Escort Reports

**TheGeneral** · 01-18-11 18:49

Saw her yesterday. New rack, new ride. Got new digits. She was the best BJ I ever dreamed about.

**Deviousdog** · 01-03-11 20:46

Thanks for the info. I called her number earlier today to set up an appt and I could not leave a voicemail, later I checked her website (chekaplays. Com) and saw it was offline. I figured she had either moved out of town or quit the business.

Originally Posted by Ho Consultant [View Original Post]

Cheka actually has left the industry as of a week or so ago, and retired incase anyone is curious. She made the announcement on another board. She would not say why. She was a good fuck.

**Ho Consultant** · 01-03-11 01:02

Originally Posted by Jasper123 [View Original Post]

Seems to Cheka her reviews like a hawk.

http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEsco...w-pics/1552707

New snaps mimicking the poses in her glamour shot photos.

Hey, we got a special out of it!

Cheka actually has left the industry as of a week or so ago, and retired incase anyone is curious. She made the announcement on another board. She would not say why. She was a good fuck.

**Lithium215** · 06-23-10 19:02

Me saying that she wasn't fat or ugly was only in reference to the pics she posted and the girl you saw.. You see.. IMO the pics she posted were not a totally inaccurate representation of the girl. ie. she isn't fat, ugly, 65 years old, one-legged, covered in hairy moles, a humpback, etc.. She is still a pretty girl and not much to complain about in the sack for the price she offers. She also gives a hell of a BJ. Sorry to have made myself unclear.

**Jasper123** · 06-23-10 16:02

Seems to Cheka her reviews like a hawk.

http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEsco...w-pics/1552707

New snaps mimicking the poses in her glamour shot photos.

Hey, we got a special out of it!

**BananaOil** · 06-21-10 22:13

I've seen Cheka and she is a very nice and enthusiastic provder and her incall is very nice. I think she looks like Trudy Weigel from Reno 911. Her bod is pretty nice except for her titties. They need a rebuild asap.

**Clinton Bush** · 06-21-10 22:06

Agree with Originalwook, Blondehound and Steel Thunder - why are women posting fake or 15 year old pictures? Do they really expect that Stevie Wonder is going to show up at their door for service?

If any forum advertisers are reading this, take note - guys expect the girl who answers the door to be the girl in the pictures. Is that to much to ask? And if you look like shit and are ashamed to post your current pictures then just don't post anything rather than posting a lie. We are less disappointed if we see no picture in your ad and leave it up to chance than if you show us pictures of a smoking fox and look like a run down dog. And if you are not in shape, make up for it with superior service. Just have a little self respect and some concern for your customers. That means don't be out there spreading venereal diseases to all your clients (victims???) like those nasty ho sisters Alicia and Angel have been caught doing again.

ps- if you look like an old hag then maybe you should be working at Kmart and not in the ass for cash business. Think about it.

**Member #4558** · 06-21-10 21:29

Originally Posted by Lithium215

She may or may not be the girl in the pics, but Cheka is far from fat and ugly though. How disappointed could you have been? Plus the services she provides are great! She is very talented. You may have had a bad experience with her, but I can't say I wouldn't recommend her to anyone thinking about seeing her. With all the doped up trash you can run into as a hobbyist, having a problem with Cheka baffles me to be honest..

Did you even read what I wrote? Perhaps the better question is did you understand it? Let me answer for you. No, you did not. I did not call her fat. I did not call her ugly. I even said the services were ok. My issue is what I would call false or misleading advertising.

You need to work on your reading comprehension skill...

**SteelThunder** · 06-21-10 20:34

...use other, more accurate and recent pics from what I would guess.

On the positive side, it sounds like Cheka runs from average to downright excellent in her performace, which is enough to leave many hobbyists very, very happy indeed!! Its just a damn shame that she (and many other providers) don't just use accurate, up to date pics. It would make the whole review process here a hell of a lot easier than having to explain what her body really looked like compared to what it looked like in her photos.

There are enough surprises to worry about in the hobby. I just wish less of them were of the "appearance" variety since that is something that is easy enough for these girls to advertise correctly if they so desire.

I, for one, am much more appreciative of those girls that show exactly what they are working with...flaws and all. Somebody a lot smarter than me said that most times the biggest flaw is pretending you don't have any.

Best of luck and be safe

**Lithium215** · 06-21-10 17:13

She may or may not be the girl in the pics, but Cheka is far from fat and ugly though. How disappointed could you have been? Plus the services she provides are great! She is very talented. You may have had a bad experience with her, but I can't say I wouldn't recommend her to anyone thinking about seeing her. With all the doped up trash you can run into as a hobbyist, having a problem with Cheka baffles me to be honest..

**Jasper123** · 06-21-10 14:27

A few random observations-

1. IME, TER will disapprove reviews when the next approved one gets you a VIP membership. I have had ones disapproved for no other apparent reason. I have submitted my last TER review.

2. Cheka's photos are her and taken within the past year/year and a half. The newer set are "glamor-shots" which have been airbrushed but they are her.

3. My dreams of Cheka have been among the best I have had in the hobby. The woman has some serious skills. I'd rank her right up there with Vanessa of Discrete Meets. Her boobs are small and a bit deflated looking from breast-feeding. She is in her mid to late 30's, not her early 20's. She is otherwise slim and beautiful, with fantastic gams. She also returns her telephone calls, is on time for her appointments, and keeps her incall apartment spotlessly clean. She is the consummate professional as a provider. I heartily recommend her.

Just my $.02

**Blondehound** · 06-21-10 10:59

Originally Posted by Originalwook

I submitted a review to TER for Cheka who is based in Clearwater. I gave her ok marks, nothing spectacular, and made a mention that the woman that I saw did not resemble the images on her web site. Did not say she was not the one pictured, just that they did not look alike.

Well, she must have read my review and pitched a hissy fit as my once "approved" review was pulled and marked as "disapproved". She apparently claimed that I had not seen her and was making it up. The dicks at ter made no effort to contact me prior to pulling the review and just took this broads word at face value. Well, that kind of pissed me off and I sent a pretty scathing response to the staff at ter. I supplied specific directions on how to get to her place (which were provided by her) and I even described the interior if her little love shack. Of course they failed to respond just as I expected that they would not.

Well for everyone reading this, for any ter staff that may read this and especially for cheka who may read this, I did see her and the woman that I saw is not the one pictured on her web site. Hair is different, body shape is different. The big thing for me is that the legs do not match. The images look to me like a somewhat tall and slender woman with long slender legs. The woman I saw was short and a little on the pudgy side. Stretch marks and some pretty small and droopy tits. Guess the airbrush is a wonderful thing!

I can make two assumptions here. Either the pics on her web site are very, very old or the pictures are not of her. Now don't get me wrong, the service was ok but I will not be going back to see her because of this episode. Just consider yourself alerted to the fact that if you elect to visit Cheka, you may or may not see the woman in her web site pictures. I certainly did not.

And one last point. I only submitted the review to garner a few free VIP days. I had a paid membership there but found the site to be so corrupt and slanted that I vowed that I would never pay another cent to the site owners. There was another provider that I wanted to do a little research on so I accomplished my goal at any rate.

For years now there have been complaints about how the TER removes posts that the ladies don't like. So over the past year I have given up on that site being a reliable site. Thanks for the report. I will for sure stay away from Cheka. The biggest thing that I hate is when women do not use current photos and I show up to see my perky titted blonde beauty is now a droopy titted brunette fatty.

BH

**Member #4558** · 06-21-10 10:51

I submitted a review to TER for Cheka who is based in Clearwater. I gave her ok marks, nothing spectacular, and made a mention that the woman that I saw did not resemble the images on her web site. Did not say she was not the one pictured, just that they did not look alike.

Well, she must have read my review and pitched a hissy fit as my once "approved" review was pulled and marked as "disapproved". She apparently claimed that I had not seen her and was making it up. The dicks at ter made no effort to contact me prior to pulling the review and just took this broads word at face value. Well, that kind of pissed me off and I sent a pretty scathing response to the staff at ter. I supplied specific directions on how to get to her place (which were provided by her) and I even described the interior if her little love shack. Of course they failed to respond just as I expected that they would not.

Well for everyone reading this, for any ter staff that may read this and especially for cheka who may read this, I did see her and the woman that I saw is not the one pictured on her web site. Hair is different, body shape is different. The big thing for me is that the legs do not match. The images look to me like a somewhat tall and slender woman with long slender legs. The woman I saw was short and a little on the pudgy side. Stretch marks and some pretty small and droopy tits. Guess the airbrush is a wonderful thing!

I can make two assumptions here. Either the pics on her web site are very, very old or the pictures are not of her. Now don't get me wrong, the service was ok but I will not be going back to see her because of this episode. Just consider yourself alerted to the fact that if you elect to visit Cheka, you may or may not see the woman in her web site pictures. I certainly did not.

And one last point. I only submitted the review to garner a few free VIP days. I had a paid membership there but found the site to be so corrupt and slanted that I vowed that I would never pay another cent to the site owners. There was another provider that I wanted to do a little research on so I accomplished my goal at any rate.

**Clinton Bush** · 06-15-10 21:46

Originally Posted by Atl Guy

Has anyone sampled any of these girls? Looks oddly like some of the girls from FT/TG.

http://tampabaycompanions.com/companions.phtml

Brandy is Kristy/Christy at FT/TG (see last several days discussions in Tampa Massage thread of Brandy). Eve also looks like she was once one of the FT/TG girls (though I could be mistaken).