Rants and Raves

**Berol Loz** · Yesterday 19:07

Originally Posted by NameSake [View Original Post]

Actually it might be a much better choices than $$ or more indy girls on Eros. I'll dig it out more. Hope to find a hot chick!

Good luck with it, I'm messaging some of these girls for then I'm in the Maryland area next (I'm mainly in the Atlanta area) and I'll fill in if any work out.

One thing to do is sort by the most recently joined. Pretty much any attractive girl is going to get bombed with messages, so you want to get into their inbox early and put a (tasteful) offer of a gift amount right in there and maybe include your (burner) number so she knows you're serious.

**Berol Loz** · Yesterday 19:00

Originally Posted by RexTrucker258 [View Original Post]

I call BS.... And in Rants? Please.

First, you're right, that list should go in the sugar section, not the rant section. It was a follow-up to CollegParkBoy's asking about the site. I've asked the admin to remove the leads from the Rants section.

As for contact information, no, I'm not going to post civi-girls' phone numbers on a public board, that would be really dumb. If you look at the board, guys are sharing numbers, but they do it in PMs and only if they've cleared it with the girl first. Sugar dating is not SkipTheGames.

Also, I'm not bashing Seeking either; it's the first sugar site I used, and it still has the most members of any sugar site. Outside the USA, it's still the best site to use.

What I'm saying is that Seeking has changed direction (not just dropping "Arrangements" There are other options available for guys like me who aren't looking for "hypergamy" but regular girls for affordable casual bangs, such as SDM or SugarLife. I'll be happy to bash Secret Benefits, though.

BTW, the reason I post pictures is that many girls are on more than one site. So, if you're already on Seeking (like most people here) and you see the same photos on SDM with a more explicit profile, then feel free to message her on Seeking, you already know she's looking for more than delicious salads on the beach.

Personally, SDM works for me now. If Seeking works for you, great. Share some of your adventures.

Here's what they said themselves: https://blog.seeking.com/exciting-ch...ead-on-seeking.

**NameSake** · 09-12-25 15:23

Originally Posted by BerolLoz [View Original Post]

If anyone is looking for some new girls to try out, these seem to be interested in meeting up, and it seems like PPM should be on the table. Most of the girls here are seem to be black / mixed, maybe it's just the time of day. I look for girls with a couple of full-body shots and something in their profile that suggests they're interested in meeting up. Too many close-up usually means she's bigger.

London, 23, Baltimore.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...70880198&nsp=1

"looking for an sponsor" - has a bit of a pro-vibe.

Malenamonroe, 25, Baltimore.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...64724549&nsp=1

"mutually beneficial! Ask me anything and let's see if we are a good fit for one another!" - has a bit of a pro-vibe.

Melody, 21, Rockville.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73219317&nsp=1

"sugar daddy who can help me paying my bills".

Cinnamon, 30, Upper Marlboro.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73720429&nsp=1

"connection in the DC-metro area or someone open to me visiting you in NYC. Have stimulating encounters ".

Nostalgia, 21, Baltimore.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...72949078&nsp=1

"Very straight forward and definitely not a time waster. ".

Tyshayjefferson, 25, Baltimore.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73953194&nsp=1

"single mother. Just love money I'm not looking for a relationship".

Kittyxo, 23, Rockville.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73733299&nsp=1

"drink or 2 will loosen me up. Wants a mutual benefit connection".

LadyTee4, 30, Waldorf.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...72569083&nsp=1

"good time and be feminine with the right partner. No children, I work a 9-5".

Puxttyprincess, 21, Glen Burnie.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...74122625&nsp=1

"clear, mutually beneficial relationship".

On the other hand. Sounds like she's been around:

QueenAthena, 21, Baltimore.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73992758&nsp=1

"This app sucks. I WILL NOT LET YOU HAVE WITH RAW or CUM INSIDE ME. Not looking for a relationship. I am simply here for a good time not a long time. ".

Based on my experience, usually offer around $3-400, but some younger members seem to be able to find some good mid-20's single moms for $200-$300. Except for QueenAthena most girls are ok going bare if you don't make a big deal about it. I've included pictures if anyone recognizes them from Seeking, alot of girls are on both sites.

Actually it might be a much better choices than $$ or more indy girls on Eros. I'll dig it out more. Hope to find a hot chick!

**RexTrucker258** · 09-11-25 22:06

I call BS.

Looking at your posts, you say the same stuff all over the country, bashing SA and telling everyone about your site. Never post contact info, just pics and links that sit behind a paywall. The Admin should have flagged this. And in Rants? Please.

**Berol Loz** · 09-11-25 21:15

If anyone is looking for some new girls to try out, these seem to be interested in meeting up, and it seems like PPM should be on the table. Most of the girls here are seem to be black / mixed, maybe it's just the time of day. I look for girls with a couple of full-body shots and something in their profile that suggests they're interested in meeting up. Too many close-up usually means she's bigger.

London, 23, Baltimore.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...70880198&nsp=1

"looking for an sponsor" - has a bit of a pro-vibe.

Malenamonroe, 25, Baltimore.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...64724549&nsp=1

"mutually beneficial! Ask me anything and let's see if we are a good fit for one another!" - has a bit of a pro-vibe.

Melody, 21, Rockville.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73219317&nsp=1

"sugar daddy who can help me paying my bills".

Cinnamon, 30, Upper Marlboro.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73720429&nsp=1

"connection in the DC-metro area or someone open to me visiting you in NYC. Have stimulating encounters ".

Nostalgia, 21, Baltimore.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...72949078&nsp=1

"Very straight forward and definitely not a time waster. ".

Tyshayjefferson, 25, Baltimore.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73953194&nsp=1

"single mother. Just love money I'm not looking for a relationship".

Kittyxo, 23, Rockville.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73733299&nsp=1

"drink or 2 will loosen me up. Wants a mutual benefit connection".

LadyTee4, 30, Waldorf.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...72569083&nsp=1

"good time and be feminine with the right partner. No children, I work a 9-5".

Puxttyprincess, 21, Glen Burnie.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...74122625&nsp=1

"clear, mutually beneficial relationship".

On the other hand. Sounds like she's been around:

QueenAthena, 21, Baltimore.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73992758&nsp=1

"This app sucks. I WILL NOT LET YOU HAVE WITH RAW or CUM INSIDE ME. Not looking for a relationship. I am simply here for a good time not a long time. ".

Based on my experience, usually offer around $3-400, but some younger members seem to be able to find some good mid-20's single moms for $200-$300. Except for QueenAthena most girls are ok going bare if you don't make a big deal about it. I've included pictures if anyone recognizes them from Seeking, alot of girls are on both sites.

**Berol Loz** · 09-11-25 19:54

Originally Posted by CollegeParkBoy [View Original Post]

It's sugardaddymeet.com has anyone heard of / used it? I don't think anybody here has mentioned it. If you all have, disregard. If not, my coworker said it was all over her TikTok feed. She did research and said it's straight up escorting. I'm not joining, for obvious reasons, though my research tells me it's really good since it has less bots and more verified sugar babies. Hope this leads to good / better results for those who still frequent the hobby and try this. Be safe out here.

Your coworker is on the site researching it? That's a story in itself.

Yeah it's obviously not as big as Seeking, but they're similar in that you pay a monthly fee (about half of what Seeking costs) and that gives you full access, a better search the free one. I think the reason she's saying it's straight up escorting is Seeking has clamped down anything that sounds like "compensated dating" more than it used to be. SugardaddyMeet.com is kind of the opposite, they are fine with you talking money and you'll find a fair number of ads with "PPM" right in the description.

Two thing I have noticed, location matters, there's a lot of guys using it in the south but it's not really big on the west coast it seems. Also, the girls tend to be a bit different class compared to Seeking, there's a lot of UTR girls on SDM, which I don't mind at all, but you're not always going to find supermodels on SDM like you might find on Seeking.

It has bots and scams, but I'd say it's much less Secret Benefits and most of the scams are pretty low level, girls wanting to sell content instead of meet or asking for money ahead of time, so most of the scams just waste your time. I started on Seeking myself, but mostly use SDM now just because I find it easier to get right to the point without worrying about getting banned.

**CollegeParkBoy** · 09-07-25 15:25

It's sugardaddymeet.com has anyone heard of / used it? I don't think anybody here has mentioned it. If you all have, disregard. If not, my coworker said it was all over her TikTok feed. She did research and said it's straight up escorting. I'm not joining, for obvious reasons, though my research tells me it's really good since it has less bots and more verified sugar babies. Hope this leads to good / better results for those who still frequent the hobby and try this. Be safe out here.

**NarrowLeeway** · 08-28-25 16:41

You can refresh the screen then it would work.

**AirRade** · 08-28-25 11:31

In mobile browsers, urls always default to https even if you specifically input http.

For Chrome a, go into the app settings, privacy and security, and toggle the option for "Always use secure connections. " There should be a similar setting for other browser apps.

**Horsetrader** · 08-28-25 04:05

http://www.usasexguide.nl works for me. I'm using it right now with the latest IOS and a 6 year old iPad. Be sure to type out the whole thing.

Originally Posted by DriftingFan101 [View Original Post]

Still not working for most due to bad gateway 502.

Posting is messed up too and only by removing the S in the http does this work.

A mp site users reported on this and many still cant get the site to work, the bad gateway 502 needs fixing

**DriftingFan101** · 08-28-25 02:52

Still not working for most due to bad gateway 502.

Posting is messed up too and only by removing the S in the http does this work.

A mp site users reported on this and many still cant get the site to work, the bad gateway 502 needs fixing

**RexTrucker258** · 08-25-25 22:43

Originally Posted by Horsetrader [View Original Post]

I never had a problem using my computer, but the mobile problem has existed for about a week. Even the direct link from the front page of the InternationalSexGuide does not work using my IOS mobile devices, but same link works fine from Windows PC.

Mobile and PC both work fine with ISG.

I worked on this earlier today and figured out a solve. What's happening is that most search engines and browsers, by default, are adding the 's' at the end of the http prefix. Seems like with the recent back end changes that have been made to the site, the site's server is refusing calls with an https: as a first line of defense; no hacker would ever attack from a non-secure site, they'd be nailed in a minute. I always wondered why it wasn't a secure address. You also need extra resources for the encryption.

Just type the full site address: http://www.usa. And it works. Don't forget it's not. Com.

**Horsetrader** · 08-25-25 19:27

Originally Posted by PhyuckYiu [View Original Post]

So its been figured out. For now, I have not found a way to access this website via mobile. But as far as on a computer, make sure there is no "s" on the http: on the URL. At Admin, look into this.

Phyuck!

I never had a problem using my computer, but the mobile problem has existed for about a week. Even the direct link from the front page of the InternationalSexGuide does not work using my IOS mobile devices, but same link works fine from Windows PC.

Mobile and PC both work fine with ISG.

**Phyuck Yiu** · 08-25-25 17:46

So its been figured out. For now, I have not found a way to access this website via mobile. But as far as on a computer, make sure there is no "s" on the http: on the URL. At Admin, look into this.

Phyuck!

**FaceDownPro** · 08-25-25 16:30

Originally Posted by Frenulum [View Original Post]

I haven't picked up a walker in many years because I felt the same way and asked the same questions. My neighbor used to partake many moons ago when things were fruitful and safer. I knew it was him because he would monger in his bright red classic muscle car. At first I thought it was cool and "everyone does it". But he ended up on longterm IV antibiotics, lost his wife, and home. I was a Healthcare worker and knew the risks but need that head at all costs. When I switched jobs into one of the busiest ER's in the state I saw the girls from the strolls and their "baggage" that they carry with them into your cars and notels and you can't see it. Didn't completely stop me but then as things got worse in the community the constant stench they all have cured me. Every once in a while I will pick one up to remind me why "I sobered up". If I need something I spend real money on a real escort. Not the trash they talk about on the Baltimore escort tread. If you are questioning if you are safe. You are not.

This was an attempt a light-hearted humorous post. Nothing serious, inspired by a pic I saw in SW thread. I'm not goofy enough to believe these women are clean or hygienic enough to hit raw or doing anything unprotected, so I'm not sure why you assumed I was questioning my safety. But I guess I appreciate you looking out for my well being. Have I ever scooped someone ugly and regret after, sure but it's not a constant thing and I'm selective of who and what I do, but again thanks, hope this clears whatever you were thinking up. Be safe.