals.html
I guess someone can appeal and argue these tickets, then with the sex for a fee hanging over head and the "code" violations from city inspectors all come together in being alot to chew with anyone with out a 10 K legal fund.
Once the Code violations are given out, electric is shut off and it takes atleast 2 months before they give the violators what they are.
This is just a rough run down.
I guess I will have to see the new series the client list to see how everything goes down. Might be a little melba.
-
04-08-12 19:47 #10206Senior Member

Posts: 922Curious
Has anyone been to Framingham or Lexington Bodyworks lately? Both seemed popular but no mention in recent months.
-
04-07-12 22:43 #10205Senior Member

Posts: 507Yumi
I recall she was wearing stretchy pants and one of those aprons that sometimes the legit places have on.
Couldn't really see the pudge, but got the feeling it was there. Her face is round but not ugly.
Better value elsewhere is an understatement. Although she was indeed pleasant and there was no argument over extras or tip, the skill is just too lacking to make the experience at all worth it for me. I would probably put several of the legit places higher up on my "backup" list than going back to her. The alcohol was just the icing on the cake, so to speak.
JP.
Originally Posted by AsianLPGAfan
[View Original Post]
-
04-07-12 22:09 #10204Senior Member

Posts: 657I agree also
But it is the LE "dick" that goes in after the "others" may have visited. And busts them. Whether it was "reported" or not in their "methods" of police work I also question the legality of these methods.
Originally Posted by Amp Slave
[View Original Post]
-
04-07-12 21:37 #10203Senior Member

Posts: 662Medford busts
I could see that some complaints coming from citizens regarding Lavish Spa. Its near a dance studio. Parents seeing guys with large bulges in their britches could have sounded an alarm. The other is next to a liquor store and a dentist office. Not sure who would be concerned there.






Reply With Quote




