Uh. Yeah I didn't see the girl. That's why I was asking. If I've seen her, I wouldn't be asking you. Do you know what mongers want to know the first thing about a girl? It's whether or not pics are real. You know why? Because. You said it yourself. Most pics are bollocks.
I was not saying or implying you're full of shit at all.
I pointed out that those reviews contradict each other and pointed out prospective customers (like myself) might have issues figuring it out. Hence me asking.
I review and discuss plenty of girls in the open.
Are we only allowed to talk about girls we've seen or something?
Funny. No more than a few months ago you called me a hero. Now you're telling people to put me on ignore. Live long to become a villain.
And because I'm not talking about girls? Huh? Is jini not a girl?
I don't even ask if photos are real anymore. It's rare that they are, and even then there's photoshop. In Jiji's case, I don't think they're real. That said, she's gorgeous, imo. Face is good, but her body is smokin.
Rocketman, you're not confused. You've long said I should give my honest take. But now you question it again, over a girl you did not see again. Same thing you've done to Boner. And now BrainLara, Stl Danish, and many others in recent posts. It would be so easy if you looked at a review or description I made of any girl you did see. Then you could tell right away if I'm right or wrong about her. Right?
You read and follow all my posts so you know from my Baby Arin example that two guys are going to have different takes on the same girl. I got great attitude on her and so did 10. 2 guys got an awful attitude from her. Who's to believe? You act like there's some confusion but anyone with critical thinking skills knows they can both be true, Rocketman. Any honest person already acknowledges that.
This is my description of Jji: Jiji - Not girl in ad, maybe 30, service over looks, fantastic body, dark complexion, somewhat skinny, face is fine, B or C cup with great nipples, enough ass to grab, loves to fuck. Magnum friendly.
This is BrainLara's: Pics are her. Cute, flat stomach, TNA need apply, beautiful tight peach, generous DFK, no gag, forked me back plenty, total pleaser, almost no English spoken, recommend. She takes different roses than is typical here. I hope she stays a good long time and brings joy to others like she did me.
I don't agree the pics are her. I agree she's cute, the stomach part is true for him to point out, got a lot of DFK even though that's not my thing, her pussy was great though I wouldn't call it tight, I even mention I liked her face but others might not in a longer review of her.
Uh. Yeah I didn't see the girl. That's why I was asking. If I've seen her, I wouldn't be asking you. Do you know what mongers want to know the first thing about a girl? It's whether or not pics are real. You know why? Because. You said it yourself. Most pics are bollocks.
I was not saying or implying you're full of shit at all.
I pointed out that those reviews contradict each other and pointed out prospective customers (like myself) might have issues figuring it out. Hence me asking.
I review and discuss plenty of girls in the open.
Are we only allowed to talk about girls we've seen or something?
Funny. No more than a few months ago you called me a hero. Now you're telling people to put me on ignore. Live long to become a villain.
And because I'm not talking about girls? Huh? Is jini not a girl?
Say, I'm confused. You say she's not the girl in the pic yet in those minis linked by you, BrainLara as well as Stl Danish says that she Is the girl in the pic and then you say your experience was consistent with those reviews.
So like, is she girl in the pics or not? Obviously both statements cannot be true at the same time.
Who's a consumer to trust here? And how could this be consistent? If you guys can't even agree on whether she's the girl in the pic, there's something going on here, no?
Also I'm pretty sure she is a serial rebrander. At least those pics I remember a girl using under different multiple names here in the bay area and in socal.
Rocketman, you're not confused. You've long said I should give my honest take. But now you question it again, over a girl you did not see again. Same thing you've done to Boner. And now BrainLara, Stl Danish, and many others in recent posts. It would be so easy if you looked at a review or description I made of any girl you did see. Then you could tell right away if I'm right or wrong about her. Right?
You read and follow all my posts so you know from my Baby Arin example that two guys are going to have different takes on the same girl. I got great attitude on her and so did 10. 2 guys got an awful attitude from her. Who's to believe? You act like there's some confusion but anyone with critical thinking skills knows they can both be true, Rocketman. Any honest person already acknowledges that.
This is my description of Jji: Jiji - Not girl in ad, maybe 30, service over looks, fantastic body, dark complexion, somewhat skinny, face is fine, B or C cup with great nipples, enough ass to grab, loves to fuck. Magnum friendly.
This is BrainLara's: Pics are her. Cute, flat stomach, TNA need apply, beautiful tight peach, generous DFK, no gag, forked me back plenty, total pleaser, almost no English spoken, recommend. She takes different roses than is typical here. I hope she stays a good long time and brings joy to others like she did me.
I don't agree the pics are her. I agree she's cute, the stomach part is true for him to point out, got a lot of DFK even though that's not my thing, her pussy was great though I wouldn't call it tight, I even mention I liked her face but others might not in a longer review of her. I don't know what forking is but I'm not going to question it since I don't do everything to a girl. She doesn't speak much English. I agree she's a total pleaser. And I agree she takes a different rate than usual.
Two guys disagree on ad photos all the time, same as height, age, weight, and so on. But certainly that's what I would call consistent with BrainLara's review, we agreed on a ton of details and he mentioned things I didn't bother to mention but were spot on. You very rarely review girls for someone who keeps talking about reviews, and it would be so easy to reply to your posts about a girl being off two inches and say "What about these small differences. Who's to believe?" I mean it's just impossible for a girl to grow two inches right? It's not the gotcha you seem to think. It's clear you didn't read past the first few words to make your claim on all our reviews.
You keep talking about girls you didn't see. It's the same problem with shills who review girls they never saw. But there's a simple solution. Why not wait until a girl you've seen shows up and then tell me that a) I'm full of it or b) I'm totally right. Because I would welcome either! You already knew that of course, so get to it and let's find out. You sound like a younger version of me and I believe you can do better.
For those who need it, you can hit ignore on any user if you don't find their posts helpful or containing any intel on girls.
There are names variations depending on the booker website. She's here until Saturday.
Saw her the second time yesterday. She was genuinely happy when she saw me, and was a lot more playful and affectionate. Much better connection this time, as she was a bit nervous and reserved the first time. A reminder that most HYAs will be better with repeats as they get more comfortable.
Great to hear she's back. She's no longer on CAKD, but CGLA.
There are names variations depending on the booker website. She's here until Saturday.
Saw her the second time yesterday. She was genuinely happy when she saw me, and was a lot more playful and affectionate. Much better connection this time, as she was a bit nervous and reserved the first time. A reminder that most HYAs will be better with repeats as they get more comfortable.
Jiji is outstanding. I could fuck her for days. A body that makes me hard just thinking about her. I've seen her twice and will see her again. Her older sister was one of my favorites, too.
Thanks for pointing this out. My last mention of Evian was right before your post, I did not realize she was off. She is on break for a few weeks. I've gotten PMs asking about her. It is really tricky but I've explained in private that the intel I gave is accurate even though it appears contradictory. She is "Asians only" yes, but I've also said if you've seen her before that rule you can get an exception. She is on break. Let's hope she gets good rest.
And look, Jiji is back! She is fantastic body, body over face, great service, magnum friendly. As in, she was actually pleased that I had a bigger cock. Same as Amy. That's not common FYI, just start slow at first when in doubt. Wonderful girl who is also bb inclusive. I wanted to repeat her more but she left SD for OC. https://get9irl.com/Jiji Jiji 320 bb inclusive http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7092517 Nov 8 OC Roster with 6 Jiji reviews
Jiji description - Not girl in ad, maybe 30, service over looks, fantastic body, dark complexion, somewhat skinny, face is fine, B or C cup with great nipples, enough ass to grab, loves to fuck. Magnum friendly....
A reminder again that Jiji is not the girl in the ad, I include it simply to help people identify the ad to book the right girl. I think this is the 20th reminder in 3 months I've made not to expect things out of ad photos, but that's just me. You do you.
Say, I'm confused. You say she's not the girl in the pic yet in those minis linked by you, BrainLara as well as Stl Danish says that she Is the girl in the pic and then you say your experience was consistent with those reviews.
So like, is she girl in the pics or not? Obviously both statements cannot be true at the same time.
Who's a consumer to trust here? And how could this be consistent? If you guys can't even agree on whether she's the girl in the pic, there's something going on here, no?
Also I'm pretty sure she is a serial rebrander. At least those pics I remember a girl using under different multiple names here in the bay area and in socal.
I think Adela = Nelly who had been in OC before but got no reviews for some reasons. As always, only reason I might not see a girl is cause I think she's MILF. Booker rec to me is more reliable than bros to me cause bros gatekeep me. Having said that, I already had a sense if a girl may be HYA or not and would TOFTT anyway without booker rec. Bookers saved me from MILF sometimes. I rarely had bad experience with booker rec, but the girl may not be young and hot enough for my taste sometimes LOL.
I think I reviewed Adela on the other site. She was a MILF to me with below average service. No repeat. Not Boner worthy.
Baby Evian appears to be off according to CGLA website.
Thanks for pointing this out. My last mention of Evian was right before your post, I did not realize she was off. She is on break for a few weeks. I've gotten PMs asking about her. It is really tricky but I've explained in private that the intel I gave is accurate even though it appears contradictory. She is "Asians only" yes, but I've also said if you've seen her before that rule you can get an exception. She is on break. Let's hope she gets good rest.
I tried to quit rosters a few weeks back but people dumped new HYA intel on me and I had to check it out. I've shared everything I know except for Freesia who I will describe after New Year's. I'm still quit on rosters, I'm working on Tokyo rosters now. It was once my dream to bang all the women of Japan, but unfortunately jgirls are so easy to date that I soon got one girlfriend after another and had to stop mongering. But now I'm back in business and I'm determined to fight the GPS pricing (Golden Pussy Syndrome) that Tokyo DH girls try on some tourists.
As I mentioned with Baby Blue and Ericka gone I'd consider Minji and maybe Jenny worth checking out for those focused on HYAs. Minji is looks over service, Jenny is balanced with both looks and service. HYA is a tough criteria to meet, there are actually a lot of good looking girls who are beautiful 30s (just my opinion). Amy, Lauryn, Victoria, many more. See the Dec 13 roster for some intel, plus new reviews since. There are also some new girls but no intel.
And look, Jiji is back! She is fantastic body, body over face, great service, magnum friendly. As in, she was actually pleased that I had a bigger cock. Same as Amy. That's not common FYI, just start slow at first when in doubt. Wonderful girl who is also bb inclusive. I wanted to repeat her more but she left SD for OC. https://get9irl.com/Jiji Jiji 320 bb inclusive http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7092517 Nov 8 OC Roster with 6 Jiji reviews
Jiji description - Not girl in ad, maybe 30, service over looks, fantastic body, dark complexion, somewhat skinny, face is fine, B or C cup with great nipples, enough ass to grab, loves to fuck. Magnum friendly. A different gentleman's take: Jiji - "Her body is honestly killer and having a ravenous women ride me is super hot. She was so tight, my dick was hurting lol. But her face left a lot to be desired." If anyone knows FirstAsians Cherry (there are a ton of Cherry's btw) Jiji has a very similar ass just dark tanned. Wonderful to grab during bbbj. I mostly hunt HYA but make an exception for her, she is for guys who enjoy a great body. Again, she is slightly skinny.
I will bold girls in my awards list who are still in OC and SD.
A reminder again that Jiji is not the girl in the ad, I include it simply to help people identify the ad to book the right girl. I think this is the 20th reminder in 3 months I've made not to expect things out of ad photos, but that's just me. You do you.
I think Adela = Nelly who had been in OC before but got no reviews for some reasons. As always, only reason I might not see a girl is cause I think she's MILF. Booker rec to me is more reliable than bros to me cause bros gatekeep me. Having said that, I already had a sense if a girl may be HYA or not and would TOFTT anyway without booker rec. Bookers saved me from MILF sometimes. I rarely had bad experience with booker rec, but the girl may not be young and hot enough for my taste sometimes LOL.
I have no intel on her but I can give you this advice. Ignore any bookers rec. It's almost 100% going to lead to disappointment. 80% of my bad experiences have been because I went with their rec. Park at Kspecial doll loves to rec and it never plays out well. Find reviewers that grade similar to your tastes.
I have no intel on her but I can give you this advice. Ignore any bookers rec. It's almost 100% going to lead to disappointment. 80% of my bad experiences have been because I went with their rec. Park at Kspecial doll loves to rec and it never plays out well. Find reviewers that grade similar to your tastes.
This has been my experience as well unfortunately.
Any reports on Adila from CAK? Booker recommended but I couldn't find any intel from search.
I have no intel on her but I can give you this advice. Ignore any bookers rec. It's almost 100% going to lead to disappointment. 80% of my bad experiences have been because I went with their rec. Park at Kspecial doll loves to rec and it never plays out well. Find reviewers that grade similar to your tastes.
Most girls are not like their ad photos, I hope everyone realizes that. But maybe 20% of the younger and better looking ones are comparable or even real photo. Keep in mind out of 50 girls, I focus on just the 5-10 girls I think are the best looking. I label the youngest and best ones HYAs. When it comes to MILFs, they usually photoshop them to look way better. This is true of most ad photos. So I am literally cherry picking the best girls, basically unicorns. That is not the norm. I hope that's clear.
I never see a girl based on photos, I rely on intel usually from people with similar taste. I think you'll be disappointed if you use ad photos. So I will copy and paste the PSA I made yesterday here: http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7129138
I normally call out girls who look like their ad, maybe 25% of girls are close enough. About 10% of girls look better than their ad. Otherwise, everyone should know by now to ignore ad photos. I literally don't look at ad photos to decide a girl, the only reason I even mention is because most guys care. I warn guys almost every roster about the girl not matching the ad by default:
A few girls are actually photo accurate, so sometimes I only post their photos and point them out. But other times the purpose of ad photos is to confirm it's the same girl reviewed, since there can be multiple girls with the same name. Some girls look very similar to celebrities, so I will post comparison photos like Shim Mina (20 years ago) or Seolhwa Kim. Leslie K looked like a 10 years younger version of her. http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...wa#post7106478 Leslie K
I used to even do a 'photo accuracy' review, as well as find online models who better match the girl than her own ad
I will now attach some ad photos to talk about accuracy, but most of these girls are not in OC now. 1st photo is Sammy, that's 100% accurate but notice no face (her face is just okay aka "body over face"). Other photos on her ad have some PS, don't rely on them. 2nd photo is Amy's new ad. It is NOT her. She is arguably more beautiful, but a totally different girl for privacy. 3rd photo is Apink, it has some PS. I think the real Apink is quite attractive, but others don't. The ads make her look much younger. So again, don't rely on ad photos. 4th photo is a celebrity Shim Mina from 20 years ago. Baby Min most resembles her. She does not resemble her own ad photo. 5th photo is Megan, that's her. Thai orgs in OC and SD tend to use real photos. 6th Photo is Kendal / Shelby, it's hard to tell but that's probably her a few years ago but blurred. 7th Photo, that's Ina. She is beautiful, that's more or less her. She is in LA no upcharge. 8th photo is Jenny, that's her. Light PS on the face.
As I said, about 10% of girls look better than their ad. It's for privacy reasons. MILFs are generally PS'd to look way younger. Even girls who don't need it have PS on the face which makes it look ideal and won't match. Just to be clear, my advice is to ignore ad photos unless someone reliable confirms they are real or close. Boner does this with almost every girl. If someone just wants to ignore this warning on ad photos, that's fine. I did my part.
Speaking of #5 dude I need Megan to come back to OC. Dying for some Thai D cup.
Any reports on Adila from CAK? Booker recommended but I couldn't find any intel from search.
No intel as of this posting. There will always be information gaps cause we just don't have enough honest and reliable reviewers to cover the waves of new talent as they come in.
Wow, how accurate are those photos of those girls on the websites? I know AMP ads are completely the opposite of what you're getting. But what about these agency websites? If they're even 80% as hot as the photos, got to be worth the price. Especially considering what some "sugar babies" charge, or other girls on rubrankings and stuff.
Most girls are not like their ad photos, I hope everyone realizes that. But maybe 20% of the younger and better looking ones are comparable or even real photo. Keep in mind out of 50 girls, I focus on just the 5-10 girls I think are the best looking. I label the youngest and best ones HYAs. When it comes to MILFs, they usually photoshop them to look way better. This is true of most ad photos. So I am literally cherry picking the best girls, basically unicorns. That is not the norm. I hope that's clear.
I never see a girl based on photos, I rely on intel usually from people with similar taste. I think you'll be disappointed if you use ad photos. So I will copy and paste the PSA I made yesterday here: http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7129138
This is an important point. Most ad photos are PS or not the girl. A good ad will give you the right idea, but some are far off. I hope everyone knows this. It gets tiring to repeat it every time.
I normally call out girls who look like their ad, maybe 25% of girls are close enough. About 10% of girls look better than their ad. Otherwise, everyone should know by now to ignore ad photos. I literally don't look at ad photos to decide a girl, the only reason I even mention is because most guys care. I warn guys almost every roster about the girl not matching the ad by default:
1st photo is similar idea to Leslie K, but Leslie is darker and younger. 2nd photo is similar to the idea of Hanni, but Hanni is much younger. 3rd photo is Lily's ad photo. She is tall and good looking. 4th is Cherry Blossom (aka Baby Cherry). 5th is Elena.
A few girls are actually photo accurate, so sometimes I only post their photos and point them out. But other times the purpose of ad photos is to confirm it's the same girl reviewed, since there can be multiple girls with the same name. Some girls look very similar to celebrities, so I will post comparison photos like Shim Mina (20 years ago) or Seolhwa Kim. Leslie K looked like a 10 years younger version of her. http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...wa#post7106478 Leslie K
I used to even do a 'photo accuracy' review, as well as find online models who better match the girl than her own ad
Attached are three girls I mentioned earlier who have 90%-100% accurate ad photos. Jira, Jenny, Amy. As a bonus, a photo of actress Lin Hui that looks 90% close to Lizza.
These three girls are part of 'Team Ikumi', after the online model Ikumi. See the bath and shower photos. Notice how the ass is melon round. Lizza is very round like this, maybe 1 size smaller than the largest ass photo next to bathtub. Baby Arin is 1 size smaller than that, still round. Then Evian 1 size smaller, round but small. All three girls look similar when observed from the correct angle.
I will now attach some ad photos to talk about accuracy, but most of these girls are not in OC now. 1st photo is Sammy, that's 100% accurate but notice no face (her face is just okay aka "body over face"). Other photos on her ad have some PS, don't rely on them. 2nd photo is Amy's new ad. It is NOT her. She is arguably more beautiful, but a totally different girl for privacy. 3rd photo is Apink, it has some PS. I think the real Apink is quite attractive, but others don't. The ads make her look much younger. So again, don't rely on ad photos. 4th photo is a celebrity Shim Mina from 20 years ago. Baby Min most resembles her. She does not resemble her own ad photo. 5th photo is Megan, that's her. Thai orgs in OC and SD tend to use real photos. 6th Photo is Kendal / Shelby, it's hard to tell but that's probably her a few years ago but blurred. 7th Photo, that's Ina. She is beautiful, that's more or less her. She is in LA no upcharge. 8th photo is Jenny, that's her. Light PS on the face.
As I said, about 10% of girls look better than their ad. It's for privacy reasons. MILFs are generally PS'd to look way younger. Even girls who don't need it have PS on the face which makes it look ideal and won't match. Just to be clear, my advice is to ignore ad photos unless someone reliable confirms they are real or close. Boner does this with almost every girl. If someone just wants to ignore this warning on ad photos, that's fine. I did my part.