Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

**Supereloquent** · 11-07-10 16:12

Originally Posted by Street Steve

It is good for us to post those SW's that are merely acceptable, and maybe a little under that. It takes some guts. Guys need to know it is ok to pick up a SW that is NOT a Gem- that on some days a plain jane may be the girl for you. Truthfully I always felt sorry for those Guys that can only get off with a Gem. They are missing out. A plain jane can be fun, and have her own kind of heat.

A GEM to some mongers is a SW who looks good. Looking good is desirable, but I would prefer an average looking girl with a great attitude to a great looking girl with an average attitude. Sex to me is a two-person chemistry that is beyond the mere visual. It is still ideal to have a girl who has good hygiene, an excellent attitude, great performance AND good looks, but I would prefer them in that relative order, given a choice.

**Supereloquent** · 11-07-10 14:45

Originally Posted by Member #1759 [View Original Post]

Personally I think a cock in the mouth whether it is your or mine adds to the beauty and sensuality of the ladies.

That commercial on TV is funny in which an appraiser is examining a 'bird in the hand" and telling the owner it is definitely worth "two in the bush."

Some on here hate cock-pics and some love them. Some hate the posting of many pics and some say the more the merrier.

I am neither looking for popularity or to piss anyone off (well, one exception would be the whiners: to post the pics they complain about in even greater volume IS deliberate, just so the whiners realize how effective complaining about it REALLY is). I do what I do because I decide to do it. I have tried to make it less tedious for the viewers here by posting pics in batches of 10, and showing them in a large collage format so they can see what they look like before opening the pic icons. That has been very well received if one looks at the number of pic views as a measure of its success, compared to my previous approach of batching the pics in groups of 20-60, or more. I have also revised my pic postings to include a wider variety of types and angles of pics within each grouping of 10 that I post. This has also been very well received judging by the pic views. I made both of these adjustments after some members here had well-reasoned discussions with me about it. I am certainly not above adjusting my behavior to accommodate intelligent suggestions.

Originally Posted by Member #1759

Keep up the good work SuperE.

Thank you for your support.

**Supereloquent** · 11-07-10 13:39

I saw Santa at the mall yesterday. Maybe we rush the season too much these days, and maybe the retail stores need an extra shot in the arm in this recession (was THAT a good analogy to K mongering or WHAT?) But, that, and contemplating low-ballers as a definite category for the contest, got me thinking about the possible structure of my Miss SW of the Year Contest for 2010. Rather than arbitrarily setting down some guidelines, I thought I would begin by incorporating your feedback to my initial design thoughts. You will all likely have different ideas. I can't promise that they all can be accommodated. My decision will be final. However, I do desire your input if you have any sincere thoughts on the matter.

First, my thoughts as to groups and categories. You will see that they are somewhat tongue-in-cheek, more risque copies of the Miss America Contest. They are the following:

Specialty Groups:

Low-Ballers
Spinners
Miss Congeniality

The "Swimsuit" Categories:

Face
Tits
Ass
Pussy
Overall Body

The "Talent" Categories:

BJ
Fucking
Overall

Overall Miss SW of the Year 2010

I am keeping the contest categories open until feedback regarding them is closed at midnight, Wednesday, November 24th. After that, voting will be open for the contest. To give you flexibility to include SWs with postings after the opening of the contest, you can change your mind right up until the end of the contest at midnight, December 31st. You are not obligated to vote for any particular category or categories. If all you want to do is vote for the best tits or the best overall SW, that is up to you. Votes in any category will help me to make final decisions on the overall winner in case of a very close vote or tie. Winning in any group or category does not preclude that a SW could not be the overall winner (for example, the best spinner could also be the overall winner). YOUR criteria apply in any selections. If you are an ass man and you think that takes precedence in your considerations for the overall winner, then so be it. Since it is unlikely that voters have experienced the performances of any or all of the SWs, reliance upon reports of their performance is both necessary and acceptable.

All of the SWs that I have reported on with pics during 2010 in the Philly and Camden areas are automatically nominated for the contest. Other SWs with pics posted in Philly and Camden during 2010 may be nominated, subject to my approval. This obviously excludes certain considerations for reasons of Administrative regulation. Don't shoot the messenger on this one.

I look forward to your feedback and to having a fun contest from Thanksgiving through year end.

**Bigtime Monger** · 11-07-10 13:27

Unaccustomed as I am to issuing praise in this thread, I must compliment Supereloquent on the great montage reproduced below. It shows clear and attractive views of the four "low-ball" SWs, and will make it most helpful to identify them on the street, where they will likely be in a similar pose and attire.

We love many of the other photos too, in moderation, with one exception that I have pretty well beaten the horse on. Time to feed the old nag some oats.

**Supereloquent** · 11-07-10 12:35

Thanks to Street we added Jennifer (standing in her jeans) to the current line-up of Brooke (reddish hair),"Christina Ricci" Nicole (she should be pretty obvious) and Kendra (the blonde).

Street and Rook: did I miss any?

Does anyone else have any further nominations for 2010 to date?

This will definitely be a category for my SW of the Year contest for 2010. Other categories will be announced, as I expect to have a full slate of "candidates." (And you thought the election season was over. LOL)

**Member #1759** · 11-07-10 06:45

Personally I think a cock in the mouth whether it is your or mine adds to the beauty and sensuality of the ladies.

Keep up the good work SuperE.

**Supereloquent** · 11-06-10 21:08

Damn! I like this one too. What can I say? There is something about pendulous titties hanging in front of me that is a big turn-on!

**Supereloquent** · 11-06-10 20:57

And, OF COURSE, a pic JUST for the cock-pic haters. Is this "small" enough for you, Sprat? LMAO Keep complaining and I will dig every cock-sucking pic I have out of my immense collection, and publish them large and singly like this, JUST FOR YOU!

**Supereloquent** · 11-06-10 20:53

My favorite from the last set of 10 pics posted.

**Supereloquent** · 11-06-10 20:51

A collage of the last 10 pic set posted of Niki.

**Supereloquent** · 11-06-10 20:24

Clothed; nude; fingering herself doggie; sucking my cock

**Supereloquent** · 11-06-10 19:04

I get many PMs. Many of them want something. I guess that is human nature. Whether I provide it is subject to many factors, but let's just say the odds decrease tremendously if you have made relatively few posts here, have never done a solid for me, or, worse yet, have shown yourself to be a whining, rock throwing and immature complainer.

Of the remaining PMs, 100% are positive, with the exception of those where I have refused a request (funny how sweetness and light turns on a dime when someone doesn't get what they want). The ratio of positive PMs to negative public posts regarding me is, oddly enough, a remarkably constant ratio in the vicinity of 100 to one. I thought about this for a bit and it isn't difficult to consider why this might be so. The attention sl*uts who throw rocks want public acknowledgment. They have no legitimate beef to air in private and resolve rationally. They merely want to bash you and bask in that spotlight, to puff out their chests and say,"Look at me! Look how great I am! Look how stupid and disreputable that guy is!" Their idea of raising themselves up is to do it by stepping on your face. Since most have little of real value to contribute, then what else remains? You got it: attack the contributor that you perceive will give you the most recognition. Take him down a peg or two.

What is the ultimate motivation for this nonsense? It is one of the oldest and darkest of them all: a plenary of ego and envy. I have had a few lapses in this regard since becoming a member here, but more than 99% of my posts have been contributory in nature and I have not been inclined to initiate attacks of others as my usual MO. HOWEVER, I have been known to defend myself against the same and I have generally not suffered fools gladly.

Mike 80 recently wrote about the "baggage" he imagined would be the case with being a heavy contributor, and especially by contributing many pics. My experience is that the dangers in this are not with the girls or their "associates" on the streets. The dangers are among the very members here who would sooner take you down than benefit from your intel. Envy is a very powerful and sinister emotion.

You have a right to express your opinions where I am concerned. Some have convinced me to actually change my mind about how I think and what I do in this Forum. But, do it with obviously nefarious motives, and I am NOT likely to change. Moreover, I just might redouble my efforts to do the very thing that you complain about. If that is your wish, then I quote one of my favorite actor / director's statements: "Go ahead, make my day."

**Supereloquent** · 11-06-10 17:43

Street, you and Rook seem to be the undisputed low-ball contenders on the K, but I have to admit that you are a few laps in the lead, not to say anything bad about Rook.

Your latest find, Jennifer, keeps mongering on the K REAL: 10 for FS has got to be admired! The MP and internet crowd might come out and wail the one sorry old song they know how to sing. But, mongering on the K has a complete menu, including value meals. If someone else wants the sexual equivalent of foie gras, pheasant stuffed with wild rice, chestnuts and mushrooms and baked Alaska, then such is not generally available on the Ave. But you seem to be the King in finding a few items from the dollar menu.

I am contemplating adding, among some other new categories, a low-ball section to my SW of the Year contest for 2010. The entry requirements would be a pic posted in 2010 and a date costing 10 or less (with some leeway given for buying her a drink or some loosies to grease the deal).