|
This blog is moderated by BonerAppetitty
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 91
B. I. V.
 Originally Posted by Heizenberg
[View Original Post]
She is a repeat for sure. Great body and GND face said 24 but maybe 27/28 I'm not really good at guessing Asian ages.
She is not a service queen so bring your own service but nice fucking a HYa for sure.
Baby IV is young and hot for sure, but not so sure about the acronym she goes by on booker site. Especially the I. V. Part. I hope she means Isla Vista.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 81
 Originally Posted by Stonkz
[View Original Post]
Hey bro don't take that review seriously I was just trolling lmao.
Lmfao thanks for the run back. Thank you still for the comprehensive hya data dump earlier. I got baby IV and Lumi on my list now.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 1565
 Originally Posted by Optional
[View Original Post]
I see a few new names popping up in the past week. Anyone tried Baby Yeeun, Kiwi, Lissom, or Yomiko? There's also a new C-girl, I think she goes by Nian on CGLA and Miju on Get9. Could be different girls but could be the same C-girl.
Lissom has reviews if you search far back. Very many people have tried Kiwi. She is a true MILF service queen, so I posted on the K BB thread:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7386683 A disturbance in the force
 Originally Posted by Optional
[View Original Post]
I've seen some conflicting reviews on Lael K in this forum recently, so I decided to go try myself a couple days ago. Here's my POV:
Beautiful face, but she's likely in her early 30's. So I'm not sure if she counts as HYA, but nonetheless, beautiful face.
Her D's are natural but quite saggy, and she has a slightly loose tummy, but no scarring. This leads me to believe she's in her 30's as well.
Very friendly, great service. I enjoyed my time with her. Her BJ technique could use some work though, she tends to use her teeth.
Would I recommend? Sure, but only if you go into it not expecting a real HYA.
Also, it seems like her price has gone down by 10.
Thanks for your review. If you search Lael K, there are two reviews - yours and Pistol's. Both of your reviews were accurate, so there are no conflicting reviews imo. Some say early 30s, some say late 20s, so we can say about 30. It means some will say HYA while others will not. It is kind of splitting hairs, so the best solution is for everyone to just say their opinion. For those interested, here was his review:
 Originally Posted by PistolPete357
[View Original Post]
HYA alert. Met Lael K first day in US. No mention of her here, this HYA is flying under the radar. Booker Marie says first time in US and young. Pictures are real she is young and fkn hot! I was pleasantly surprised when she appeared behind the door. She giggled as I was standing there, probably my goofy smile haha. Definite certified HYA. Kpop car model looks. She was very GFE and gives off civvie vibes which I love. Natural D / E a bit saggy but big soft handfuls. Nice ivory skin and thin. She is cool as a cucumber, confident and knows her way around. Service was good also. Dfk pays attention to me and pussy is tight wet. Very nice feeling puss. I lasted a bit longer than usual and she was game the whole time. I'd have to say one of the youngest in town right now. Kpop looks and great chemistry. I'm going to se her again this afternoon.
Lael K has saggy Ds, has both looks and service. I knew Pistol's review was accurate when he posted it.
 Originally Posted by PistolPete357
[View Original Post]
Instead of doubting my experience. Go see her then say something that helps us.
This is the way.
We are here to review girls, not review reviewers. The latter is why I dislike reviewing for LA, because people love to argue when we're all really here for the same thing. We're on the same team. We just want to know who to bang. It's why I skip past any post not about that in some way.
One thing that isn't obvious is that reviews can at best be about 80% accurate. For example, you can just assume that any height I quote could be off by 1 or 2 inches, and cup size off by up to 1 size. More than once I have said a girl is not her ad photo but someone said she was. It's not worth debating imo, I truly have no idea sometimes and we just want to know if a girl is hot or not. And if I say a girl has a nice face, obviously you might not agree. But who cares, just review the girls. If you say a girl I liked wasn't good looking, that's actually quite helpful because then other people will understand there is a range to taste and that the girl is probably borderline. Whereas there were some girls who everybody agreed is beautiful. So it doesn't matter what I or someone else said about a girl, your opinion is as good as mine.
I always welcome a different opinion, the only thing I'm not going to do is have an argument about review accuracy. It is just a handful of people supplying most of the intel, so even if they make a mistake you'll never hear me complain about them.
This is one advantage of the PLEASER thread. Anything but a review gets deleted.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 190
 Originally Posted by PistolPete357
[View Original Post]
I may not be the best judge of real pics but looks close enough for me. I'm not a professional kgirl researcher but I see plenty of girls. Being a snob on this forum is kinda embarrassing "big bro".
You don't need to be professional. All you have to do is right click a picture and find image source on google. Shows directly where every picture was taken from.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 190
 Originally Posted by DefCooked
[View Original Post]
I've accepted that more often than not, natural D / E's are going to sag. Thank for the scoop though.
Also, the guy crashing out over aura points on an anonymous board to discuss pussy is diabolical work my boy.
Hey bro don't take that review seriously I was just trolling lmao.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 81
Thank you on Lael K
 Originally Posted by Stonkz
[View Original Post]
I was playing nice. Am I not suppose to question a review? What you going to come find me bro? Let me help you be a better shill little bro. First step don't mention booker marie. And stop with this big certified HYA alert and kpop. Chat gpt could write a better review. But If you want to keep it more legit, here let me help you.
Pictures are fake but she is young and hot. She looks better than the pictures. She has a nice smile and gives off civvie vibes. Natural D / E a bit saggy but big soft handfuls. Nice ivory skin and thin. Service was good with plenty of DFK. Her pussy was tight and wet. If I had to guess, early to mid 20's. Definitely going to repeat.
Your welcome.
I've accepted that more often than not, natural D / E's are going to sag. Thank for the scoop though.
Also, the guy crashing out over aura points on an anonymous board to discuss pussy is diabolical work my boy.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 81
Baby Bona
 Originally Posted by JordanSmith
[View Original Post]
Not HYA. Somewhere between 35-45 years old. She is a total service queen but that's not what I am looking for. I shot in the dark and missed. I don't want to be the reason guys don't go see her so please, if you like service queens you will be in heaven with her. I just happen to be a HYA lover.
I saw her yesterday and for me she's HYA. I can't imagine her being over 35. My guess would be between 24 and 27. At least I found her very beautiful. Pale skin, long black hair down to her ass, a body similar to Baby Soa's but a little thinner, with a small waist and wide hips, and a beautiful ass for an Asian. She still has a few years to go before she's a pre-MILF. Her body is all natural and her breasts, which are normally only young, still have a nice shape. I agree with the service queen part; she's a nymphomaniac. I've never done so much DFK on a K-girl. After the CIP, she continued with BBBJ while my baby dough dripped between her legs. I like submissive HYAs, but Baby Bona was a change of pace that made me want more. I'll repeat it a few times. She said it was her first time here in the US, but in this life she was totally service-oriented.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 37
Lael K review
I've seen some conflicting reviews on Lael K in this forum recently, so I decided to go try myself a couple days ago. Here's my POV:
Beautiful face, but she's likely in her early 30's. So I'm not sure if she counts as HYA, but nonetheless, beautiful face.
Her D's are natural but quite saggy, and she has a slightly loose tummy, but no scarring. This leads me to believe she's in her 30's as well.
Very friendly, great service. I enjoyed my time with her. Her BJ technique could use some work though, she tends to use her teeth.
Would I recommend? Sure, but only if you go into it not expecting a real HYA.
Also, it seems like her price has gone down by 10.
-
Regular Member
 Posts: 9
B. Bona
Not HYA. Somewhere between 35-45 years old. She is a total service queen but that's not what I am looking for. I shot in the dark and missed. I don't want to be the reason guys don't go see her so please, if you like service queens you will be in heaven with her. I just happen to be a HYA lover.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 81
I may not be the best judge of real pics but looks close enough for me. I'm not a professional kgirl researcher but I see plenty of girls. Being a snob on this forum is kinda embarrassing "big bro".
 Originally Posted by Stonkz
[View Original Post]
I was playing nice. Am I not suppose to question a review? What you going to come find me bro? Let me help you be a better shill little bro. First step don't mention booker marie. And stop with this big certified HYA alert and kpop. Chat gpt could write a better review. But If you want to keep it more legit, here let me help you.
Pictures are fake but she is young and hot. She looks better than the pictures. She has a nice smile and gives off civvie vibes. Natural D / E a bit saggy but big soft handfuls. Nice ivory skin and thin. Service was good with plenty of DFK. Her pussy was tight and wet. If I had to guess, early to mid 20's. Definitely going to repeat..
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 81
OK it's actually a copy of my post. But ya OK.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 81
Geez we even got snobs in this forum. Are you proud of yourself. So I was right. Your welcome
 Originally Posted by Stonkz
[View Original Post]
I was playing nice. Am I not suppose to question a review? What you going to come find me bro? Let me help you be a better shill little bro. First step don't mention booker marie. And stop with this big certified HYA alert and kpop. Chat gpt could write a better review. But If you want to keep it more legit, here let me help you.
Pictures are fake but she is young and hot. She looks better than the pictures. She has a nice smile and gives off civvie vibes. Natural D / E a bit saggy but big soft handfuls. Nice ivory skin and thin. Service was good with plenty of DFK. Her pussy was tight and wet. If I had to guess, early to mid 20's. Definitely going to repeat.
Your welcome.
.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 81
Haha my bad. I'm not a pro like you. I'm not on here all day everyday talking bullshit like you. Sorry I don't know "the rules" of kpop booker etc. My bad old man, "big forum bro " LOL.
 Originally Posted by Stonkz
[View Original Post]
I was playing nice. Am I not suppose to question a review? What you going to come find me bro? Let me help you be a better shill little bro. First step don't mention booker marie. And stop with this big certified HYA alert and kpop. Chat gpt could write a better review. But If you want to keep it more legit, here let me help you.
Pictures are fake but she is young and hot. She looks better than the pictures. She has a nice smile and gives off civvie vibes. Natural D / E a bit saggy but big soft handfuls. Nice ivory skin and thin. Service was good with plenty of DFK. Her pussy was tight and wet. If I had to guess, early to mid 20's. Definitely going to repeat.
Your welcome.
-
Regular Member
 Posts: 14
Manmade DDs
 Originally Posted by DownloadX
[View Original Post]
I checked the Jedi Archives and she was described as DD. Boobs don't come in exact sizes but the more opinions the clearer it gets. Hope this helps.
For Baby Iv, the looks are there especially for tits lovers. There are mixed opinions on service and vibe, but that's to be expected. All that means is guys who are "tits first" and "looks first" will have a higher success rate, while "service first" guys are lower. Matchmaking cannot guarantee anything, it is just meant to increase your chances and help you prioritize candidates.
Lately, it is hard to tell MMs on a few of the newer girls because the quality is very good. Often it is a small base underneath real boobs, and you can't easily tell with casual inspection. To me, at that point it doesn't matter since they look and feel good. In a sense the are "mostly real" anyways. Sometimes I thought boobs were real and were told they are MMs, so I had to inspect on a future visit. But I realized after, at that point I don't even care - there is no functional difference to my tastes. What I do care is they look great and feel great. Bonus points if she is the right balance of sensitive.
I will continue working on the Archives based on your feedback. Once you get enough opinions, it becomes bell curved and the pattern becomes clear.
Definitely DD manmades. I confirmed with her on my second visit. And you're right-feel very very real-I couldn't tell that they were MM till I asked her.
She's also got a great ass, though she says that's fully natural.
I really vibed with her. Has become by ATF, and I'm going to repeat her till she leaves at the end of the month.
-
Senior Member
 Posts: 1565
I checked the Jedi Archives and she was described as DD. Boobs don't come in exact sizes but the more opinions the clearer it gets. Hope this helps.
For Baby Iv, the looks are there especially for tits lovers. There are mixed opinions on service and vibe, but that's to be expected. All that means is guys who are "tits first" and "looks first" will have a higher success rate, while "service first" guys are lower. Matchmaking cannot guarantee anything, it is just meant to increase your chances and help you prioritize candidates.
Lately, it is hard to tell MMs on a few of the newer girls because the quality is very good. Often it is a small base underneath real boobs, and you can't easily tell with casual inspection. To me, at that point it doesn't matter since they look and feel good. In a sense the are "mostly real" anyways. Sometimes I thought boobs were real and were told they are MMs, so I had to inspect on a future visit. But I realized after, at that point I don't even care - there is no functional difference to my tastes. What I do care is they look great and feel great. Bonus points if she is the right balance of sensitive.
I will continue working on the Archives based on your feedback. Once you get enough opinions, it becomes bell curved and the pattern becomes clear.
Posting Limitations
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
|
|