"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[GoneForGood97]

https://members.seeking.com/member/4fc7740f-4c50-4ef5-a456-fa695df70060

She seemed like a nice girl, but then she told me that she wanted $800 PER MEET and then we eventually move into an allowance situation.

It's not even a question of can I afford it, I just can't rationalize spending THAT MUCH money on something I can get the same quality at a much more reasonable rate.

Do these girls not understand economics?

They don't. All they understand is what they heard on tiktok / twitter, where some LA or NYC based instamodel who is a LA 8 or 9 brags about "knowing her worth" and "never settling for less than 800" from some "splenda daddy".

The connection they fail to make is 1) social media is full of liars who intentionally inflate everything about their lifestyle for more clicks / engagement. The SB influencers are no different from the fitness ones or a million others. "Fake it til you make it" is the rule of the day. So you have social media "influencers" who have every incentive in the world to lie about what they're paid because no girl wants to hear that someone prettier than them is making only 400 and 2) an LA instamodel is simply WORTH MORE than a pretty Atlanta girl. It's confidence shattering, so they simply ignore it and think they are "worth" the same. At the end of the day, it's just GPS.

[Verdit]

https://members.seeking.com/member/4fc7740f-4c50-4ef5-a456-fa695df70060

She seemed like a nice girl, but then she told me that she wanted $800 PER MEET and then we eventually move into an allowance situation.

It's not even a question of can I afford it, I just can't rationalize spending THAT MUCH money on something I can get the same quality at a much more reasonable rate.

Do these girls not understand economics?

[Airmantroy]

Thank you, my man. I suppose I need to get back on TeR and check it out, and cross reference some of these girls.

I wouldn't have caught it myself except some of her pics showed a distinctive tat, I remembered seeing it and then cross checked the pics. Luckily I had to cancel my meet with her, I had her down to 400 and she was hosting. Had a meet set with Janisa a day or so later and she gave me the same address for hosting. I confirmed she shared the place with "Kendall". Apparently they bounce around in AirBnB rentals.

[Peter Johnson]

She's a pro. Has reviews on TeR under NovaCane. Works alongside / with Janisa on Seeking. Reviews mention ripoff. Avoid that one.

Thank you, my man. I suppose I need to get back on TeR and check it out, and cross reference some of these girls.

[Airmantroy]

I'm sure some of you guys have seen Kendall:

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...e-4ecd00ceb7e0

She seems stuck on 500 ppm, and I should probably do M&G vibe check before making that kind of investment. But if anyone has intel to share, feel free post it here or just DM me. Thanks much.

She's a pro. Has reviews on TeR under NovaCane. Works alongside / with Janisa on Seeking. Reviews mention ripoff. Avoid that one.

[Peter Johnson]

I'm sure some of you guys have seen Kendall:

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...e-4ecd00ceb7e0

She seems stuck on 500 ppm, and I should probably do M&G vibe check before making that kind of investment. But if anyone has intel to share, feel free post it here or just DM me. Thanks much.

[Oldhead77]

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...0-137076e761f9

Lys (formerly Lyss) has a new profile and account. She is one of the worst dates I've had from the site and at least two other guys on here had similar experence.

She doesn't look that much like her pics, in person. Very chunky little body. I took some pics when I was with her, but I suppose should not share those on here. But avoid unless you are in a masochistic, money wasting mood that day.

I almost saw her 2 years ago, we agreed to meet but when I asked her a few questions, she started to give me an attitude. That's a red flag for me.

[Peter Johnson]

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...0-137076e761f9

Lys (formerly Lyss) has a new profile and account. She is one of the worst dates I've had from the site and at least two other guys on here had similar experence.

She doesn't look that much like her pics, in person. Very chunky little body. I took some pics when I was with her, but I suppose should not share those on here. But avoid unless you are in a masochistic, money wasting mood that day.

[Airmantroy]

I don't have link to the profile, because I blocked her. She was talking about "$350 for an hour" in Seeking messages and trying to get both of us banned. I mean nearly all of the girls on the site are quasi-escorts, but this one is just straight up. She wants $350 and you know it's going to be clockwatching, not a casual cool date. And she doesn't even have a lower price for just BBBJ.

She's staying in the Guest Inn on Ptree Industrial in Norcross. I am not far from there, so am half tempted but just have a bad feeling about it. She does look pretty good, no doubt about that. And sounds like CIP is just fine (and got to assume high traffic). I suppose I could have posted this in the Escort thread, but she is on Seeking so just a heads up here. I wish I had her number but I blocked and deleted the conversation from my inbox before I saved it.

She was fine with getting on Signal too, which I still insist is better if you are openly talking about exchanging $$$ for sexual services. I had disappearing messages set for four hours with that conversation.

She's a wannabe pro that hasn't discovered Listcrawler. STG. Met her in person and immediately didn't trust her, sent her packing with her pimp / bf / simp who gave her a ride. Best guess is she's a junkie, she's texted me offering all kinds of threesomes and such since. I'm not that desperate.

[Muffin6655]

Val made a new account recently, https://members.seeking.com/member/5...a-be36598050fc.

We did end up meeting and it was well worth it, she also does content and if anyone wants to share vids you get from her dm and I can get you her snap. And we can trade.

[OliverNP]

If there was a backdoor in Signal, it would be discernible in the open source code. But it's not, because there isn't. Sure there is always some risk of them pushing an auto update with such malicious code, that could do some harm before it was recognized, but that's about it.

Nope.

And here is the point you're missing, and it's a huge one.

There is absolutely no guarantee that the code you see in the open source repo is necessarily, byte for byte the same code that gets deployed.

All it takes is a very brief court action by the right people to redirect the DNS resolution of one endpoint that the user is used to, to another one that looks alike at the UI level but has "lots of extra features in the new build".

I did exactly that kind of work for years and was well paid for it. You have absolutely no idea how naive the average open-source believer is to what really happens. Its very obvious by what you've written.

[Peter Johnson]

So is there currently a way to bypass the selfie verify step to create a Sugardaddymeet account? I wasn't sure if that popped up, because I was using VPN or if it always happens, with all new accts just like with Seeking now. No way I am doing that, but I was curious to give it a try, although I still figure that Seeking is better.

[Peter Johnson]

I don't have link to the profile, because I blocked her. She was talking about "$350 for an hour" in Seeking messages and trying to get both of us banned. I mean nearly all of the girls on the site are quasi-escorts, but this one is just straight up. She wants $350 and you know it's going to be clockwatching, not a casual cool date. And she doesn't even have a lower price for just BBBJ.

She's staying in the Guest Inn on Ptree Industrial in Norcross. I am not far from there, so am half tempted but just have a bad feeling about it. She does look pretty good, no doubt about that. And sounds like CIP is just fine (and got to assume high traffic). I suppose I could have posted this in the Escort thread, but she is on Seeking so just a heads up here. I wish I had her number but I blocked and deleted the conversation from my inbox before I saved it.

She was fine with getting on Signal too, which I still insist is better if you are openly talking about exchanging $$$ for sexual services. I had disappearing messages set for four hours with that conversation.

--------------------------------

And another one... Lily 23 in "Atlanta:

https://members.seeking.com/member/62fe3361-7847-40e6-a990-2505eb835f2f

That one says she is really in Costa Rica and wants some guy to fly down there to meet her. She comes to ATL twice a year (and not now). So don't waste your time with her unless you are into that.

[Peter Johnson]

Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp, if uncle wants to come after you, they'll find you. Every picture you take with your phone has a geo-location

Wrong. Most apps, including Signal strip out the EXIF metadata like location, when you send a pic.

I second what PJ said. I had the same experience. She was concerned about the bare head but told her I was out if head is wrapped. So got the BBJ but wrapped up for the main action. She cool and the puss is fat.

Wow she was even concerned about BBBJ? No wonder she is freaked out now, consdering I busted a weeks worth of backed up jizz inside of her. Well it didn't take any real convincing on my part, she was wet and ready and totally down for it.

She's a wannabe pro with horrible reviews. She was going by the same name when she was posting.

Ok thanks for that additional feedback about McKenzie. I was still a bit tempted, but now will definitely steer clear.

[Jah Cool]

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...5-5506ee74223e

I saw this one and had a good time on a car date. We were going to just do oral, but then got carried away and some CIP action. She seemed really happy afterwards and said she wanted to see me again, but then ghosted me after that. I'm pretty sure she's mad at herself for the BBFS because she said she was really concerned about STDs and wanted me to get tested first before we did anything like that. But her pussy got wet, and she wanted me in there, and now she probably feels guilty.

It's all good though and I had her and she was cool. Lots of fun. Definitely on the chunky site, but huge tits and fat juicy puss. Her pics are fairly accurate so I would recommend, just based on my one experience.

I second what PJ said. I had the same experience. She was concerned about the bare head but told her I was out if head is wrapped. So got the BBJ but wrapped up for the main action. She cool and the puss is fat.