Escort Reports

**BFDeal** · 02-23-12 08:50

Celebrated the start of Lent with a dream about a hot black chick. She had been out of town. Damn, did I miss this chick. Anway, she's about 5-2, 100 pounds, wet. 21 years old. And she did get wet. Soaked in fact. And she's back for awhile. She has one of the hottest rear-ends in Indiana, and well, back to the dream. We went at it like fuck buddies who hadn't seen each other in quite awhile. She slathered by tool with a vengeance, yet was gentle to the boys. She tasted like sweet chocolate pudding when it was my turn. Then came one of the tightest experiences I've ever had. She's got a real tight box with long, slender legs and perky, natural breasts. Not an ounce of fat on her. Looking in the hotel room mirror while banging her was a PSE. I dispensed a pearl necklace and then we showered together because she insisted on cleaning me up. Then the dream was over. Back to work where I chopped off a few heads for not making their quota.

It was an awesome Ass Wednesday. Fellow seniors, PM me for digits.

Keeping it real.

BFDeal

**Fudge1** · 02-22-12 02:56

[QUOTE=IndyGentleman; 1386776]Just want to add my two cents worth here. I have seen Melissa 4 times in the last two months and she is great. Reports on here are accurate. I would say she looks better than her pictures. Wonderful FS for a fantastic price. Did anyone take advantage of her $80 Valentines Day special? I could not, but you won't find a better value in Indy IMHO."Sweetheart" is the best possible word to describe her. [/QUOT.

I have seen Melissa many many times, but have only had FS once don to timing and mother nature. I am not complaining because he other services are off the charts. You can't go wrong with her. She is a keeper and a down to earth great girl. Treat her right.

**IndyGentleman** · 02-20-12 15:23

Just want to add my two cents worth here. I have seen Melissa 4 times in the last two months and she is great. Reports on here are accurate. I would say she looks better than her pictures. Wonderful FS for a fantastic price. Did anyone take advantage of her $80 Valentines Day special? I could not, but you won't find a better value in Indy IMHO."Sweetheart" is the best possible word to describe her.

**Ilapp** · 02-20-12 10:29

Originally Posted by BFDeal [View Original Post]

OK, I've been "dared" by a provider to use the phrase "G-dammit" in the title box of my next 20 posts. So if it doesn't look right or make sense, you guys know WTF going on.

BFDeal

You know I love ya brother, but this shit is going to get old, unless of course you are going to get laid for free for putting us all through this, if that is the case then I am sure we are all good with it. And if that is the case then I thought I would throw one in to see if it helps speed your count along.

**Hobbyist666** · 02-20-12 10:28

Originally Posted by TryinAgain2 [View Original Post]

Late last Spring, I was intro'd to a new, VERY UTR girl by a senior here. I know some others on here saw her and were pleased as was I. I only got to see her twice, scheduled individually, though I know she was really looking for a few regular guys rather than playing with ads. Well, with as dry as the field's been lately, I tried reconnecting with her the last few weeks. She never questioned meeting me again, and though it took awhile to get schedules worked out, I went by her place on Friday.

Here's where it got weird. She was dressed in jeans and a sweater with wet hair, having obviously just showered and looked more like she was getting ready to go shopping than entertain anyone. Previously she'd greeted me, even at our first meeting, in just a robe. And she acted like she didn't remember seeing me before, though I'm pretty sure she did. Then she hesitantly asked what I wanted, I said FS like we had before, and she said "I don't do that anymore", just the "sugar daddy thing". It got awkward real fast, and I'm not sure what she was wanting from me, so I wished her well and left. Then she texted me saying she just didn't want to do anything illegal and asked if I would be able to see her the twice or so per month I'm in town, or was I not interested in the sugar daddy thing? I just responded that I'm looking for something occasional, nothing formal, and that seemed to end the conversation. I was left thinking, huh? I suppose she may not really have remembered me and feared I was on a mission, but it felt like something else was going on. She kept harping on the "sugar daddy thing". It was awkward enough that I've no desire to see her anymore, despite the rocking body she was sporting.

Anyway, I'm not really looking for answers here, just wanted to get that off my chest. If someone has any insight to share, it's probably best left to PM's. I specifically have not named her and won't publicly to respect whatever her desires for privacy are at this point.

I've run into the same thing before but going the other direction. For awhile, I liked having a discreet LTR with a couple of sugar babes. I would say the half I've met just wanted regular escort type relationships. The other half were more interested in a true relationship. Of course, I'm dying to know if this was one of the girls I've met. I did find one who insisted on only a SB / SD relationship was busted in Greenwood a few years ago.

**TryinAgain2** · 02-20-12 10:05

Late last Spring, I was intro'd to a new, VERY UTR girl by a senior here. I know some others on here saw her and were pleased as was I. I only got to see her twice, scheduled individually, though I know she was really looking for a few regular guys rather than playing with ads. Well, with as dry as the field's been lately, I tried reconnecting with her the last few weeks. She never questioned meeting me again, and though it took awhile to get schedules worked out, I went by her place on Friday.

Here's where it got weird. She was dressed in jeans and a sweater with wet hair, having obviously just showered and looked more like she was getting ready to go shopping than entertain anyone. Previously she'd greeted me, even at our first meeting, in just a robe. And she acted like she didn't remember seeing me before, though I'm pretty sure she did. Then she hesitantly asked what I wanted, I said FS like we had before, and she said "I don't do that anymore", just the "sugar daddy thing". It got awkward real fast, and I'm not sure what she was wanting from me, so I wished her well and left. Then she texted me saying she just didn't want to do anything illegal and asked if I would be able to see her the twice or so per month I'm in town, or was I not interested in the sugar daddy thing? I just responded that I'm looking for something occasional, nothing formal, and that seemed to end the conversation. I was left thinking, huh? I suppose she may not really have remembered me and feared I was on a mission, but it felt like something else was going on. She kept harping on the "sugar daddy thing". It was awkward enough that I've no desire to see her anymore, despite the rocking body she was sporting.

Anyway, I'm not really looking for answers here, just wanted to get that off my chest. If someone has any insight to share, it's probably best left to PM's. I specifically have not named her and won't publicly to respect whatever her desires for privacy are at this point.

**Mikehammerindy** · 02-20-12 00:36

Originally Posted by Naughty169 [View Original Post]

Thanks! Now I am craving some spaghetti!

That makes two of us.

**BFDeal** · 02-17-12 16:38

OK, I've been "dared" by a provider to use the phrase "G-dammit" in the title box of my next 20 posts. So if it doesn't look right or make sense, you guys know WTF going on.

BFDeal

**Naughty169** · 02-17-12 10:16

Originally Posted by BFDeal [View Original Post]

There's just something about a chick who answers the door of her incall location with no clothes on. G-dammit, she's so tasty! Jenna's so hot I would eat a plate of spaghetti off her azz. I would dump the pasta on her azz, then the sauce, then sprinkle on some parm cheese followed by a little oregano. By the time I would have it all slurped up, it would be juicy, spicey hot! Yup, I know she requires a few more roses, but who really cares?

BFDeal

Thanks! Now I am craving some spaghetti!

**BFDeal** · 02-16-12 19:51

There's just something about a chick who answers the door of her incall location with no clothes on. G-dammit, she's so tasty! Jenna's so hot I would eat a plate of spaghetti off her azz. I would dump the pasta on her azz, then the sauce, then sprinkle on some parm cheese followed by a little oregano. By the time I would have it all slurped up, it would be juicy, spicey hot! Yup, I know she requires a few more roses, but who really cares?

BFDeal

**TruckerDan** · 02-07-12 01:06

Originally Posted by Forgot It [View Original Post]

Regular, contributing members of the board are always at odds with newbie posters asking for this type of direct answer and, no doubt, follow-up details to information that is already freely dispersed throughout this great site. Do some homework on here and you will find enough information on providers (to borrow from a popular beer commercial) to break a lesser man's wallet.

F / I

I was a lurker for a long time before I made my first post. Most of the information I was seeking (questions about providers and reviews) was right in front of my face and not difficult to find via posts and reviews. I appreciate the information provided by the forum members and try to post valuable info instead of wasting the time of the senior members with a cry of "help me" or "do it for me". Noob doesn't have to mean "stupid".

**B Beall** · 02-06-12 07:51

shorter kevin m. ryan, indianapolis star, sunday:

"claims about international child-sex slavery made before the super bowl were wildly exaggerated, but it's worth it because there might've been one or two **** hookers out there."

http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dl...=2012202050307

in other words, don't go demanding any evidence to back the wild claims my organization and others made beginning last spring. we just wanted to energize local anti-solicitation efforts. (oh, and the cash spigot is now turned off. see you next super bowl!)

funny that one year ago ryan was spouting those same "exaggerated numbers" for the benefit of folks in big d:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kevin-..._b_816311.html

mr. ryan, of course, will not be helping us to pay for the increased police activity which netted the misdemeanor arrests of a few decidedly not-****d providers, nor of the stings which utilized well-past-21 decoys to snare a few hobbyists who, presumably, had been thwarted in their efforts to buy preteens. he'll be off raising funds for his tax-free haven elsewhere, secure in the knowledge that whatever excesses others were subjected to were in the name of what he personally considers a good cause.

it's unclear to me whether the flying nun squad, having informed local motel clerks how to spot **** sex slaves before the big weekend, will be returning to local duties, or are off to daytona. i don't mean to minimize their efforts, or make light of any genuine child exploitation, even though the vast majority of those cases take place in farm fields, not motel 6s. on the contrary, i just wish they'd been organized early enough that they could have informed catholic parishioners over the last several decades how to spot pederasts in the clergy. because there was definitely more than one or two of those.

**EarlyCuyler** · 02-05-12 14:45

Steer clear. Her reviews (one of which also reviewed Vivian) have been confirmed in another forum to be written by someone who is LEO.

**BFDeal** · 02-05-12 00:54

And that's from a respected member of this board.

BFDeal.

Originally Posted by Mikehammerindy [View Original Post]

Well put. One needs to approach this board as a new entrant, as any public board, with patience and a great deal of humility. On the other side of the coin, we veterans should take a page out of "Forgot It's" book on how to treat new members initially, YOURS TRULY ESPECIALLY. If, after having had things explained in an adult manner, the offending neophyte still insists on having things his way, by all means, read the shithead the riot act. We should hesitate to do anything to unnecessarily run off potential new members, but still maintain the safety of this hobby best we can by weeding out undesirables of all kinds.