"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

**OliverNP** · 10-14-25 06:25

Originally Posted by PeterJohnson [View Original Post]

Yes, that's the point about Signal. It is open source software from a non profit foundation. You don't have to trust them. The code is all public and it is reviewed and audited regularly. Not true of google, telegram, whatsapp, etc

Well if you use SMS and don't send your pics to the girls, and don't discuss ppm / allowance terms in the conversation, then it's low risk. But it's difficult to have a productive conversation, excluding those two topics, especially if you don't have your real pics in your Seeking profile.

I agree completely with your second paragraph, but your first paragraph requires a response.

The fact that the source code is open has nothing to do with whether it can be trusted. It is dead easy for whoever is control of infrastructure and hosting to insert their own hooks into the devops process that capture and records all traffic for future data-mining. Open-source actually makes that easier to do.

What's more, the industry is currently undergoing a major awakening, starting to realize that free software typically doesn't stay free forever. Especially services like this, which use "free" as a way to build the audience, at which time the platform then has value to be sold off (and most buyers will want all the data that has accumulated over the years, as that is more valuable than the software in most cases).

**GoneForGood97** · 10-14-25 01:26

Originally Posted by TravelinSD [View Original Post]

So I had a text exchange with Serena:

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...b-1432a6eb0419

Seems like a sweet, intelligent lady. Nice, conversational responses to text, but she definitely has a system all set up for herself. She's looking for short-term pay-per-meet. The further we went, the more I picked up a bit of a pro vibe.

She requires dinner or lunch with drinks for the first meet.

So, here are her expectations:

"I appreciate being spoiled with $800-1 K each meet while we are starting out, or more if you're feeling generous. ".

Good hunting,

Travelin.

I don't remember what name she advertised under, but she looks super familiar. If I remember right she was 400 per hour on Tryst, no BBJ, which is why I never pulled the trigger. Though possible I'm mixing her up with someone else, it's been a few years. She was this hippie looking girl on Tryst.

**TravelinSD** · 10-13-25 19:47

So I had a text exchange with Serena:

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...b-1432a6eb0419

Seems like a sweet, intelligent lady. Nice, conversational responses to text, but she definitely has a system all set up for herself. She's looking for short-term pay-per-meet. The further we went, the more I picked up a bit of a pro vibe.

She requires dinner or lunch with drinks for the first meet.

So, here are her expectations:

"I appreciate being spoiled with $800-1 K each meet while we are starting out, or more if you're feeling generous. ".

Good hunting,

Travelin.

**SugarDaddio** · 10-13-25 17:17

Hey gents. Chatting with Kaitlyn. I'm interested and just wondering if anyone has seen her yet. If you have and feel like sharing it would be much appreciated.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...e-f81c0d5cb623

May the pussy be with you. SD.

**MadDog1746** · 10-13-25 15:36

Originally Posted by MilfHunter818 [View Original Post]

I've seen Alex twice. Tight little body for sure. She will give BBBJ. But when she looks at you during the act, it's creepy, like she's looking through you. And good luck holding a conversation, half way through she gets distracted and changes the subject.

Clear your inbox. I am chatting with her now and like you said comms are trash, got her down to 250 plus room but she won't send me any pics of her body. You said its nice, what would you rate her service? Was DFK and DATY involved or is it business as usual?

**MilfHunter818** · 10-13-25 15:21

Originally Posted by Turtman [View Original Post]

Hello Gents. Been talking to few on the SA and would like to know if anyone of you had luck with them and ball park of numbers.

-

Alex - https://members.seeking.com/member/d...c-5590b0d8033d Awkward conversation but decent run for 500 did not pursued after a couple times.

I've seen Alex twice. Tight little body for sure. She will give BBBJ. But when she looks at you during the act, it's creepy, like she's looking through you. And good luck holding a conversation, half way through she gets distracted and changes the subject.

**MadDog1746** · 10-13-25 11:31

I talked to Danielle a while ago when she "first" got on the site and she came with like 500 per week and I said nah, she is not that good looking or freaky enough for that. I reached back out like last month and she told me she had a SD so I left her alone.

I am talking to Alex now but her comms are horrible, got her down to 250 but she can't host and she won't send any more pics so I can see her body so I may pass on her. DM and lets chat about this one. Did you see her already?

Originally Posted by Turtman [View Original Post]

Hello Gents. Been talking to few on the SA and would like to know if anyone of you had luck with them and ball park of numbers.

Maya - https://members.seeking.com/member/c...1-d6611d540402.

Jen - https://members.seeking.com/member/c...9-e4d19d6ffdca.

Stacy - https://members.seeking.com/member/e...5-e88a9876f499 Not budging down below 1 k per meet.

Danielle - https://members.seeking.com/member/d...a-7311bae1a393 Now her ask is to meet her previous SD who offered 5 k per month.

Lizett - https://members.seeking.com/member/c...9-40fc93c81261 Time waster. Not sure if she is even real.

Artemis - https://members.seeking.com/member/d...7-ade988b29e2c.

Alex - https://members.seeking.com/member/d...c-5590b0d8033d Awkward conversation but decent run for 500 did not pursued after a couple times.

**Turtman** · 10-12-25 15:17

Hello Gents. Been talking to few on the SA and would like to know if anyone of you had luck with them and ball park of numbers.

Maya - https://members.seeking.com/member/c...1-d6611d540402.

Jen - https://members.seeking.com/member/c...9-e4d19d6ffdca.

Stacy - https://members.seeking.com/member/e...5-e88a9876f499 Not budging down below 1 k per meet.

Danielle - https://members.seeking.com/member/d...a-7311bae1a393 Now her ask is to meet her previous SD who offered 5 k per month.

Lizett - https://members.seeking.com/member/c...9-40fc93c81261 Time waster. Not sure if she is even real.

Artemis - https://members.seeking.com/member/d...7-ade988b29e2c.

Alex - https://members.seeking.com/member/d...c-5590b0d8033d Awkward conversation but decent run for 500 did not pursued after a couple times.

**Peter Pan** · 10-11-25 23:04

Originally Posted by LGSeeking [View Original Post]

https://www.bustle.com/life/sugar-da...gar-baby-money

Nice article.

**LGSeeking** · 10-10-25 13:33

https://www.bustle.com/life/sugar-da...gar-baby-money

**Peter Johnson** · 10-09-25 22:40

BTW, if you click to cancel your membership before the auto renewal, it always seems to offer 20% discount, to keep it going.

You can also check your email for old offers of 25 - 30% off. and many of those links still work as well. I haven't paid full price for a subscription in over a year.

**Peter Johnson** · 10-09-25 22:34

Originally Posted by CrazyRocket [View Original Post]

Keep in mind that even Apple, which has been relatively privacy focused company, has recently bent over for Trump administration and struck down an app that made tracking ICE personnel possible.

Do not trust any big tech company at these times. They might even release info without a court order now.

Different times, different expectations.

On the topic of this thread turning into security talks: I personally find it productive to read about experienced people's input. It takes a few scrolls to skip. I sometimes wish we had an FAQ kind of section to put common pitfalls for newcomers, though. I was once burned for giving out my actual number when I was under the influence of the little head unfortunately.

Yes, that's the point about Signal. It is open source software from a non profit foundation. You don't have to trust them. The code is all public and it is reviewed and audited regularly. Not true of google, telegram, whatsapp, etc

Well if you use SMS and don't send your pics to the girls, and don't discuss ppm / allowance terms in the conversation, then it's low risk. But it's difficult to have a productive conversation, excluding those two topics, especially if you don't have your real pics in your Seeking profile.

**Peter Johnson** · 10-09-25 22:30

Originally Posted by Georgiaguy57 [View Original Post]

I was talking to Cheyenne for a bit. She's cute though, so I was pretty disappointed. Why did she seem dangerous?.

As someone pointed out a few weeks ago, she is taking some pretty hardcore medication for bipolar disorder, that is also used to treat schizophrenia. When you talk to her, she also says some irrational things. So that combination just raises the probability of her doing something crazy... perhaps accusing a guy of rape, soliciting, stalking, or who knows what?

She is pretty cute and polite in person, and I obviously took the chance here. Actions speak louder than words, but I did go into it being aware of the elevated risks.

But she rejected me, so maybe it's for the best and will keep me out of more serious trouble. Congrats to any guys who already got in and out of there successfully. I'm sure it was good.

**FarFarAway** · 10-09-25 19:30

Originally Posted by CrazyRocket [View Original Post]

On the topic of this thread turning into security talks: I personally find it productive to read about experienced people's input. It takes a few scrolls to skip. I sometimes wish we had an FAQ kind of section to put common pitfalls for newcomers, though. I was once burned for giving out my actual number when I was under the influence of the little head unfortunately.

At one stage, the Richmond VA sugar thread was the de facto national thread where people discussed it all. An archive was made there of everyone's most useful posts.

While that Richmond thread isn't what it used to be, there isn't any replacement. Anyway, the advice cataloged there is still pertinent.

**Georgiaguy57** · 10-09-25 10:14

Originally Posted by PeterJohnson [View Original Post]

Ok continuing to stay on topic, has anyone seen Poison Ivy?

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...5-7e99c620b2b1

I met her for lunch and she is super pretty. A very nice goodbye kiss and thought things were on track, but then she started to ghost me about a week later. Maybe I was too slow to close the deal.

She wants 600 ppm, and I've never agreed to more than 400 before, but was thinking it might be worth it on the right day. It won't be the end of the world if I end up saving that $$$$$$, but still was looking forward to doing more with her.

I also had lunch with Cheyenne, but she is very difficult to get anything going with. She says she has online SDs mailing her big stacks of cash from other states, so we may be competing with that. Or she could have made it up for all I know, but it sounded like a somewhat believable story. Seemed like a sweet girl though, but certainly dangerous. However that is true of most of them on the site, as my recent experiences have reminded me.

I was talking to Cheyenne for a bit. She finally gave me her number like a month ago, but every time I hit her up, she's apparently always so busy and can't make anytime whatsoever, then apologizes and tells me she'll let me know when she's available. Weeks go by, radio silence. I hit her up one last time asking if she's free this week, received a one word reply: working. LOL. I just gave up and deleted her number. She's cute though, so I was pretty disappointed. Why did she seem dangerous?

I also talked to poison ivy for a bit. And yeah, seems like she's pretty firm on 600, would only go down to 550. She looked good, but not that good for that much.

Another month on the site and the number of attractive pot's keep drying up or straight up ignoring you. Seems like it's becoming like secret benefits on seeking.