Non Pro's

**MarioBrother** · 11-02-25 12:42

Originally Posted by Markro3000 [View Original Post]

Agree, this is a straight up escort ad, worthy of tryst.

The hypocrisy of Seeking is why they don't get my money.

Using different text fonts gets it thought seeking moderation.

**MarioBrother** · 11-02-25 12:29

Originally Posted by Markro3000 [View Original Post]

I used to see her from time to time. It was honestly exhausting and not in a good way.

Major Pro.

**Markro3000** · 11-02-25 03:50

Originally Posted by MorganCreamin [View Original Post]

Throwing this one back after a trial run. Too young for me- the conversation style and content had me rolling my eyes.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...c-9b47977a8423

I used to see her from time to time. It was honestly exhausting and not in a good way.

**Morgan Creamin** · 11-01-25 22:47

Throwing this one back after a trial run. Too young for me- the conversation style and content had me rolling my eyes.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...c-9b47977a8423

19, asked her for ID before I let her in and it all looked legit, she looks very questionable on age so had to be sure. She even has a light lisp to make her seem even younger which was a challenge for me. Rougher looking in person. Huge (for her size, she's short) but firm black-girl-ass, decent tits, maybe a C, but not big enough for decent Russian, tried and quickly gave up. Almost no BBBJ skills, another reason why I don't chase a lot of yung'uns is their lack of experience, the best part of the BJ was her hand.

But she's a super freak who absolutely loves to fuck and her kink is breeding. Walked in pulled her pants off with barely a hello. Claims to be on BC but there's no way to verify of course. 3 bens for as much time as I wanted. Filled her twice and tried my damndest to bust in her mouth for the third but junior was being a lazy kunt . But she never quit working on me and was begging for the load.

She's extremely open about fucking a lot of dudes and is basically a pro but with an honestly great attitude, she was into it as much as I was if not more. If she were a bit mature and hotter she'd be s-tier.

I might go back when I need a low-effort release for that price but she's not going into regular rotation, not that I need an SB to be an MIT grad but jesus christ be able to talk about something other than instagram for fuck's sake. To be clear she wasn't bad in any way but I couldn't handle how immature she sounded.

Go fill her up, you'll make her very happy.

**Morgan Creamin** · 11-01-25 11:47

Originally Posted by Markro3000 [View Original Post]

Yes, the NSA acronym means nothing.

To some it clearly means "no emotional attachment".

To others it means "I don't have to do anything".

To others it means "NSA, you know, NSA" -- which is even less meaningful.

I have a formula that I loosely follow when I first start talking to them to get them to offer details first. Usually if they say 'NSA' before I do then about 90% of the time it means they are using the same way I am.

**Markro3000** · 11-01-25 03:00

Originally Posted by CameraShy [View Original Post]

To quote Inigo Montoya, "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. ".

NSA. No Strings Attached.

Has anyone else found some (or many) women on SA actually believe that NSA means that the arrangement comes with no expectations (strings) for them to do anything? In the past month, I've had multiple conversations with people trying to redefine the term to mean that.

Like what? Just me?

Yes, the NSA acronym means nothing.

To some it clearly means "no emotional attachment".

To others it means "I don't have to do anything".

To others it means "NSA, you know, NSA" -- which is even less meaningful.

**Twister100** · 11-01-25 00:30

Originally Posted by CameraShy [View Original Post]

To quote Inigo Montoya, "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. ".

NSA. No Strings Attached.

Has anyone else found some (or many) women on SA actually believe that NSA means that the arrangement comes with no expectations (strings) for them to do anything? In the past month, I've had multiple conversations with people trying to redefine the term to mean that.

Like what? Just me?

Every woman I've met on SA where NSA was a topic of discussion understood it to mean no emotional attachments ie she's not looking for a boyfriend and I'm not looking for a girlfriend and it was well understood that the arrangement would come with certain obligations that both sides had to fulfill.

**Runner2448** · 10-31-25 22:07

Originally Posted by CameraShy [View Original Post]

To quote Inigo Montoya, "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. ".

NSA. No Strings Attached.

Has anyone else found some (or many) women on SA actually believe that NSA means that the arrangement comes with no expectations (strings) for them to do anything? In the past month, I've had multiple conversations with people trying to redefine the term to mean that.

No, not just you. I have seen an increase on those "platonic only". Like why would I feed you, drink, take trips. And on top of that give you anything?

**Morgan Creamin** · 10-31-25 21:32

Originally Posted by CameraShy [View Original Post]

Has anyone else found some (or many) women on SA actually believe that NSA means that the arrangement comes with no expectations (strings) for them to do anything?

Who hasn't found that is the easier question to answer. To us NSA (rightly) means there is no obligation outside the terms of the arrangement but within the arrangement there are definitely expectations around service for compensation. A lot of women think it means we pay them just for drawing breath.

On the other hand, I've also found women who do get it and enjoy those expectations, those are great situations.

**CameraShy** · 10-31-25 18:26

To quote Inigo Montoya, "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. ".

NSA. No Strings Attached.

Has anyone else found some (or many) women on SA actually believe that NSA means that the arrangement comes with no expectations (strings) for them to do anything? In the past month, I've had multiple conversations with people trying to redefine the term to mean that.

Like what? Just me?

**Markro3000** · 10-31-25 12:21

Originally Posted by MorganCreamin [View Original Post]

This one literally has a pro ad on her profile, LOL. Not interested in her but just had a laugh that she got that profile approved. "The Asian luxury provider you've been looking for".

They are so goddamned strict with some things (if you put the word 'arrangement' in a DM they will pop up a warning) but they let this through, LOL. Also she's clearly got a massive case of GPS from the way her ad is written. And naming yourself after a disney character is a massive turn off.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...2-6e9070c5de94

Agree, this is a straight up escort ad, worthy of tryst.

The hypocrisy of Seeking is why they don't get my money.

**Morgan Creamin** · 10-31-25 08:58

This one literally has a pro ad on her profile, LOL. Not interested in her but just had a laugh that she got that profile approved. "The Asian luxury provider you've been looking for".

They are so goddamned strict with some things (if you put the word 'arrangement' in a DM they will pop up a warning) but they let this through, LOL. Also she's clearly got a massive case of GPS from the way her ad is written. And naming yourself after a disney character is a massive turn off.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...2-6e9070c5de94

**MaCross19** · 10-31-25 00:55

Originally Posted by Pawghtr16 [View Original Post]

I posted something about her cause she is also on SB. She was pitching the same thing about needing the money. Wanted me to send money so she can send me content first until we could meet up. Never sent her the money. Sucks that happened to you but thanks for doing a write up of her.

You both dodged a bullet. She got beat by the ugly stick. Needs like 10 k worth of dental work. She is UGLY, has absolutely no time management skills, and is just one of the worst experiences I have ever had in seeking. Stop giving this fat piece of crap the time of day.

**Morgan Creamin** · 10-30-25 21:26

Originally Posted by Bronco62 [View Original Post]

Started chatting with this one, switched to text quickly. Seemed cool and we got to discussing amounts fairly quickly. She didn't want to say an amount so I offered what is pretty much what I have offered in the past. She came back with 600-1000 depending on what we did. When I told her that I wasn't comfortable with that much she said we could start at 600 and go from there. Pass.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...a-d548cdc22bec

Definitely not worth it. Good response.

**Runner2448** · 10-30-25 18:00

Originally Posted by Bronco62 [View Original Post]

Started chatting with this one, switched to text quickly. Seemed cool and we got to discussing amounts fairly quickly. She didn't want to say an amount so I offered what is pretty much what I have offered in the past. She came back with 600-1000 depending on what we did. When I told her that I wasn't comfortable with that much she said we could start at 600 and go from there. Pass.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...a-d548cdc22bec

Even when I have the opportunity to do those amounts I profusely refuse to even entertain those offers.