Thread: Hot Young Asian Girls
+
Add Report
Results 1,846 to 1,860 of 10206
-
11-13-24 20:37 #8361Senior Member

Posts: 1741I have to agree. I know it's an unpopular opinion but I'll say this about FA / SDAG which is very similar to SSG. SDAG is extremely strict with screening, they wouldn't screen me for half a year until I came back with more references. But that is exactly what makes them great, I've used them over 10 years without one single safety issue. The girls don't worry as much about their appointments in SD because almost all customers have been there for years, many up to 15 years.
Originally Posted by ResilientJohn
[View Original Post]
SDAG forces me and everyone else to follow common sense rules. They are always polite unless you say or do something stupid or that might put girls in danger. For example they got mad when I once mistakenly went to an apartment before confirmation, which was my mistake and could have messed up another customer and girl's day by mixing up the appointments. Think of it from the other customer's perspective if they got their appointment fucked up by some other guy. Accident or no. They should be mad, but it's not like they said anything more than "don't do that again". I think we can all be mature enough to understand that's a fair request in everyone's interest. There are other examples but you get the idea.
Agencies like SDAG are quick to ban and do not do "customer service" like 90% of other bookers. But I noticed something over many years. SDAG protects their girls and keeps them safe at another level. If a guy is too rough they are banned not just from that girl, but all girls. For life. They banned my own friends for life, who by my friend's own admission was banned for being too rough. That same friend was even banned by another booker, but just for that one girl. However he could see other girls. I can see both sides, but what SSG and SDAG is doing is keeping only the best customers. That's my chief complaint about the multi-booker system, it's nice enough for the customer but sucks for the girl and makes some top tier girls quit. I've seen it enough but won't name them. It's also bad for customers that get cancelled because another customer fucks up or is too rough again. Seen it enough times.
Just want to give both sides of it. There are times bookers are so nice and polite to me and they shouldn't be. It would be nice if they enforced common sense rules and boundaries more strictly. Banning is just one example but I can't discuss the others since it just makes things less safe to say it.
-
11-13-24 18:24 #8360Senior Member

Posts: 531Daisy
I agree, she is overhyped and not worth 600. Thus, she is now being booked by SBC and CG. I texted bookers and she is not busy at all. I think she is satisfied with higher rates and low volume since she is a student here. Any thoughts.
Originally Posted by GhtTwentyK
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-24 18:10 #8359Senior Member

Posts: 691My experience with them has been fine. Haven't run into anything rude or unethical. The only thing that was a pain in the ass was their screening. I was just advising those who want to vet with them now as of this posting to be prepared to be given the cold shoulder.
Originally Posted by Thud1
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-24 18:03 #8358Senior Member

Posts: 691It's feels like deja vu all over again with SBC. Exclusivity gets thrown out the window when they know they can't fully book her with their own client pool. Especially at their inflated rates. Just FYI and even CGLA lists her under her old profile name. Daisy is Celine K, now new and improved at the low low rate of $600/ hr. She pushed for more money in the past, forgot the actual number but it went nowhere. Now she's going bigger than before. GPS to the max baby.
Originally Posted by GhtTwentyK
[View Original Post]
My brief synopsis of my time with Celine K last year:
Pretty face, ABG vibe, natural D's pillowy but with some sag to it, slender frame, good English, tan skin complexion, painfully fake theatrics. I saw her once and did not feel the desire to see her again. She's definitely looks over service. She was booked solid at $360 but I don't think she'll repeat the same feat at this price point. At least for me, she's definitely not worth seeing at $600.
It's worth noting that after things simmered down and her proponents' voice faded away, some users did start posting that she was overhyped. By all means, see her if you want. Far be it for me to tell a man what he should do with his hard earned money. But I hope history doesn't repeat itself.
-
11-13-24 16:13 #8357Senior Member

Posts: 112Sticker Shock
Now CGLA has a post for DD cup Daisy starting tomorrow (11/14) charging SIX bills an hour.
Originally Posted by Bbaka10
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-24 14:02 #8356Senior Member

Posts: 1741Yeah that's called getting kicked out. There are other ways too. I've seen it all.
Originally Posted by AAbb3322
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-24 10:43 #8355Senior Member

Posts: 206Looks like she vanished today. So strange. Makes me wonder if this is just bookers putting a feeler out to see what the demand is for a $$ girl.
Originally Posted by GeeDaty
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-24 00:44 #8354Senior Member

Posts: 203Looks like there's a girl Mia3 on CG at 500 1 hr GFE.
I wonder if rebrand or a new Celine / Freesia tier.
-
11-13-24 00:14 #8353Advertiser-Escort

Posts: 22No one kicks them out. We get along well. But you have to check your seniors and juniors to be recognized. Seniors when you are proud of the fact that you are a big girl. They don't recognize you or listen to you. They want to go. If you want to see them, bring them. They fought with their owners and went somewhere else.
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
-
11-12-24 18:05 #8352Regular Member

Posts: 24Is this the same Amy that was in KT and roommate was Lily (very skinny one)?
Originally Posted by PaenkeikeuPounder
[View Original Post]
-
11-12-24 17:25 #8351Senior Member

Posts: 161Sesangirls booker is the worst of all agency bookers. Really rude and unethical practices. No other bookers treat customers so badly. My advice. Use other agencies and eventually her private providers (Nali) will too.
Originally Posted by ResilientJohn
[View Original Post]
-
11-12-24 15:29 #8350Regular Member

Posts: 12Baby Yui and Tiffany, both also have pretty face, natural breast and awesome service. Baby Yui probably p has the best butt among all Asian girls that I have encountered.
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
-
11-12-24 13:04 #8349Senior Member

Posts: 97Non upcharge girls
With Nali and Ina on vacation, is there any Hya that are non up charge? Any recs would be great, don't mind going to OC as well. Thanks.
-
11-12-24 10:14 #8348Senior Member

Posts: 735Addendum to previous post Round ass and Sexy legs
Every list like this should also include Baby Arin!
-
11-12-24 10:10 #8347Senior Member

Posts: 735Round ass and sexy legs
I am an ass and leg man, unlike the majority of those on this forum. Since most reviews talk about pretty face and big tits and a tight hole. I like a pretty face, nice round bubble butt which if natural always comes with nice shapely legs and flat stomachs. I am not talking about a Kim Kardashian ass or a huge Latina cartoonish ass, but a nice shapely bubble butt, just the right amount of cushion and roundness to make doggie a must just for the rearview.
Are there others here with a list of those girls with the right attributes? In no particular order here are some from the past and some from the present: Rebecca, Eva, Maia, Ina, Suzi, Min, Stella, Elena, Shani. Who did I miss?













Reply With Quote











