Thread: Hot Young Asian Girls
+
Add Report
Results 1,501 to 1,515 of 10207
-
01-11-25 05:51 #8707Senior Member

Posts: 38
Originally Posted by CreampieSupply
[View Original Post]
Which org is that? I only used VIP and Miya's but never saw her on the roster. She looks like she's worth dumping a few loads in.
Originally Posted by Omfgitzjin
[View Original Post]
-
01-11-25 03:19 #8706Senior Member

Posts: 691Whoa.
Holy Sticker Shock Batman. Take a look at that video option upcharge.
Calling Download, what do you think?
https://get9irl.com/BabyNyan
-
01-10-25 21:55 #8705Senior Member

Posts: 1743No, don't worry. We'll take good care of her for you.
Originally Posted by Taliesin92
[View Original Post]
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
This is why rosters will separate face and body as needed. Baby Suger is face over body, Shani is body over face. They are different styles. I hope each guy finds his girl.
Originally Posted by Bbaka10
[View Original Post]
Every guy has a different sense of taste. I know some guys say Freesia is better than Daisy, but I liked Daisy better than Freesia. She has more the style I like. Same with Jira and Baby Suger, I like skinny girls with nice face. Whereas in Isabella's case you'd have to be blind not to recognize she's beautiful. I only like Asians but she was good enough to be an exception. Will sound the alarm on her return.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...62#post7157662 Tobonkornot's HYA list of 2024
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...Agency-30-Plus Calling on OC MILF lovers to post reviews
"More HYA will come" - Theoden
-
01-10-25 19:21 #8704Senior Member

Posts: 785Shani vs Baby Sugar
This is obviously a very subjective question but, to me, Shani is WAY hotter than Baby Sugar. Like, they are not even close. Baby Sugar is tits on a stick. Which I'm not opposed to. (Some of my favorite k-girls of the past are TOAS.) Whereas, Shani has real curves. As I mentioned earlier, her surgically enhanced body looks like it came straight out of a 1980's issue of Playboy magazine. Sugar, meanwhile, looks more like a skinny waif girl, with nice implants and a pretty face.
Originally Posted by CreamFire
[View Original Post]
The face is where the comparison gets closer. Both of them are very beautiful. Both girls would turn a lot of heads in public, even with their clothes on. But I would give a slight edge to Shani. Her face looks more pretty & feminine to me. Plus, she smiles and laughs more, and her smile totally lights up the room.
Finally, when it comes to service, Shani easily wins in that comparison. Baby Sugar even admits, "customers say my service isn't good. " And then she doesn't really try to disprove that reputation. She's low energy and prefers you do all the work. Now, to be fair, I've seen Shani many times, and I've only seen Baby Sugar once, so that's a limited comparison set. Maybe Baby Sugar gets better with repeat sessions, or if she likes you. But the reason I haven't seen Baby Sugar more times is because she just wasn't very good.
If you like hot little Korean spinners with excellent skills, then Shani is the obvious choice.
OK. I know a bunch of Baby Sugar fans are going to be angry. She has a large group of loyal followers. But keep in mind, this is just one man's opinion. Don't assassinate me for it. LOL!
-
01-10-25 09:08 #8703Senior Member

Posts: 735Baby Sugar. Skinny emo with lots of tats and non-stop oral diarrhea or Shani, CYA / HYA with a hot gymnast body with nice curves, abundant T&A, no tats. My complaint about Shani is that she still had acne last year when I saw her, and she had a bit of an attitude then, too. To each their own.
Originally Posted by Bbaka10
[View Original Post]
-
01-10-25 02:48 #8702Senior Member

Posts: 206I would say that Baby Sugar has a better looking face. But Shani is still very attractive in her own right. Based on face alone, I'd rate Baby Sugar a 9 and Shani about an 8.
Bodywise, Shani is def more my type. She is more of a petite, spinner type whereas Baby Sugar is more tall and lean.
Originally Posted by CreamFire
[View Original Post]
-
01-10-25 02:30 #8701Senior Member

Posts: 382Shani or b. Sugar?
I've always been curious about Shani but never bothered to see her when she transitioned to GFE only. Now that more is available, is she the same level as baby sugar based on looks?
Originally Posted by CreamInside
[View Original Post]
Yes, I know. I keep asking for a comparison of B. Sugar but she likes to disappear after a couples weeks then disappears for a couple months. Been searching for an option b for when she disappears again.
-
01-10-25 01:19 #8700Senior Member

Posts: 785Bbfs
Yes, of course. Totally agree. Anyone who is in a relationship should absolutely be using protection at all times. It's not fair to the other person to potentially expose them to some nasty shit. At times in my life when I've been married or had a girlfriend, I have either used a cover or stayed away from the hobby all together.
Originally Posted by Mmmmm00
[View Original Post]
But for anyone who is single and not in a relationship — which is where I find myself today — then my philosophy is, "Enjoy it while it lasts!" As long as the BBFS is consensual, agreed upon by the customer and the girl, then it's a wonderful thing that should be openly pursued by anyone who desires it. And anyone who doesn't like that situation is totally justified in not seeing that girl.
That's what I love about this hobby. We get to choose. The customer is king.
-
01-09-25 21:36 #8699Senior Member

Posts: 174Thats your personal preference and I'm sure it's shared with a lot of other mongers which is fine. There's still a market for covered sessions. I personally don't BBFS girls who openly BBFS and I'm sure there are mongers in committed relationships who only do covered sessions.
Originally Posted by Taliesin92
[View Original Post]
-
01-09-25 18:50 #8698Senior Member

Posts: 785Bbfs
Yup, good move on Shani's part. I think BBFS has become a necessary offering for all but the legendary, veteran k-girls who have been here for 8 to 10 years or more. Those k-girls generally see the same regular customers all the time, so it's a different vibe. They can offer BB or not, and it has less of an impact on their business. And I suspect some of them do it on a selective, customer-by-customer basis.
Originally Posted by CreamInside
[View Original Post]
Everybody else needs to openly offer BB, or they will get overtaken by the high level of competition in LA. Most of the newer ladies are doing it. (And by "newer," I mean k-girls who have been around for 3 to 5 years or less.) There are always exceptions, of course, but I think that is the general rule these days. And I think it's a good thing. The hobby is way better without having to strangle your dick with a rubber hose. It's like fucking through a tire. It's just not the way it was meant to be. LOL!
-
01-09-25 08:44 #8697Senior Member

Posts: 302Great news, BBFS is back on the table
Great news since it seems like Shani is offering BBFS again for upcharge which is well worth it IMO. One of the nicest and smoothest pussies and hottest K-girls I ever had the pleasure of filling up with cum.
Originally Posted by Taliesin92
[View Original Post]
https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/shani
-
01-09-25 08:42 #8696Senior Member

Posts: 302Looks like she's been busy as her pricing has increased from 320 to 350 for the base rate. There is definitely some gatekeeping going on!
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-25 17:44 #8695Senior Member

Posts: 30Sloppy wet and slow BJ. Def not usual Kgirl type service. She's very petite. One of those rarer times where door opened and you immediately recognized her.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-25 01:33 #8694Senior Member

Posts: 2405Thanks for the heads up. Nakamura surprised me with better head than I expected. How's Saki with suckin and service in general?
Originally Posted by BobLove
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-25 01:30 #8693Senior Member

Posts: 3445She's not Baby Soyu or Sweet Soyu. (Click here) for rebrand thread and you can find for names. She was with the defunct Sexy Angels. Here are her reviews (click here) and probably this as well (click here).
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]













Reply With Quote









