Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 28,741 to 28,755 of 32907
-
02-08-12 15:27 #4167Senior Member

Posts: 2644A couple more shots of Tiffany
Here's a couple more shots from my shoot with Tiffany. I should be doing another shoot with her (and a couple of other girls) in the very near future.
Stay safe, and happy hunting.
-
02-08-12 13:43 #4166Senior Member

Posts: 1089Wow this list is so wrong on so many levels! I can't believe they are even listing some of the wives of who this person feels is a bad boy client. 3rd party verification services are awful for this reason. So many innocent people will have there lives ruined for being on this list. If any of you guys have ever been to the west coast, they have a service called humaniplex which is a great site in my opinion. It acts as a place to advertise for providers along with provides verification for johns based on how previous providers rate the john.
Originally Posted by AMP Slave
[View Original Post]
-
02-08-12 11:54 #4165Senior Member

Posts: 203BP Sting Targeting Johns
Heads up fellas:
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/reg..._campaign=Feed%3A+bostonherald%2Fnews%2Fregional+%28Local+%2F+Regional+-+News+%26+Opinion+-+BostonHerald. Com%29&utm_content=FeedBurner
-
02-08-12 11:09 #4164Senior Member

Posts: 1856A better way
In my humble opinion (and some of you may not care) I think a better way of handling this would have been by way of PM'ing. This way the request with some I'd'ing info of the provider could be made to the one who offered it. A call or e-mail could then could be made to verify that is WAS the same provider as I'm sure there may be more than one in Winthrop and indeed the request was true and accurate. As LB said we do want to honor requests that providers make to keep info UTR but again a 'new' poster making that request publically would have me 'doubting' the veracity also. And if it was true then any requests for the info which were asked for by way of pm could be met with a response of 'she would rather not have the info shared'.
Originally Posted by Longjblues
[View Original Post]
-
02-08-12 10:55 #4163Senior Member

Posts: 1089LJ I agree with what your saying, but this guy sends me what sounded like genuine PM, offering to exchange intel on a blonde in Quincy for my info. (and me giving this regular member the benefit of the doubt) , I give him info, and then he responds back and says sorry, my girl doesn't want her info given out! I mean what kind of Jerk offers me info and then after receiving info tells me that they do not want there info given out? After that he keeps on sending repeat messages to me saying "I hope you understand", and for me to login this morning to see he replied to my original post saying the girl in winthrop does not want her info shared?
Seriously WTF!
Senior Members, take this as a lesson learned! Better to Regular Members Requests with Zero Credibility and keep info between us Senior Members Only.
GV.
Originally Posted by Longjblues
[View Original Post]
-
02-08-12 10:27 #4162Senior Member

Posts: 922Fair Enough
Fair enough LJB. Coming from you.
My point had nothing to do with the lady and everything to do with the poster. Had the request come from you or someone like you it would be taken seriously. In fact, I would have read it and moved on without a second thought.
Hopefully you see my point.
Originally Posted by Longjblues
[View Original Post]
-
02-08-12 09:43 #4161Senior Member

Posts: 1697PW
I agree with his post. He posted it in a direct, clear and courteous manner.
The lady from Winthrop has asked nicely that her info not be traded.
I think that we should abide by her wishes, rather than shooting the messenger.
Yes, I have spoken to her about giving out her info. I beleive that the poster you
took issue with has a more extensive reputation on other Boards.
Originally Posted by Pw Herman
[View Original Post]
-
02-08-12 08:20 #4160Banned Member

Posts: 1004UTR Winthrop
I have seen this Winthrop girl several times, so much so that she has asked me to introduce her to friends of mine. I actually heard from her 2 days ago when she asked me if any of my friends were interested.
Originally Posted by RedSox101
[View Original Post]
-
02-08-12 01:30 #4159Senior Member

Posts: 2140I think the distinguished lady in Winthrop whose UTR info I got from at least 3 different hobbyist should be grateful that her information is being passed UTR and not FTWWTS (for the whole world to see).
Originally Posted by Pw Herman
[View Original Post]
-
02-07-12 22:17 #4158Senior Member

Posts: 922Ok
But who are you?
Originally Posted by RedSox101
[View Original Post]
Your history deems that I would completely ignore your post just as if you said " Stop getting massages from Asian chicks"
Bottom line is you have no credibility to ask, much less demand, anything here.
I look forward to you setting me straight.
-
02-07-12 19:50 #4157Senior Member

Posts: 327Stay away from third parties verification
Due to this I am no longer using a third party to be verified. What I do not need is to falsley accused of something with all my personal info.
www.badboyclientlist.com
-
02-07-12 16:18 #4156Regular Member

Posts: 4The girl in winthrop does not want her info getting out traded our otherwise. Please respect that.
Originally Posted by Gianni Versace
[View Original Post]
-
02-06-12 23:43 #4155Senior Member

Posts: 119Public or not.
While a private site is not as bad, there still is no way to know what is reported to it is true and it can still be used vindictively. Worse, any site that has your personal information can be compromised by illegal means such as hacking, or legal means such as a court order.
Originally Posted by Kit Kat
[View Original Post]
In the internet age, I consider giving out personally identifying info a risk on the level of going bareback. No good time is worth it.
-
02-06-12 08:37 #4154Senior Member

Posts: 379Not only that.
It's detrimental to the business. Many people are going to be very afraid of giving out personal information for screenings once they see this site. Even if they are not the type to do anything nasty or inconsiderate.
Originally Posted by Kit Kat
[View Original Post]
-
02-05-12 18:02 #4153Forum Advertiser

Posts: 141I think a clarification is in order, I wasn't referring to that site in particular, but to similar (and not open to the public) sites. That particular site seems to me to be very unprofessional and simply vindictive.
Originally Posted by BaconBits
[View Original Post]
Xoxo Kat oxox









Reply With Quote


