Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 33,001 to 33,015 of 42964
-
02-29-12 12:49 #9964Senior Member

Posts: 1856Both had Grand Openings!
Both purported to have grand openings in Jan but that Codington address has been around since the days of matrix spa who I believe was at 67. I know it is a 'complex' so I'm not sure it it is all connected and 59 and 67 are in the same bldg. I also know that MILF Barbara is at 67 and there is another place at 67 in suite 203 which has had decent reviews.
Originally Posted by Rito1
[View Original Post]
-
02-29-12 12:41 #9963Senior Member

Posts: 1856Ocean Spa
I'm guessing it was with Jenn. The last note I had was that jenn and alice were there. Both gave nice massages and endings but Jen was more layful and allowed access and Alice was OTC only. But please feel free to update on Alice or if someone else is there.
Originally Posted by Soundp1
[View Original Post]
-
02-29-12 12:32 #9962Senior Member

Posts: 1856Article in Herald
There was an article in the Herald a little bit ago which had some interviews from some of the independent escorts around who complained that the 'human trafficing' they were looking to stop didn't exist as much as those who passed the law were led to believe by the do-gooders. As a matter of fact the article pointed out that there were more instances of 'human traffic' arrests in the toney suburbs for 'maids, nannies and live in help' then for 'escorts'. Of course all the do=gooders came on board and slammed the ladies interviewed.
Originally Posted by Maximus77
[View Original Post]
In short (I believe although this is from quotes) that the law treats those 'taken into custody' for 'performing' the act as victims of 'human traffic' without penalty and the 'johns' as the cause with severe penalties. Besides driving it underground and to RI as stated I have read (and I'm not a lawyer) that several test cases may cause issues since the aim of the law was for a specific reason (human traffic) and if that reason doesn't exist than the law may not apply for a specific circumstance. One opinion I read state that was why there were no further penalties for the ladies as the gents caught were less likely to fight it. But I could be totally wrong. Anyone who understands better please chime in.
-
02-29-12 12:22 #9961Senior Member

Posts: 1856More truthful words never uttered
I absolutely agree! I have been in this hobby one way or another since the late 70's back in the days of Royal Sauna, Danish Health Club and the many offshoots that existed in the day. My first few experiences of a rub and'tug were at Royal and Ole English and were performed by middle 20 something ladies. It was a pleasure indeed. My first foray into FS however was at an unlikely place and it was performed by a pair of mid 30 ladies (not at the same time LOL). It was at a small massage place in the basement of the bowling alley just down the street from Royal. It was so different from the 'younger' ladies I had seen before. And to this day while I certainly do like the 'younger hotties' for a quick reminder of what it used to be like (not that I can remember much LOL) I find that the 'older and more mature' MILF's generally have a little something extra to share. Maybe it is experience or maybe it is a slower more caring time or maybe it is that they appreciate the 'act' more. Who knows. But don't just discount the older ladies as I've found that it can make this 54 year old dude happy and feeling a little younger. Just a couple of cents from SO
Originally Posted by Ampman44
[View Original Post]
-
02-29-12 11:49 #9960Senior Member

Posts: 144You're only young once
Good review and to each his own. My two cents is that you can AMP when you are married, middle-ages, etc. If I were a good looking single guy in my early 20s, I would be snagging as much pert coed T&A as possible. When we heard about how supposedly wild young girls are now and the concept of friends with benefits, most of us probably thought we were born at the wrong time. Are the stories about chicks your age true or exaggerated? Also, keep in mind hot MILFs. I did not realize until I was married myself how many hot MILFS were hitting on me at your age while I was clueless to the whole thing.
Originally Posted by Turbate
[View Original Post]
-
02-29-12 10:41 #9959Regular Member

Posts: 10Lotus Massage
I apologize ahead of time. This is my first report. I made a visit to Lotus Massage earlier this week. Located on Harrison Ave in Chinatown, it's a small clean establishment which offers both half hour and one hour sessions for 0. 40 and 0. 60 respectively. On my visit I drew Judy, probably late 30s fit body, spoke very good English and was very friendly. There was also a younger woman there, also attractive who spoke very little English. Massage was very good. There wasn't much of a tease though it may have been because it was my first time. On the flip I was asked if I needed anything else massage and the technique was fantastic. I will return.
-
02-28-12 22:27 #9958Senior Member

Posts: 33New laws
I don't need to get into the lengthy details, but a week or 2 ago the state enacted the strictest and highest penalty laws in the country and that means more pressure on sites promoting the behavior as well. Won't stop anything tho, just make people go to rhode island more.
Originally Posted by Top Floor
[View Original Post]
-
02-28-12 20:43 #9957Senior Member

Posts: 460Turbate
Good report. Try Lisa at Relax Time (you might get shorted on time though) or Coco at 5 Knapp St.
Originally Posted by Turbate
[View Original Post]
-
02-28-12 20:42 #9956Senior Member

Posts: 460New laws?
Second time I heard about these "new laws" but no details as to what they are. Care to enlighten me?
Originally Posted by Maximus77
[View Original Post]
-
02-28-12 20:38 #9955Senior Member

Posts: 86Welcome
Welcome to the world of mongering. Good job on these reports. That's how to go about it.
Looking forward to sharing some info with you.
A. M.
Originally Posted by Turbate
[View Original Post]
-
02-28-12 20:28 #9954Senior Member

Posts: 723Competitor
Silly question. With that in mind. Why is this one still up with a Massachusetts board?
Originally Posted by Maximus77
[View Original Post]
BB
-
02-28-12 20:13 #9953Senior Member

Posts: 103Don't Ask, and You Shall Receive
Decided to hit my favorite Somerville place again this past week. After being bait-and-switched out of a session with Coco last month (which generated some discussion on this board regarding her moving on to another location) , I didn't bother asking for anyone in particular when I called 15 minutes ahead of my arrival; I hadn't been disappointed here yet, so I figured why be picky?
Lo and behold, I arrived and drew Coco. Now, perhaps this isn't the same "Coco" that had been discussed previously, but I was not disappointed. Not at all. Looks were fantastic, body was incredible, the medium massage was excellent (though I might ask for hard next time) , and I was only shorted of the full hour by perhaps 5 or 6 minutes (I was concerned after having been shorted 15-20 minutes my last visit).
Damages were $60 + $40 which, in hindsight, probably should have been a little more. Hopefully I'll get a chance to make it up to her sometime soon.
-
02-28-12 19:48 #9952Senior Member

Posts: 78Ocean
Soundp1. Thanks for the report. I think the proper address is 299 Newport. But most people who monger in Quincy know the place.
Originally Posted by Soundp1
[View Original Post]
I've had more miss's than hits there, but when you find someone who is good. It can be really good if you repeat with them. If you visit again and figure out the name, please report back as I'm sure others in the area would appreciate a good option in Quincy. I know I would.
-
02-28-12 19:46 #9951Senior Member

Posts: 92Aiko
When going to AMPs, I try for the first of the day appointment. In CT, that's usually 10 am. It seems I have pretty good luck with less interruptions and friendlier providers.
Originally Posted by Turbate
[View Original Post]
Just sayin.
-
02-28-12 13:35 #9950Senior Member

Posts: 28Aiko
Second report I know but figured I would separate locations to make it easier for searching. Recently moved into Boston and figured I'd give CT a shot. Read some good things about Aiko from a massage quality and 2 pop expectation. Arrived for appt. And did not find her attractive at all. I don't mind an older woman but she didn't really appeal at all, once again I decided if I am going to try to get into the hobby I need to try the spectrum for good ideas of what to expect. Massage was pretty good with lots of teasing and eventually the reach under for the first pop. Good technique and overall a good massage. I understand she's a 1 person shop but still the endless phone ringing and knocking on the door causing interruptions made it a terrible time. Had the flip at 5 min left and didn't even try for a second pop, gave 60+40 and will not repeat despite good massage skills mainly due to the annoyance of stopping 8+ times.







Reply With Quote





