Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 33,001 to 33,015 of 42978
-
03-02-12 21:22 #9978Senior Member

Posts: 351Sorry to see this review. I was there recently and saw Sophia, who is by far the best there even though she is the oldest (claims she's 27 but she must be in mid 30s even though she looks mid 20s) , great body even if breasts are man made, but her teasing and soft touch are absolutely fantastic. After a great session with Sophia, on way out she introduced me to Sasha and suggested I try her next time. Couldn't notice any belly and she was really very pretty. I was tempted to try her next time but your review is giving me second thoughts. Perhaps, however, since I was introduced to her by Sophia my session will be more enjoyable. Not sure if I want to TOFTT with Sasha since Tina and Coco are known quantities and they are both known as being very very good and there is always Sophia who I still prefer.
Originally Posted by Phindroid
[View Original Post]
-
03-02-12 21:19 #9977Senior Member

Posts: 78Ocean
Couldn't tell you SO. I've called before and asked who's working and the standard response is "new girl". When I asked her name. She said "new girl". When I press further and ask for the name the response was "I do not say name". So it's never been fruitful and probably one of the reasons I don't visit there much.
Originally Posted by Stressed Out
[View Original Post]
After reading your post last night I called and tried a different tactic "is Jenn or Alice working tonight?". Answer "new girl working only"."is that Cici (from my earlier post)?" I ask. The response "I do not say name".
The strangest thing I've ever heard from an AMP. My only guess is that whoever is working the phones is trying keep the peace amongst the girls so that a strict rotation can be upheld. Just a guess. Either that or she just doesn't like the sound of my voice (which has a bit of a southern drawl. So maybe it's throwing her off?)
-
03-01-12 23:39 #9976Senior Member

Posts: 44That place in Somerville
Called a recently opened place on Elm St, and was told that they did not provide services like the "other place" two blocks away from them. So, I went back to Highland Ave and drew Sasha.
Sasha is petite, slightly heavy, has a noticeable lower belly, and implants. Throughout the hour-long massage that I paid for, she kept referring to herself in the third person, which was weird. The massage itself was ok at best-she used her elbows and forearms quite a bit on the back and ass. Some light teasing pre-flip. It was more a body rub than a therapeutic massage. Flipped after the hot towel and she went straight to work. She had a gorilla grip which I had to request relax a couple of times. \Then, with the left she grabbed the base and continued working with the right hand until I was happy. UTC on top, OTC below, not much else on the menu. Erect nipples and well-rounded breats, but I prefer natural. Paper towel cleanup, five more minutes of mild head / face massage and she said "done!" I will not be repeating with her, much better options within that parlor are available for the asking. I saw some of my usual favorites on the way out and slightly regretted having said ok to Sasha. TOFTT, I suppose.
Total damage 60+40, I was shorted 10 minutes. Stay safe.
-
03-01-12 16:44 #9975Senior Member

Posts: 56Please no lesions to mp workers!
I'd prefer my mp workers to be lesion-free!
-
03-01-12 14:37 #9974Senior Member

Posts: 1243Give lessions to all mp workers
Lets teach the massage girls how to give a proper HJ. Show them this video.
http://www.heaven666.org/ladies-a-le...-job-61065.php
-
02-29-12 21:27 #9973Senior Member

Posts: 1856Thanks for the update
Thanks for the update sb. Guess I'll have to update my notes. Wonder if they both left or one was just off? SO
Originally Posted by Ski Boz
[View Original Post]
-
02-29-12 19:33 #9972Senior Member

Posts: 78Ocean
Well SO and soundp1. It wasn't Cici who you saw. After your post last night and after a long hiatus from AMP's I decided to revisit Ocean to see what was new. I drew the only girl there by the name of Cici or Ceecee. Late 30's to early 40's. Gave a decent massage, but only OTC roaming upstairs. Coaxed her into utc but found a triple padded bra with barely A cups underneath. The HE was brutal. Lackluster tease, flip, straight for the junk with a Kung Fu grip that made me wince a couple of times. Finally took instruction and got the job done, but barely.
Originally Posted by Stressed Out
[View Original Post]
$60+$40 will pass next time.
-
02-29-12 18:42 #9971Senior Member

Posts: 50Jenny in Bedford
Finally caught up with Jenny as she seems to be in high demand. Location is easy to find office building on the main st. She has a waiting area and then a room were she provides the massage.
I was given an excellent massage, nice tease and a very unique HE. Not rushed at all and will repeat.
Happy Hunting!
-
02-29-12 17:34 #9970Senior Member

Posts: 1856Ain't that the truth
How right you are. I knew the now previous owner (I believe from all the reports) at Harmony and she was not only not involved in human traficking but was using the proceeds to send her kids to college (nearby) so that they would graduate with zero loans. And the ladies that came up to work there were well off women from NY who all had families and kids that were being taken care of by mom. Don't know about you but my kids owe many thousands in loans!
Originally Posted by Fly Dangler
[View Original Post]
-
02-29-12 16:49 #9969Senior Member

Posts: 628A couple crusading do gooders selling a factually deficient picture of human trafficking to the RI legislature IOT get the law passed closing down RI's indoor loophole. I'm not saying that human trafficking doesn't exist in RI, but if you get to know ladies working in the AMPs well enough to find out their real stories then you'll find out just how factually challenged these crusading do gooders really are.
Originally Posted by Stressed Out
[View Original Post]
-
02-29-12 12:55 #9968Senior Member

Posts: 1856I think it was yuki
I think the name of the lady (from prev reports) was Yuki. The experience reported was the same as yours except the tip was. 40. As an aside I still can't fathom all the reports that the names of the ladies were not remembered. When I go out I try and make sure I know the name especially when she is going to be pulling on JR. But hell that is just me. And the number was 99 and one floor up for those that want to visit. Guess he forgot that too.
Originally Posted by Deklau
[View Original Post]
-
02-29-12 12:49 #9967Senior Member

Posts: 1856Both had Grand Openings!
Both purported to have grand openings in Jan but that Codington address has been around since the days of matrix spa who I believe was at 67. I know it is a 'complex' so I'm not sure it it is all connected and 59 and 67 are in the same bldg. I also know that MILF Barbara is at 67 and there is another place at 67 in suite 203 which has had decent reviews.
Originally Posted by Rito1
[View Original Post]
-
02-29-12 12:41 #9966Senior Member

Posts: 1856Ocean Spa
I'm guessing it was with Jenn. The last note I had was that jenn and alice were there. Both gave nice massages and endings but Jen was more layful and allowed access and Alice was OTC only. But please feel free to update on Alice or if someone else is there.
Originally Posted by Soundp1
[View Original Post]
-
02-29-12 12:32 #9965Senior Member

Posts: 1856Article in Herald
There was an article in the Herald a little bit ago which had some interviews from some of the independent escorts around who complained that the 'human trafficing' they were looking to stop didn't exist as much as those who passed the law were led to believe by the do-gooders. As a matter of fact the article pointed out that there were more instances of 'human traffic' arrests in the toney suburbs for 'maids, nannies and live in help' then for 'escorts'. Of course all the do=gooders came on board and slammed the ladies interviewed.
Originally Posted by Maximus77
[View Original Post]
In short (I believe although this is from quotes) that the law treats those 'taken into custody' for 'performing' the act as victims of 'human traffic' without penalty and the 'johns' as the cause with severe penalties. Besides driving it underground and to RI as stated I have read (and I'm not a lawyer) that several test cases may cause issues since the aim of the law was for a specific reason (human traffic) and if that reason doesn't exist than the law may not apply for a specific circumstance. One opinion I read state that was why there were no further penalties for the ladies as the gents caught were less likely to fight it. But I could be totally wrong. Anyone who understands better please chime in.
-
02-29-12 12:22 #9964Senior Member

Posts: 1856More truthful words never uttered
I absolutely agree! I have been in this hobby one way or another since the late 70's back in the days of Royal Sauna, Danish Health Club and the many offshoots that existed in the day. My first few experiences of a rub and'tug were at Royal and Ole English and were performed by middle 20 something ladies. It was a pleasure indeed. My first foray into FS however was at an unlikely place and it was performed by a pair of mid 30 ladies (not at the same time LOL). It was at a small massage place in the basement of the bowling alley just down the street from Royal. It was so different from the 'younger' ladies I had seen before. And to this day while I certainly do like the 'younger hotties' for a quick reminder of what it used to be like (not that I can remember much LOL) I find that the 'older and more mature' MILF's generally have a little something extra to share. Maybe it is experience or maybe it is a slower more caring time or maybe it is that they appreciate the 'act' more. Who knows. But don't just discount the older ladies as I've found that it can make this 54 year old dude happy and feeling a little younger. Just a couple of cents from SO
Originally Posted by Ampman44
[View Original Post]






Reply With Quote




