Thread: Kgirls Rebrands
+
Add Report
Results 196 to 210 of 1134
-
01-26-25 09:37 #939Senior Member

Posts: 735I saw Derby years ago. She was a one-time no repeat for me. However, I am picky on repeats.
Originally Posted by NaFindKGirls
[View Original Post]
-
01-26-25 09:35 #938Senior Member

Posts: 735Kiva in OC pics are super hot, I am highly doubtful she looks like that. I would follow the IG model she got those pics from though.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
01-26-25 09:34 #937Senior Member

Posts: 735Not sure if she is a rebrand but the pic of Yona K in denim shorts is a real pic, so if you saw her then she is easily recognized.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
01-25-25 21:20 #936Senior Member

Posts: 3445Kiva looks like a rebrand
Pics triggered Boner Sense. Nuru for 60 more doesn't seem worth it. I have had free nuru way better from Pepsi Palace. Why does Yona K use one fake pic of Mongolian / Korean Ms Hime? Yona K had a pic that triggered me.
-
01-22-25 15:40 #935Senior Member

Posts: 112Jodie
Jodie has a pretty mediocre review on the other site. According to the review she is tall for a K-girl with huge tits, but they are flapjacks and she has belly rolls. Appearance 6, performance 7. For once, an honest assessment from that board.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
01-22-25 10:47 #934Senior Member

Posts: 735CG Emma
Could she be Sexy Dior / Ashley Fox? Anyone see Emma?
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
01-19-25 10:34 #933Senior Member

Posts: 735Much of what you have said is gospel. Also, HYA is a matter of perspective for me. (although BA is the ultimate arbitrator since he coined the acronym) . I, for one, will call a girl a HYA if she looks like one, regardless of age. Which, for me, means she can be in her 20's-30's with a fit and tight body, a pretty face, and, of course, is Asian.
Originally Posted by DownloadX
[View Original Post]
-
01-18-25 17:49 #932Regular Member

Posts: 4If pics are accurate, Bridget fka Derby. If anyone remembers.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
01-18-25 15:14 #931Senior Member

Posts: 3445FA girls
Ms Zina = Nuri.
Ms Kyss = OG Kiss.
Ms Hope = Carina.
Ms Bella looks like a rebrand.
Ms Hime finally adds BB upcharge option.
-
01-18-25 15:07 #930Senior Member

Posts: 3445CG Emma
I think she's a rebrand. I remember seeing those fake pics years before. Same case with Jodie. I feel like I have seen that name and similar fake pics before. Resilient John got intel that Jodie is not a rebrand, but that can only be certain if someone has seen many girls years before FOSTA too.
-
01-18-25 14:57 #929Senior Member

Posts: 3445CAKdolls double listing
Bridget = Nara (could be wrong here but 70% confidence).
Everly = Luna.
Dana = Olivia = Soy / Cosmo / etc.
Linda = Kai and I think she already gone.
-
01-15-25 22:50 #928Senior Member

Posts: 1743The nice thing about HYA is even borderline HYA are nowhere near MILFs by two dimensions. "Is she young" and "Is she good looking" are not that hard to call. Few would dare to call and old woman both, so it blocks the F-tier and generally prevents D and E tier. The definition of "30 and under with above average looks" for HYA is plain and simple, and it let me quickly grade other OC reviewers for relevancy. I immediately noticed 5 OC reviewers who were "gold standard" HYA lovers, so when one of them tells me Leslie K has a fantastic ass, that's exactly what I expect. Instant erection is the result. Out of respect, I will PM the rest.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
About grading, we could rate "Is she young" as S = 20 and under, A = 25 and under, B = 30 and under, and so on. We could rate "Is she good looking" on my scale where average is in-between C and D, with B being a strict cutoff of "good looking". So B-B is the minimum, but we get that any honest person could call a C-B or B-C girl a HYA, even a C-C on occasion. But they tended to acknowledge it was a borderline call, or qualified it with fair justifications like "I like thick" or "I like short hair" and so on which make perfect sense, and are useful to anyone as long as they know to factor it out. I make it very clear I like skinny and cute, so you can drop any skinny and cute girl by 2 tiers of looks instantly to compensate. If I call a thiiiiick girl like Baby Terri a "borderline HYA if you like thick", it makes sense. She's a B-B girl if you like thick, B-C if you're neutral, or B-D through B-F if you are traumatized by thick. This is why descriptions on body size, age, hair, skin color, face vs body matter. There are guys who only care about hair length and skin color. To me, once you control for these factors explicitly you start getting a lot of consensus.
It needs to be said some girls are so beautiful that it doesn't matter your preference, you can't deny they are HYA. A negative Daisy review will go "She is a HYA but I didn't like her service". I can easily believe that, I got good service but I'm sure she gave someone else bad service. But if they said "She is not good looking" or "She is an old woman", I would let their own words be their indictment and say nothing more in reply. We could argue in circles about service, but not about HYA looks. You either have eyes or you don't.
In OC it is possible to strongly overlay 5-7 HYA hunter opinions on a girl and usually get a unanimous decision or close. Therefore, we can objectively call it most of the time through unanimous consent. Through this simple method, I could determine that 10%-20% of girls in OC were HYA by the strictest definition. Realistically 25% by a looser definition (allowing for 31-33, butterface with a good body, good face with no body, etc..). I personally always use the looser definition for decision-making, but publicly I play it safe. So I will say of those girls "she is close". I do not use alternative terms like CYA, PHYA, etc.. because we end up with an unclear message and subjectivity all over again. A girl is either HYA or not, a girl can be borderline/close to HYA or not. Remember, I also use HYA to grade reviewers so if they aren't 80% in agreement then they aren't useful. When I use a gold standard reviewers' intel, I succeed 100% of the time. It's not even close, because I'm actually happy with borderline HYA. It is a pretty high bar.
I've already explained in public why bookers can't really retaliate, since it would be against their very best customers who all know each other. What they will do instead is make vague threats. I've known people to get them, and I've spelled out clearly that a korg that follows through on threats would show they are unsafe. No one would ever use them again. This is a case where the dog can't bite, so it must bark and make uncomfortable statements. I would be happy to copy and paste any such DMs I get publicly, but they no longer send them to me after I explained it all. I made sure to post it on the LA forum since that's where they're from.
I have repeatedly also offered that any booker or agency that doesn't like a single thing I've said just needs to say the word and I will be happy to never mention them or their girls again. No one has taken me up on the offer. Well, the offer still stands. I'm seriousness, I only do things with consent anyways.
I think maybe 5% or 10% of girls can charge "whatever they want". If it's a short tour, it works. If it's a long tour, it won't. Believe me, they are reinventing the wheel on this corgs have done it for decades and know you can only do premium pricing with short tours or limited slots. It makes sense for a few girls, that's cool. For girls that want to make real money, they need long schedules at cheaper prices. Or to tour, but that has its own drawbacks. Oh the stories I could tell. Will PM. Touring only makes sense for mid girls or girls trying to escape bad conditions.
-
01-15-25 03:12 #927Senior Member

Posts: 3445Better Boning Bureau: 108 Heavenly Boners
I happen to see a heated discussion on bogus reviews, mongers right and double standards. I support mongers rights 100%. My white knight extent is just common decency toward a woman who works to please me.
The purpose of this forum is to exchange intel and see hot young Asian girls. We don't want to be fooled by rebrands and MILFs. We don't want to be retaliated for honest intel. Gate keeping is a violation of our rights.
I don't have double standards. Every monger is my bro and every HYA is my bae. If I can have an accurate assessment of most girls on looks, age, service, and rebranding, I would not hesitate to rank / out them all. I don't want to stick out like a sore thumb if I don't see many care.
In other words, if there are 108 Boners, we would be the Better Boning Bureau. We may even be able to suppress rate increase. We can for sure destroy rebranding and fake reviews. I choose the number 108 boners cause new girl is usually busy in first 2 weeks or so. That number can make quite an impact on new girl.
-
01-14-25 22:17 #926Senior Member

Posts: 3445That failure rate sounds about right. I never had to worry about rebrands and MILFs before FOSTA. Due to gate keeping, I can't wait for intel. Bookers and Boner Sense are what's helping me not to fail so much. I would rage quit the hobby or just do what you do if I wasn't happy TOFTT'ing.
Originally Posted by Taliesin92
[View Original Post]
-
01-14-25 22:13 #925Senior Member

Posts: 3445I believe you and I haven't seen Mocha or Julli4/ Gem3/ Layla. Thanks for confirming.
Originally Posted by ImMyself
[View Original Post]











Reply With Quote












