Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 4,051 to 4,065 of 49118
-
11-24-24 21:25 #45068
Posts: 2Rotten fish eyes.
Originally Posted by Micca112 [View Original Post]
If I were 50 years old. Mancum, who still lives. I'll be 50 years old if I live longer.
-
11-24-24 20:39 #45067
Posts: 1557Originally Posted by Madickbiggs [View Original Post]
How to research
PSA on how USAG search works. If you click on the search box with gray background, Wooju returns 0 results besides your post. But that only searches the 'Korean Agency BB' thread of LA. If you click on the search box further up with blue background, you get 19 results from the whole USA. It is also useful to go up 1 level to 'Los Angeles' where you get a 'Search Forum' dropdown that searches every LA thread. That returns 4 results. You want to use this local search method when a name is super common.
So within the 19 search results, you can see she's mentioned in OC as well. There are mentions in other cities, but at that point it could be a different Wooju. The most common way to confirm it's the same girl is if they use the same ad photo. Another is if you get a tip. For example, Ina can be verified as in NYC by both methods.
Here is Wooju's PLEASER review:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...ju#post7077694 Wooju
Most of the other Wooju posts are just people begging for intel. But notice two posts showing she has rebranded to Baby Pomi.
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...ju#post7090168
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...ju#post7096492
These are critical posts. It turns out, on the Get9 website she was called Baby Ppomi. Typos and name variations happen all the time. You might be surprised which is the correct name. For example, Baby Apink is in fact Apink, not Pink as people assume or other bookers might say. I asked her myself. She's named after the kpop group Apink. Don't worry about knowing kpop, I only recognize kpop because of some disgusting websites. Anyways, Baby Suger is actually Suger. But other bookers spell it Sugar like you'd expect. And so on. So you do have to get creative in searching names on USAG. If you search for Ppomi, you'll find she was on my Nov 14th roster. I mention she may be a bit thick. Boner notes she is real photo:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...mi#post7098876
I give these examples to help others research girls better. For those into jgirls and find one that starred in JAV, this research guide will teach you everything:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7108468
By the way, the disgusting kpop channel has 8000+ videos so make sure to scroll up to refresh more. Or if you have a video selected, you can use the keyboard left and right arrows to cycle. After you right click and save as, give it some time to finish download don't just quit.
Reviews
Most girls get just 0 or 1 review, that's normal. Some of the better girls get 2 to 4 reviews. Maybe 6 to 8 in SD since we desperately want to keep the good ones. Notice Ina is in NYC but there is not ONE single review of her besides mine, just pages and pages of jgirl reviews. It's not that regulars are gatekeeping Ina, it's that only 3% of people are motivated and posting reviews, and they just happen to like jgirls. The jgirl reviewers are the heroes, they filled their city with more and more jgirls by seeing them and reviewing them fairly. It is self-fulfilling, same thing in Socal with HYA. Maybe there is a city full of GILFs because that's all the regulars there want, right. Sometimes a girl doesn't have recent reviews because people already reviewed her a year ago. Or if a girl is not worth seeing, there's dead silence. This is the way.
Reviews raise the average quality of girls by keeping them and getting them to come back. If you see the typical PLEASER reviews in OC, you'll noticed they arent overly detailed but focus on things people care about. I'll be posting two new PLEASER reviews soon. Boner writes reviews too you can search for, but I just look at his summary lists with thumbs up on girls worth seeing with key info. I don't need to read any further, I have a 100% success rate I don't need to spoil the details. People just need a hint of if a girl is worth seeing. For my part I describe girls on their appearance and service in ways I believe people make decisions on.
Everyone should work with their level of comfort and do what they think is right. I've never had any issues posting tons of reviews. Bookers only care if you only say a girl is ugly or sucks and your whole post is that. But nobody cares if you say you wont repeat a girl, or a girl has good and bad. Like she is fun but her face is disappointing. Just be reasonable and don't go out of your way to be mean. There is always someone who will like a girl.
Like in Jiji's case, I think her face is fine but know others won't. But her body is fantastic and amazing. There is a huge gap between face and body, so I will say her body is fantastic but her face is not the main attraction. Some guys care about face and not body - they should not see Jiji then. If a guy only cares about body, he's won the jackpot. I am doing Jiji a favor because if a guy knows that, he will walk in and be happy. No guy is going to disrespect her by leaving at the door, or just be disappointed for an hour. I don't want somoeone to feel like they wasted their time and money, whenever it can be easily avoided.
Here is a guy who waited 5 months to see Allie because he figured the ad photos were too good to be true and she was going to be some MILF. Actually, she looks way better than her fake ad photos. Literally 9 people reviewed Allie in SD and 100% of them said go see her. So my guess is he didn't use the USAG search function far back enough. Multiple regulars said she is good looking. My exact words were "she is good looking head to toe" which btw is exactly how I describe Ericka. Who also looks way better than her ad photos. But guys get carried away if you say any more than that, if you say a girl is beautiful they then focus on looking for flaws. Anyways, someone found some old ad photos which were mostly real with just light PS:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post7109179
The reason I don't hype Allie in SD because there is no girl every guy will like. It can get comical, one guy on TER said Allie had model level looks, he used the word 'model' four times in his review and said he was blown away. Then gave her a 9 for looks / 5 for service rating because she wouldn't do 'crazy stuff' (his exact words on TER). His own review words don't even match a 5 for service, but that that's his right to do. So wouldn't it be nice instead if he never went in the first place, knowing she isn't a MILF. This is why my reviews are actually to dissuade the wrong guys from seeing her as much as encouraging guys to see her.
https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...ez2011-2651487 The 9 / 5 review
By his own admission he really put her to work, doing things hard and cycling her in all kinds of positions. But she isn't MILF level service. Cool. Let me have those girls, I'll take care of them for you and get them out of your way.
The reason good kgirls in San Diego get 6 to 8 reviews is if we don't review them, they go back to OC or LA. This keeps our reviews honest too, no point in doing this for a girl that isn't good. If someone hypes or makings things up, we give our take instead but rarely need to. If a girl is not good, they are free to leave.
Ad photo attached, it's 80% accurate. Allie has darker skin tone, there is PS on the face, and ad does not show her fantastic natural D cup tits. But if you are looking for MILF service, run the other way. Run fast.
-
11-24-24 20:09 #45066
Posts: 746Sesang web site
Originally Posted by Bbaka10 [View Original Post]
Based solely on her pics, Celina looks like a little cutie. Given Sesang's track record of brining in hot little spinners, I will give her a try. Also hoping this means Lucy and Nali will be back soon.
https://www.sesanggirls.com/models-celina/
-
11-24-24 19:50 #45065
Posts: 746Lily K
Originally Posted by KGirlSavant [View Original Post]
-
11-24-24 19:38 #45064
Posts: 746Playa
Originally Posted by PumpNDump [View Original Post]
Also, I see the web site has a Santa Monica category, too. It will be interesting to see who winds up there. I wonder if they are going to use the same building that was so popular a few years ago. When Reah was there, it felt like my second home. LOL!
-
11-24-24 18:58 #45063
Posts: 1022Originally Posted by KGirlSavant [View Original Post]
-
11-24-24 17:02 #45062
Posts: 43Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]
Always looking forward to seeing her haha.
-
11-24-24 16:45 #45061
Posts: 190Originally Posted by RockItAllNite [View Original Post]
That actually makes SGV another candidate. Only COrgs there and offering either Erewhon or Food 4 Less prices. The place could use a Trader Joe's here and there.
While we're suggesting places, I'd like to see more locations in Little Tokyo.
-
11-24-24 12:37 #45060
Posts: 14Baby Wooju
Is this the definition of a girl being gate kept? I saw her about a month ago and I can post my review here but for some reason, there are no posts about her, same with baby yui. Anyway want to be a part of this community providing solid info for others but I am fearful that bookers that are on this site may get angry LOL.
-
11-24-24 12:36 #45059
Posts: 1935Kbliss Sunday funday selection.
Somi Jiyoung Celina Viviana Amy Sawtelle. Linda Sienna Ari Jena Kate mw. Hera Irvine.
-
11-24-24 12:33 #45058
Posts: 1935BookerM. Good news you deviants, new wla spot has been chosen in playa, it will start around Dec.
https://www.rokm.ch/
-
11-24-24 10:20 #45057
Posts: 6Originally Posted by AwabiLover [View Original Post]
-
11-24-24 08:03 #45056
Posts: 711Originally Posted by PumpNDump [View Original Post]
-
11-24-24 07:58 #45055
Posts: 711Originally Posted by KGirlSavant [View Original Post]
-
11-24-24 06:14 #45054
Posts: 206Zina is back in SoCal and rebranded to Lily K with new pictures. Booker is so lazy they did not bother changing her name in the URL.
https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/zina