Comment on Forum Rules Here

**Soluopoganap** · 04-09-25 19:18

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the content of the report was pointless, unproductive drama. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

**TheBoobHound** · 10-13-24 08:35

When is it permissible to post photos or videos of working girls?

There are a lot of different cases. I have seen all of these on the forum. Which are acceptable and which are against the rules?

- Photos from ads on escort sites.

- Photos from mugshots, media stories.

- Photos from a woman's social media (under her escort name, only fans, etc).

- Photos from a woman's social media (under her real name).

- Photos that a woman shared in direct communication (WhatsApp, text messages, etc).

- Candid photos taken in public, without the woman's knowledge (I. E. Photographing a streetwalker on a corner from your car or walking past her while wearing a hidden camera).

- Photos taken by the forum member, with the woman's knowledge (although she may not know it will be posted online).

- Photos taken without her knowledge in a place owned by the monger (I. E. A hidden camera in his car or house).

- Photos taken without her knowledge in a place not owned by the monger (a hotel or MP).

**Admin2** · 09-23-24 15:12

Originally Posted by DirkyDiggy [View Original Post]

Far from it. A bit presumptive on your part. When I read "no links", I thought he meant there were no links referenced in the post. I was merely trying to help. I spent more then 20 minutes looking for a "contact us" link to respond appropriately, but I don't see it, so my apologies if I come across as a dick by responding here.

You spent more than 20 minutes looking for this and didn't find it?

How much easier do we have to make it?

**DirkyDiggy** · 09-15-24 20:17

Far from it. A bit presumptive on your part. When I read "no links", I thought he meant there were no links referenced in the post. I was merely trying to help. I spent more then 20 minutes looking for a "contact us" link to respond appropriately, but I don't see it, so my apologies if I come across as a dick by responding here.

**Sadinhaverhill** · 09-02-24 11:20

I passed my infraction time back at the end of May but my postings and replies still get bagged out for approval.

Can this be fixed, it really sucks.

**MongerLuv69** · 07-19-24 02:21

I do not know what I said politically but suspect it was while I was in shock over the assassin. It will not happen again. I know the rules and try to follow them. Sorry sir.

**Admin2** · 04-29-24 00:46

Originally Posted by ATVBro [View Original Post]

300 is way too damn long. The info in this site is sensitive and a lot of us users are trying to be discrete while using it. I have to have it open for like 25 minutes to reply to my inbox and repeatedly bring it up / set 5 minute timers. Vs just replying to the messages and having my typing time be about the same as the old 60 second limit. This is unsustainable and frankly is interfering with my discretion and the rest of my life. I have literally never gotten a spam message from this site, so this seems like overkill.

You "discretion" guys will be the death of the forum. Have a nice day.

A2

**Admin2** · 04-29-24 00:40

Originally Posted by Member#1658 [View Original Post]

Two things in one post:

1) 300 seconds is way too long. I get frustrated waiting 60 seconds, but I understand the delay is to discourage abuse. 300 seconds discourages people from replying to all but their closest friends. Please consider putting that back.

We were under attack for several weeks by some botnet/AI that would register 1000's of users and send 10 DM's with each user spamming a sex site. We had to make it not worth their time to be here so setting the time between messages to 300 was one of the things we did. It's been a week or so since they registered and we made the decision today to lower it. I'm not sure if it's done yet but if not it will be soon.

2) Is "moderation" a life sentence? It really isn't THAT big of a deal, but being stuck on moderation puts your posts back a ways on very active threads because they get inserted based on the date / time they were originally submitted instead of the date / time the moderator approved the post. That causes some posts to never be noticed by some people. It would really be appreciated if parole were allowed after some period of time. I'm sure some people likely give up and just create a new account over this, but I've got over 1500 posts and quite a few years here, so that's not an option I prefer to consider. Any chance of a guy catching a break and getting a second chance?

In your case yes, it's a life sentence. You posted a picture and outed a monger. What the fuck do you expect?

A2

**ATVBro** · 04-28-24 17:32

Originally Posted by Member#1658 [View Original Post]

Two things in one post:

1) 300 seconds is way too long. I get frustrated waiting 60 seconds, but I understand the delay is to discourage abuse. 300 seconds discourages people from replying to all but their closest friends. Please consider putting that back.

2) Is "moderation" a life sentence? It really isn't THAT big of a deal, but being stuck on moderation puts your posts back a ways on very active threads because they get inserted based on the date / time they were originally submitted instead of the date / time the moderator approved the post. That causes some posts to never be noticed by some people. It would really be appreciated if parole were allowed after some period of time. I'm sure some people likely give up and just create a new account over this, but I've got over 1500 posts and quite a few years here, so that's not an option I prefer to consider. Any chance of a guy catching a break and getting a second chance?

300 is way too damn long. The info in this site is sensitive and a lot of us users are trying to be discrete while using it. I have to have it open for like 25 minutes to reply to my inbox and repeatedly bring it up / set 5 minute timers. Vs just replying to the messages and having my typing time be about the same as the old 60 second limit. This is unsustainable and frankly is interfering with my discretion and the rest of my life. I have literally never gotten a spam message from this site, so this seems like overkill.

**Member #1658** · 04-10-24 10:04

Two things in one post:

1) 300 seconds is way too long. I get frustrated waiting 60 seconds, but I understand the delay is to discourage abuse. 300 seconds discourages people from replying to all but their closest friends. Please consider putting that back.

2) Is "moderation" a life sentence? It really isn't THAT big of a deal, but being stuck on moderation puts your posts back a ways on very active threads because they get inserted based on the date / time they were originally submitted instead of the date / time the moderator approved the post. That causes some posts to never be noticed by some people. It would really be appreciated if parole were allowed after some period of time. I'm sure some people likely give up and just create a new account over this, but I've got over 1500 posts and quite a few years here, so that's not an option I prefer to consider. Any chance of a guy catching a break and getting a second chance?

**OrdLover** · 03-31-24 11:57

Originally Posted by BoRegardHer [View Original Post]

I think this used to be 60 seconds between sending private messages. Now it seems it's 5 minutes (300 seconds). Was this intentional? When we can't post #'s and when we want to share a #, 5 minutes is going to make responding to requests take forever.

Today I went to reply to some of my pm. And I noticed the 300 sec timeout. Before the one minute was already long enough. Is there a reason the timeout for pm is 5 minutes now?

**BoRegardHer** · 03-12-24 08:47

I think this used to be 60 seconds between sending private messages. Now it seems it's 5 minutes (300 seconds). Was this intentional? When we can't post #'s and when we want to share a #, 5 minutes is going to make responding to requests take forever.

**FredFred123** · 11-21-23 12:28

First I want to apologize for a post I inadvertently made on the the Nevada. Las Vegas. Escort Reviews Thread. It was not my intention to post prohibited content, for which I received a citation. However, I do agree it needs to be considered for future posts and conversation. Just wanted to throw that out there. Thanks.

**DirtyFuk** · 10-06-23 15:27

Originally Posted by BBShaq [View Original Post]

Why can't we talk about trans here?

With the changes in society, many pre op and post op trans women are very beautiful. I would hope the owner would consider allowing members to discuss them. Some pist op trans providers try to hide they are post op. Allowing discussion would inform those that are not interested in seeing a trans provider.

In the end, the owner gwts to do as they see fit. They have provided a great place for all of us to discuss the issues. We owe them our gratitude.