Thread: Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia
Closed Thread
Results 601 to 615 of 3219
-
11-08-10 17:26 #2619Senior Member

Posts: 2113I would say she was the best experience I had yet in Philly, Next would be Stacy from Old York Road.
Originally Posted by Supereloquent
[View Original Post]
-
11-08-10 14:44 #2618Senior Member

Posts: 2334Stefany
Great FS experience!
-
11-08-10 14:43 #2617Senior Member

Posts: 2334Melanie
A young spinner who could DT. YEAH!
-
11-08-10 14:41 #2616Senior Member

Posts: 2334Kitty
Sweet, pretty, fuckable young Kitty. With a great sucking technique, Yeeeeeehawwwww!
-
11-08-10 14:39 #2615Senior Member

Posts: 2334"Bad Katie"
There are several reasons I would strongly recommend not dating this SW (read the reports in my index), but she could suck you dry when she felt like it.
-
11-08-10 14:36 #2614Senior Member

Posts: 2334Monica
A sweet, cute, young BBW with a mouth like a HOOVER!
-
11-08-10 14:33 #2613Senior Member

Posts: 2334Deb
Another MILF with sucking ability. One of the things I found very arousing about Deb was her high-pitched voice and willingness and ability to talk FILTHY DIRTY!
-
11-08-10 14:30 #2612Senior Member

Posts: 2334Carol
"Sleepyhead Carol" didn't open her eyes during our entire date, but when she got actually into sucking mode she was AWESOME!
-
11-08-10 14:27 #2611Senior Member

Posts: 2334Babs
Here is a MILF-suck from early on in my pic taking publishing adventures. You will see that I hadn't yet perfected a great way to reduce the glare from close-up flash photography at that point, but I finally figured it out.
-
11-08-10 13:47 #2610Senior Member

Posts: 2334One Man's Junk Is Another Man's Treasure
Another Clint Eastwood fan. I love it!
Originally Posted by Rocket Dork
[View Original Post]
The cock-pic whiners' complaints are to your benefit. I already made this very clear: the more they bi*tch and moan, over-exaggerate and throw rocks on this subject, the more cock-sucking pics they (and you for collateral enjoyment) will get. A different version of the first cock-pic reprise I published as a collage is attached below. To follow are some close-ups of the first of this series of cock-sucking collages that I presented.
I have DOZENS of EACH of these individual pics to show close-up. And, do the math; I have dated over 150 SWs in the past two years, most of whom I have taken 20-30, and often a LOT more cock sucking pics each. Plus, I have dated many of these SWs multiple times. I haven't counted all my cock sucking pics, but let's just say, technically, that there are oodles, LOL
So, those who are clueless about cock pics had best either shut the fuck up or tune to another channel, because there is a lot more where this came from. Rocket Dork would be only happy to have his day made, so in case you didn't comprehend my last statement about this,"Go ahead, make my day."
-
11-08-10 08:17 #2609Senior Member

Posts: 1421Pictures
Keep up with the pictures! They make my day! Rocket Dork Chicago
-
11-07-10 21:22 #2608Senior Member

Posts: 2334RE: Cock sucking picture haters don't have a clue
Ask and you shall receive; complain and you shall receive; just MENTION cock-sucking pics and you shall receive. Is that clear enough for you cock-pic haters?
Originally Posted by Dripper
[View Original Post]
-
11-07-10 20:28 #2607Senior Member

Posts: 87Cock sucking picture hates don't have a clue
SE:
Originally Posted by Supereloquent
[View Original Post]
These shots are surpassed only by the money shots. I vote for an endless supply of both. Keep it and us up!
-
11-07-10 20:19 #2606Senior Member

Posts: 2334Low Balling: the "New Math"
IMHO Street is the reigning King of low-balling on the stroll. I am merely his designated pic chronicler. This is his domain. I merely operate in his shadow and serve at his pleasure. My ego is not invested in this arena, and I respect his particular documented expertise in this on the stroll. Rook would be a solid second alternate.
Originally Posted by Street Steve
I recently submitted a collage of SWs in the low-ball category. Lest there be any confusion among the mathematically challenged in reference to this category in my SW of the Year Contest, I offer the following re-clarification of exactly what I have previously stated that a low-ball SW is on the K, based on Street's original criteria: it is any date you have for 10 or less, with some leeway given for a few bonus loosies or a drink, etc. I defer to Street for any appropriate future adjustments to this definition, but "low-ball" refers to an absolute and not a relative target. Regardless what a girl "usually" gets (or says she gets, which is one of the great SW lies), a low-ball SW is one with a documented date at the target low-ball price of 10 (or below, with acceptable leeway), and a published pic.
I hope that clears the air on this matter. It is pretty simple and straight-forward, and doesn't require further muddying of the water. I may have promulgated this initial ruling as far as my contest is concerned, but Street is the final authority and arbiter of any disputes as to what SW is or isn't a "low-baller" in my contest, and in any further admissions to my official Low-Ballers Hall of Fame. If someone else wants to have his own set of definitions, proclaim himself the King of this domain, and reinvent low-ball math, then go for it.
-
11-07-10 19:38 #2605Senior Member

Posts: 2334RE: Cock in the mouth worth 2 in the Bush
I guess cock-pic kibitzers will just never "get it." The more they piss and moan, the more of my cock they are going to see in the mouths of SWs. You appreciate this genre, Member #1759, so you will be the beneficiary of their bitching. Here is a collage of my earliest cock-sucking pics. I literally have THOUSANDS of them, both previously published and not previously published, more than enough to post 10 LARGE pic attachments a DAY here and never run out, not to mention the fact that my ongoing cock-pic taking could keep up that pace INDEFINITELY. I am sure the cock-pic lovers would absolutely love it if the cock-pic haters kept on making an issue of it.
Originally Posted by Member #1759
[View Original Post]
Sorry, Bigtime Monger: others do not possess your sincere rationality on this subject. They need to be taken to the "Woodshed."












