Escort Reports

**Rexxbreefs** · 03-10-12 08:58

Quick report:

Tori & Lexi take their show on the road occasionally, I was craving a redhead and arranged a 1/2 hour meeting with Tori. The photos of her are murky, but pretty close. She's a bit heavier. Nice girl, pleasant to chat with honestly not too easy on the eyes. Fast FWD, very nice slow BBJ, finished w / CFS. Not sure if I'll repeat or try the Tori\Lexi 3-way. Damage: 0. 80.

http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...ly-35/19613080

**Stressed Out** · 03-09-12 18:55

Originally Posted by Kowabunga [View Original Post]

. She claims that providers are all victims of human trafficking, going so far as to say it's not possible to willingly choose sex work for a living.

.

Now of course we all realize that her rationale is so full of shit. But hell that doesn't matter as it is just the never ending line of do gooders beating their chests and telling us that the world will end so that they ensure their funding continues. In RI where the 'loophole' was closed to prevent the 'human trafficking' by the do gooders there the few arrests that occured resulted in not one case of HT. In fact the couple of ladies that actually were allowed to present their view publically turned out to be very 'well off and educated' ladies.

Of course we are being led by Martha who couldn't be one anyway as no one would go near her anyway. Ugh

**Kowabunga** · 03-09-12 03:12

Originally Posted by Kit Kat [View Original Post]

Keep in mind that if you get caught, it's a misdemeanor charge, that will most likely be dismissed upon payment of court fees (assuming first offense).

Kat, you need to read the new human trafficking law they enacted in Mass. For us mongers, it's now a _minimum_ $1000 fine, max $5000, plus possible jail time even for a first offense, and they intend to push the far end of that scale as much as possible. Attorney General Martha Coakley explains that the idea behind the new law is to shift punishment away from the providers and onto the mongers. She claims that providers are all victims of human trafficking, going so far as to say it's not possible to willingly choose sex work for a living. Even worse, while this means your girls are less likely to be punished if caught, you yourself could be punished far more harshly for facilitating with mind boggling levels of fines and jail time. It's an insane law, but regardless it is the law. The stakes of the game have gone up for both you and me, but most especially for you. Please don't misunderstand my post as not being fully sympathetic to your position.

Originally Posted by Kit Kat [View Original Post]

my safety and freedom mean more to me than your concerns (or money).

Sure, I understand. Just as I'm explaining that my safety and freedom mean more to me than your concerns (or your agency's services). I could care less about the fine; it would be the _least_ of my concerns if I were caught. I'd have *much* more serious problems to deal with than that.

Bottom line is if you can run your agency the way you are and do well, all the more power to you. No hard feelings on my part, and I hope none on yours. Since you seemed open to alternative methods, perhaps in the future we'll think of one that can keep careful agencies like yours feeling safe and careful mongers like myself feeling safe, too. Date-Check and Preferred411 certainly don't make me feel safe, because uncle Leo could just as easily retrieve my personal info from them as they could if you had it in your data banks.

**Eugene West** · 03-08-12 07:52

Originally Posted by Yellow Fever [View Original Post]

There are three different ladies advertising on Backpage Tewksbury, one is a 2 for 150 or 100 if a single.

I've been visiting these travel Brazilian girls on and of for a few years. They seem to show up in waves, mostly from NY or NJ area. I've found them to be always a bit of a crap shoot on looks and performance, but latina women make me drool no matter what. Usually I've experienced CFS. Not many BJ's. Always DTY (my favorivte). Often there english is limited. The person on the phone is NEVER the girl is see. To me they're sexy even when they don't try, and they definately aren't as greedy as asian girls. From Revere to Andover to Burlington. I like them all. Actually there are two sister that work from home in Everette that I'm not crazy about. I don't always think their choice location to host in Twks is the safest but. I have been invited by their hndler to travel to Walthem for a better location but its often too far for me. God I love latin girls. Plus who can complain about 100?

**Yellow Fever** · 03-07-12 23:35

There are three different ladies advertising on Backpage Tewksbury, one is a 2 for 150 or 100 if a single.

**Member #4868** · 03-07-12 18:51

Originally Posted by Brguy1981 [View Original Post]

Does any one know a phone or website for Brazilian girls? Will be going to Boston this Friday and looking for some Brazilian ladies.

This phone number should help out as they are very accommodating:

617. 343. 4200.

And try this link as well:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=RTFF

Scroll to definition two.

Oh yeah, welcome to Boston!

**Brguy1981** · 03-07-12 14:16

Does any one know a phone or website for Brazilian girls? Will be going to Boston this Friday and looking for some Brazilian ladies.

**Ccup2** · 03-07-12 14:02

Yes legit but not same girl in pics. Close but not same girl.

Face not as cute, bigger thighs and ass, breasts bigger too.

Okay visit, but from reviews she might be YMMV.

Originally Posted by Flamebird [View Original Post]

Asking here, because I had the another site people complain I was not a VIP when I asked there and would not answer. At least here people can see I have posted reviews / etc (in RI section).

The frequency of reviews on Bree Banks is VERY thin (7 reviews in 3 years!). Way fewer reviews than anyone who is normally in this hobby. I am overly careful and this is suspicious.

Then you have the following pics:

EROS profile:

http://www.eros-boston.com/files/254315.htm

Top pic is from the same shoot as the following:

http://sflchronicle.com/wp-content/u...00full-571.jpg

Which is of Ashlynn Brooke.

Same thing for the white bra / panty set.

Both of those can be seen here:

http://www.ashlynnbrooke.com/tour1/photos.html

Sooo. Either she is using fake pics. Or she IS actually Ashlynn Brooke. However.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashlynn_Brooke

Stats she lives in Oaklahama. Which is sure not New England.

So. That pretty much proves Bree Banks is using someone else's picks IMO (I would love to be wrong!).

Minimal reviews (could even be faked?) and stolen pics. Not good. But my weakness for spinner blondes gets the best of me (first serious gf was one. You guys know the feeling!)

However, at least one another site reviewer stated the pics were accurate. I would still like to see her. But I don't TOFTT (sorry guys!). So I was hoping some of the nice gentlemen (or girls. Kat?) here would confirm if she was legit or not?

**Flamebird** · 03-07-12 12:26

Asking here, because I had the another site people complain I was not a VIP when I asked there and would not answer. At least here people can see I have posted reviews / etc (in RI section).

The frequency of reviews on Bree Banks is VERY thin (7 reviews in 3 years!). Way fewer reviews than anyone who is normally in this hobby. I am overly careful and this is suspicious.

Then you have the following pics:

EROS profile: http://www.eros-boston.com/files/254315.htm

Top pic is from the same shoot as the following:

http://sflchronicle.com/wp-content/u...00full-571.jpg

Which is of Ashlynn Brooke.

Same thing for the white bra / panty set.

Both of those can be seen here: http://www.ashlynnbrooke.com/tour1/photos.html

Sooo. Either she is using fake pics. Or she IS actually Ashlynn Brooke. However http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashlynn_Brooke Stats she lives in Oaklahama. Which is sure not New England.

So. That pretty much proves Bree Banks is using someone else's picks IMO (I would love to be wrong!).

Minimal reviews (could even be faked?) and stolen pics. Not good. But my weakness for spinner blondes gets the best of me (first serious gf was one. You guys know the feeling!)

However, at least one another site reviewer stated the pics were accurate. I would still like to see her. But I don't TOFTT (sorry guys!). So I was hoping some of the nice gentlemen (or girls. Kat?) here would confirm if she was legit or not?

**Kit Kat** · 03-06-12 06:50

Originally Posted by Asket [View Original Post]

Kat you rock really mean that, I come from greece were brothels are legal and real cheap. The girls are clean and 90 percent of them are Russian,

Its just sad that our country has these stupid laws, any ways we will meet one day, I went out of my way trying to prove to cc chanell that I have seen many girls.

But she did not want to see me for whatever reason, take care and look forward to meeting you one day.

Thank you for the kind words. To paraphrase Professor Bernard De La Paz, I try to do my best in an imperfect world. Many independent providers don't want to take the time to screen someone who doesn't have perfect references. Especially since they're typically having to also book their own appointments, check references, and somehow make time to actually see clients. An agency has an advantage in that one person isn't having to do everything. My partner, Jack, is a whiz with computers. He'll take the time to actually screen your references to make sure they're legit providers even if they don't have any reviews on that other site. It can be a time consuming process, and I can understand why an independent wouldn't want to take the time to do it.

Xoxo Kat oxox

**Kit Kat** · 03-06-12 04:31

Originally Posted by Kowabunga [View Original Post]

I doubt that. Many of us will never give out our personal information; anyone who does is engaging in extremely high risk behavior on the level of BBFS. Especially with the new human trafficking laws enacted in Massachusetts. If all providers were to require verifiable personal information, I don't think there would be enough business left to go around and the requirement would be dropped again.

I do understand the mutual goals of protecting both client and provider, and though I would not give out my personal information, I'd be willing to otherwise go a long way with an agency like yours (judging both by your professionalism and from the hot pictures of you and your girls!) for such mutual protection. We need to come up with some better methods. As you explain quite well, if it's too easy for Uncle Leo, it's worthless as a form of protection. As you also correctly point out, we also take a risk when contacting new providers, though of course with a well reviewed agency like yours, the risk is extremely low and almost all on your side. I do understand and appreciate that. If you didn't protect yourself, you wouldn't be in business very long.

I think the references by reviewed providers are an example of a reasonable compromise. As you imply, not easy for Uncle Leo to fake these kinds of references. Perhaps if we think about it enough we can come up with other systems that work well. We all know the basics of how Uncle Leo works most of the time.

If reputable providers / agencies won't see anyone without references from other reputable providers / agencies, then how can you get any acceptable references? The only alternative I can see is to provide sufficient personal information to be properly screened. Even that has it's risks, since while it may provide reasonable assurance that you aren't really Uncle Leo, it doesn't prove that you aren't a psychotic serial killer. Which is where an agency is safer for providers since it insures that someone else will know where they are, and who they're with. Keep in mind that if you get caught, it's a misdemeanor charge, that will most likely be dismissed upon payment of court fees (assuming first offense). If I (or any other agency, or even an independent's driver) gets caught, it's a felony with a minimum mandatory two year sentence. Both may obviously face other consequences because of an arrest. We turn down on average at least two to three times as many appointments per day as we actually accept. I would much rather lose money, than risk losing my freedom (or that of my girl's. I wouldn't send anyone else to an appointment I wouldn't do myself).

Obviously, if someone can come up with a better way of screening that would not increase my risks, I'm more than happy to consider it. But even if you say nothing illegal over the phone, in your ads, or through email, once Uncle Leo is standing in front of you, he will arrest you. They'll let the court figure out if there is sufficient evidence for the charge. Once they make an arrest, they can make what's known as a "search incident to an arrest" (which does not require a warrant). Any condoms, cell phones, money, or computers, will be seized as evidence, and used against you in court. They'd rather make the arrest and hope they gather enough evidence to convict since most providers will attempt to plead out. Conviction or not, Uncle Leo gets credit for the arrest, which can then be used to justify a budget increase. So the only sure way to avoid this, is to never make an appointment with Uncle Leo at all. Thus the reason for adequate screening.

I can certainly understand your concerns about revealing personal information, it's obviously a big risk (especially considering the unstable mental state of some providers). Not to be rude, but honestly my safety and freedom mean more to me than your concerns (or money). Personally, I feel that third party screening services (ie Date-Check and Preferred411) are a reasonable compromise. They do require extensive personal information, but providers do not have access to it directly. I'm pretty sure just about every provider / agency accepts Date-Check and Preferred411. They certainly make things much easier, and quicker, for both parties involved.

Xoxo Kat oxox

**Kowabunga** · 03-06-12 01:06

Originally Posted by Kit Kat [View Original Post]

The days of being anonymous are coming to an end.

I doubt that. Many of us will never give out our personal information; anyone who does is engaging in extremely high risk behavior on the level of BBFS. Especially with the new human trafficking laws enacted in Massachusetts. If all providers were to require verifiable personal information, I don't think there would be enough business left to go around and the requirement would be dropped again.

I do understand the mutual goals of protecting both client and provider, and though I would not give out my personal information, I'd be willing to otherwise go a long way with an agency like yours (judging both by your professionalism and from the hot pictures of you and your girls!) for such mutual protection. We need to come up with some better methods. As you explain quite well, if it's too easy for Uncle Leo, it's worthless as a form of protection. As you also correctly point out, we also take a risk when contacting new providers, though of course with a well reviewed agency like yours, the risk is extremely low and almost all on your side. I do understand and appreciate that. If you didn't protect yourself, you wouldn't be in business very long.

I think the references by reviewed providers are an example of a reasonable compromise. As you imply, not easy for Uncle Leo to fake these kinds of references. Perhaps if we think about it enough we can come up with other systems that work well. We all know the basics of how Uncle Leo works most of the time.

**Member #4675** · 03-04-12 18:16

Originally Posted by Kit Kat [View Original Post]

The problem is that people (ie Uncle Leo) are trying to fake their way through provider screening now. Uncle Leo will call up to make an appointment with Provider Annie. Provider Annie asks Uncle Leo for references, he gives her names and numbers. But these names and numbers are really Auntie Leo, who just happens to also have ads posted to catch poor innocent mongers. Auntie Leo of course wouldn't have any reviews though, so that is the flaw in their plan. They've also been known to use names and numbers of providers they've recently arrested for a reference as well, and then have Auntie Leo answer if you call. Which is why multiple references are required by most providers. It's also the reason why some providers don't take same day appointments from new clients.

The days of being anonymous are coming to an end.

Xoxo Kat oxox

Kat you rock really mean that, I come from greece were brothels are legal and real cheap. The girls are clean and 90 percent of them are Russian,

Its just sad that our country has these stupid laws, any ways we will meet one day, I went out of my way trying to prove to cc chanell that I have seen many girls.

But she did not want to see me for whatever reason, take care and look forward to meeting you one day.

**Kit Kat** · 03-04-12 16:54

Originally Posted by Asket [View Original Post]

http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...or-26/19569831

http://twitter.com/ccchanelcc702

So as with the changing times, this hobby is changing, I have always just called a provider and made an appt, no questions asked for the most part.

But the powers that be have been out like sharks this past year and this is the 2nd girl (meaning CC) That will not see me because I'm not a another site member.

I have called up 5 providers I have seen in the past and asked if they will vouch for me, and they all said they would.

Problem is the 5 providers I have seen do not have another site reviews example.

http://newhampshire.backpage.com/Fem...ver-30/2784184

I seen jennie and she was one of the best I have seen, called her up and asked if she would vouch for me, she said no problem, well when "CC chanell looked.

Her up on another site, she said jennie has no another site reviews, and she is not verified, I know there is alot of talk on here about married guys not wanting to give out.

Personal info, so I'm confused doesn't another site require a credit card and personal info?

I don't see this trend changing seems like the legit providers have strict rules now, sucks for guys like me that is not a trouble maker, this is the 2nd time.

A girl has declined me, before cc aa girl that does greek visiting from new jersey denied me as well. Can not think of her name but she is hot!

The problem is that people (ie Uncle Leo) are trying to fake their way through provider screening now. Uncle Leo will call up to make an appointment with Provider Annie. Provider Annie asks Uncle Leo for references, he gives her names and numbers. But these names and numbers are really Auntie Leo, who just happens to also have ads posted to catch poor innocent mongers. Auntie Leo of course wouldn't have any reviews though, so that is the flaw in their plan. They've also been known to use names and numbers of providers they've recently arrested for a reference as well, and then have Auntie Leo answer if you call. Which is why multiple references are required by most providers. It's also the reason why some providers don't take same day appointments from new clients.

The days of being anonymous are coming to an end.

Xoxo Kat oxox

**Member #4675** · 03-04-12 14:01

http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEsc...or-26/19569831

http://twitter.com//ccchanelcc702.

So as with the changing times, this hobby is changing, I have always just called a provider and made an appt, no questions asked for the most part.

But the powers that be have been out like sharks this past year and this is the 2nd girl (meaning CC) That will not see me because I'm not a another site member.

I have called up 5 providers I have seen in the past and asked if they will vouch for me, and they all said they would.

Problem is the 5 providers I have seen do not have another site reviews example.

http://newhampshire.backpage.com/Fem...ver-30/2784184

I seen jennie and she was one of the best I have seen, called her up and asked if she would vouch for me, she said no problem, well when "CC chanell looked.

Her up on another site, she said jennie has no another site reviews, and she is not verified, I know there is alot of talk on here about married guys not wanting to give out.

Personal info, so I'm confused doesn't another site require a credit card and personal info?

I don't see this trend changing seems like the legit providers have strict rules now, sucks for guys like me that is not a trouble maker, this is the 2nd time.

A girl has declined me , before cc aa girl that does greek visiting from new jersey denied me as well. Can not think of her name but she is hot!