Thread: Internet Security
+
Add Report
Results 121 to 135 of 213
-
11-23-10 13:49 #93Senior Member

Posts: 362No, I am not sending money "to" WU. I am sending money through WU to people I know, there is no scam. I am not just sending money to WU. The problem is, WU wants the people I send money to to provide my name and phone number. For obvious reasons I do not want the chica to know my full name and phone number, because I don't want them calling my house or googling me and showing up at my front door one day.
Originally Posted by Willieherman
[View Original Post]
-
11-23-10 11:51 #92Regular Member

Posts: 21Maybe your luck is better
It has been my experience that sending money to Western Union is a big red flag for rip-off. It may be different in your area, but not in mine.
-
11-23-10 11:42 #91Senior Member

Posts: 362Western Union. How can I keep receiver from seeing my info?
With the Nazi regime now ensconced in the USA, every aspect of our lives is subject to the most intense scrutiny.
I try to send WU and the person I sent the money to says she cannot get it unless I tell her my name, my city, and my phone.
Well, I do not want her to see these things!
WTF!
She has the MTCN, it is a small amount of money. There is a space where I can put a security question. Her name is on it. Why can't she just get the money from WU by presenting the MTCN?
Is this just some local idiocy at this particular WU, or is this WU everywhere?
I finally found a WU that does not require me to present I'd, I use a fake phone number and PO box. But now the assholes on the other end want me to give my info to the chica so she can get the money.
Does anyone have some advice on how to send money annonymously?
To be honest, it is not so much Big Brother I am worried about, as it is all the other idiots. Not to mention the chica on the other side and the s / o back home.
-
05-27-10 21:29 #90Senior Member

Posts: 52Microsoft Security Essentials
Microsoft has a free anitvirus program thats pretty good and free updates for personnel computers.
http://www.microsoft.com/security_es...s/default.aspx
R60
-
04-04-10 05:09 #89Senior Member

Posts: 1464I also use Spybot Search & Destroy. It's excellent & free.
Misfit
-
03-31-10 00:55 #88Senior Member

Posts: 26One thing for many of you who run without antivirus to consider: Many of the major Internet Service Providers provide an antivirus program for you to download and install as a part of your service, either for Free or for a discounted amount. I know ATT offers McAfee (my deluxe pacakage comes with the ability to install on 7 computers), and I also know Comcast offers Norton Security Suite (not sure how many licenses you get there.)
You may also want to consider the free antivirus packages Avast! and AVG.
As to malware protection, I have used Spybot Search & Destroy from SaferNetworking for almost 10 years now. They're much better for cleanup after the fact, not livetime protection, although they do have some good protection in the way of the Immunize function and TeaTimer to try to stop any changes to known areas that malware likes to take hold.
-
12-20-09 07:24 #87Senior Member

Posts: 1464Cyber Condom
Cost me a Ben, but am now completely protected with the software Norton 360 Premier Edition with automatic updates every 15 mins. Comes with a 1 yr. license included. Virus & Spyware removal, also a Firewall. Not promoting the software, just a simple comment.
Misfit
-
08-23-09 06:31 #86Senior Member

Posts: 1464Spyware
Guys be careful on what you click on when watching porn vids on the net. Last weekend I got a nasty program downloaded into my system. It was called braviax.exe
It corrupted my Norton Anti-Virus, Norton Firewall, Spybot, & everytime I booted the computer it would disable my Windows Firewall.
I finally had to buy a Spyware Removal program named Ad-aware Plus which finally got rid of the Malware & fixed my registery. All my programs are fine now. Just be careful on what you let inside your computer.
Misfit
-
08-21-09 06:53 #85Senior Member

Posts: 90Thanks
Jackson, thanks for your post on the Wtby board. It reallys helps to alleviate me of the worries about the site security. My kudos to you!!!
C'est tout.
-
08-20-09 18:39 #84Senior Member

Posts: 1270Cyber Stalker
Yes, this sick freak is the ultimate definition of the words "cyber stalker".
This just serves as a heads up to everyone that posts here. Be careful who you're sharing information with, especially via PM. I also feel for the girls on the streets. Not only are they already in an unsafe situation, now there's some crazy loon who's going to pick them up just to interrogate them for information on the guys that are picking them up.
I know this Sick Freak Cyber Stalker is reading all this. Get some help before you really end up hurting someone.
-
08-20-09 18:24 #83Senior Member

Posts: 114cyber stalker
Jackson Thank You for all you do.
Originally Posted by Bubba261
Jack
-
08-20-09 18:07 #82Senior Member

Posts: 991Re: "Cyberstalker" ....
....well done, handled perfectly. And thanks for the lengthy explanation, many other members were concerned with the reaons and ultimate outcome of this "confrontation".
Thanks again.
-
02-04-09 07:46 #81Regular Member

Posts: 10******* barred 90,000 sex offenders
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The online networking site ******* has identified and barred some 90,000 registered sex offenders from using the site over the last two years, ******* revealed to an investigative task force on Tuesday.
The "shocking" number was 40,000 more than ******* had previously acknowledged, according to Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, a co-chairman of the task force of state attorneys general looking into sex offenders' use of social networking.
*******, owned by News Corp.'s Fox Interactive Media digital division, disclosed the figures to the task force in response to a subpoena.
"This shocking revelation, resulting from our subpoena, provides compelling proof that social networking sites remain rife with sexual predators," Blumenthal said in a statement.
Blumenthal's office said it was awaiting a response to a similar subpoena issued to Facebook, another popular social networking site that his office said also might host "substantial numbers of convicted offenders."
Facebook's Chief Privacy Officer Chris Kelly said in a statement it was working with Blumenthal's office but said the site had "not yet had to handle a case of a registered sex offender meeting a minor through Facebook."
"Unlike ******* or other social networking sites, Facebook has always enforced a real-name culture and has developed and deployed social verification and powerful privacy rules that allow people to interact in a safer and more trusted environment," the statement said.
Two years ago, ******* commissioned background verification firm Sentinel Safe Tech Holdings Corp. to create a national database of sex offenders after reports that some of its teenage users were abducted by sex predators.
Sentinel operates a U.S. database of sex offenders that includes as many as 120 details for each offender, from their names and addresses to their scars and tattoos, Sentinel Chief Executive John Cardillo said.
Before the national database was created, information on convicted sex offenders was available only locally.
******* said on Tuesday the technology had enabled it to identify 90,000 users as registered sex offenders -- people who have been found guilty of sex crimes and ordered to register with law enforcement officials -- and had removed and blocked them from the site.
"We can confirm that ******* has removed these individuals from our site and is providing data about these offenders to any law enforcement agency including the Attorney General's in Connecticut," *******'s Chief Security Officer Hemanshu Nigam said in a statement.
(Reporting by Edith Honan; Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst and Philip Barbara)
-
01-25-09 16:21 #80Senior Member

Posts: 192Warning about usasexguide.com
Without thinking, I went to usasexguide.com instead of usasexguide.info. The com site brought up a bunch of stuff like free movie clips, webcams, etc. So like an idiot I clicked on one, and got a really really nasty virus. It was a little costly and time consuming. If you go to the com site by accident, leave it right away, don't be tempted to try anything there.
-
01-13-09 19:19 #79Senior Member

Posts: 576Cleansing files
I'm not sure how they compare. CCleaner will find your browser's cache and clean it but you have to turn on the secure deletion in the options, and it handles cookies. Eraser would be less useful as it would involve more work to remove the files, and CleanUP appears to just delete temporary files and not in a secure manner.
Originally Posted by Square Tree
"delete in a secure manner" means to overwrite the existing file with random data multiple times. The more passes of random data written, the less likely a snooper will be able to glean useful information, even if they "recover" the file.







Reply With Quote




