Thread: General Reports
+
Add Report
Results 6,346 to 6,360 of 9345
-
04-07-11 17:24 #3000Senior Member

Posts: 89Help with a number
I used to Goddess Hailey frequently, but started to travel for work and lost touch. I am hoping that a fellow hobbyist might still have her number?
-
04-04-11 20:51 #2999Senior Member

Posts: 131Never been to SS. Went to 1501 once but there was a mixup on the appointment time and everybody was busy, so I left. Sounds like it's too much trouble to deal with.
So SS is a pretty good be? Near Outback - is that near the old Rose's Spa?
-
04-04-11 20:08 #2998Senior Member

Posts: 8891501 seems to be a place that is nothing like what Soothing Sensations used to be where you knew what you were getting and not getting before you walked in the door. Instead, sessions at 1501 appear to be very dependent on which girl you get. And even then it seems to vary on how well you "click" with her if that makes sense.
Originally Posted by OneSwiss
[View Original Post]
-
04-04-11 19:38 #2997Regular Member

Posts: 14Hell
Hell, the differing opinions don't make my decision any easier.
Originally Posted by OneSwiss
[View Original Post]
-
04-04-11 18:58 #2996Senior Member

Posts: 79Names
So please help us out with the names so we won't get ripped off too!
Originally Posted by OneSwiss
[View Original Post]
Thanks,
Gman
-
04-04-11 15:14 #2995Banned Member

Posts: 873Rachael is the best example of this bs
Originally Posted by Horimtele
[View Original Post]
-
04-04-11 12:08 #2994Senior Member

Posts: 975I beg to differ.
I have only been there twice but I did not have the same experience. No upsell and no problem with the ladies coming through with the goods even if in one case it was only a tug.
Originally Posted by Horimtele
[View Original Post]
-
04-04-11 08:57 #2993Senior Member

Posts: 711501. Waste of time and money
Used to be an ok place, if you look for the back rub and HJ routine.
Not any more, the girls try to up sell and will not even give the HJ with out extra. Lots of extra money,
Be careful,
-
04-04-11 00:46 #2992Senior Member

Posts: 297Lol!
LOL! No way both of those pics are the same girl, unless she's gained about 3o lbs inbetween photo shots. The top pic looks like Hailey Baby.
Originally Posted by EvansvilleMan3
[View Original Post]
-
04-03-11 18:55 #2991Regular Member

Posts: 11Tineye. Com is amazing
http://louisville.backpage.com/Femal...ind-23/2867324
I knew the girl in the bottom pic was all over the internet on jerk sites. I just ran it through tineye. Com for s. Giggles and sure enough. Amazing website.
-
04-03-11 01:25 #2990Regular Member

Posts: 11Some more help with Research
I though this would also be helpful to those wanting to do additional research.
This is a nation wide phone reverse lookup for escorts. Check it out.
http://fuuz.in/phone/502 This is of area code 502.
Enjoy. Cheers!
-
04-01-11 19:21 #2989Senior Member

Posts: 60Thank You
Golfcart,
Originally Posted by Golfcart
[View Original Post]
Thank you so much for the tutorial, I will put tineye to use in the future. I had no idea the site was out there. You are a wealth of information, and I appreciate it.
-
03-31-11 13:28 #2988Forum Advertiser

Posts: 99Now that's love (LOL.)
Sincerely,
Originally Posted by Golfcart
[View Original Post]
Golfcart.
CEO and Chief Stockholder.
Tineye, Inc.
-
03-30-11 22:59 #2987Senior Member

Posts: 36Golfcart to the rescue!
As usual, my friend Golfcart is sharing his wisdom with an amazing post of not just how to better search for the important details behind a poster's advertisement, but more importantly, how to interpret the data that are found. Since he's nailed the analysis with amazing thoroughness, I just want to add a couple of technical details.
Originally Posted by Golfcart
[View Original Post]
In order to use tineye you don't necessarily have to find the image's location by right clicking and getting the "View Image Info" details, or the equivalent of "Copy Image Location" in Firefox. You can also just note the URL for the entire page and copy and paste that into the tineye search engine. After it evaluates the URL, it will bring up a selection of all the images on the page and ask you to click on the image you would like to search.
The browser extensions that allow for automatic tineye evaluation uses the #1 method. That is, after selecting the picture it passes along the image's absolute URL to the tineye engine for processing. I verified this by doing a TCP / IP traffic dump and running through the logs.
He was of course also dead on about tineye's capabilities. Tineye is miniscule compared to the gargantuan processing power and bandwidth that google possesses. Google can likely crawl more in an hour than tineye can do in a week. Tineye has quite limited resources and as such only catalog a fraction of what's really out there. The rate at which new pics are added on the net far, far exceeds the rate at which they can catalog, as indexing all that content requires crawling through all those links and downloading the images to be analyzed. Google's image search currently catalogs more than 12 billion images according to their the googleblog, whereas tineye catalogs about 2 billion. It's not bad for a small entity, but nowhere near thorough.
There is somewhat of a way to glean a little bit more information about whether the pic could correspond to the girl in the event of a postive tineye result. At the bottom of each positive picture is the URL for the site where it can be found. Entering the URL into a google search and looking for the result that corresponds exactly to that URL (usually the first one, but not always) also notes the last time the page was updated. This can give you some more information, although limited. If the girl posts her age as 19 and the image she posted was found on a website last updated 5 years ago, it's very likely that it's not her. But, since she could also be lying about her age it doesn't give you too much more to go on. It's just a little bit more data to be evaluated using Golfcart's "system".
Originally Posted by Golfcart
[View Original Post]
I tend to do a quick phone number and tineye search for the girls I find hot, mainly out of curiosity as to whether they're real or not. The girls I'm seriously considering, I do the full monty of searches that Golfcart outlined. It's really the only ability we as hobbyists have. It's limited, but it does help knock out a great many fakes.
Originally Posted by Golfcart
[View Original Post]
Hah! LOL!
Originally Posted by Golfcart
[View Original Post]
-
03-30-11 21:49 #2986Senior Member

Posts: 1420There's More to Tin Eye Than Meets the Eye.
http://www.TinEye.com
Using Tin Eye. Method 1:
1. Right click the pic to be tested.
2. Dialog box that appears, last line says "View Image Info."
3. Click "View Image Info."
4. What comes up is a bigger box. Look for "Location:" and what follows is the URL of the pic to be tested on Tin Eye. Copy the URL.
5. Open http://www.TinEye.com.
6. Paste the URL in the panel on the top RIGHT and click 'Search. '
7. Note what Tin Eye finds.
8. Tin Eye has searched its inventory of images using the URL.
Using Tin Eye. Method 2:
1. Instead of copying the URL, save the pic to be tested.
2. Open http://www.TinEye.com.
3. Upload the saved pic to the panel on the top LEFT of Tin Eye and click Search.
4. Tin Eye has searched its inventory of images using the pixels.
Tin Eye has browser-specific plug-ins on its site we can download that make running Tin Eye a snap just one click for Tin Eye to open its box and a second click to run Tin Eye on a given pic. What I don't know is whether the application runs Method 1 above or Method 2.
Nuances of Tin Eye:
We want to know if she really is the girl in front of the camera, if the pic was taken in the recent past and is not misleading and if the girl in the pic is the girl who shows up. If she pirated her pic we want to know that, also. We want Tin Eye to give us, in other words, a review.
It is asking a lot of Tin Eye to do all this for us when we cannot do a good job doing it ourselves even after we see her with our own eyes. How many times have we left an appointment happy with what we saw and got, and we thought it was her but we were not entirely sure? Along comes Tin Eye with a computer based search process and we jump to the conclusion, wrongly, we now have science on our side giving black and white answers we can take to the bank. Not so fast. There's more to Tin Eye than meets the eye.
Pics have always represented a peanut-and-shell game. Tin Eye does not change that in the typical situation.
Specifically:
Tin Eye cannot tell us that the girl in front of the camera that took the pic that got our attention is the same girl who posted the pic to advertise herself. The pic could be a pic of her or some other girl taken whenever. Tin Eye cannot confirm that the girl we contact through her site looks like the pics on her site. Only the photographer knows for sure.
Even when Tin Eye finds the pic that got our attention all over the internet the girl who posted it to advertise herself may have posted it in all those places, and it may be a pic of her or someone else taken yesterday or 15 years ago. The sheer number of places where Tin Eye found the same pic, standing alone, is no indication of the pic's authenticity due to copying by third-party 'repackaging' and advertising sites. Only the photographer knows for sure.
No matter what Tin Eye tells us about the pic that got our attention being elsewhere on the internet, Tin Eye cannot tell us what the girl who shows up to the answer the door will look like. Only our eyes will know and even then our eyes won't always know for sure.
What Tin Eye can tell us:
Tin Eye Positive will tell us where else the pic that got our attention was found in Tin Eye's inventory of images. But that will not include internet images not yet captured in Tin Eye's inventory. Tin Eye's inventory of images, while large, is small in relation to the total images on the internet.
Tin Eye Positive finding the pic that got our attention on a site other than where we found it means it could have been posted by (i) our girl who does or does not look like the pic that got our attention, (ii) some other girl (which won't tell us which girl is the pirate) or (iii) a third-party 'repackaging' and advertising site and in this situation we don't know whether their source for the pic is our girl or some other girl.
Tin Eye Negative means the pic that got our attention was not found in Tin Eye's inventory of images. It is unknown if the pic that got our attention is on the internet where Tin Eye has not yet crawled. So Tin Eye Negative takes us to square one.
More often than not the pic that got our attention will turn up Tin Eye Negative. This is because Tin Eye is searching its inventory of images and not the internet itself. Tin Eye's inventory of images is small in relation to the total images on the internet. Tin Eye constantly 'crawls' the internet for images (like Google 'crawls' for text). This means that Tin Eye and Google are always behind the internet. What I don't know is if Tin Eye 'crawls' at a rate faster than the rate new images are being added. It could be Tin Eye is catching up with the internet little by little each day or falling further behind. My sense is Google 'crawls' faster than Tin Eye. We get very few Google Negatives. We get a lot of Tin Eye Negatives. Maybe it has to do with Google being around longer or having more resources. I don't know.
In the circumstance of Tin Eye Positive note the following:
The number of other places where Tin Eye found the pic that got our attention means nothing. Finding the pic that got our attention in one hundred other places is the same as finding it in one other place. It means it was found elsewhere. Well, the poster of the pic that got our attention could have posted it there, or the poster of the pic that got our attention could be the victim of piracy. We have no way of knowing which poster is the pirate.
With Tin Eye Positive what is important is the nature of the sites where the pic that got our attention was found. The nature of these sites may allow us to make an educated guess on the probability that the pic that got our attention was pirated from a different poster on of the internet. Maybe the nature of these other sites leaves us with uncertainty of the explanation.
About the only time the probability is high that the pic that got our attention was pirated is when the sites where the pic that got our attention was found are catalog, model or porn sites, especially those sites in a foreign language. Do not see the girl behind that pic if her appearance is important.
No matter how the analysis turns out, nothing can confirm the girl posting the pic that got our attention is the girl in front of the camera, or if she is the girl that she still looks like she did then, or that she will be the girl behind the door when we knock.
It should be apparent that Tin Eye Positive is not useful at all unless the other places are catalog, model or porn sites, especially those sites in a foreign language.
Finally, Tin Eye is a tool best used with Google so the whole thing won't be riding on one picture show. Google the girl's website, directory profile, email and phone to find additional ads turning up additional and different pics, websites, profiles, emails and phones. Google each new found website, email and phone so you have everything out there you can find. Keep Googling these new finds until nothing new turns up. At that point you will have found everything on the internet to be found (at last for tonight LOL). This will give you a pretty good idea what you are dealing with. That's the time to run Tin Eye and run it on all the pics, not just some.
That was a lot of work. It's time for me to go to bed with a book or a hot woman who has read one.











Reply With Quote









