Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 1 to 15 of 6480
-
Today 06:45 #6480
Posts: 745SA Tips
Originally Posted by GamerDude86 [View Original Post]
Back in 2013 when I joined it was easy to find ladies for fun time at realistic requests of support. The last round proves they still exist but honestly over 90% of interactions are now scams or requesting 600. They all watch the same influencers in the "sugar lifestyle" and collectively suffer from the same delusion that weekly dates at 600 per meet (31,200 annually) is the rock bottom point for them as they "know their worth. ". They then get jaded from rejection and believe "there are no real guys on the site. ". For this reason I respond to every ridiculous request and tell them "sorry but I have decided to pursue another beautiful lady asking less that half of what you are requesting" some negotiate down right away others get offended but rarely do I ever attempt to meet these entitled princesses.
SA is now a numbers game. Send out a basic message to everyone that is not fat or ugly and if you send enough you will still turn up a gem, but locally I would not recommend it.
I am really hoping someone could share the same level of info for SDM and how it is working locally. In some of the other larger metropolitan areas I visit it seems SA and SDM are 50/50 at this point. I would certainly make the switch if I knew it would work out.
-
09-09-25 15:52 #6479
Posts: 524Originally Posted by GamerDude86 [View Original Post]
I got banned by them for "soliciting favors" but I don't really know how that's even possible; I literally never spoke about that stuff on-site. So it's possible they're sleazy enough to accept screenshots of texts that occur away from their website. Even if they were cheaper, I wouldn't use them again just for that.
But, on top of that, they're also absurdly expensive.
Secret Benefits is a known scam site with a bunch of "active" profiles (of real women who did sign up at some point but then never come back to their account, and SB just steals those and runs them themselves) that are just there to waste your time and your money. Really, any site where you have to pay to message someone is going to eventually trend towards screwing you out of your money just based on the enshittifcation of everything these days.
Sugardaddymeet might be the only one worth the bother anymore. It's way, way less expensive than Seeking (4-5 x less cost), and when I used both, I probably pulled more numbers per messages sent from SDM than I did from SA. They may change their rules at some point, but it doesn't seem that way yet. Only issue with them is smaller user base, so it's just overall harder to find something.
-
09-08-25 14:40 #6478
Posts: 342Originally Posted by JunkSecond [View Original Post]
-
09-07-25 09:00 #6477
Posts: 745Any More News?
Originally Posted by OBXMule [View Original Post]
SA resulted in only one potential lady from August and Cola (75 mile search) and several ladies for my Atlanta trips. It just pretty much sucks locally now.
Has anyone had issues with the site loading? I have been getting a 502 server error for 3 weeks now, just read that if you type the entire address it will fix it and it did.
< http://www.usasexguide.nl/ .
-
08-26-25 08:14 #6476
Posts: 9As far as in town stayers it's slim as all the newer ones seem to want min 120 and video verification.
Originally Posted by Escritic [View Original Post]
-
08-26-25 08:07 #6475
Posts: 9Should I avoid those?
What's wrong with those hotels? should I avoid those?.
Originally Posted by Escritic [View Original Post]
-
08-24-25 17:28 #6474
Posts: 128Correct
Like I stated. She's a plain jane, not much of a looker. But not hard on the eyes either. Her comms is horrible and I told her about it. She wanted to move out there. But it's on her how she can or not.
Do you have any recommendation in the area with similar qualities (young, ok physique, pleasant personality) and damage? All I see are fat and old hoes asking for 100+ qv.
Originally Posted by MasterGooner [View Original Post]
-
08-24-25 17:22 #6473
Posts: 128Video or Pic Verification
That is just a hard no for me. Positive identification leads to other stuff. It's like a provider staying at Hampton? Hyatt? Maybe it's just me.
Originally Posted by MasterGooner [View Original Post]
-
08-23-25 17:39 #6472
Posts: 85They can kick rocks
Originally Posted by MasterGooner [View Original Post]
-
08-23-25 15:14 #6471
Posts: 449Originally Posted by MasterGooner [View Original Post]
-
08-23-25 08:35 #6470
Posts: 3Anyone seen her lately?
Sarah Shae looks like a fun time.
https://skipthegames.com/posts/augus...i/976380200340
-
08-23-25 08:06 #6469
Posts: 9Video Verification
How do you guys feel about most girls requiring a video call as want the best method any recommendations I usually prefer to just text to setup.
-
08-23-25 08:03 #6468
Posts: 9Finally did see her
Not much of a looker guy of reminds me of the special wd girl in school the guys would run trains on but for the hassle to get up we with her not worth it horrible location she nice though me personally wouldn't repeat.
Originally Posted by GADude1 [View Original Post]
-
08-23-25 02:50 #6467
Posts: 449Skyla / Candie
Originally Posted by MasterGooner [View Original Post]
-
08-22-25 22:39 #6466
Posts: 3Anyone try Sarah shae recently?